LindyAF
Well-known member
So, to make a point. What the later did the former didn't,is one was in uniform. Speaking from his position as a BC, while the former was in civies etc.
That actually matters, as one is against UCMJ policy.... almost like the latter had said. He knew what the risk was doing it in that manner
Pretty sure Vindaman was in dress uniform when he testified, unless this is referring to something else.