Shame they only got him for manslaughter.
Indiana has a good model for how to level the playing field against illegal searches and seizures by police; lethal self-defense against illegal actions by cops is now legal in the state.
I think some of that law was prompted by the Carmel Police Department deciding to go after and arrest an off-duty State Trooper because he and his car "didn't fit the neighbourhood" with "driving while black" tossed in for fun.Problem is a lot of people have no idea what is legal and what isn't. I don't want my daughter or my little brother being shot because some idiot didn't think they should get a speeding ticket.
A guy, standing still with his hands on his head, is tased, and when that doesn't work, kicked in the back for no reason. Also, my new canned response for anyone saying "Just comply!" They'll beat you anyway.
Society hasn't been polite since the 1960sThat's cop misbehavior and in no way indicative of how polite society should work.
The problem with the police unions isn't a police problem, it's a union problem. The police unions act and are run just like any other union. The cure is to treat them like a union. Call their bluff tell them no. If they go on strike so be it. Call in the State police or the National Guard. It might suck but the Police Unions are not there for us. Just like the UAW isn't there for Ford or GM. They exist for their members.The police unions are a big part of it. Not only do they fight to keep the bad ones, but they also actively try to get rid of the good ones.
No. It's a public sector union problem. No public sector union works well (well, it works well for the unionized, but it's shit for everyone else in society), because unlike private sector unions, there's no pushback from management. In a private sector, the owners/management want to lower costs and keep the company running as well as possible, so there is pushback against union desires, and things work out somewhere in the middle. Meanwhile, with a public sector union, there's little to no desire to cutdown on costs, and worse, if a politician is negotiating, they align in desires of giving unions everything, as the union is a ton of votes. The only pushback will be temporary outrage, which cannot compete with the sustained push of a public sector union.The problem with the police unions isn't a police problem, it's a union problem. The police unions act and are run just like any other union. The cure is to treat them like a union. Call their bluff tell them no. If they go on strike so be it. Call in the State police or the National Guard. It might suck but the Police Unions are not there for us. Just like the UAW isn't there for Ford or GM. They exist for their members.
No. It's a public sector union problem. No public sector union works well (well, it works well for the unionized, but it's shit for everyone else in society), because unlike private sector unions, there's no pushback from management. In a private sector, the owners/management want to lower costs and keep the company running as well as possible, so there is pushback against union desires, and things work out somewhere in the middle. Meanwhile, with a public sector union, there's little to no desire to cutdown on costs, and worse, if a politician is negotiating, they align in desires of giving unions everything, as the union is a ton of votes. The only pushback will be temporary outrage, which cannot compete with the sustained push of a public sector union.
Basically, a public sector union is a cancer that must be completely banned.
Oh, btw:
Congrats drug warriors! This is entirely legal! Remember, cops will just follow horrible orders.