PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
It seems lot of people have a reason to fear this and the next year
This seems incredibly specific. These are people not on rent or mortgage, not the population as a whole. What are the normal statistics for these people?It seems lot of people have a reason to fear this and the next year
This seems incredibly specific. These are people not on rent or mortgage, not the population as a whole. What are the normal statistics for these people?
That's not what it's saying, at least as far as I can tell. The quote is:I think thats saying that, for example 30% of all households are not current with their rent or mortgage.
Percentage of adults not currently on rent or mortgage where eviction or foreclosure in the next two months is likely or somewhat likely.
Percentage of (adults not currently on rent or mortgage) where eviction or foreclosure in the next two months is likely or somewhat likely.
Yeah it means that if you literally misquote the title.That's not what it's saying, at least as far as I can tell. The quote is:
So I think it should be parsed this like:
Ah, I couldn't copy and paste, so I had to type it. Sorry for the mistake. But still, I don't think my parsing is wrong here.Yeah it means that if you literally misquote the title.
It says "not current." That means behind on payments.
Percentage of (adults not current on rent or mortgage) where eviction or foreclosure in the next two months is likely or somewhat likely.
Percentage of adults where they are not current on rent or mortgage and eviction or foreclosure in the next two months is likely or somewhat likely.
Percentage of adults for whom eviction or foreclosure in the next two months is likely or somewhat likely.
Then we need at least 40% of people in Florida "not current on rent or mortgage payments, or who have slight or no confidence that their household can pay next month’s rent or mortgage on time". But by the Same survey, only 7.3% of people are "not current on rent or mortgage payments, or who have slight or no confidence that their household can pay next month’s rent or mortgage on time".behind on mortgage/rent and facing foreclosure/eviction
EDIT: I just looked up the actual survey, and I was right, they were lying with statistics. Here's a link, click on housing insecurity. New York is actually the worst, with 16% of people encountering some type of housing insecurity (Percentage of adults who are not current on rent or mortgage payments, or who have slight or no confidence that their household can pay next month’s rent or mortgage on time). So let's take Florida, which according to this graph has about 40% of whatever. If, by your reading, it means that:
Then we need at least 40% of people in Florida "not current on rent or mortgage payments, or who have slight or no confidence that their household can pay next month’s rent or mortgage on time". But by the Same survey, only 7.3% of people are "not current on rent or mortgage payments, or who have slight or no confidence that their household can pay next month’s rent or mortgage on time".
That's not quite how it works either because you normally should extrapolate the rest of the country from the respondents, not just use the 9.1M who responded.Yeah, the statistics are being misrepresented by pulling a different map (the eviction map from the same survey). That earlier graph was a grab from the Eviction tab on that survey. So of the 9.1M respondents in the survey, between 400k and 800k of them are behind in their payments. Of those, 39-63% are facing foreclosure in the next 2 months. So the actual numbers according to the survey data are "only" 156k - 504k facing who would be at risk of being homeless in the next 2 months (at the time of the survey).
Yeah. This could be bad, but not 40% of people getting evicted badThat's not quite how it works either because you normally should extrapolate the rest of the country from the respondents, not just use the 9.1M who responded.
I haven't been able to find any other surveys on how many people are worried about eviction. However Eviction Lab has some useful information up to about 2016 on rates of evictions filed vs. actual evictions. The worst we've gotten in some time was during the 2008 economic crisis where eviction filing rates hit a touch over seven percent and actual evictions didn't quite break three. This is consistent with my experience where landlords are generally loath to ever evict someone and generally use eviction filing as a negotiating tactic (and means to get the court to assign a mediator) but generally don't want to actually have to evict.
That's not quite how it works either because you normally should extrapolate the rest of the country from the respondents, not just use the 9.1M who responded.
I haven't been able to find any other surveys on how many people are worried about eviction. However Eviction Lab has some useful information up to about 2016 on rates of evictions filed vs. actual evictions. The worst we've gotten in some time was during the 2008 economic crisis where eviction filing rates hit a touch over seven percent and actual evictions didn't quite break three. This is consistent with my experience where landlords are generally loath to ever evict someone and generally use eviction filing as a negotiating tactic (and means to get the court to assign a mediator) but generally don't want to actually have to evict.
Taxes are back motherfucker.
I dread every year.
But this upcoming year looks to be particularly bad. Do you think we're going to have another stock market crash when everyone gets evicted simultaniously?
Stock drop probably, but there won’t be mass eviction. The government will continue their moratorium, landlords will be fucked, and over time real estate will collapse as in such an environment who on earth would be willing to maintain rentals. So the future is more likely to be like you see in NYC where due to the regs the only thing built are high end condos, since those are sold, not rented.I dread every year.
But this upcoming year looks to be particularly bad. Do you think we're going to have another stock market crash when everyone gets evicted simultaniously?
There will never be a peaceful breakup. The entire point of all that is happening is to sacrifice prosperity for power.Whether that would dissolve into civil war at that point is hard to say. It's certainly possible that cooler heads on the leftist's side would permit a peaceful breakup, considering that the Democrat's leadership would be unlikely to survive a civil war regardless of the outcome.