Proposals in Regards to Immigration

Simonbob

Well-known member
Afghans are too culturally incompatible? Even the pro-US ones?

You do realise that the Pro-US faction of Afghans were nortorious for their raping young boys, don't you? One of the Taliban's common tactics was to slip the young boy sex slaves guns, and help them take vengance.

No, you don't want many, if any Afghanies.


 

WolfBear

Well-known member
You do realise that the Pro-US faction of Afghans were nortorious for their raping young boys, don't you? One of the Taliban's common tactics was to slip the young boy sex slaves guns, and help them take vengance.

No, you don't want many, if any Afghanies.



Well, just how many of the Afghans whom we imported are pederasts?
 

Cherico

Well-known member
You do realise that the Pro-US faction of Afghans were nortorious for their raping young boys, don't you? One of the Taliban's common tactics was to slip the young boy sex slaves guns, and help them take vengance.

No, you don't want many, if any Afghanies.



We dont want them but our president wants people to talk shop with so we might be stuck with em...
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
We dont want them but our president wants people to talk shop with so we might be stuck with em...

You sure?





They're mostly unvetted, so nobody knows.

Well, we've got one case so far:


He's a businessman, interesting enough. And a horndog apparently.
 

Simonbob

Well-known member
You sure?

The thing that always stands out in that kind of stuff?

"Want to move refugees to the US?"
"Yes."
"Want them to live next door?"
"No."


People say a lot of things, but often it's only sort of true. "Help the Poor! As long as I don't have to pay for it."


There are some who really mean it, but a bunch don't really care, they just don't want to be seen as "Mean".
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
The thing that always stands out in that kind of stuff?

"Want to move refugees to the US?"
"Yes."
"Want them to live next door?"
"No."
Seems like a lot of virtue signalling is involved in the answers. A lot of people don't have the guts to say no before the interviewer or to doubt their own status as do gooders, but at the same time the rational side of their brains screams that it's a bad idea.
 

TheRomanSlayer

Unipolarity is for Subhuman Trogdolytes
Seems like a lot of virtue signalling is involved in the answers. A lot of people don't have the guts to say no before the interviewer or to doubt their own status as do gooders, but at the same time the rational side of their brains screams that it's a bad idea.
It’s more of a ‘let those peasants deal with the incoming migrants’, since the virtue signallers thought of themselves as elites.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
The thing that always stands out in that kind of stuff?

"Want to move refugees to the US?"
"Yes."
"Want them to live next door?"
"No."


People say a lot of things, but often it's only sort of true. "Help the Poor! As long as I don't have to pay for it."


There are some who really mean it, but a bunch don't really care, they just don't want to be seen as "Mean".

It all depends on what kind of refugees we're talking about here. As in, just how well are they capable of successfully assimilating and integrating. If they're comparable to the Vietnamese and Persians who are already here in southern California, then I'd have no problem with them living next door either.
 

Simonbob

Well-known member
It all depends on what kind of refugees we're talking about here. As in, just how well are they capable of successfully assimilating and integrating. If they're comparable to the Vietnamese and Persians who are already here in southern California, then I'd have no problem with them living next door either.

Yeah, so they're something you have a handle on. I can see that, but the current setup isn't so neat.

The vetting isn't all that good, the borders aren't well run, the people running the system are, well, we all know what they're like.


It's one of the reasons I just want to shut it all down, for a decade, at least.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Yeah, so they're something you have a handle on. I can see that, but the current setup isn't so neat.

The vetting isn't all that good, the borders aren't well run, the people running the system are, well, we all know what they're like.


It's one of the reasons I just want to shut it all down, for a decade, at least.

FWIW, refugees/asylees and illegal immigrants are both not particularly educated:


So, it does make sense to see whether there are safe third countries that can resettle large numbers of them. But we should keep the smart and educated ones for ourselves, of course!
 

Simonbob

Well-known member

WolfBear

Well-known member
So, how will the 3rd World rise, when we take the smartest for ourselves?

Voluntary eugenics. They would still be able to donate their sperm/eggs to other Third Worlders, especially if the West would be willing to subsidize this. For that matter, the West would also be capable of donating its own sperm/eggs to the Third World. I hear that white/European sperm is a hot commodity in Brazil, for instance:


It's similar to asking how exactly Detroit can rise back up when all of the smart people have left Detroit. Well, the remaining population of Detroit simply needs to produce better offspring through a large-scale voluntary eugenics program. Get the students and faculty over at MIT to donate sperm and eggs to Detroit en masse, for instance! Seriously; why not?
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
I fully expect India to have its own little empire this century
But India is struggling so badly with developing because for all practical purposes it already is an empire, the place has 21 official languages FFS, and slightly less than half consider Hindi their first language.

So, how will the 3rd World rise, when we take the smartest for ourselves?
That's the thing, it won't.
It's similar to asking how exactly Detroit can rise back up when all of the smart people have left Detroit. Well, the remaining population of Detroit simply needs to produce better offspring through a large-scale voluntary eugenics program. Get the students and faculty over at MIT to donate sperm and eggs to Detroit en masse, for instance! Seriously; why not?
The irony here is that if such a thing becomes economically, culturally, financially and medically feasible on a large scale, the people willing and able to do it will be, above all, the tech elites and political elites wanting to ensure that their heirs have the brains to keep the family in the business, not the poor and backwards, nevermind the underclass - after all, some of them waste such easy, cheap and already available opportunities to "increase" the mental capacities of their offspring as not doing crack and alcohol while pregnant.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top