Sweden is a shithole

If no one has any claim to the land, then there is no defense against having your land taken at all.

Strange how this sort of suicidal anti nationalist negation politics only applies to Europeans.

If the Native Americans were just born there, then there is nothing morally wrong with what the Europeans did.

But no, leftists will argue “only European land is without ownership or value in terms of its possession”, “colonization bad”. Because “oppression” or “white supremacy” or some other shit.

Like this stuff will never apply beyond Europeans. It’s essentially anti nationalism. Or rather anti-ethnocentrism. Meaning one’s own ethnicity has no value or merit and no inherent worth.
 
I remember at least more than a year ago, sometime when the Covington thing was being talked about, someone acknowledged that racism against whites was a thing

BUT they said that whites on average were way way way way way more racist and all sorts of bigoted and were in power and stuff
 
Basically the argument is, all things are unequal and structurally tiered. Black people can’t be racist because of oppression contemporary and historical. Same with every other non white ethnic group.

A white person has no right to live in Africa because Africa belongs to Africans and would be a trespasser, due to all the historical and contemporary baggage, whereas Africans are free to migrate to Europe because being the oppressed group-have no boundaries on where they may live, morally speaking.

It’s actually a rather complex set of ideas, dangerous, malicious, malignant, diseased yes, but still.
 
Basically the argument is, all things are unequal and structurally tiered. Black people can’t be racist because of oppression contemporary and historical. Same with every other non white ethnic group.

A white person has no right to live in Africa because Africa belongs to Africans and would be a trespasser, due to all the historical and contemporary baggage, whereas Africans are free to migrate to Europe because being the oppressed group-have no boundaries on where they may live, morally speaking.

It’s actually a rather complex set of ideas, dangerous, malicious, malignant, diseased yes, but still.

But they won’t just outright say that outside of maybe colleges

Honestly, there seems to be a huge level of selective ignorance and denial occurring alongside using emotion or shaming or anger and accusations to avoid outright saying it

Let them spout their nonsense, have somebody record it and post it all on youtube or upload it wherever you can
 
But they won’t just outright say that outside of maybe colleges

Honestly, there seems to be a huge level of selective ignorance and denial occurring alongside using emotion or shaming or anger and accusations to avoid outright saying it

Let them spout their nonsense, have somebody record it and post it all on youtube or upload it wherever you can
Yeah they will flat out admit stuff like “white people being replaced in Europe is due course for colonialism” or whatever in colleges or their own conferences. Or in writing in their various academic and cultural publications(but never in such blunt language).

That’s not something they will say publicly. They will at most accuse the right of racism and deflect on the issue of moral weight.
 
Yeah they will flat out admit stuff like “white people being replaced in Europe is due course for colonialism” or whatever in colleges or their own conferences. Or in writing in their various academic and cultural publications(but never in such blunt language).

That’s not something they will say publicly. They will at most accuse the right of racism and deflect on the issue of moral weight.

Say, you ever meet GuestLurker on SB, years ago he denied colleges ever being fucking crazy and went on about there being neonazi bikers around in large numbers

I really wonder, just how much does the average Lefty even know of what it’s like in those colleges

TBF the sheer ridiculousness makes it hard to believe or easy to dismiss
 
Say, you ever meet GuestLurker on SB, years ago he denied colleges ever being fucking crazy and went on about there being neonazi bikers around in large numbers

I really wonder, just how much does the average Lefty even know of what it’s like in those colleges
I mean, I haven’t seen any Neo Nazi bikers at my college and I’m in the southern United States. But a professor who explained to me my privilege as a white man and went on a long lecture about white privilege.
 
I mean, I haven’t seen any Neo Nazi bikers at my college and I’m in the southern United States. But a professor who explained to me my privilege as a white man and went on a long lecture about white privilege.

How true or existing is this “Deep South” to begin with? I’m pretty sure lots of rurals have internet connection and access to modern tools and knowledge

Unless they’re deep into some swamp or forest
 
How true or existing is this “Deep South” to begin with? I’m pretty sure lots of rurals have internet connection and access to modern tools and knowledge

Unless they’re deep into some swamp or forest
The south is a definite cultural region. Its more than slavery and more than sweet tea. The south has always been different than the rest of the nation. Nearly a nation itself.
 
The south is a definite cultural region. Its more than slavery and more than sweet tea. The south has always been different than the rest of the nation. Nearly a nation itself.

Different from the rest of the nation, except for the cities, I’m pretty sure the cities are increasingly going Blue
 
Self flagellating of these imbeciles knows no bounds

The Swedish National Museum is under fire for attaching “warning labels” to classic pieces of art, tipping viewers off about the dangerous “nationalism,” racism, and “patriarchal gender roles” apparently hidden on canvas.

Gustaf Cederström’s world-famous painting ‘Bringing Home the Body of King Carl XII of Sweden’, for example, is accompanied by a miniature social sciences treatise stating: “The populist and nationalist view of Swedishness, which is used politically today, is based on the idea of a statically idealised and constructed past. The idea that there is a historical time and place to look back on, where everything was in a certain way, is not true.”

lossy-page1-1024px-Bringing_Home_the_Body_of_King_Karl_XII_of_Sweden_%28Gustaf_Cederstr%C3%B6m%29_-_Nationalmuseum_-_18366.tif.jpg
 
"The idea that there is a historical time and place to look back on, where everything was in a certain way, is not true."

Do there people ever stop to listen to themselves?
It sounds like whoever wrote that does not believe that anything in the past really happened, or something.
Is it just me trying to read this after just waking up and my brain hasn't into gear or this sentence defeat itself? Who's to say that they're view of it "is not true"?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top