Alternate History The Undying Empire: A Trebizond Timeline

Part XXXIV: Musical Chairs (1514-1516)

Eparkhos

Well-known member
Part XXXIV: Musical Chairs (1514-1516)


Alexios’ final purges had cleansed the Trapezuntine state of much of its more debauched and conspiratorial aspects. However, Trapezous was truly a Byzantine state, and no single man could completely cleanse the empire of its darker nature. The efforts of the late aftokrator had gone a long way towards securing the reign of his son, but the responsibility for maintaining this security would fall upon the shoulders of a priest, a diplomat and a slave, far from the most inspiring group of men to oversee a decade (at minimum) long regency. In a place as corrupt as the Trapezuntine Empire, they were hardly the best men for the job….



As the dying emperor’s men ravaged the upper classes of the capital in search for any would-be assassins, the true killer of the emperor was in the wind. Skaramagos had correctly ascertained two things; namely, that Katsarina would double cross him at the first opportunity, and that Alexios might not be dead. He picked his way across the city, shot the guards outside the building where his brother was being held, and rescued him. Then they fled eastwards out of the city, making their way across the breadth of the empire to the eastern frontier. Ever the opportunist, Skaramagos saw a chance in all of this, and was unwilling to pass it up.



Back in the capital, meanwhile, the Three Basils were shakily adapting to the levers of government. As previously mentioned, they were far from good candidates for the regency. Mgeli had spent the last decade and a half traveling across Central Europe, flitting between the courts of Rome, Esztergom and Krakow and even accompanying a Papal expedition led by Antonio Trivulzio against the Barbaries to recover a stricken Trapezuntine merchantman. He was a career diplomat, and while this was a trait that would be useful in pretty much any court throughout history, he had no experience in actually governing. He knew what not to do, of course, having observed many rulers in the Holy Roman Empire and beyond fall from grace and power due to blunders and bad slips, but this wasn’t much help. The Patriarch was even worse off, having spent most of his life as a quiet country priest before being shot up to royal tutor and advocate for the deranged prince-turned-emperor. The task of handling the fractious infighting of the Pontic Church and relations with the other surrounding Patriarchates would have probably been more than he could handle by itself, but having to do that and rule in David’s name was an overwhelming challenge for him. Basileios the Scythian was a career soldier, true[1], but he had little actual battlefield experience other than a few battles in the Samtskheote War half a decade previous and some battles with Karamanid raiders in the Lykos Valley. He was a thoroughly unimaginative commander, and swung between essentially ignoring the actions of the other regents and threatening to have his soldiers murder them anytime they did something that pissed him off. David was a non-entity at this point, unable to even say ‘David Megalokomnenos’, and so the three men were left to blunder their way forward, hoping that they did more good than they did harm.



Alexios’ murder of anyone who looked at him funny had effectively gutted the ranks of the Imperial bureaucracy, aristocracy, and the upper echelons of the army with few exceptions. While this crippled the aforementioned organizations and thus posed a sizable challenge to the new regency, in the long-term it was a boon for the empire’s stability. All but the most tepid and inoffensive servants of the aftokrator had been purged, and this allowed the regents to refill their ranks with loyal and docile men, the kind who wouldn’t pose a threat to either the joint regency or the young David himself. The remainder of 1514 was spent analyzing potential recruits and hand-selecting new administrators and officers. Mgeli was the prime driver behind this, of course, as the Patriarch was already occupied with trying to reform the Pontic Church’s organizational structure and the Scythian was sacking officers left and right in a manner not dissimilar to Alexios’ old purges. While they were distracted in doing this, plotters began to come out of the woodwork, seeking the power that was wielded by a regent for themselves.



Chief among these were Skaramagos and Ioannes Sabbiades who were, funnily enough, half-brothers. Antonio Scaramanga had been rebaptized in the Orthodox Church during the 1480s, and had sired a bastard son who went on to become the commander of the eastern frontier. Alexios, even during his most paranoid flights of fantasy, had never dared to execute a war hero as beloved to many of the commoners as Sabbiades was, and so he had remained as the governor of the eastern military frontier, fighting off Karamanid raids and attacks from the rump Samtskheote state. When his half-brother informed Sabbiades of the ongoing turmoil in the capital, the general saw an opportunity to gain power for himself. He was not a power-hungry man by nature, but having to spend years dreading the approach of every rider from the west had instilled in him a desire to be in complete control of his destiny, a desire which he believed could only be fulfilled by seizing the regency for himself. He had more than enough loyal soldiers to do it--after all, the eastern military frontier was the second-most heavily garrisoned region in the Empire, and most of the soldiers posted there supported him whole-heartedly. He and Skaramagos just needed the right opportunity to take power for themselves.



Meanwhile, in the capital, the regency council began to fracture in mid-1515. Previously, Basileios Mgeli and Basileios the Scythian had, if not gotten along very well, at least tolerated each other. However, as Basileios III’s mind began to slip[2]--he was nearly eighty, after all--conflict began to brew between the two men. Mgeli, who had been the chief administrator of the regency simply due to lack of any other would-be clerical minister. As such, he assumed that he would step into the void left by Basileios III’s increasing incompetency. This, however, Basileios the Scythian would not allow. Conventional wisdom held that in order to secure oneself at the top of a Byzantinesque state such as Trapezous, you would need the support of two of the three pillars of the state[3]. With the initial arrangement of the regency, each of the Basileios had held one of these pillars; Mgeli the bureaucracy, Davidopoulos the church and Scythian the army. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be. However, now that Basileios was on the verge of bowing out, the potential for one of the men to gain the advantage was clear to him. Mgeli had not exactly tied to endear himself to him, either, encourage the growth of the city watch and the expansion of the city’s regular garrison as counterbalances to the eleutheroi.



When Basileios III formally declared his retirement in August 1515, Basileios the Scythian sent a detachment of eleutheroi to arrest Basileios Mgeli, so that he could not prevent him from installing a claimant of his own upon the patriarchal throne. The regent was caught completely off-guard and was confined within his apartments within the palace with a few secretaries, unable to reach his network of supporters before he was effectively imprisoned. With his ally-turned-rival reduced, Basileios the Scythian appointed one of his colleagues, a military chaplain known as Thomas the Vainakh, as Patriarch, cinching another one of the pillars of state behind him, or so he thought.



Mgeli knew that the ante was rising with every second, and he had to act quickly if he wanted to keep his head on top of his shoulders. He paid off a guard and slipped out a letter to his cousin up in Tennessee to Sabbiades, traveling through a secret network of couriers he had arranged on the side. He promised Sabbiades a seat on the regency council and command of all the realm’s armies if he would revolt against Basileios the Scythian, hoping that the two would fight each other and allow him to weasel his way out of his present predicament, or at least fire a Parthian shot. Basileios the Scythian, meanwhile, officially deposed Basileios Mgeli a few days later, elevating a fairly obscure notary named Konstantinos Ypsilantis to replace the former emperor’s cousin and join himself and Thomas the Avar as regents. Hoping to tie up a loose end, he had Mgeli paraded out of his cell and put on a ship to Tmutarakan in chains. The ship then sank a few hundred yards from shore with exactly one death. Thus died the last son of Keteon.



While Mgeli himself was dead, his Parthian shot flew straight and true. In September 1515, Sabbiades received the late regent’s offer and, after ruminating on the subject for a time, decided the time was right. He raised the standard of revolt at Artane (OTL Ardahan)[4] on 26 September, and was hailed by his men as the true regent of the emperor David. There were already nearly 5,000 professional soldiers scattered across the section of the frontier under his control[5], and the bandons of the region rallied to his standard. With the harvest already completed, he was able to raise an unusually great number of men, mustering 12,000 men in his army proper even with 4,000 men left behind to guard the frontier from any opportunistic raiders. Sabbiades knew that the most likely strategy his enemies would take would be to keep him trapped on the far side of the mountains for as long as possible, in hopes that he would begin to waver and start to bleed to defections. As such, he drove directly across the mountains, floating down the Akampsis in a two-week long advance to the sea. Vatoume surrendered without a fight on 15 October, securing Sabbiades his foothold on the northern side of the mountains. He turned and swept along the coastal plains toward the capital itself, gathering more men as he marched. His success can be attributed to promises of relief from the rising taxes imposed by the capital and promises of the restoration of the glory of Alexandros II, whom Sabbiades had campaigned beneath on several occasions[6].



Basileios the Scythian was, understandably, more than a little concerned by the vast rebel host that was currently marching towards the capital with all haste. He scrambled together a host, mustering 3,500 of the 5,000 eleutheroi[7] and marching out from the city mustering bandons from the lands surrounding the city. Most of these conscripts weren’t exactly eager to fight and die for the claim of some barbarian who had no distinguishing victories or endearing traits other than his money and his title, and fewer still were willing to do so against the war hero Sabbiades. As such, he was able to muster a host of 8,000, which was by now outnumbered by more than 2:1 and growing. Basileios decided his best option was to try and blunt Sabbiades’ advance and force him to endure a winter siege, which would hopefully affect the rebel army in a manner similar to Mustafa II’s thirty years before. However, this would never come to pass.



After watching his predecessor be murdered on his orders, Konstantinos Ypsilantis had quickly deduced that Basileios could not be trusted. He had begun plotting against his nominal ally almost at once, managing to neatly insert himself into much of Mgeli’s network. Within a few weeks, he had managed to turn the regular garrison and the city watch to his side with a number of well-placed bribes. As soon as the bulk of the eleutheroi were a day’s march beyond the city, he ordered the city gates to be closed, then fled the palace for the army barracks in the upper town. Ypsilantis’ loyalist forces quickly coalesced, and within a few hours they and the city watch had managed to secure all of the lower and upper towns. A traitor opened one of the citadel’s sally gates, and he and his soldiers were able to fight their way through into the palace complex and the eleutheroi barracks there within. The battle here was fierce, as the narrow corridors and small, disjointed buildings reduced much of the fighting to one-on-one duels. The city watch and the regular garrison took heavy losses as the disciplined eleutheroi fought desperately, but weight of numbers was on their side and they eventually cut off and then took the Imperial chambers. Ypsilantis personally shepherded David out of the building, after which he turned the cannons on the citadel walls about and threatened to blow the palace to kingdom come if the eleutheroi didn’t lay down their weapons. Some kept fighting, but most of them reluctantly surrendered and were led away in chains. By the end of the day, all but the most isolated tunnels and chambers in the warren beneath the palace had been swept of their defenders. David, stuttering on every word due to an unfortunate speech impediment, proclaimed the deposition of Basileios the Scythian and Thomas the Avar (who had been imprisoned when the coup began) and elevated Ypsilantis to sole regent.



Ypsilantis, I mean David, immediately drafted a chrysobull declaring that the Scythian was deposed. After hastily making and signing copies, riders were dispatched to distribute these messages amongst his camp. Sure enough, most of the bandons took this as an opportunity to abandon the field, rushing away to their homes and families. Basileios of course denounced the message as false and treasonous, but this did not prevent the eleutheroi from fracturing as several junior commanders attempted to arrest their captain as a rebel. While the eleutheroi were busy fighting themselves and the bandons fleeing in all directions, Sabbiades decided this was as good a time as any to attack, and his army surrounded and then overran the divided enemy camp. Basileios the Scythian was found barely alive and was tied to the back of a horse leg-first, dragged for several miles over sharp rocks on his face, then tied in a sack with a rabid dog and thrown down a well[8]. Sabbiades then resumed his march on the capital, arriving outside the city just as winter was setting in on 8 December 1515.



Ypsilantis was essentially forced to let them in, as Sabbiades had a worryingly large siege train consisting of cannons captured at a supply depot at Kapnanion and several dozen more taken from cities along his marching route. Sabbiades entered the city in a triumphant march, being hailed as a liberator by many of the residents of Trapezous, a fact which only further unnerved Ypsilantis. However, the most worrying thing that happened that winter for the new regent was Sabbiades’ proclamation that he ought to be coregent, as he had been promised such a role by Mgeli before his untimely death. Ypsilantis obviously didn’t want to give up his power to a man who already wielded so much, but with a large army camped in the lower town, it wasn’t exactly like he could say no. On 14 December, Ioannes Sabbiades was raised to co-regent with Ypsilantis, returning the city and the empire to an uneasy power-sharing agreement. It would not last long.



By the time he was elevated as regent, both Sabbiades and Ypsilantis were plotting to have the other bumped off. The reasons for this were rather obvious, as Ypsilantis feared that his nominal partner would try to overthrow him and Sabbiades feared that his nominal partner would try to have him killed. Unfortunately for them, neither of them was an especially skilled plotter, and so throughout December 1515 and into January 1516, they made a series of clumsy, badly-handled assassination attempts against each other. Be it poison, the assassin’s knife or barrels of power, they tried it. Skaramagos had disappeared somewhere into the Qutlughid Empire back in July, and so Sabbiades was left without his best assassin, which was no doubt extremely frustrating. By February, the two regents had holed up in opposite wings of the palace and refused to speak to each other. Why Sabbiades didn’t just outright depose Ypsilantis at the first opportunity is unknown--it is possible that the regent, with nothing left to lose, might try and repeat Mgeli’s little stunt and plunge the country into civil war--but it would prove to be a fatal mistake.



On 23 February 1516, Sabbiades finally threw up his hands and said ‘Screw it’. That morning, several dozen of his soldiers burst into Ypsilantis’ wing of the palace, hacking down the regent’s guards and rushing into his personal rooms. They pulled the man they found sleeping there from his bed and realized, to their shock, that it was not in fact him. Ypsilantis had started sleeping in an adjoining closet out of fear of being killed in his sleep, and while the soldiers had been busy he had fled into the tunnels beneath the palace. Furious that his quarry had been lost, Sabbiades ordered his men to spread out through the tunnels and hunt him down. For two days they searched, finding nothing, as Ypsilantis fled between different store rooms and hidden tunnels. Finally, on the third day, he presented himself before a group of soldiers and demanded to be taken to Sabbiades. The general had his former co-regent brought before him, taunting him before he had him executed. However, Ypsilantis retorted in kind, mocking him for his clubfoot and weak leg. Sabbiades flew into a rage and began screaming at him, causing the soldiers holding him to shrink back. Seizing the opportunity, Ypsilantis pulled a concealed dagger--from where is not known, but given that the wound later became severely infected, many historians have a guess[9]--and stabbed Sabbiades in the arm, missing his chest by a few millimeters. Absolutely apoplectic now, Sabbiades grabbed Ypsilantis and threw him out of nearby window, sending him hurtling seven hundred feet to the bottom of the Kontos Valley.



Sabbiades was proclaimed as David’s regent later that same day, but he would not have long to enjoy it. He refused treatment for his wound until he had been formally invested, not wanting to waste time getting it cleaned. He allowed it to be treated afterwards, but it was too late. It was already infected, and within a few days the infection worsened into severe blood poisoning. By 27 February, he was in agonizing pain and took so much opium that he couldn’t move from his bed. A day later he was dead, and David was left without a regent once again.



By now, the people of Trapezous were thoroughly fed up with the regent roulette, and the garrison and the bureaucrats agreed. After a bit of deliberation, the city garrison invited the megas doux, the highest-ranking officer who had stayed clear of this mess, to take the regency. Loukas Ratetas[10] had worked his way up to the admiralty from a lowly rower on an Imperial galley, and was well-respected by all because of his honesty, loyalty and genial nature. He had actually been raised to his office in 1511 because he was the only captain who Alexios had trusted, and he had been sufficiently inoffensive to survive the following years. He was at Kerasounta, overseeing the loading of new cannons onto his galleys, when Sabbiades died. After a brief caretaker regency by Patriarch Nikolaos (Thomas had been deposed by Ypsilantis), Ratetas arrived in the city on 12 March and formally accepted the regency, becoming David’s seventh and final regent.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Although this wasn’t exactly a willing decision since he was, y’know, a slave.

[2] Basileios III likely had an early form of dementia as early as Nikephoros’ reign, but it truly became impactful during his regency.

[3] That is, the army, the bureaucracy and the church. Huh, A-B-C. The ABCs of Byzantium, perhaps?

[4] This was the capital of the eastern frontier, the largest settlement conquered from the Samtskheotes

[5] The size of the Trapezuntine military had ballooned during the long peace between 1486 and 1517. Note: This span is referred to as the long peace due to the lack of major foreign wars, the war between Basileios the Scythian and Sabbiades being the only major civil conflict and the Samtskheote War being the only foreign conflict, which didn’t inflict much damage on the Empire itself.

[6] Alexandros led several small campaigns against Karamanid raiders that I glossed over.

[7] I think this is the right number, but I might be a little off. I don’t have my notes in front of e.

[8] This was the fate of an Armenian vassal lord who tried to assassinate Nikephoros I back in the 10th Century. Supposedly, this was copied from the same punishment this lord gave to a bishop who pissed him off.

[9] This is exactly what you think it is.

[10] This is the same Loukas Ratetas captured the Čandarid flagship at the Battle of Sinope in 1468.
 

stevep

Well-known member
Part XXXIV: Musical Chairs (1514-1516)


Alexios’ final purges had cleansed the Trapezuntine state of much of its more debauched and conspiratorial aspects. However, Trapezous was truly a Byzantine state, and no single man could completely cleanse the empire of its darker nature. The efforts of the late aftokrator had gone a long way towards securing the reign of his son, but the responsibility for maintaining this security would fall upon the shoulders of a priest, a diplomat and a slave, far from the most inspiring group of men to oversee a decade (at minimum) long regency. In a place as corrupt as the Trapezuntine Empire, they were hardly the best men for the job….



As the dying emperor’s men ravaged the upper classes of the capital in search for any would-be assassins, the true killer of the emperor was in the wind. Skaramagos had correctly ascertained two things; namely, that Katsarina would double cross him at the first opportunity, and that Alexios might not be dead. He picked his way across the city, shot the guards outside the building where his brother was being held, and rescued him. Then they fled eastwards out of the city, making their way across the breadth of the empire to the eastern frontier. Ever the opportunist, Skaramagos saw a chance in all of this, and was unwilling to pass it up.



Back in the capital, meanwhile, the Three Basils were shakily adapting to the levers of government. As previously mentioned, they were far from good candidates for the regency. Mgeli had spent the last decade and a half traveling across Central Europe, flitting between the courts of Rome, Esztergom and Krakow and even accompanying a Papal expedition led by Antonio Trivulzio against the Barbaries to recover a stricken Trapezuntine merchantman. He was a career diplomat, and while this was a trait that would be useful in pretty much any court throughout history, he had no experience in actually governing. He knew what not to do, of course, having observed many rulers in the Holy Roman Empire and beyond fall from grace and power due to blunders and bad slips, but this wasn’t much help. The Patriarch was even worse off, having spent most of his life as a quiet country priest before being shot up to royal tutor and advocate for the deranged prince-turned-emperor. The task of handling the fractious infighting of the Pontic Church and relations with the other surrounding Patriarchates would have probably been more than he could handle by itself, but having to do that and rule in David’s name was an overwhelming challenge for him. Basileios the Scythian was a career soldier, true[1], but he had little actual battlefield experience other than a few battles in the Samtskheote War half a decade previous and some battles with Karamanid raiders in the Lykos Valley. He was a thoroughly unimaginative commander, and swung between essentially ignoring the actions of the other regents and threatening to have his soldiers murder them anytime they did something that pissed him off. David was a non-entity at this point, unable to even say ‘David Megalokomnenos’, and so the three men were left to blunder their way forward, hoping that they did more good than they did harm.



Alexios’ murder of anyone who looked at him funny had effectively gutted the ranks of the Imperial bureaucracy, aristocracy, and the upper echelons of the army with few exceptions. While this crippled the aforementioned organizations and thus posed a sizable challenge to the new regency, in the long-term it was a boon for the empire’s stability. All but the most tepid and inoffensive servants of the aftokrator had been purged, and this allowed the regents to refill their ranks with loyal and docile men, the kind who wouldn’t pose a threat to either the joint regency or the young David himself. The remainder of 1514 was spent analyzing potential recruits and hand-selecting new administrators and officers. Mgeli was the prime driver behind this, of course, as the Patriarch was already occupied with trying to reform the Pontic Church’s organizational structure and the Scythian was sacking officers left and right in a manner not dissimilar to Alexios’ old purges. While they were distracted in doing this, plotters began to come out of the woodwork, seeking the power that was wielded by a regent for themselves.



Chief among these were Skaramagos and Ioannes Sabbiades who were, funnily enough, half-brothers. Antonio Scaramanga had been rebaptized in the Orthodox Church during the 1480s, and had sired a bastard son who went on to become the commander of the eastern frontier. Alexios, even during his most paranoid flights of fantasy, had never dared to execute a war hero as beloved to many of the commoners as Sabbiades was, and so he had remained as the governor of the eastern military frontier, fighting off Karamanid raids and attacks from the rump Samtskheote state. When his half-brother informed Sabbiades of the ongoing turmoil in the capital, the general saw an opportunity to gain power for himself. He was not a power-hungry man by nature, but having to spend years dreading the approach of every rider from the west had instilled in him a desire to be in complete control of his destiny, a desire which he believed could only be fulfilled by seizing the regency for himself. He had more than enough loyal soldiers to do it--after all, the eastern military frontier was the second-most heavily garrisoned region in the Empire, and most of the soldiers posted there supported him whole-heartedly. He and Skaramagos just needed the right opportunity to take power for themselves.



Meanwhile, in the capital, the regency council began to fracture in mid-1515. Previously, Basileios Mgeli and Basileios the Scythian had, if not gotten along very well, at least tolerated each other. However, as Basileios III’s mind began to slip[2]--he was nearly eighty, after all--conflict began to brew between the two men. Mgeli, who had been the chief administrator of the regency simply due to lack of any other would-be clerical minister. As such, he assumed that he would step into the void left by Basileios III’s increasing incompetency. This, however, Basileios the Scythian would not allow. Conventional wisdom held that in order to secure oneself at the top of a Byzantinesque state such as Trapezous, you would need the support of two of the three pillars of the state[3]. With the initial arrangement of the regency, each of the Basileios had held one of these pillars; Mgeli the bureaucracy, Davidopoulos the church and Scythian the army. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be. However, now that Basileios was on the verge of bowing out, the potential for one of the men to gain the advantage was clear to him. Mgeli had not exactly tied to endear himself to him, either, encourage the growth of the city watch and the expansion of the city’s regular garrison as counterbalances to the eleutheroi.



When Basileios III formally declared his retirement in August 1515, Basileios the Scythian sent a detachment of eleutheroi to arrest Basileios Mgeli, so that he could not prevent him from installing a claimant of his own upon the patriarchal throne. The regent was caught completely off-guard and was confined within his apartments within the palace with a few secretaries, unable to reach his network of supporters before he was effectively imprisoned. With his ally-turned-rival reduced, Basileios the Scythian appointed one of his colleagues, a military chaplain known as Thomas the Vainakh, as Patriarch, cinching another one of the pillars of state behind him, or so he thought.



Mgeli knew that the ante was rising with every second, and he had to act quickly if he wanted to keep his head on top of his shoulders. He paid off a guard and slipped out a letter to his cousin up in Tennessee to Sabbiades, traveling through a secret network of couriers he had arranged on the side. He promised Sabbiades a seat on the regency council and command of all the realm’s armies if he would revolt against Basileios the Scythian, hoping that the two would fight each other and allow him to weasel his way out of his present predicament, or at least fire a Parthian shot. Basileios the Scythian, meanwhile, officially deposed Basileios Mgeli a few days later, elevating a fairly obscure notary named Konstantinos Ypsilantis to replace the former emperor’s cousin and join himself and Thomas the Avar as regents. Hoping to tie up a loose end, he had Mgeli paraded out of his cell and put on a ship to Tmutarakan in chains. The ship then sank a few hundred yards from shore with exactly one death. Thus died the last son of Keteon.



While Mgeli himself was dead, his Parthian shot flew straight and true. In September 1515, Sabbiades received the late regent’s offer and, after ruminating on the subject for a time, decided the time was right. He raised the standard of revolt at Artane (OTL Ardahan)[4] on 26 September, and was hailed by his men as the true regent of the emperor David. There were already nearly 5,000 professional soldiers scattered across the section of the frontier under his control[5], and the bandons of the region rallied to his standard. With the harvest already completed, he was able to raise an unusually great number of men, mustering 12,000 men in his army proper even with 4,000 men left behind to guard the frontier from any opportunistic raiders. Sabbiades knew that the most likely strategy his enemies would take would be to keep him trapped on the far side of the mountains for as long as possible, in hopes that he would begin to waver and start to bleed to defections. As such, he drove directly across the mountains, floating down the Akampsis in a two-week long advance to the sea. Vatoume surrendered without a fight on 15 October, securing Sabbiades his foothold on the northern side of the mountains. He turned and swept along the coastal plains toward the capital itself, gathering more men as he marched. His success can be attributed to promises of relief from the rising taxes imposed by the capital and promises of the restoration of the glory of Alexandros II, whom Sabbiades had campaigned beneath on several occasions[6].



Basileios the Scythian was, understandably, more than a little concerned by the vast rebel host that was currently marching towards the capital with all haste. He scrambled together a host, mustering 3,500 of the 5,000 eleutheroi[7] and marching out from the city mustering bandons from the lands surrounding the city. Most of these conscripts weren’t exactly eager to fight and die for the claim of some barbarian who had no distinguishing victories or endearing traits other than his money and his title, and fewer still were willing to do so against the war hero Sabbiades. As such, he was able to muster a host of 8,000, which was by now outnumbered by more than 2:1 and growing. Basileios decided his best option was to try and blunt Sabbiades’ advance and force him to endure a winter siege, which would hopefully affect the rebel army in a manner similar to Mustafa II’s thirty years before. However, this would never come to pass.



After watching his predecessor be murdered on his orders, Konstantinos Ypsilantis had quickly deduced that Basileios could not be trusted. He had begun plotting against his nominal ally almost at once, managing to neatly insert himself into much of Mgeli’s network. Within a few weeks, he had managed to turn the regular garrison and the city watch to his side with a number of well-placed bribes. As soon as the bulk of the eleutheroi were a day’s march beyond the city, he ordered the city gates to be closed, then fled the palace for the army barracks in the upper town. Ypsilantis’ loyalist forces quickly coalesced, and within a few hours they and the city watch had managed to secure all of the lower and upper towns. A traitor opened one of the citadel’s sally gates, and he and his soldiers were able to fight their way through into the palace complex and the eleutheroi barracks there within. The battle here was fierce, as the narrow corridors and small, disjointed buildings reduced much of the fighting to one-on-one duels. The city watch and the regular garrison took heavy losses as the disciplined eleutheroi fought desperately, but weight of numbers was on their side and they eventually cut off and then took the Imperial chambers. Ypsilantis personally shepherded David out of the building, after which he turned the cannons on the citadel walls about and threatened to blow the palace to kingdom come if the eleutheroi didn’t lay down their weapons. Some kept fighting, but most of them reluctantly surrendered and were led away in chains. By the end of the day, all but the most isolated tunnels and chambers in the warren beneath the palace had been swept of their defenders. David, stuttering on every word due to an unfortunate speech impediment, proclaimed the deposition of Basileios the Scythian and Thomas the Avar (who had been imprisoned when the coup began) and elevated Ypsilantis to sole regent.



Ypsilantis, I mean David, immediately drafted a chrysobull declaring that the Scythian was deposed. After hastily making and signing copies, riders were dispatched to distribute these messages amongst his camp. Sure enough, most of the bandons took this as an opportunity to abandon the field, rushing away to their homes and families. Basileios of course denounced the message as false and treasonous, but this did not prevent the eleutheroi from fracturing as several junior commanders attempted to arrest their captain as a rebel. While the eleutheroi were busy fighting themselves and the bandons fleeing in all directions, Sabbiades decided this was as good a time as any to attack, and his army surrounded and then overran the divided enemy camp. Basileios the Scythian was found barely alive and was tied to the back of a horse leg-first, dragged for several miles over sharp rocks on his face, then tied in a sack with a rabid dog and thrown down a well[8]. Sabbiades then resumed his march on the capital, arriving outside the city just as winter was setting in on 8 December 1515.



Ypsilantis was essentially forced to let them in, as Sabbiades had a worryingly large siege train consisting of cannons captured at a supply depot at Kapnanion and several dozen more taken from cities along his marching route. Sabbiades entered the city in a triumphant march, being hailed as a liberator by many of the residents of Trapezous, a fact which only further unnerved Ypsilantis. However, the most worrying thing that happened that winter for the new regent was Sabbiades’ proclamation that he ought to be coregent, as he had been promised such a role by Mgeli before his untimely death. Ypsilantis obviously didn’t want to give up his power to a man who already wielded so much, but with a large army camped in the lower town, it wasn’t exactly like he could say no. On 14 December, Ioannes Sabbiades was raised to co-regent with Ypsilantis, returning the city and the empire to an uneasy power-sharing agreement. It would not last long.



By the time he was elevated as regent, both Sabbiades and Ypsilantis were plotting to have the other bumped off. The reasons for this were rather obvious, as Ypsilantis feared that his nominal partner would try to overthrow him and Sabbiades feared that his nominal partner would try to have him killed. Unfortunately for them, neither of them was an especially skilled plotter, and so throughout December 1515 and into January 1516, they made a series of clumsy, badly-handled assassination attempts against each other. Be it poison, the assassin’s knife or barrels of power, they tried it. Skaramagos had disappeared somewhere into the Qutlughid Empire back in July, and so Sabbiades was left without his best assassin, which was no doubt extremely frustrating. By February, the two regents had holed up in opposite wings of the palace and refused to speak to each other. Why Sabbiades didn’t just outright depose Ypsilantis at the first opportunity is unknown--it is possible that the regent, with nothing left to lose, might try and repeat Mgeli’s little stunt and plunge the country into civil war--but it would prove to be a fatal mistake.



On 23 February 1516, Sabbiades finally threw up his hands and said ‘Screw it’. That morning, several dozen of his soldiers burst into Ypsilantis’ wing of the palace, hacking down the regent’s guards and rushing into his personal rooms. They pulled the man they found sleeping there from his bed and realized, to their shock, that it was not in fact him. Ypsilantis had started sleeping in an adjoining closet out of fear of being killed in his sleep, and while the soldiers had been busy he had fled into the tunnels beneath the palace. Furious that his quarry had been lost, Sabbiades ordered his men to spread out through the tunnels and hunt him down. For two days they searched, finding nothing, as Ypsilantis fled between different store rooms and hidden tunnels. Finally, on the third day, he presented himself before a group of soldiers and demanded to be taken to Sabbiades. The general had his former co-regent brought before him, taunting him before he had him executed. However, Ypsilantis retorted in kind, mocking him for his clubfoot and weak leg. Sabbiades flew into a rage and began screaming at him, causing the soldiers holding him to shrink back. Seizing the opportunity, Ypsilantis pulled a concealed dagger--from where is not known, but given that the wound later became severely infected, many historians have a guess[9]--and stabbed Sabbiades in the arm, missing his chest by a few millimeters. Absolutely apoplectic now, Sabbiades grabbed Ypsilantis and threw him out of nearby window, sending him hurtling seven hundred feet to the bottom of the Kontos Valley.



Sabbiades was proclaimed as David’s regent later that same day, but he would not have long to enjoy it. He refused treatment for his wound until he had been formally invested, not wanting to waste time getting it cleaned. He allowed it to be treated afterwards, but it was too late. It was already infected, and within a few days the infection worsened into severe blood poisoning. By 27 February, he was in agonizing pain and took so much opium that he couldn’t move from his bed. A day later he was dead, and David was left without a regent once again.



By now, the people of Trapezous were thoroughly fed up with the regent roulette, and the garrison and the bureaucrats agreed. After a bit of deliberation, the city garrison invited the megas doux, the highest-ranking officer who had stayed clear of this mess, to take the regency. Loukas Ratetas[10] had worked his way up to the admiralty from a lowly rower on an Imperial galley, and was well-respected by all because of his honesty, loyalty and genial nature. He had actually been raised to his office in 1511 because he was the only captain who Alexios had trusted, and he had been sufficiently inoffensive to survive the following years. He was at Kerasounta, overseeing the loading of new cannons onto his galleys, when Sabbiades died. After a brief caretaker regency by Patriarch Nikolaos (Thomas had been deposed by Ypsilantis), Ratetas arrived in the city on 12 March and formally accepted the regency, becoming David’s seventh and final regent.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Although this wasn’t exactly a willing decision since he was, y’know, a slave.

[2] Basileios III likely had an early form of dementia as early as Nikephoros’ reign, but it truly became impactful during his regency.

[3] That is, the army, the bureaucracy and the church. Huh, A-B-C. The ABCs of Byzantium, perhaps?

[4] This was the capital of the eastern frontier, the largest settlement conquered from the Samtskheotes

[5] The size of the Trapezuntine military had ballooned during the long peace between 1486 and 1517. Note: This span is referred to as the long peace due to the lack of major foreign wars, the war between Basileios the Scythian and Sabbiades being the only major civil conflict and the Samtskheote War being the only foreign conflict, which didn’t inflict much damage on the Empire itself.

[6] Alexandros led several small campaigns against Karamanid raiders that I glossed over.

[7] I think this is the right number, but I might be a little off. I don’t have my notes in front of e.

[8] This was the fate of an Armenian vassal lord who tried to assassinate Nikephoros I back in the 10th Century. Supposedly, this was copied from the same punishment this lord gave to a bishop who pissed him off.

[9] This is exactly what you think it is.

[10] This is the same Loukas Ratetas captured the Čandarid flagship at the Battle of Sinope in 1468.

Well that was chaotic. Hopefully Ratetas, who is getting on himself, will be able to restore a measure of stability.

Is the "to his cousin up in Tennessee " a private joke or something I'm missing?

Steve
 
Part XXXVI: Martyrs (1514-1516)

Eparkhos

Well-known member
Part XXXVI: Martyrs (1514-1516)

The Greeks of Anatolia had spent the past two centuries or more languishing beneath the Ottoman yoke, left behind after their brethren fled across the Bosphorus in hopes of escaping the ever-expanding Turkish empire. As the Byzantines departed the region, the Turkmen moved in in their wake, subjecting the Orthodox to all sorts of humiliations and depredations. For two score decades, the poor farmers and artisans had managed to eke out a living despite their oppressive circumstances, allowed to just barely skate through by the Sublime Porte, who by now saw them solely as tax cows and recruiting grounds for the janissaries. As Imperial governance in the region began to collapse as the civil war spiralled out, however, things only became worse. Bands of roving marauders and ghazis came down from the interior mountains, ravaging the countryside and butchering Greeks for the crime of mere existence. Across north-western Anatolia, entire villages were sacked or burned, their inhabitants massacred or carried off into the chains of slavery. Churches were levelled, bloated corpses piled atop their foundations to further defile the spot, and priests and monks tortured to death[1]. As hundreds were killed and thousands more sold into slavery, there was but one option left to the Greeks of Bithynia and Paphlagonia; Revolt or die.

The lives of the Anatolian Greeks under Ottoman rule had never been especially pleasant, but it had always been at least tolerable. They were treated as conquered subjects by the Sublime Porte, not an unusually cruel fate given the time period, and were lesser than their Muslim brethren in nearly all aspects of society. Greeks were forbidden to build their houses taller than those of their Muslim neighbors, their churches had to be smaller than every mosque in whichever city or town they resided in. They paid extra taxes, both the jizya and the çalviafsarone, the latter of which saw many of their sons taken away as slaves to join the armies of the sultan and the vizier. They were forbidden to carry weapons or potential weapons of any sort, ranging from arquebuses to certain types of cookware, and the sentence for owning a horse was death. Despite these many restrictions, most of the Anatolian Greeks got along with no more than a good bit of grumbling, willing to put up with these draconian laws so long as they were able to live in peace.

However, the ability of the Sublime Porte to ensure peace in the region was dramatically thrown into question with the outbreak of the civil war in 1512. The eastern regions of Anatolia universally struck for Mehmed, while Bithynia and Paphlagonia proper both remained under the control of Ebülhayr Paşa and his men. Of course, as the war raged on in Thrake, the vizier was forced to hastily transfer many of the garrison soldiers to Europe to help him in the titanic struggle there. This, naturally, led to the advance of the Mehmedist horsemen from the interior, as there was next to no army present to stop them from doing so. Ebülhayr Paşa allowed only for a handful of milia units to be raised to defend Bithynia from the raiders, fearing the uprising of the repressed natives more than he did the invasion of his arch-rival’s forces. As such, by the end of 1513 the entire region had been overrun by the Turkmen.

These Turkmen were a wild bunch, more accustomed to the semi-nomadic and raiding lifestyles of the inner Plateau than to the bureaucratic and systematic governance of settled regions, such as the aforementioned sanjaks of Bithynia and Paphlagonia. They were fanatical Muslims, considering themselves to be the warriors of God, Swords of the Faith, Soldiers of the Prophet, ghazis and mujahideen alike[2]. The pre-existing Turkish conceit that the Greeks had been delivered into their servitude because of their cowardice, intemperance and worst of all, their refusal to accept the faith was magnified by the easy triumph of these fanatical nomads over the defenseless Christians, and their leader, the former governor of the Anatolian Elayet, Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey, began demanding that all Christians submit to Islam. This went over as well as could be expected, and several of the ulema sent out to proselytize in more isolated Greek villages wound up ‘disappearing’ into the surrounding wilds.

However, the persecutions that wound up sparking the Greek revolt did not begin in earnest until the outbreak of Nikolaidis' Revolt in July 1514. Kalpazar (OTL Bilecik) was one of the largest urban areas that had been relatively unaffected by the civil war, supporting large populations of Greeks and Armenians. It was one of the few areas of the former Byzantine Empire to have managed to preserve its silk works, and so it was quite the wealthy business center. The city had a number of Orthodox and Apostolic[3] churches, and was a minor pilgrimage center in the region. Seeing the significance which the city held to the Christians, Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey sent a force to the city in July 1514, demanding the razing of the churches and the conversion of the city to Islam. Obviously, this wasn’t likely to go over well, so the imam, one Kaykhusraw of Saray, had a sizable military escort. This military escort got him through the gate, but it is frankly shocking that none of the horsemen thought better of riding into a warren of side streets and tall buildings populated by natives whose feelings towards them ranged from restiveness to outright hatred. Nonetheless, they rode directly into the city center, where the town mayor was bluntly and publicly informed by the imam that the city was to be converted to the true faith and its churches pulled down. There were several minutes of stunned silence before a silk worker grabbed a brick and attacked the imam from behind, whacking him over the head with it and knocking him out of the saddle. The Kalpazaroi then swarmed the rest of the Turkish horsemen, who were barely able to defend themselves given the narrow confines of the city and were quickly cut down en masse. An elderly sipahi[4], Nikolaos Nikolaidis, quickly relived the mayor and took command of the situation, raising the standard of his old force in revolt.

The Kalpazar Flag, one of the great symbols of Greek nationalism



Nikolaidis quickly set about organizing the revolt, training men, procuring/making weapons and stockpiling food from the surrounding regions. The city’s walls were hastily rebuilt and expanded, while one singular cannon was hauled out from an Angelovic-era former border fort. This was no great army, but God-willing, the rag-tag bunch of fanatics and militiamen would be able to hold the walls against the Turkmen until help arrived. He sent riders out to the Karamanids, to other Greek cities and even one all the way to Trapezous, begging for help. He received little aid from his fellow Anatolian Greeks, however, most of whom feared retribution for aiding what looked to be a lost cause.

These preparations were well-warranted, for in early August Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey arrived with several thousand horsemen. Light cavalry, which was the bulk of the force, isn’t exactly good for assaulting cities, and so Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey settled in for a siege, establishing a blockade of the city to keep anything from getting or going out. He also flung the corpses of his own men, many of whom had died from the usual camp diseases, over the wall in hopes of spreading plagues amongst the populace. Both of these strategies were highly effective, as the sizable population of the city required a great deal of food and Nikolaidis had been unable to send away the non-combatants as was usual in siege warfare. By the end of October, food stores were almost non-existent, diseases were rampant amongst the Kalpazaroi and there seemed to be no prospect of help. Nonetheless, Nikolaides and the city’s bishop, Alexios of Kalpazar, were able to buoy the spirit of the defenders, who were increasingly filled with the grim determination of doomed men. As November dragged on, the Turkmen began bombarding the walls, forcing defenders to congregate to meet them, then hurling diseased bodies at those spots. This only worsened the ongoing disease problem, and as the end of the month drew nearer, it became apparent that they would soon have to surrender. The question was put to a vote, and the Kalpazaroi resolved to face death rather than defeat. On 21 November, the Feast of the Presentation of the Mother of God, Nikolaides and several hundred poorly-armed men arrayed themselves at the southern gate. Meanwhile, the women and children of the city began throwing themselves off of the northern wall, which sat atop a series of cliffs, rather than facing a lifetime of torture and slavery. The Kalpazaroi charged out of the battered gate, screaming war-cries as their ragged bands swarmed across No-Man’s Land and into the Turkmen camp. Most of them were killed quickly, being poorly armed and even worsley(?)-armored, but the Turkmen too fell in droves. The air was filled with screams and shouts of the dead and dying, the whistle of arrows and the thunder of the few cannons present. The Turks were caught by surprise but quickly rallied, surrounding the Kalpazaroi and grinding them down with swords and arrows. At long last, the battle was over. The Turkmen then rushed into the city, finding it mostly abandoned, looting anything that wasn’t nailed down and burning or smashing the rest. Most of the Kalpazaroi had followed through with their pact and laid dead either on the field or at the foot of the cliffs, but a few hundred still remained. The fates of these poor souls were….unpleasant….to say the least, but worst of all was their execution. Furious at the city’s insolence, Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey ordered the survivors to be crucified along the road leading back to Eskişehir for a period of three days, then burned any who still lived upon their crosses. The city was then demolished wholesale.

This was the spark that lit the powder keg. The Anatolian Greeks were willing to put up with a lot, but crucifying brothers and sisters in the faith--many of them children!--and then burning those crosses was too much. As word of the atrocities spread, the stories became inflated, describing the Turkmen beating and raping the entirety of the city’s population before nailing them onto flaming crosses and hurtling them off a cliff, or people being tied to crosses by their own intestines, or having nails driven up their genitals, etc, etc. Special attention was given to the fate of the churches within the city and their priests and monks, all of whom had been tortured even more than the other Kalpazaroi. By the spring of 1515, the general consensus was that the Turkmen were going to do the same to all of them, and that the Anatolians needed to strike first before they faced the same fate as their brethren. Men across the region were preparing to take up arms against their oppressors after so long subject to their yoke.

The Great Rising began on 19 January 1515, the Feast of the Epiphany. The men of Magnesia on the Sangarios (Gevye) silently took up arms on the rainy night, slipping through the streets of the city to pick off the Turkish garrison piecemeal. With their occupiers slaughtered, the Bishop of Magnesia, Gabriel Lefkos, proclaimed the restoration of the Empire of Nikaia. Within weeks, cities across the region followed Magnesia’s lead, slaughtering or driving out their garrisons. For a time it seemed as if all of Bithynia would rise and the Turkmen would be forced to flee for their lives, but this never came to pass. While the urban mobs of the cities were good at defeating horsemen in street fighting, they were significantly less capable in open-field battles, which the Turkmen excelled at. Because of this, several cities were recaptured by the Turks after their military force, per se, rushed out to attack the horsemen on foot and were surrounded and mowed down. However, for the most part they remained holed up behind their walls or in the immediately surrounding area, forcing the Turks to spread themselves thin to keep them all pinned down. Many of the rural rebels took to guerrilla tactics, waylaying patrols and isolated detachments of enemy riders. They joined forces with the klephts--brigands who nominally robbed for the sake of an Imperial restoration--and quickly turned all but a few major roads into death zones for Turkish cavalry, further limiting them.

One of these klephts, a Pont[5] by the name of Basileios Panagiokhristophorites, quickly became something of a commander in the revolt after killing a bey in single combat in May 1515. Panagiokhristophorites was a short, ugly man with a short temper, excellent fighting skills and unusual piety, who had fought under Ebülhayr Paşa during his invasion of Eprios and was familiar with the tactics with which Epirote irregulars had confounded the invaders. Under Panagiokhristophorites’ command, the klephts joined with the armatoloi[6], as the militia were coming to be called, in the systematic targeting and destruction of significant Turkish forces. The self-proclaimed katepano would follow Turkish forces as they rode between points, waiting until they were vulnerable before striking like a bolt from on high. He famously broke the sieges of Prusias (Duzce) and Angelokastron (Inegol) in August 1515, moving with shocking speed across the breadth of the region held by the rebels by the end of the campaign season of 1515, the rebels had carved a broad swath of land away from either of the Turkish combatants, all of which was proclaimed the property of the Emperor of Nikaia.

But who, exactly was to become the Emperor of Nikaia? A number of local magnates had been proposed, but the general feeling was that a pre-existing monarch would be needed to secure the newly-independent state. The logical candidate for this was the Trapezuntine Emperor, but the ongoing regency for a literal child made this unappealing, to say the least. The Morean Despot was also floated around, as well as several of his relatives, but upon contact all of them refused. This question continued to occupy the attentions of many of the rebel leaders throughout the autumn of 1515 and into the spring of 1516, when it was suddenly overshadowed by other events.

While many Turkmen soldiers and officers had been killed, Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey had not been one of them. He had been able to withdraw back into Anatolia proper during the late summer of 1515, where he had set about raising another army. Many of the Turkmen, both in the Ottoman realm and beyond, were used to raiding and warfare and were hungry for battle, while many others were Ottoman-aligned bands that had been pushed north by the Karamanid invasion the previous year. As such, he was able to raise a large number of horsemen and even a respectable number of infantrymen by the time the next spring came. In April 1516, he crossed back into rebel territory with 8,000 horsemen and 2,500 infantry, relieving Eskişehir and then fighting through rebel-held territory all the way to Angelokastron and beyond. By the beginning of April, he had reached Bursa, former capital of the Ottoman state, and reestablished a presence in Bithynia, a serious blow to the rebel cause. Even worse, the civil war in Europe seemed to be winding down in the vizier’s favor, so they soon may have to deal with an invasion from another army, or several. With few other options, Lefkos and Panagiokhristophorites finally broke down and formally invited David I of Trapezous to take the throne of the Nikaian Empire.

Ratetas eagerly agreed and began assembling a fleet and expeditionary force at once. It still remained to be seen, however, if he would arrive in time to turn the tide once again….

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] All of these were really done by Ottoman irregulars putting down the Bulgarian Uprising of 1876, known to history as the Bulgarian Horrors
[2] All of these were titles that historic Muslim warriors had bestowed upon them by either themselves or others of the same ilk.
[3] That is, Orthodox and Armenian churches. A number of Armenian merchants and craftsmen had migrated to the region during the Rumite period and stuck around after their collapse.
[4] Prior to the 17th Century, non-Muslims were allowed to become Sipahis
[5] Here, Pont refers to the dialect of Greek spoken, as the Pontic-Paphlagonian dialect was spoken across the Black Sea littoral. Panagiokhristophorites was in fact a bog-standard Paphlagonian
[6] This is a serious anachronism, referring to the Venetian mercenaries-turned-Ottoman constables who resided in Thessaly and Epiros during this time period, eventually playing a major role in the Greek Revolution. I’m using it here because they were (very) roughly the same, and because I couldn’t come up with anything better.
 
Last edited:

stevep

Well-known member
Well that gives some interesting options. However wouldn't such a force be pushing itself between the two Ottoman factions and hence be liable to be attacked by both?
 

ATP

Well-known member
So,it would be war with Ottomans.Unles Trebizond get allies,they would lost.I suggest Venice,Persia or both.Hungary would not join.
 

CastilloVerde

Active member
Finally caught up again with the story.

Very interesting developments with the Trapezuntine regents and the Ottoman civil war.

It appears the vizier's faction is winning the war so I wonder if there would be a purging of the Turkmen because the Turkmen seems to support the traditional ottoman sultan. This may in the long term benefit the Greeks and Bulgarians in the empire, particularly in administration.

The massive purges in Trebizond with Alexios and the following regents opens new opportunities for Trebizond to have new bureaucratic reforms. I don't know how plausible this would be though.
The Kalpazar Flag, one of the great symbols of Greek nationalism
I think an image is missing here.
 

Eparkhos

Well-known member
Finally caught up again with the story.

Very interesting developments with the Trapezuntine regents and the Ottoman civil war.

It appears the vizier's faction is winning the war so I wonder if there would be a purging of the Turkmen because the Turkmen seems to support the traditional ottoman sultan. This may in the long term benefit the Greeks and Bulgarians in the empire, particularly in administration.

The massive purges in Trebizond with Alexios and the following regents opens new opportunities for Trebizond to have new bureaucratic reforms. I don't know how plausible this would be though.

I think an image is missing here.
Shit, you're right.
 

Eparkhos

Well-known member
Well that gives some interesting options. However wouldn't such a force be pushing itself between the two Ottoman factions and hence be liable to be attacked by both?
The Mehmedists have been mostly reduced in Bithynia, but you are somewhat correct in that Malkcoglu and Ebulhayr's men in the region have made common cause against the rebels.
So,it would be war with Ottomans.Unles Trebizond get allies,they would lost.I suggest Venice,Persia or both.Hungary would not join.
The Ottomans are a bit worse-off than it seems, actually.
 
Part XXXVI: Return to the Sangarios (1516-1517)

Eparkhos

Well-known member
Part XXXVI: Return to the Sangarios (1516-1517)

When Nikaia’s call for aid arrived in Trapezous, it arrived at what was probably the most opportune moment given the previous years’ turmoil. Ratetas had set about trying to reorganize the chaotic and undisciplined remnants of the army into a true fighting force, making surprisingly good progress in a mere two months. The primary losses had been amongst the officer corps, and while they would take time to replace in terms of quality, in terms of quantity it wasn’t especially difficult to just promote NCOs and junior officers up the ranks. The bandons, thank God, had remained mostly intact and could still be called upon if need-be, while the standing army had been significantly diminished but were still a capable force. The eleutheroi had been reduced to less than two hundred by the purges, Sabbides’ revolt and Ypsilantis’ coup, but they could be used as a core to rebuild around. Already, Trapezuntine ships were stalking the coasts of Circassia, waiting to pounce upon any slaver they caught unescorted. Speaking of ships, the Trapezuntine navy was in great condition, as Ratetas had managed to keep them firmly latched to the treasury’s teat, and any postponed repairs or equipment changes were rushed through once he was officially in power.

Moreover, Ratetas was also eager to join their western brothers in their struggle for independence. He was a deeply pious man and had been infuriated by the reports of the atrocities against the faithful that came streaming out of Bithynia after Kolpazar’s fall, and had gone so far as to dispatch ships to evacuate refugees from Pontoherakleia in 1515. His personal desire for vengeance was not the only motivating factor, however, as there was a great deal of political and strategic benefit to be gained from intervention. By leading a successful campaign against the infidels--and the hated Ottomans, at that--he would legitimize himself as regent, making it far more difficult for any rivals to unseat him, as well as make himself enormously popular. Annexing such lands as were held by the rebels, excuse me, Nikaians, would also benefit Trapezous by at the very least creating a buffer zone and at the very best allowing them to establish complete control of the Anatolian littoral. He wasn’t deluded, of course, and he knew that the best that he could realistically hope for was all of Paphlagonia with Prousias and Pontoherakleia thrown in, but still, it was a tantalizing prospect. As such, he wrote to Lefkos and Panagiokhristophorites and promised that he would arrive in July to aid them if they could just hold out for a few more months.

In the interim, he set about raising an army. He was able to muster some 10,000 soldiers from the regular army while still leaving enough behind to secure the capital and the Empire proper, and then raised sixty bandons (15,000 men) from the lands surrounding the capital, promising them vast rewards taken from those Turkish bastards when they drove them away from Christian hearths and homes. This first force was just barely able to fit aboard the Trapezuntine armada (and a few requisitioned grain merchantmen[1]), and so it would be the force which Ratetas would lead against Bithynia himself. He was a sailor, not a soldier, though, so the actual soldiers aboard would be commanded by a minor general named Khristophoros Raptis. However, it would not be the sole army, as he also raised forty more bandons (10,000 men) and put them under the command of his cousin, Sabbas Tarkhaneiotes. Tarkhaneiotes was a somewhat experienced commander, having commanded forces on the southern frontier and thus being used to the raid-and-counter-raid pattern of conflict with Turkmen bands. Tarkhaneiotes was to stay behind in Trapezous, to keep the Karamanids or Qutlughids from getting any ideas[2]. Of course, securing supplies for such an armada would take time, and so it was not until late June that the expeditionary force was truly assembled. After a week of awkward maneuvering, camps in the middle of the city, and disorganized loading, the armada put out from Trapezous on 6 July 1516. There were 15,000 soldiers, nearly 20,000 sailors, and several thousand horses loaded aboard more than fifty transports and escorted by that and more warships, one of the largest forces raised in all of Trapezuntine history.

After departing the capital, the grand fleet hugged the Pontic coast all the way to Sinope, where they weighed anchor and made some last-minute resupplies in addition to taking on two more bandons and a pair of galleys to join their number. Whether either of these galleys was the Çandarid flagship which Ratetas had captured nearly fifty years previous is unknown[3], but the regent and admiral almost certainly thought of that incident before they departed once again on 19 July. After weighing anchor, the ships continued along the Pontic coast to Abana, the easternmost town in the Empire. A single salvo was fired that afternoon, officially marking the beginning of the Trapezuntine intervention. They pressed further onwards in the same formation, passing Amisos (OTL Amasra) on 23 July and landing five bandons to capture the city. The defenders fled without firing a shot and three of them were left behind to garrison the port.

Four days later, they arrived at Pontoherakleia. The city had been under siege for the better half of the last year by a motley force of klephts and armatoloi, not enough to actually take the city but enough to make leaving the city or receiving supplies overland a nightmare for the garrison. As the vanguard arrived, its commodore[4], Ioannes Psarimarkos, sent a message to the garrison commander demanding that they surrender outright and immediately. This was, as expected, ignored by the city’s commander, who no doubt believed that some of the rebels had managed to hijack/liberate a few slave galleys and were now playing pirates. We can only imagine how the commander felt as he watched the rest of the Trapezuntine fleet pull around the headland north of the city. He hastily tried to surrender, but Ratetas apologetically informed him that allowing a garrison who had refused to surrender to go free would be a bad precedent. Six galleries closed to within cannonshot of the harbor and opened up, sending several hundred pounds of stone and lead into the walls of the citadel at subsonic speeds. Within half an hour the eastern face of the castle had collapsed, and the Turks were allowed to surrender. Five bandons were landed to secure the city, alongside the local klephts and the armatoloi. Ratetas then split his forces, sending twenty galleys to advance before them and sweep the coast of any Ottoman ships while the rest of the armada pressed on along the coast.

On 30 July, the fleet made landfall at its final destination, the mouth of the Sangarios River. (Note: the modern coastline around the mouth of the Sakarya was created after extensive dredging by the Turkish government during the ‘60s and ‘70s. Prior to this, much of the coastal strip was taken up a mangrove swamp, and the river was constantly silting up its mouth, which was much wider than OTL. At this time, the mouth of the Sangarios would have been 5km inland from the modern coast, near the OTL village of Tuzla. The river mouth would have been a sizable harbor, albeit a fairly shallow one outside of the main channel.) The Trapezuntines weighed anchor in the narrow river mouth and quickly captured the small nearby village of Kontolimani, which was turned into a bustling harbor. Over the next few days, the entire host was put ashore there, forming up in a sprawling camp system that encompassed more than a square mile. On 3 August, the unloading was finally completed, having been delayed by the lack of good port facilities. At long last, however, Ratetas and his army were ready to do battle.

It was excellent timing, to say the very least. The reversal of fortunes had only gotten worse since the Nikaians had sent their cry for help, and they were now on the ropes. While the klephts and the armatoloi still clung on in the highlands, Malkoçoğlu Bali Bey and his cavalrymen had succeeded in driving them from the lowlands of Bithynia, and many of the major cities had surrendered rather than share the fate of Kolpazar. Back in June, Ebülhayr Paşa had dispatched a small force to put down the revolt, and the two factions had made common cause to put down the rebels. Magnesia itself was under siege, and if it were to fall the fire would go out of the rebellion altogether. Ratetas was hastily informed of all of this by Panagiokhristophorites, who had mustered a host of 3,000 in hopes of breaking the siege or at the very least wearing them down. The arrival of the Trapezuntines was a welcome relief, and the regent and the thief soon began concocting a plan….

After departing Kontolimani, Ratetas and his army marched directly for Magnesia. No doubt driven by fear of the rebel capital falling, they moved swiftly (well, as swiftly as one can when most of your experienced commanders are dead) southwards, beating back Turkmen outriders in all directions. They moved along the left bank of the Sangarios this entire time, seemingly with no regards to secrecy or security. Word of their march reached Malkoçoğlu, and he was left to watch in confusion as they blundered directly towards them. This Ratetas fellow was far from a skilled general according to all reports, but he had to be a special kind of stupid to be acting like he was. Come on, marching 10,000 men directly towards the enemy’s camp when they are superior in both numbers and experience? Nonetheless, the bey decided not to look a gift horse in the mouth and moved to intercept. In order to approach Magnesia from the north, the Trapezuntine army would have to pass through the narrow Sangarios Pass. The Turkmen lay in wait, of course, camped upon the steep slopes of the mountains and waiting for the enemy to make contact with them. Finally, on 17 August, the approaching Trapezuntine force became visible, and Malkoçoğlu readied his men for battle. As the enemy infantry entered the valley, he raised the horsetail banner and ordered his men to open fire, sending a hail of arrows down at them.

But then the left side of the valley exploded into gunfire, sending a hail of bullets and cannonballs streaking across the breadth of the valley. The bey turned to look, or rather he would have turned to look had the left side of his body not decided to try and occupy the same space as a cannonball. More Greeks came swarming out of a small side valley, ranks of men on the side of the mountain opening fire with cannons, arquebuses and crossbows. With hoarse war cries, the Ponts streamed across the valley and fell upon the Turkish ambuscade like a bolt from on-high, easily cutting down the practically unarmored dismounted archers. Taken completely off-guard, the Turkmen were unable to respond in kind for several crucial moments, and with their commander dead and his standard fallen, many of the Turkmen ran for their lives. The Trapezuntines followed them, cutting down many before they reached their waiting horses and fled in disarray.

Panagiokhristophorites had led nearly 15,000 men through a winding series of valleys, over rough hills and in one case even across the face of a sheer cliff to arrive in the flank of the valley, where they hoped the Turkmen would be waiting for Ratetas and the bait force. By sheer luck, it had worked exactly as planned, and now the Ottoman army was shattered, running scared across the valley. The next day, the Trapezuntines relieved Magnesia and paraded through the streets of the beleaguered city to the roar of the townspeople. Ratetas formally accepted Lefkos’ offer of the Nikaian crown on behalf of his charge.

In the following weeks, Trapezuntine forces would spread out across the region, recapturing several cities from the Turks and driving their raiders from much of the highlands. Prousias still stood strong, and Bolu would be put to a siege as their Turkish garrison fought to the bitter end. Phrygia[5] proper was quickly secured, and Ratetas soon directed his attention to an offensive against the still-Ottoman lands to the north and west. That October, Ratetas and a force of 15,000 marched against Nikomedia, once the chief port city of the region. Under Ottoman rule, the city’s defenses had lapsed due to a perceived lack of threat, and its garrison had been siphoned away to join the fighting in Europe. The regent had cannons hauled onto the heights to the north of the city and pounded away at the city walls, but in spite of his best efforts the defenders stood as strong as those in Ferrara, fighting on from the rubble against overwhelming odds. Ebülhayr Paşa was bogged down in Europe, believing that Mehmed was on the ropes and could be defeated within that campaign season, but recognized how damaging the loss of Nikomedia would be and redirected forces to support the city, fearing that with its loss Constantinople would be left open to attack. Because of this, in spite of the long odds facing the defenders, they were able to hold out throughout the autumn of 1516, into the winter of 1516 and then into the spring of 1517. Even as the city was reduced to a glorified pile of rubble and Ratetas ordered frequent assaults across the many breaches in the city’s walls, they were able to hold out. By March of 1517, however, it had become apparent that they wouldn’t be able to do so for much longer. The slow trickle of reinforcements had been cut off entirely as Mehmed’ second wind drove the vizier’s forces back down the Axios Valley, and Ratetas hoped that at long last he would take the city.

But Nikomedia would receive a stay of execution as Ebülhayr Paşa sued for peace. Mehmed had somehow managed to turn the tide in the far west, and he needed every man available to him to be in the field ASAP. He believed that the Trapezuntines would be seriously overextending themselves by pushing into Bithynia, and so they could be rather easily defeated once he had managed to restore order within the Ottoman realm. He was willing to take territorial losses in the east, because he thought they were recoverable. As such, he proposed that Bithynia proper (sans the ports, of course, because the last thing he needed were Trapezuntine ships in the Marmora) be given over to the Nikaians. Ratetas, however, refused. He was far from a seasoned administrator, but he knew that having such a large exclave on the far side of Anatolia was a recipe for disaster. After several weeks of back and forth, the regent and the grand vizier settled upon an agreeable arrangement. All of Ottoman Paphlagonia and Kontolimni would be given over to the Trapezuntines, while the Nikaians would be ceded a decent section of land, a map of which will be posted alongside this. The Nikaians weren’t the happiest, being forced to give up a great deal of their conquered/liberated lands so the Trapezuntines could take Paphlagonia. However, Ratetas brushed off these concerns, instead concerned with word coming out of the Qutlughid Empire. But of course, all of this would be overshadowed by the brewing conflict in the west….

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Trapezuntine merchants were required to give up their ships to the aftokrator in times of crisis, but they weren’t exactly happy about this
[2] The Qutlughids were, nominally speaking, allies of the Trapezuntines, but alliances only last as long as their members are willing to honor them.
[3] Some truly ancient galleys were kept around in reserves or mothball fleets, ready to be reactivated in times of crisis if they were needed. Of course, they weren’t exactly effective, but, hey, if push comes to shove it’s always good to be prepared.
[4] i.e. subcommander
[5] This refers to the hilly areas in the north and east of Bithynia.
 

ATP

Well-known member
i read about ships of the line which served about 100 years.And in case of galleys there is Theseus ship in Atens - which even made place in philosophy,when they asked if Theseus ship with all parts replaced is still Theseus ship./Yes,it is/
 

Eparkhos

Well-known member
i read about ships of the line which served about 100 years.And in case of galleys there is Theseus ship in Atens - which even made place in philosophy,when they asked if Theseus ship with all parts replaced is still Theseus ship./Yes,it is/
I agree about the ship of Theseus
 
Part XXXIV: The Three Leagues (1494-1517)

Eparkhos

Well-known member
Part XXXIV: The Three Leagues (1494-1517)

During the closing years of the 15th Century, France had risen to become the hegemon of Europe. French territory and French allies spread from the Scottish Highlands and the Arm of Holland, across the plains of the Po and the hills of Naples all the way to the distant Principality of Epiros on the far coast of the Adriatic in the east and the Lusitanian colonies in the New World in the west. No other state could even dream of rivaling the great French empire, not even the reviving Holy Roman Empire or the Central European power, Hungary. However, the power wielded by the kings of France put them in the cross-hairs of practically every other European state, and Paris’ many enemies would put aside their differences to advance their common interests of toppling her….

After the end of the Italian Wars in the 1490s, Charles VIII had sought to shore up French control over Italy by giving the other Italian states a vested interest in preserving his and his successors’ regional domination. As such, in 1499 he had created the League of Verona, a group which encompassed France, the newly-revived Kingdom of Lombardy, Savona, Florence, the Papal States and Naples. This league was a tenuous affair, held together only by French power, which was able to overpower the long-standing Italian rivalries. From its outset it was doomed to failure, as most if not all of its member states had a burning hatred for one of their companions. The Lombards were a tenuous mess of crownlands, free cities, and vassal territories, which was also only held together by French might, and most if not all of its neighbors were sizing it up even as they swore their undying loyalty to France. Savona was probably the least inflammatory of the Veronan states, having good relations with France and Lombardy but being utterly hated by the Florentines. Urbino was also a strong French ally, but hated the Florentines with a burning passion and had a series of long-standing border disputes with the Papal States, the kind of border disputes that cannot be resolved without pissing everyone off. The Pope himself, Alexander VI, was fairly pro-French, but had reluctantly agreed to join the League after his initial policy of “alliance at arm’s length” had been foiled with the rise of Lombardy. The Papal States were dealing with the above-mentioned disputes with Urbino, as well as bearing a burning hatred for Florence. And, finally, there was Naples, which just sort of….was. The Neapolitan nobility was happy to remain the subjects of a distant and inattentive king, who let them essentially run things for themselves. As such, their participation in the League was more to keep the French happy and uninterested in southern Italy than out of any shared geopolitical interests with Paris.

Of course, there was one problem child; Florence. Once the bleeding edge of global financial innovations and a center of de’Medici power, the city had been transformed into a theocratic dictatorship. As the 15th Century drew to a close, the apocalyptic piagoni movement had taken over the city, led by the charismatic priest Giacomo Savonarola[1]. Savonarola and his followers believed that the Time of Tribulations was at hand and that every Christian man and woman would be needed to fight Antichrist and his coming demonic hordes. As such, they purged Florence of any sign of decadence or wealth, expelling the bankers and the artists and other such degenerates and making the transition to a medieval total war society. Savonarola had declared Pope Alexander VI a tool of Antichrist--to be fair, he was almost comically corrupt and decadent, famously spending hours watching horses mate from the Apostolic Palace--and excommunicated him, for which he was excommunicated in turn. However, before the inevitable Crusader army could be assembled, the Italian Wars had kicked off and Florence, as a steadfast ally of Paris, had entered under French protection. Thus, Savonarola was free to lobby declarations of heresy at most of his neighbors, and Italy at large, and most of the western Mediterranean, too. By the 1510s, the Florentines had completely alienated all of its neighbors, and was swiftly falling out of alignment with France as well, whom Savonarola had come to regard as hopelessly decadent, and needing to be purged before the Tribulations began. Of course, he didn’t say this outloud, but as tensions across Europe rose, Savonarola began to consider turning against the French, for the sake of all that was righteous and holy. They may be outnumbered, of course, but had not the LORD given Gideon and his three hundred victory against thousands of pagans?

Nor was Florence alone in starting to turn against French rule in Italy. The Venetians, while driven from most of their landward holdings, had never been reconciled to the idea of French hegemony and had steadfastly refused to join the League of Verona, in spite of constant raiding from the Lombards and a number of trade barriers thrown up by the other league states. The Venetians had begun building up their armed forces as the 1500s began under the leadership of Leonardo Loredan (elected in 1496), fearing attacks from the French and Lombards in Italy, the Hungarians in Dalmatia and the Ottomans in the east. Loredan’s ambitious projects saw the Venetian fleet grow massively, finally achieving the long-held ambition of every doge since Imbros in 1514 and eclipsing the Ottoman fleet in sheer size, with 135 galleys to their 116. The Venetians had managed to recover by monopolizing trade with the Mamluks and, according to the Calvians and Savonese, using the Barbary Corsairs to harass their rivals’ shipping.

Calvi was also opposed to the League, putting it in a truly strange alliance with the Venetians. This was mostly due to their rivalry with the Savonese whom they, recall, viewed as usurpers to the legacy of Old Genoa, as well as the aforementioned trade barriers that the League had proclaimed, which had completely failed in their intention to force the maritime republics into the League. The legacy of Paolo di Campofregoso, who was hailed by the Calvians as “Father of the Republic” and “Savior of the Nation” also lived on strongly, with his nephew Tommasino taking office after his death in 1498. Tommasino continued Paolo’s policy of ‘Splendid Isolation’, which saw the Calvians make use of their position on Corsica to abstain from getting involved in wars on the mainland, allowing the Savonese and the Venetians to bleed themselves while they went about business as usual. As such, they were whole-heartedly opposed to getting involved in any mainland agreement, instead preferring to thumb their nose at Paris and Rome alike. The Calvians had managed to build up a sizable fleet of more than 75 galleys by 1515, which was more than enough to keep the mainlanders from getting any ideas.

The only other state in Italy to oppose the League was Modena, but this was not due to any opposition to French hegemony but rather due to their own long-standing alliance with the French, which they prized jealously[2]. As such, the various dukes of Modena--Alfonso I ruling by the 1510s--had instead kept relations with France separate from the League. Charles was willing to accommodate his old ally, as he recognized that delivering what they believed would be an insult by forcing them into the League could easily drive them towards Venice or Florence. However, after Charles’ death in 1515, his successor, Louis XII, would make this error, which resulted in a severing of relations between the two states and the conduction of alliance between Venice and Modena.

It should be noted that the ascension of Louis XII to the French throne marked a change in how France was regarded by foreign powers. Charles had been a capable general and a diplomat, well respected by both his subjects and foreign rulers, and he had used these traits to advance the cause of France in Italy and the Holy Roman Emperor. Loved and hated in equal measure, none could deny that he was a capable ruler. However, Louis XII was, to all appearances, an incapable ruler, only seventeen years of age with no experience in battle and the diplomatic tendencies of a jack mule. Several of the more loosely-aligned French allies, notably Brunswick in Germany and Florence and Urbino in Italy, began to drift away as this fool of a king abandoned his father’s carefully laid plans.

While France wielded a great deal of influence in Italy, its influence outside of Italy was significantly less strong. The only major French-allied states outside of Italy were Epirus, Castilla e Portugal and Scotland. Epirus was truthfully more Neapolitan-aligned, but fell under the umbrella of French protection due to the personal union between the two states. France was also allied with Castilla e Portugal against Aragon, their mutual opponent, which put the Iberians in an awkward position given that they also had a long-standing alliance with the English. King Duarte had made an agreement with King Charles in 1503 that a Portuguese army would not be forced to fight an English force, but otherwise he backed the French practically to the hilt. This was because the chief Castillian-and-Portuguese strategic aim was to secure their eastern frontier so they could expand into North Africa without distraction. Because of this, an alliance with the French, who were long-time enemies of the Aragonese, made sense. However, were the Aragonese to cease to become a threat, then it would be in Duarte’s best interest to turn against the French to keep them from getting too powerful. This need, to keep a balance of power in Europe, would grow in import as Louis became increasingly bellicose, threatening his neighbors with war over the pettiest of matters.

The Scots, on the other hand, were bound to the French at the hip, as they were the only sizable counter-weight to the English, who were always nipping at the southern border, with chronic raids and counterraids across the borderlands. The French also gave covert backing to Gerald FitzGerald, the Lord of Ireland, who sought to gain independence from the English. The justification for this was that this revolt would at best secure them another ally in the British Isles and at worst distract the English from events unfolding on the continent. This support was covert, but in 1516 Louis began making threats about supporting an Irish rising, which nearly scuppered Gerald’s plans. However, he was able to persuade Edward that it was in fact several of his subordinates who were plotting against him, and with their execution secured his cause for a few more years.

The threat of an all-powerful France was significant enough of a motivating factor for the League of Munster to form in 1508. The League of Munster was an alliance between a number of minor German states--the Free City of Strassburg, the Duchies of Lorraine and of Wurttemberg, the Bishops of Trier, Metz and Munster, the Counties of Vaudemont and of Palatine Zweibrucken and the Swiss Federation--and several more significant powers--the Holy Roman Emperor, Bogislaw (who had taken the regnal name Fredrick III upon being crowned in Rome in 1504) who ruled the Duchies of Pomerania and Brandenburg, the latter as regent for his underage son, Christopher (b.1498), and the English, under Edward V. There was already an alliance between Pomerania-Brandenburg and England, Edward being married to Anna[3], the daughter of Bogislaw by Anne of Mecklenburg. However, the creation of the League of Munster allowed England, Pomerania-Brandenburg and the other minor states to present a united front against the expansion of French power into the Holy Roman Empire. Due to the efforts of Eric II, the brilliant Prince-Bishop of Munster, Charles was unable to secure any allies within Germany except for the Counts of Brunswick, who swiftly became a pariah, and the Duke of Carinthia[4], who became even more isolated than he had been before. While the League of Munster served to curtail the expansion of French power within the Holy Roman Empire, it had an equally important hidden clause, known only to Edward, Bogislaw, Eric and Philip II of the Rhinemouths. The secret thirteenth member of the League was the King-in-the-Rhinemouths, who desired above all complete independence from the rule of Paris.

The membership of the Rhinemouths in the League of Munster was potentially inflammatory. A coalition against French interests could be tolerated by Paris, but directly fomenting revolt by a French vassal would lead directly to only one thing. The Rhinemouths were an awkward and unwieldy realm, a god-forsaken mess of different territories, crownlands, free cities and bishoprics that would make a unified defense against French invasion nigh-on impossible. However, Philip II--who almost perfectly fits the trope of a young and overeager king, having only taken the throne in 1506 at the age of 21--was confident that he could win his independence with the help of his allies. This was due in part to blind optimism, but there was some realistic grounding for this belief. The Rhinemouths were one of the most heavily urbanized parts of Europe, second only to Northern Italy, and as such was very wealthy, which meant that mercenaries from across the known world would flock to the excellent salaries paid by the Rhinemouthers. They were also at the bleeding edge of gunsmithing. The Rhinemouther armies were in the process of adopting pike-and-shot formations, which also gave them an advantage over foreign armies. However, there were still a number of weaknesses, most notably the rivalries between various parts of the realm and large numbers of burghers, who tended to surrender without sieges due to a desire to preserve their urban property.

In spite of these, Edward and Bogislaw were willing to support Philip. Bogislaw’s support was rooted in the internal politics of the HRE. He had only achieved the throne after winning a bloody war with the Saxons and their allies, and many of the princes of the Empire still chafed under his rule. The presence of the French as a viable alternative to his rule was a serious threat to his legitimacy and the stability of the inner Empire, as many of the princes of the interior would gladly choose a distant monarch ruling from all the way in Paris than one ruling from less than a week’s ride away in Stettin. As such, he had a vested interest in expelling the French and their influence from the Empire as swiftly as possible, before the rot had time to take root. The fact that the Rhinemouths which was, legally speaking, his vassal, paid homage to Paris before it did him was also extremely insulting, enough to get under the normally diplomatic Emperor’s skin. Edward also had his own litany of reasons for supporting Philip II’s efforts for independence. Once again, a fair bit of it is obvious--France was England’s archrival, and it’s always a good time to weaken your archrival--but there is more depth to the topic. The Rhinemouthers had begun to develop a sizable fleet, one that was capable of rivaling the expanded Royal Navy which Edward had been constructing since the late 1490s. Edward didn’t want to risk letting the French get their hands on such a navy, which would allow them to launch an invasion a la 1066, and so felt obligated to try and win over the Rhinemouthers, with the destruction of their fleet preserved as a backup option. The urban core of the Rhinemouths was also a major market for English wool and jachaing, and Edward hated that the French were making money, albeit indirectly, from any English gain. From 1508 on, England, Rhinemouths, Pomerania-Brandenburg and, unknowingly, the Munsterian states, were perpetually on the brink of war with France, armies ready to be mobilized and fleets undertaking patrols and shakedown cruises in preparation for invasion. Charles’ death in 1515 nearly sparked war, but Edward backed out at the last moment, as the Scottish were being unusually aggressive and may invade before the English could meet them. As such, the Munsterian League was waiting for the word 5 ‘go’ throughout 1516 and 1517, like a hammer hovering above a firing pin. However, the spark of the conflict would not come from tensions in the north boiling over, but rather from events in Italy.

On 13 November 1516, Pope Alexander VI keeled over at the ripe old age of 85. The Pope’s faculties had begun to desert him around 1510, and he had been assisted in many of his duties by his son, Gioffre, who had been a mere deacon before being hastily promoted all the way to bishop by his father in 1507[5]. The last six years of Alexander’s pontificate had been derisively nicknamed the ‘Corpse Pontificate’, as he steadfastly refused to abdicate despite his increasingly worsening state. It was an open secret that the cardinals were already beginning to debate who ought to succeed him, even as lay alive, albeit vegetablized, in the Apostolic Palace. The presence of Gioffre as the one who was actually pulling the strings was borderline heresy, and while many of the cardinals were infuriated by this, they declined to have him bumped off, as was the trend in contemporary Italian politics. Instead, they had a general agreement amongst themselves; no matter whom they elected next, it would not be a Borgia or even anyone vaguely-related to the Borgias. Of course, Alexander’s brood weren’t exactly known for respecting Papal institutions, so the cardinals encouraged Gioffre to send Cesare, who was the only member of the family who was a halfway decent general, off to Urbino to campaign against the de’Medicis there. When Alexander finally kicked the bucket while Cesare and his army were away, the cardinals rushed to form a conclave. However, they couldn’t decide who to elect. Guiliano della Rovere, who was considered the favorite, had the misfortune to also die three days into the conclave, leaving the election splintered between various factions. A dozen ballots were voted down in less than a month, as the cardinals grew increasingly panicked as word of Cesare’s intention to install his cousin, Pedro Luis, as Pope. Finally, on 23 December 1516, they elected Antonio Trivulzio as Pope.

Trivulzio was in his early fifties, the scion of a patrician family from Milan. At this point, he was best known for his burning hatred for the French, due in part to his forced exile from Milan at their hand in the 1490s[6]. He had been a member of the Milanese diplomatic corps, actually becoming the ambassador between Milan and Parma in the 1480s. He was the first auditor of the Papal treasury from 1477 to 1482, during which time he earned a reputation for extreme honesty and a hatred for simony. He was the Bishop of Como in northern Italy from 1487, and was promoted to cardinal in 1500 at the behest of Alexander VI. In 1503, he led a Papal fleet against the Barbary Corsairs, capturing the pirate base of Bejaia in a surprise attack, burning the Barbary galleys in the harbor and then freeing several thousand prisoners. He oversaw the installation of a Papal garrison in the port and was its governor from 1504 to 1508, but was forced to abandon the city after a Zayyanid siege. Upon returning to Rome, he was an outspoken opponent of the French and, more quietly, the corruption and decadence of the Borgias. All of this made him an excellent candidate for the pope, and after several weeks he and his partisans won over the rest of the conclave. Upon being elected, he took the Papal name Hyginus II, after an obscure second-century pope[7].

Hyginus immediately sprung into action, assembling a motley host of mercenaries and levies from the region around Rome before winter ended. He also sends a number of embassies to his neighbors, most notably Urbino and Florence, asking for help repulsing the Borgias, who are the sworn enemies of both. The Florentines reject him, but the Urbinites agree to help as soon as they can. His total host numbers only 4,000, but when Cesare descends from the Apennines the following spring, he is shocked to find such a host assembled so quickly. Cesare is concerned that Hyginus has the backing of foreign powers, and so dispatches an embassy to contact Louis and ask for his backing to install Pedro Luis as Pope. He has good relations with the French, and so expects that Louis will agree swiftly. Hyginus catches wind of this and reacts swiftly. He sent embassies to Florence, Urbino, Modena, Venice, Calvi, all the Italian states that would oppose a Borgia Papacy. The former four all send delegations to Rome that spring, and after a great deal of negotiations (especially with the Florentines), Hyginus declares the creation of the Marian League on 3 April[7]. The express intention of the Marian League is to protect the right of the Papacy to select pontiffs, but the subtext is clearly anti-French. The Marian states mobilize for war. On 17 April, a French envoy arrives in Rome, demanding the election of Pedro Luis and the dissolution of the Marian League. The alternative, he states, is war. Hyginus refuses, and the War of the Three Leagues begins….

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Good fortune means that Savonarola is able to depose the de’Medici before he can be excommunicated, allowing him to transform Florence into the above mentioned theocracy.
[2] Historically, this was the Duchy of Ferrara and Modena, but Ferrara was annexed by the Venetians, which was then annexed in turn by the French, who firmly but politely refused to return it. Instead, they gave Parma over to the Modenese, thus the duchy’s official name of ‘Modena, Emilia and Parma’.
[3] This is an allohistorical Anna who was born ten years before the historical Anna.
[4] This is the Habsburg rump state
[5] At this time, one did not have to be a priest to become a bishop, and so Gioffre had his marriage annulled, was invested as bishop, then undertook holy orders.
[6] This is alternate history, caused by the difference in the Italian Wars. He will also be much longer-lived in this timeline.
[7] ‘Hyginus’ means ‘The Clean One’, and so was chosen both as a denouncement of the degeneracy and simony of the Borgia Era.
 

ATP

Well-known member
I read about Italian militaries - once they have good infrantry levies,especially crossbowmen,but till 1500 they degenerated to the point when everybody used mercaneries.Which lead to ruling mercaneries - except Venetia,when locals was smart enough to hire small units without one commander,so they could not made coup.

They made exception for Swiss,which do not made putch,but either do not fight another Swiss.Which,in at least one case,lead to situation when swiss infrantry on french and venetian side sit and look how french and italian calvary fight each other.

In the same time,in OTL french had arleady standing army with calvary and missile troops.HRE defeated them with landsknechts,so they hired Swiss and formed their own pikeman.
England still used archers and knights,Scotland pikeman,Irish - i think they have light and heavy infrantry.

Hungary should still have Black Army,and Poland gentry levies was still effective.HRE - in OTL they arleady have landsknechts.

P.S i read anecdote about Swiss mercaneries hired by french to fight in Italy - which almost all die from...syphilis.Which in beginning was deadly illness for european.
 

stevep

Well-known member
Eparkhos

Sounds like western and central Europe are in for some 'interesting times' and it could be pretty bloody, with France and a few allies against just about everybody else. Of course while their involved in this other nations which avoid the conflict could have more room for their own games and expansion.

A strict and reformist pope could delay - but hopefully not prevent - the Reformation, although how he will get alone with Savonarola and his followers is going to be intriguing.

I take it the Rhinemouths is OTL Low countries but without the southern Burgundian lands that presumably have already gone to French rule? Your almost certainly mentioned it before but such details get missed at times, especially when my memory is as dodgy as it gets nowadays.

You have a couple of small typos I think,
"Charles had been a capable general and a diplomat, well respected by both his subjects and foreign rulers, and he had used these traits to advance the cause of France in Italy and the Holy Roman Emperor " I assume the latter should be Empire rather than Emperor?

Also you have two [7] bookmarks, the 2nd being about the forming of the Marian League, which I suspect should be a missing [8] comment?

Steve
 

ATP

Well-known member
Eparkhos

Sounds like western and central Europe are in for some 'interesting times' and it could be pretty bloody, with France and a few allies against just about everybody else. Of course while their involved in this other nations which avoid the conflict could have more room for their own games and expansion.

A strict and reformist pope could delay - but hopefully not prevent - the Reformation, although how he will get alone with Savonarola and his followers is going to be intriguing.

I take it the Rhinemouths is OTL Low countries but without the southern Burgundian lands that presumably have already gone to French rule? Your almost certainly mentioned it before but such details get missed at times, especially when my memory is as dodgy as it gets nowadays.

You have a couple of small typos I think,
"Charles had been a capable general and a diplomat, well respected by both his subjects and foreign rulers, and he had used these traits to advance the cause of France in Italy and the Holy Roman Emperor " I assume the latter should be Empire rather than Emperor?

Also you have two [7] bookmarks, the 2nd being about the forming of the Marian League, which I suspect should be a missing [8] comment?

Steve

Why not prevent reformation? it was disaster for everybody except rich who steal church property,and rulers which become super popes capable of declaring what chrystianity is regardless of Tradition and other people opinion.

It was not USA protestantism where everybody could establish church,and nobody could made you attend.Church become part of state,and state decided what Jesus said.And what everybody must belive now - becouse tomorrow it could be something else.Why litherans in Europe made woman bishops blessing sodomites ? becouse they are part of state.

So,it is quite normal then in all protestant countries poor people made rebellions against it - becouse when rich steal from Church,they steal institutions which helped poor.All what protestants have for poor was prisons.

Basically,Luder made church who let him and other sin whatever they wanted as long as they have Faith,and let rich steal from poor.Nothing great,in my opinion.
 

stevep

Well-known member
Why not prevent reformation? it was disaster for everybody except rich who steal church property,and rulers which become super popes capable of declaring what chrystianity is regardless of Tradition and other people opinion.

It was not USA protestantism where everybody could establish church,and nobody could made you attend.Church become part of state,and state decided what Jesus said.And what everybody must belive now - becouse tomorrow it could be something else.Why litherans in Europe made woman bishops blessing sodomites ? becouse they are part of state.

So,it is quite normal then in all protestant countries poor people made rebellions against it - becouse when rich steal from Church,they steal institutions which helped poor.All what protestants have for poor was prisons.

Basically,Luder made church who let him and other sin whatever they wanted as long as they have Faith,and let rich steal from poor.Nothing great,in my opinion.

Basically that's no different from much of Catholic abuse of power. The latter is virtually always more reactionary socially, although you have had some socially radical elements emerging at times .

However the big difference is with multiple sources of power it prevents an autocracy limited only by its own corruption and by the sheer size of the empire it seeks to maintain. If you have multiple centres competing with each other then they have to compromise, ultimately with each other but more importantly with their subject populations. The early years of the reformation were very bloody for all concerned and the more extreme Protestants were often as bad as the most hard line Catholics but its not a coincidence that civil society and reliable rule of law emerged from the breaking of the Catholic monopoly on religious power across most of Europe.

Also in this case a continued Catholic monopoly is going to be very bad for Trabazon and the rest of the eastern Orthodox. Its not for nothing that much of the region, at least in the early years of the Ottoman empire, preferred its rule as less brutal than that of the Catholic states established by the 4th crusade or the Venetian colonies in places like Crete.
 

ATP

Well-known member
Basically that's no different from much of Catholic abuse of power. The latter is virtually always more reactionary socially, although you have had some socially radical elements emerging at times .

However the big difference is with multiple sources of power it prevents an autocracy limited only by its own corruption and by the sheer size of the empire it seeks to maintain. If you have multiple centres competing with each other then they have to compromise, ultimately with each other but more importantly with their subject populations. The early years of the reformation were very bloody for all concerned and the more extreme Protestants were often as bad as the most hard line Catholics but its not a coincidence that civil society and reliable rule of law emerged from the breaking of the Catholic monopoly on religious power across most of Europe.

Also in this case a continued Catholic monopoly is going to be very bad for Trabazon and the rest of the eastern Orthodox. Its not for nothing that much of the region, at least in the early years of the Ottoman empire, preferred its rule as less brutal than that of the Catholic states established by the 4th crusade or the Venetian colonies in places like Crete.

Protestant was always worst - that is why common people fight for Church.Becouse protestantism means stealing from them.
And pope could not decide like he wanted,becouse Tradition keep him in line.Nothing keep in line protestants rulers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top