Who else dreads this year?


Only whites allowed.
But Separate but Equal is illegal. The Supreme Court said so. Does this university want all Fed funding cut?
They have gotten away with blatant racial discrimination for so long that they forgot such laws even exist.

The question is WHY did they think THIS was a good idea?

"Whites Only" means "POC", who are automatically all oppressed, are now EVEN MORE oppressed by those dumbass crackers who won't let THEM make use of those facilities

Even WITH context, it still makes em look like a bunch of white supremacists
 
The question is WHY did they think THIS was a good idea?

"Whites Only" means "POC", who are automatically all oppressed, are now EVEN MORE oppressed by those dumbass crackers who won't let THEM make use of those facilities

Even WITH context, it still makes em look like a bunch of white supremacists
Because creating "People of Color Only" spaces have always been leading to something like this. The whole thing was just an ideological end run; an attempt to redefine the playing field in a way that framed bigots as the good guys. Racists calling themselves anti-racist, while accusing those who were not racist of being racists; that's what brought us to the point where racial segregation is being openly practiced once again, as if it is a good thing.
 
Last edited:
Because creating "People of Color Only" spaces have always been leading to something like this. The whole thing was just an ideological end run; an attempt to redefine the playing field in a way that framed bigots as the good guys. Racists calling themselves anti-racist, while accusing those who were not racist of being racists; that's what brought us to the point where racial segregation is being openly practiced once again, as if it is a good thing.

Well-put.
 
One of the main books of “anti racism” by Kendi, is explicitly anti white and pro segregationist. You see you can’t be racist to white people because they have power, therefore discrimination against them is not injustice, but the redress of injustice.

It’s what these people actually believe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Ah, now I see why the Dem establishment pushed so hard to marginalize Gabbard!

For a dem, I fucking love Tulsi. She should have won the primaries. I would have even considered voting for her, and I think she's the ONLY lefty out there that I would vote for right now.

That's because I view her as honest and real. Which is why she never stood a a snowball's chance in hell in the democrat primary.
 
So...tampering with evidence charges?
Theoretically possible; but the issue is how far they're willing to take this. Actually holding members of the elite class responsible for their actions might be a step too far, ever for those in Trump's camp. Keep in mind; these people believe that they're above the law, and taking this investigation to it's logical conclusion (as opposed to simply abandoning it once the election is over) might set a disturbing precedent in their eyes. That said, they're certainly not above sacrificing scapegoats to placate the masses; which Muller and his team could now count as.
 


First GOP sherrif that's a Trans Satanist?

Probably a freestater (haven't watched video yet). They are libertarians trying to take over New Hampshire by block voting. They usually try to win one or better both primaries, without a regard for party. There was a time where New Hampshirites had a choice between an anarchist and a minarchist.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top