China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

"When you hear about people who were fired, ignore it. The unvaccinated aren't worthy of attention."


Roughly 3% of American adults have compromised immune systems and can't be vaccinated for anything, so 99% vaccinated is bullshit and a pipe dream.


It doesn't have to be something like HIV. All it takes is getting a bad DNA draw from your parents.

When I was a teenager (during the AIDS crisis BTW) the nun who taught sex-ed and religion was warning us that if things continued as they were a third of us would get AIDS or something worse.
 
Roughly 3% of American adults have compromised immune systems and can't be vaccinated for anything, so 99% vaccinated is bullshit and a pipe dream.


It doesn't have to be something like HIV. All it takes is getting a bad DNA draw from your parents.

When I was a teenager (during the AIDS crisis BTW) the nun who taught sex-ed and religion was warning us that if things continued as they were a third of us would get AIDS or something worse.

You are taking about socialists.Firstly,they do not undarstandt that.Secondly,for them death of 3% of population to made "safe" rest would be still great victory.Becouse they could say "Now,99% is vaccinated"
 
close enough to the same thing that I don't give a fuck. Dead babies made it.
Actually there's a very big difference as fetal cell products specifically require an ongoing supply of aborted fetuses for material, while things made using fetal cell lines have to do with cultures that can reliably replicate for an extremely long time and be rebuilt with no fetus involved.

To paraphrase a rebuttal to idiot vegans, the baby involved was aborted long ago. Banning it now won't un-abort it. Additionally, it will not have anything to do with future abortions, because again it's stuff that can be grown in vitro for decades from a single sample, and current genetic engineering is perfectly capable of restoring the viability for these uses.
 
Actually there's a very big difference as fetal cell products specifically require an ongoing supply of aborted fetuses for material, while things made using fetal cell lines have to do with cultures that can reliably replicate for an extremely long time and be rebuilt with no fetus involved.

To paraphrase a rebuttal to idiot vegans, the baby involved was aborted long ago. Banning it now won't un-abort it. Additionally, it will not have anything to do with future abortions, because again it's stuff that can be grown in vitro for decades from a single sample, and current genetic engineering is perfectly capable of restoring the viability for these uses.

Like I said, I don't care about fetal cells being used, so I'm making an argument that I don't necessarily agree with here, but I'd imagine from the perspective of someone who thinks it's immoral to use fetal cells, they don't CARE if the fetus was aborted a generation ago or yesterday. It took an aborted fetus to make it, regardless.

Why would it stop mattering if the fetus was killed a long time ago? If your problem is with killing and utilizing a dead fetus I don't think the timeframe in which it was killed really factors into the decision.

Maybe someone who does have a problem with it can chime in, but that seems logical to me. If I did have a problem with it, I don't think I'd care if it was a freshly killed fetus or a long dead fetus that created the stuff.
 
I don't suppose anyone is putting together any kind of a group to fight these clearly unconstitutional mandates, are they? This shit needs to be in court, like right now.
 
I don't suppose anyone is putting together any kind of a group to fight these clearly unconstitutional mandates, are they? This shit needs to be in court, like right now.
Several governors are preparing lawsuits.

But OSHA has to actually release their rules before we sue.

There remains a part of me that thinks they won't actually put out the mandate, and that the whole plan was to make more companies comfortable doing their own mandates.
 
If that's the case, I wonder what the viability of states going after these companies is? Or at least making it possible for employees who have been fired to sue the companies over this?
 
If that's the case, I wonder what the viability of states going after these companies is? Or at least making it possible for employees who have been fired to sue the companies over this?
Not sure if there's anything to be done over this. Plenty of companies have been requiring the flu shot and other vaccines for decades, for example.
 
Never heard of anything like that in my state. In any case, there are known side-effects to the COVID vaccines that aren't an issue with other vaccines. But really this might just be an opportunity to go after that kind of requirement in general, as companies really shouldn't be involved in medical decisions like that.
 
Never heard of anything like that in my state. In any case, there are known side-effects to the COVID vaccines that aren't an issue with other vaccines. But really this might just be an opportunity to go after that kind of requirement in general, as companies really shouldn't be involved in medical decisions like that.
I have to get a yearly flu shot at my job, and I had to get tested for MMR immunity and get a booster before starting.

I disagree with the policy but I'm not generally anti vax and was getting the flu shot yearly anyways, so I've just went with it.

If they mandate the covid vax I'll be moving on.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top