ISOT Tet Offensive ISOT

What will happen if South Vietnam is ISOT from Jan 24, 1968 to Jan 24, 1940?

  • The Tet Offensive will launch on schedule

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • The Tet Offensive will be postponed

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • The VC/NVA side will be more screwed by being cut off from outside supply/reinforcement

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • The USA/ARVN side will be more screwed by being cut off from outside supply reinforcement

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A Tet offensive would be highly destructive but thrown back

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • A Tet offensive would collapse South Vietnam and the American position there

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Japan would intervene in South Vietnam in 1940

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • VC/NVA and/or USA/ARVN would intervene in downtime French Indochina/northern Vietnam

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • US future knowledge or tech would would help the Allies eventually, but not in the 1940 campaigns

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • US future knowledge or tech would crucially help the Allies in 1940 campaigns

    Votes: 2 50.0%

  • Total voters
    4

raharris1973

Well-known member
I was wondering what would happen to local events and the impending Tet offensive if the territory of South Vietnam/RVN and its airspace and surrounding waters right up to the six mile nautical limit as they existed at one minute past midnight Saigon time on Jan 24, 1968 was shifted back in time to the same moment on January 24, 1940?

This is one week, seven days, before the Jan 31st launch of the country-wide Tet Offensive by the Communist side. Now both sides, the VC/NVA, and the ARVN/USA/Allied coalition, are orphaned in a world that isn't their own, that doesn't care about them and isn't helping them. This will become pretty clear during the week before the offensive starts.

The VC/NVA will see they have no Ho Chi Minh trail support network, no base camps across the border in Cambodia, Laos or northern Vietnam, no reinforcements or commands or radio signals or couriers coming from across the border, just Cambodian and Laotian wilderness, local peasants and populations who insist its 1940, the odd French administrator and flag, and if you search really hard, and know the right passwords, the odd Communist sympathizer, who also insists it is 1940.

The US forces will find they have no reinforcements/replacements coming in from the outside world, no external US authorities who recognize them, no air support from the South China Sea except from vessels within the six nautical mile limit, no air support from Thailand, no friendly operatives or agents or diplomats in Laos or Cambodia. They also have no ammunition deliveries, POL, or other supplies coming in from the USA or anywhere else they expect.

The ARVN and its ruling elite living in an artificially bloated economy have no continued flow of US funds of 1968 American and East Asian consumer goods.

Meanwhile, France will be disturbed to hear about the presence of a huge American Army and native army/armies in the southern part of its Indochina colony. It will be quite a distraction. However, France's, and the western world's, attention is largely riveted to the war with Germany, even though that war has been largely static since the end of the Polish campaign. Another global concern at this time will be the Sino-Japanese war, which reaches closest to Vietnam in Japanese occupied Hainan island, and the faltering Japanese campaign of invasion of Guangxi province.

The country team, consisting of Ambassador Ellsworth Bunker, and the CIA Station Chief, and head of MACV and US Forces, Gen William Westmoreland, will likely try to make contact with Washington, DC. The Roosevelt Administration will be unable to give much practical advice and hardly any practical assistance. The presence of these US forces overseas creates an awkward issue not just for Franco-US relations but for US foreign policy and law generally, being outside the scope of accepted, hemispherically oriented US defense and security policy and neutrality law. The Administration, State, War and Navy Departments however will be intensely interested in any and all information and technology from the future they can gain. Diplomats of other countries in South Vietnam likewise have interest in sharing "news from the future" with their downtime home countries, warning of impending German, Italian, or Japanese invasions for instance.

Some South Vietnamese, and some VC/NVA, on becoming aware that northern Vietnam is still a French colony may each begin to develop plans to "liberate" the north from French colonialism to gain resources and political prestige.

However, besides all these distractions, the VC/NVA and US/ARVN forces are tangled up in a clinch with each other, fighting in close proximity, with the Communist side poised to spring a nationwide General Offensive/General Uprising it hopes can lead to decisive victory in the south. It's rather late to pull back from the brink.

How do things go on Jan 31st, and the days, weeks and months after, in South Vietnam, and around the wider world?
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
I suspect that the North Vietnamese Communists still decide to launch the Tet Offensive, knowing that it's either now or never for them. They know that they will ultimately lose the war due to the disappearance of North Vietnam, not to mention no Communist China and a much more restrained Communist Soviet Union. However, they'll still want to put in as much effort into their final moment of glory as possible in order to win the public relations fight/battle for Vietnamese and Indochinese independence.
 

Buba

A total creep
IMO the Tet Offensive will fall apart. Some prepositioned units will attack - either disregarding the sudden lack of contact with NV or not having any direct contact with it anyway, while some will hold back while they try to sort things out with their peers and immediate superiors.
NVA/Viet-Cong miltary action fails or is rolled back even with lack of air support from outside Vietnam.
Over time the VC is ground down, maybe dropping back to simmering insurgency like Malaya, Phillippines or the South American orcs.

World history is changed completely, starting with no Fall of France. BY '43, maybe '45 - unrecognizeably so.
Is not nominated for President or loses the election, e.g. the withheld information about him being a cripple being disclosed by uptimers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP

WolfBear

Well-known member
IMO the Tet Offensive will fall apart. Some prepositioned units will attack - either disregarding the sudden lack of contact with NV or not having any direct contact with it anyway, while some will hold back while they try to sort things out with their peers and immediate superiors.
NVA/Viet-Cong miltary action fails or is rolled back even with lack of air support from outside Vietnam.
Over time the VC is ground down, maybe dropping back to simmering insurgency like Malaya, Phillippines or the South American orcs.

World history is changed completely, starting with no Fall of France. BY '43, maybe '45 - unrecognizeably so.
Is not nominated for President or loses the election, e.g. the withheld information about him being a cripple being disclosed by uptimers.

Why is there no Fall of France in this TL?
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
And who just "stole" half their Vietnam colony from them?

Yep. Interestingly enough, I can imagine really awkward interactions between 1940 Americans and 1968 Americans, with 1940 Americans possibly becoming even more convinced that getting involved in World War II would be a disaster which will subsequently result in US boys fighting not only Nazis, but also fighting "Mountain Chinamen" in Korea and "Jungle Chinamen" in Vietnam! ;)

(Sorry, I couldn't resist making these offensive jokes. A hillbilly yokel from the 1940 US probably would feel that way about Koreans and Vietnamese, though.)
 

ATP

Well-known member
There is a French embassy in Saigon ...

Indeed.France would knew,and be prepared.And,since they just start getting new planes,tanks,AT guns - they could hold till soviets backstab their german ally.
In that case,we have soviets with more germans,and Central Europe as OTL.

FDR would lost election,USA woud not provoke Japan and join war,at least till 1944.
BUT - they stil get technology,including H bombs probably.If not,knowledge for them.

In that case,USA could mass-produce,let say,M48 tanks,F5 fighters ,M16 rifles etc- and sell them to France and England.In that case,France actually could take on soviets after finishing germans.And win,soviets waited for anybody to liberate them - in 1941 mass surrender becouse of that.

USA with such technology could be still superpower without entering war.
 

raharris1973

Well-known member
How will US forces’ morale react to the sudden end of chances for rotation? Since soldiers were not signed up “for the duration”, the calendar of the “tour” was the fundamental organizing principle of their lives, and now it has been thrown into the trash, along with all their families back in “the world” uptime.

Also how do MACV logisticians, planners, and command staff feel and adapt on figuring out there will be no troop replacements, ammo supplies from the outside, POL supplies, externally supplied rations, and no air support from Thailand or the South China Sea, or any air base outside South Vietnam? Similarly for ARVN forces.

For elites and other groups siding with the USA and Saigon regime, a lot of the upside attraction was material gain and access to 1960s consumer goods and culture. How is their morale when this flow is suddenly stopped?

How is the issue of money and pay dealt with, especially the snarl at South Vietnamese ports. Downtime ships will arrive but will not have buyers they know nor be willing to accept future funny money.
 

raharris1973

Well-known member
Who are the first Vietnamese politicians to try use “future history” as propaganda tool against the downtime French Indochina authorities and for political point scoring with the South Vietnamese population? Viet Cong radio? Or RVN President Thieu?

I could just imagine them telling the French. “Your time is up in Vietnam. You are doomed to be driven from here. You should give the country back to its people. You have much bigger problems at home. The Germans are going to kick your asses and run through Paris in a few months! Watch your back!”

Actually could news of the future get the French to try to peace out of WWII?
 

Buba

A total creep
Many good questions there :)

Morale - of US conscripts in particular - collapses. In the case of many (most?) enlisted their parents haven't met yet ... at least no problem with two copies of same person.

The USA would love to get their hands on all that SF military stuff, but they'd be unhappy about the racially integrated troops, Colored NCOs and even - the horro! the horror! - Officers.
BTW - wouldn't US military personel in RVN outnumber the DT forces?

To add to the fun - let us not forget South Korean and Australian troops ...

Money - yup, definitely an issue. RVN will have to move to some sort of specie supported currency, or have it non convertible. Foreign debt erased, though.

France is IMO simply uncapable of re-conquering RVN, due to tech gap AND facing an impeding German invasion. And likely to lose the north too. The FIC is as good as gone. Which the Good People from the UT embassy will try to ream into DT craniums, arguing that (pretending) to leave on its own accord will garner goodwill, tech etc. from the ISOT-ed Annamites and Cochin-Chinoise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP

raharris1973

Well-known member
I suspect that the North Vietnamese Communists still decide to launch the Tet Offensive, knowing that it's either now or never for them. They know that they will ultimately lose the war due to the disappearance of North Vietnam, not to mention no Communist China and a much more restrained Communist Soviet Union. However, they'll still want to put in as much effort into their final moment of glory as possible in order to win the public relations fight/battle for Vietnamese and Indochinese independence.

Why should the VC have to assume it is now or never for them? The disappearance of north Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia bases, and USSR and CHICOM supplies is any worse for the Communists than the loss of outside money and supply and AirPower is for US-ARVN? RVN whose economy is collapsing? Let me ask you a question. Who was used to living and fighting more austerely, the US or VC side?

Based on World Bank demographics, in 1968, South Vietnam’s population was still 82.5% rural in 1968, and the VC/NLF had dominant political control of that population. RVN only predominated over the urban 17.5%. The VC could be well set to play a long game if they chose to. They might have a shot at winning a short game too, or at least think they do. Or make a negotiation offer, either instead of full on fighting, or alongside it.
 

ATP

Well-known member
Many good questions there :)

Morale - of US conscripts in particular - collapses. In the case of many (most?) enlisted their parents haven't met yet ... at least no problem with two copies of same person.

The USA would love to get their hands on all that SF military stuff, but they'd be unhappy about the racially integrated troops, Colored NCOs and even - the horro! the horror! - Officers.
BTW - wouldn't US military personel in RVN outnumber the DT forces?

To add to the fun - let us not forget South Korean and Australian troops ...

Money - yup, definitely an issue. RVN will have to move to some sort of specie supported currency, or have it non convertible. Foreign debt erased, though.

France is IMO simply uncapable of re-conquering RVN, due to tech gap AND facing an impeding German invasion. And likely to lose the north too. The FIC is as good as gone. Which the Good People from the UT embassy will try to ream into DT craniums, arguing that (pretending) to leave on its own accord will garner goodwill, tech etc. from the ISOT-ed Annamites and Cochin-Chinoise.

Australian troops - they would told their people how british and american let them alone in 1942 facing Japan,so they would be more interested in staing home now.Maybe even gave some tech to England.

South Korean - certainly not come back to Korea.Probably end as mercaneries for South Vietnam goverment.
 

Buba

A total creep
IMO the VC/NVA will collapse, being reduced to a smoldering countryside banditry-political force like various supposedly leftist movements in India, Malaya, South America.
The loss of safe havens in the rest of the ex-FIC and their entire material support will hurt them more than the ARVN because they are a bunch of dudes with guns in the bush, while the Republic of Vietnam is a country. And even if it is a shitty, corrupt country run by crooks it still is a A State. As we all know, God/the Materialist Dialectic is on the side of the Big Battalions.
The NVA/VC launching the Tet Offensive and committing OTL atrocities will break it. Here losses of war materiel will be non replaceable, while loss of popular support will not be overcome by NVA tanks rolling across the 17th Parallel. Whereas South Vietnam will collect taxes, will sell goods abroad (hopefully not too much war materiel will be sold by corrupt generals) and raise money to buy weapons and pay its troops. The NVA/VC can't even fall back on selling opium etc. as they do not have infrastructure nor sales channels - they never needed money making capability as they were bankrolled by the North.
 

Atarlost

Well-known member
Australian troops - they would told their people how british and american let them alone in 1942 facing Japan,so they would be more interested in staing home now.Maybe even gave some tech to England.
That's some serious revisionist mythology there. If you look at the forces fighting and often dying to keep the IJN away from Australia it's mostly Americans and Brits with a significant minority of Dutchmen. There weren't more Brits because the Med had priority through geographic necessity and there weren't more Americans because they were still at the bottom of Pearl Harbor. And there weren't more Dutchmen because there weren't any more Dutchmen.
 

ATP

Well-known member
That's some serious revisionist mythology there. If you look at the forces fighting and often dying to keep the IJN away from Australia it's mostly Americans and Brits with a significant minority of Dutchmen. There weren't more Brits because the Med had priority through geographic necessity and there weren't more Americans because they were still at the bottom of Pearl Harbor. And there weren't more Dutchmen because there weren't any more Dutchmen.

True only about dutchmen.Americans still have their carriers,just like british.They simply do not cared much about Australia.
And if USA send half of Lend-lease which they gave soviet genociders to Australia,they would not need any other help.
But - helping soviet genociders was more important,too.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Actually could news of the future get the French to try to peace out of WWII?

Defending the Ardennes more would be a more sensible strategy here, no? Making peace would ruin France's reputation as the ally and defender of the Polonkadonks (Poles).
 

raharris1973

Well-known member
Defending the Ardennes more would be a more sensible strategy here, no? Making peace would ruin France's reputation as the ally and defender of the Polonkadonks (Poles).

Sure, but by Jan 1940 they have flubbed the latter, and they might be psyched out by all the future news. Especially if it is not compensated by enough future tech and help to get confidence restored.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top