Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Reader mode
Archmagnus

Archmagnus

Well-known member
Megadeath said:
So far, Trump and his campaign haven't even been able to convince a friendly judge that there's even a possibility that it might be 50/50 regarding them being right, or that it would even matter if the cases they're actually making in court rather than in public were true.
Click to expand...
k

legalinsurrection.com

Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution

UPDATE 11-28-2020 7 p.m.: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses challenge to mail-in ballot procedures, vacates halt to certification.
legalinsurrection.com legalinsurrection.com
 
Megadeath

Megadeath

Well-known member
Archmagnus said:
k

legalinsurrection.com

Pennsylvania State Judge Upholds Halt To Certification, Finds Likelihood Mail-In Balloting Procedures Violate PA Constitution

UPDATE 11-28-2020 7 p.m.: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses challenge to mail-in ballot procedures, vacates halt to certification.
legalinsurrection.com legalinsurrection.com
Click to expand...
What exactly do you think that matters? What does it mean, to you? It's already been clarified that it doesn't alter the already established selection of electors, so...? Even if it did kick things to the state legislature to redecide electors, it seems unlikely they'd unanimously buck the popular vote, when several senior party members in state are the ones being sued for trying to uphold it. And even further, even if their electoral votes did swing from Biden to Trump, Biden would still win.
 
Zachowon

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Megadeath said:
What exactly do you think that matters? What does it mean, to you? It's already been clarified that it doesn't alter the already established selection of electors, so...? Even if it did kick things to the state legislature to redecide electors, it seems unlikely they'd unanimously buck the popular vote, when several senior party members in state are the ones being sued for trying to uphold it. And even further, even if their electoral votes did swing from Biden to Trump, Biden would still win.
Click to expand...
Well, the state court did not follow state constitution and so they are taking it into their own hands to say fuck you to the courts.
 
Archmagnus

Archmagnus

Well-known member
Megadeath said:
What exactly do you think that matters? What does it mean, to you? It's already been clarified that it doesn't alter the already established selection of electors, so...? Even if it did kick things to the state legislature to redecide electors, it seems unlikely they'd unanimously buck the popular vote, when several senior party members in state are the ones being sued for trying to uphold it. And even further, even if their electoral votes did swing from Biden to Trump, Biden would still win.
Click to expand...
Are you trying to convince me or yourself here?
 
GoldRanger

GoldRanger

May the power protect you
Founder
Megadeath said:
I'm hearing what you're saying, and it further confirms you don't have a clue what you're talking about. A criminal case is held to the standard of reasonable doubt. A civil case is judged on the balance of probability. Regardless, these cases aren't even making it to the stage where that's relevant. They're being summarily dismissed on myriad grounds, by what should be "friendly" courts, because anyone who knows anything about law is basically doing Bender's "laugh harder" bit from futurama.

So far, Trump and his campaign haven't even been able to convince a friendly judge that there's even a possibility that it might be 50/50 regarding them being right, or that it would even matter if the cases they're actually making in court rather than in public were true.
Click to expand...

That's your interpretation of events. I don't know enough about the particularities of these court cases to judge if they have merit, but there are likely others. We'll see in due time.
 
Bacle

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Guys, just ignore the troll, and remember how this has gone with the other Lefty trolls who have tried this before.

They won't be convinced of anything that might help Trump, and they will argue in bad faith just to get a rise out of us.

Don't give them the dignity of acknowledgement or a reply.
 
V

Vaermina

Well-known member
random_boy232 said:
You're lying about it, it upheld the district court ruling dismissing the entire case and denied trumps portion for leave to amend. They didn't actually appele the judges ruling dismissing the case just his descion to prevebt them from amending it.
Click to expand...
In the future I seriously suggest you read a thing before calling someone a liar...
We will thus affirm the District Court’s denial of leave to amend, and we deny an in-junction pending appeal.
Click to expand...
 
R

random_boy232

Well-known member
Banned - Politics
Vaermina said:
In the future I seriously suggest you read a thing before calling someone a liar...
Click to expand...
Given that the only thing they contested was the denial of leave to amend, their is nothing else left in the appele for them to rule on. They didn't appeal anything else.
 
Bacle

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Zachowon said:
Why are people trying thier hardest to deny the truth? China and Iran do not want Trump to win!
Click to expand...
Because Orange Man Bad, and because they do not care what Biden and the Dems do to Trump supporters or to the shrinking middle class.

They are willing to sell our nation out to China and Iran, while allowing the lockdowns that destroy small businesses and drive so many to suicide.
 
Hlaalu Agent

Hlaalu Agent

Nerevar going to let you down
Founder
Bacle said:
Because Orange Man Bad, and because they do not care what Biden and the Dems do to Trump supporters or to the shrinking middle class.

They are willing to sell our nation out to China and Iran, while allowing the lockdowns that destroy small businesses and drive so many to suicide.
Click to expand...

It is also because cheating on this scale would shatter people's view of reality and force them to acknowledge what lies just beyond the curtain. They want to ignore the figurative man behind the curtain, because if they didn't they'd have to admit that they were wrong about reality and that they people they derided were right. Though there is a variety of reasons. Such as genuine belief, which is due to being blind, ignorant, or having the wool pulled over your eyes, but given how many things have gone on, it isn't much of an excuse.
 
V

Vaermina

Well-known member
random_boy232 said:
Given that the only thing they contested was the denial of leave to amend, their is nothing else left in the appele for them to rule on. They didn't appeal anything else.
Click to expand...
So... You admit that the ruling didn't mean what you claimed?


Greengrass said:
PA Supreme Court just slapped that down.
Click to expand...

You realize the reasoning shown in that Tweet almost certainly isn't going to hold up at the federal level, right?

I mean for crying out loud, it was a claim of "you didn't file it quickly enough" forgetting that even though the law was signed into effect then it only caused harm just now.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)
Top