Dune The Golden Path, was it really necessary?

Lord Sovereign

The resident Britbong
The Atreides dynasty unleashed millennia of insanity and death on the galaxy in the name of this "Golden Path" and I'm wondering "why?" The Empire and humanity, for all their faults, were still muddling along. It spread over thousands upon thousands of worlds, man's numbers were in the trillions, so how in the bollocks could we ever go extinct aside from the heat death of the Universe?

The Atreides could have simply elected to be a dynasty of dynamic, strong and competent Emperors who stabilised the Empire and brought about an era of prosperity. Instead, we get all this religious mumbo-jumbo, Paul flailing around and Leto II deciding to be the worst tyrant in history (for some reason both these two felt the whole three thousand years of cruelty was a good idea, but Paul "wasn't brave enough" for it). If anything, it strikes me as a bunch of unbearable people huffing their own farts and deciding what's best for everyone. It doesn't matter how many mountains of bodies you leave behind you, if the end goal is good.

I have almost come to the conclusion that the only thing the Harkonnens did wrong was not wiping out the entire Atreides line when they had the chance. Duke Leto I would be spinning in his grave at what his family became.
 
Some vague idea that humanity was stagnant, which is a poor excuse if you ask me.

The final books in the series add in the idea that there were surviving Thinking Machines from the Butlerian Jihad era outside the Empire planning to invade but they also add in a bunch of other weird stuff so IDK.
 
Last edited:
Not gonna argue. Paul was certainly dealt some very heavy blows.

However, the one thing I remember most was the fact that he was worried that he would unleash what actually happened with the jihad.

Maybe the point of the story is that fear of your destiny will lead to your destiny's ruin?

EDIT: I mean Paul really just operated from fear after he killed of the Harkonnen.
 
Last edited:
It's been so long since I read the novels that I'm sure I missed a lot but... I'll take a stab at it.

Keep in mind that Frank Herbert's writing had lots of powerful narratives that went contrary to the standard heroic myth seen in science fiction and fantasy at the time. Paul Atreides is supposed to be the hero and he is indeed 'heroic' in the Dune books and leads an army of oppressed natives against their oppressors and the evil Empire that betrayedand brought ruin to his noble house. In and of itself Dune is just a great science fiction novel of its time (and written before the internet made everyone an expert in everything) with already pretty fascinating themes of ecology and technological stagnation and how culture and biology and psychology can be shaped over the millenia etc etc etc in sharp contrast to more 'progressive' visions of the future.

But then you have the sequels deconstructing that 'hero mythos' and it's not something as shallow as being grimdark or gritty or pragmatic realism or exploration of antiheroes. The Jihad is the outgrowth of Paul's heroic success. And Paul himself just couldn't harness it... or so he thought. It was just an inevitability. 🤷‍♀️

As a metaphor, think of Alan Moore's work V for Vendetta. A future fascist Britain is challenged by an anarchist terrorist. One of his main adversaries is a police detective who doesn't care for the fascism... but respects how the Fascists are bringing order to everything. At the climax of the graphic novel... Fascist Britain falls apart and there's widespread crime and looting and rape and general anarchy. This is what the terrorist/protagonist brought about.

Compare that to the Wachowski Brothers/Sisters film adaption of V For Vendetta. A future fascist Britain is challenged by a terrorist and his main adversary is a police detective. At the climax of the film, the terrorist/protagonist makes a speech, everyone peacefully assembles under the guns of the army that oppressed them and the protagonist terrorists kills all the bad guy leadership. Everyone wins! It's the most bloodless and clean revolution in the history. 👏

Most science fiction falls into the realm of the 'film adaption' level of depth.

Frank Herbert's Dune books went a little deeper.

3500 years of despotism is a scale I can't begin to wrap my head around as neccessary to safeguard Humanity, but who am I, a mere mortal to think I can question the God-Emperor for Millenia who supposedly has the prescient to see this Golden Path and know this is the only way for Humanity to survive what is to come? It reeks wholly of bullshit to me and any sort of rationality IMHO. There's so many questions, even after reading the books, which leads me to question this prescience Emperor and his monstrous prescriptions upon all of Humanity.

On the contrary... if I was incredibly powerful, maybe I'd be too smart to think that if I did possess the gift of prophecy, that I would know it to be true and no matter how monstrous I am for how long, this is the way it has to be.

Deep down though whether your prophecy is to bring balance to the force or to be the architect of the Golden Path of Humanity, deep down, you know it's bullshit unless your a God. Then your too powerful and wise to even realize it. Even if he's right... there's a galaxy worth of room to dispute how wrong his perfect vision is.

“If you handed one of them the complete scenario of his life, the unvarying dialogue up to his moment of death —what a hellish gift that’d be. A universe of surprises is what I pray for!”

EDIT:

Or as Frank Herbert says...

"The bottom line of the Dune trilogy is: beware of heroes. Much better rely on your own judgment, and your own mistakes."
 
Last edited:
It spread over thousands upon thousands of worlds...
All centered around Arrakis and only stretching as far away from Arrakis as a ship could carry a sufficient supply of Melange for its Navigator. It was a lot of territory, yes, but it wasn't all possible territory and furthermore, it was all controlled, parceled out and claimed by preexisting factions. Someone who monopolized a vital resources could, and did, conquer the lot of it.

Breaking this monopoly with Ixian Navigation Machines and artificially producing Melange via Axlotl Tanks allowed humanity to scatter across the entire universe rather than just the bubble of space reachable from Arrakis, making it impossible for anyone to ever be in a position to oppress everyone ever again. On account of speed if nothing else, a civilization at one side of humanity's domain which attempted to invade everyone else would find that in the time it took their fleet to arrive at the other side, their enemies would've built colonies even further away.

There are two real-world parallel situations. First, Ming Dynasty China destroying Zheng He's Treasure Fleet, second, the fact that despite having the technology for orion drive and nuclear thermal rockets since the cold war space race and the absolutely ridiculously profitable payoff-vs-startup-costs of asteroid mining, the corporatocracy isn't currently throwing military-industry complex levels of funding at conquering the solar system.
Baughn said:
Mew said:
A Thousand Deaths by Orson Scott Card said:
But he thought this: That this starship and the others would be and had been sent out to colonize in prison worlds were not really what the Russians thought they were. True, the prisoners sent in the Gulag ships would be away from earth for centuries before they landed, and many or most of them would not survive. But some would survive.

I will survive, Jerry thought as the helmet picked up his brain pattern and transferred it to tape.

Out there the Russians are creating their own barbarians. I will be Attila the Hun. My child will be Mohammad. My grandchild will be Genghis Khan.

One of us, someday, will sack Rome.
A World Out Of Time by Larry Niven said:
“Corbell, I have no data on the nature of water-monopoly empires. I had to take your world entirely.”

“What are you talking about?” His answer came in Corbell’s recorded voice. “I think the State could last seventy or a hundred thousand. See, there water-monopoly empires, they don’t collapse. They rot from within, to the point where a single push from the barbarians outside can topple them. The levels of society lose touch with each other, and when it comes to the crunch, they can’t fight. But it takes that push from the outside. There’s no revolution in a water empire.”

Corbell said, “I didn’t–“

“A water empire can grow so feeble that a single barbarian horde can topple it. But, Peerssa, the State doesn’t have any outside.”

“–I don’t understand.”

“The State could last seventy or a hundred thousand years, because all of humanity was part of the State. There were no barbarians waiting hungrily for the State to show weakness. The State could have grown feeble beyond any precedent, feeble enough to fall before the hatred of a single barbarian. You, Corbell. You”

“Me?”

“Did you exaggerate the situation? I thought of that, but I couldn’t risk it. And I couldn’t ask.”

He’s a computer. Perfect memory, rigid logic, no judgment. I forgot. I talked to him like a human being, and now–“You have heroically saved the State from me. I’ll be damned.”

“Was the danger unreal? I couldn’t ask. You might have lied.”

“I never wanted to overthrow the damn government. All I wanted was a normal life. I was only forty-four years old! I didn’t want to die!”
In both cases, the Ming and corporatocracy knew what the creation of potential rivals with resources and territory outside of their control would mean for them. Of course in the long run this meant Dynastic China got completely fucked by European colonial powers who didn't limit their technologies and spread to assist their leadership in maintaining control of them and if we let modern China monopolize the Outside Context technologies our civilization isn't working on, we'll get equally fucked in a few generations, but for the time being, it kept the people with the authority to make those kinds of decisions, who had ultimate power under the existing system and consequentially, no desire to see it change, happy.

So for the Dune comparison, the Landsraad monopolized land on the basis of Houses owning planets, the Navigators monopolized travel and the Bene Gesserit manipulated everyone on a case-by-case basis but were allowed to do so by the Great Houses and Navigators as long as their goals remained seemingly harmlessly apolitical. Nobody realized the implications of their eugenics program until it was way too late. An Outside Context Problem like the development of a substitute for Navigators/Melange would break the basis of the Landsraad and Navigators power, it'd let anyone escape, build up forces in unexplored space and potentially come back as a rival superpower. They'd do anything to resist it.

Which brings us to Leto II's Golden Path. During Leto II's empire, he controlled the sole source of Melange* and consequentially the Navigators and Bene Gesserit by threatening to cut said supply off. During the entirety of his reign, he worked at breaking the Landsraad system by slowly raising the cost of Melange, transferring assets from the Great Houses to him, until he'd bankrupted the lot of them into Lesser House status. And since the more expensive Melange became, the less economically practical interstellar shipping became, he ensured no rival manufacturing or resource monopolies could form since it'd always be cheaper to build anything or harvest any resource on site than transport it.

Then he died, the location of his secret Melange stash was lost or he stopped secreting it and he'd crippled every single rival, made every single planet full of plebeians resource and manufacturing-independent aside from space travel and ensured that with all its rivals destroyed, there was nobody to sabotage an attempt at building alternatives to Melange on ideological grounds like "Ixian Navigation Machines violate the Butlerian Jihad prohibitions".

* Officially, he had a storehouse. Unofficially, I always suspected that would've been too much of a vulnerability, someone destroying or robbing it or it eventually running out would destroy his entire plan and actually, being part sandworm, he was secreting the stuff himself as necessary all along.
 
Actually, the Golden path had several parts. Leto was stifling humanity so that when he was gone there would be a great scattering so that no one could wipe humanity out. Two, Leto had his own breeding program going. He was creating a humanity that would be immune to presience so that no faction, human or AI, could use it to track humans down.
 
Actually, the Golden path had several parts. Leto was stifling humanity so that when he was gone there would be a great scattering so that no one could wipe humanity out. Two, Leto had his own breeding program going. He was creating a humanity that would be immune to presience so that no faction, human or AI, could use it to track humans down.

All of that - and kind of vaccine against any future totalitarian regime,becouse altered humans would always be free.
 
To be fair the entire premise of Dune is "Calculators bad because muh human evolution in SPAAACEEE".
No, "calculators bad because they mean the calculator owners can get away with the genocide of everyone besides themselves." Traditionally, genocidal tyrannies have been self-limiting insofar as if they murder all their engineers, they'll have no industries, all their farmers, no agriculture, etc. "Calculators" remove that limitation.
hyzmarca said:
The Militant Doberman said:
Plebeians have two defenses against plutocrats. One, refuse to work until their demands are met. Two, threats of violent revolt. "Calculators" remove both of those. Strikes become ineffective if human labor had no value anyway since machines were doing all the work and violence would be ineffective against the kind of monopoly of force "Calculators" could give their owners.
 
No, "calculators bad because they mean the calculator owners can get away with the genocide of everyone besides themselves." Traditionally, genocidal tyrannies have been self-limiting insofar as if they murder all their engineers, they'll have no industries, all their farmers, no agriculture, etc. "Calculators" remove that limitation.
They literally banned literal calculators because by authors words any computation apart from the human mind reduced human growth and evolution but they remained space capable through copious use of mind expanding drugs.

So yes Calculators bad because meh human evolution in SPAAACEEE.

The real mind twisting bits are the Shields becaue really, stops all force beyond a certain speed that approached that attempts to pass the field? Without any computational components? Digital or Analog? Or some kinda neural interface hoopla to use the human mind of the user to do the calculations or some malarkey? Bah, magic forcefield cubes I tell you. Made so you could justify swordfights without physical capability tranahumanism to go along with the psychic powers.

Because God forbid the author write books about either precog gunfights or transhuman pankration instead of fencing.
 
Last edited:
I get that its a 'clever' exercise to reduce entire franchises to one sentence summaries or the like but...

To be fair the entire premise of Dune is "Calculators bad because muh human evolution in SPAAACEEE".

It must take an extremely small mind to "fairly" take from Dune one vapid comment.

Because God forbid the author write books about either precog gunfights or transhuman pankration instead of fencing.

Like how is this line even a fair criticism of Frank Herbert's work? It barely has any relevance to the topic at hand and is basically on the level of fanfiction wish fulfillment. Why doesn't Dune do more Space Opera with laser swords and Superlasers? God forbid the author write books about Tokugawa style space fantasies and derivative stormtrooper based militaries instead of waxing poetic about religion, precognition, ecology and evolution independent of certain forms of technology.
 
I get that its a 'clever' exercise to reduce entire franchises to one sentence summaries or the like but...



It must take an extremely small mind to "fairly" take from Dune one vapid comment.



Like how is this line even a fair criticism of Frank Herbert's work? It barely has any relevance to the topic at hand and is basically on the level of fanfiction wish fulfillment. Why doesn't Dune do more Space Opera with laser swords and Superlasers? God forbid the author write books about Tokugawa style space fantasies and derivative stormtrooper based militaries instead of waxing poetic about religion, precognition, ecology and evolution independent of certain forms of technology.
Meh, watched the series got bored decided to gripe online. The essence of streaming commentary.

Don't get me wrong I understand why its a classic. But the premise is not that complicated. Its the arguments and narration you continue reading for.
 
And to be fair can you honestly tell me they aren't treating the new series like "Game of Thrones in SPAAACEEEE".
 
mistake of Dune was lack of body armour.If shields do not stop blade used by experienced fighter,then armour made from their supersteel/they had something like that in book/ with added schield would made soldiers almost impossible to kill.
 
Some vague idea that humanity was stagnant, which is a poor excuse if you ask me.
Objectively speaking, it was. Everyone with power under the existing status quo only had said power because of the status quo's limitations, hence, they had no motive to fix said limitations. Try and invent your way out of a problem and the people who've used their ability to mitigate, not solve, merely mitigate, that problem to acquire power will use their power to crush you.

And in the long run, Leto II was demonstratively proven right. As soon as the Spacing Guild was no longer in a position to threaten to cut off any civilization whose leaders didn't preemptively assassinate any inventors, Ixian Navigation Machines and synthetic Melange from Axlotl Tanks were invented.

Everyone compares the Landsraad to Rome, but Imperial Chinese Haijin and Imperial Japanese Sakoku are better parallels.
 
They literally banned literal calculators because by authors words any computation apart from the human mind reduced human growth and evolution but they remained space capable through copious use of mind expanding drugs.

This element of Dune always felt like an incredibly self-righteous "take that!" to the emerging importance of computer science in the era where the story was written.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top