Middle East Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

[DarthOne]

Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

A little over a week after Muslims set fire to a total of 21 churches and 40 Christian homes on false accusations of Qur’an desecration by two Christian men comes more news of a Muslim mob swarming a Christian man on accusations of blasphemy. They shot him to death. After the massive publicity...

www.jihadwatch.org

A little over a week after Muslims set fire to a total of 21 churches and 40 Christian homes on false accusations of Qur'an desecration by two Christian men comes more news of a Muslim mob swarming a Christian man on accusations of blasphemy. They shot him to death.

After the massive publicity surrounding the riots, Pakistan made a show of giving out money to Christians who lost their homes. But how sincere was Pakistan, a country infamous for its double games?

Right before the massive anti-Christian rampage, Pakistan had increased its already harsh punishments for blasphemy. This served to further endorse the persecution of Christians, who are the main targets of Pakistan's blasphemy laws. Organized jihad groups have been increasingly targeting Christians and other religious minorities in Pakistan. Among them is the Tehreek-e-Labbaik Party (TLP) Pakistan. Just over a month ago, Pakistan "signed a twelve-point agreement with the TLP "and agreed to book those accused of committing blasphemy and charged with Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code under the Anti-Terrorism Act (1997)."

Pakistan is systematically encouraging the persecution of Christians and other religious minorities.



"Another Christian man killed by a mob of Islamist fundamentalists in Punjab, Pakistan," News Intervention, August 22, 2023:

Days after the radical lslamists ransacked 21 Churches and various other houses of Christian minorities, another Christian man has been killed by a mob of Islamic fundamentalists in Sheikhpura Punjab, Pakistan.
A viral video being circulated on social media, shows a frenzied mob targeting a man named Malik Ijaz, while the gunshots could be heard in the background. The mob barged into his house and vandalized it. They looted and threw the belongings on the road. Later, Ijaz was shot dead.
In addition, a church was also desecrated by the radical Islamists belonging to Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP). They also inscribed phrases related to Allah and Prophet, on the walls of the Church. The erasure of which could potentially incite another blasphemy case.
The Pakistan government has so far failed to stop these acts…..

 

[Zyobot]

Prayers to the victims. May they RIP.

Otherwise, I'm guessing I'm not the only one who thinks that if online news existed back in the Thirties, the reporting on Kristallnacht would've looked something like this.

Really, the way Middle Eastern Muslims react whenever their faith is questioned, I'm counting down the days until Pakistani Hitler shows up and is voted in with much the same enthusiasm. The fact "those types" tend to think highly of Hitler doesn't help, either, so if the next crop of genocidal monsters who take the world by storm are a revanchist Pakistan, that'll hardly surprise me.

 

[DarthOne]

Prayers to the victims. May they RIP.

Otherwise, I'm guessing I'm not the only one who thinks that if online news existed back in the Thirties, the reporting on Kristallnacht would've looked something like this.

Really, the way Middle Eastern Muslims react whenever their faith is questioned, I'm counting down the days until Pakistani Hitler shows up and is voted in with much the same enthusiasm. The fact "those types" tend to think highly of Hitler doesn't help, either, so if the next crop of genocidal monsters who take the world by storm are a revanchist Pakistan, that'll hardly surprise me.

More like try to take the world by storm.

Then again, despite what certain historians and alternative fiction writers will portray, Hitler had no interest in, say, conquering the whole world (*cough* Man in the High Castle *cough* Wolfenstein the New Order *cough*).

Not that it takes away from the hell the Nazis did create and would have done if they'd won.

(I swear, if I see one more moron who claims that 'the good guys lost in 1945' on social media, I'm going to go insane)

 

[Cherico]

Prayers to the victims. May they RIP.

Otherwise, I'm guessing I'm not the only one who thinks that if online news existed back in the Thirties, the reporting on Kristallnacht would've looked something like this.

Really, the way Middle Eastern Muslims react whenever their faith is questioned, I'm counting down the days until Pakistani Hitler shows up and is voted in with much the same enthusiasm. The fact "those types" tend to think highly of Hitler doesn't help, either, so if the next crop of genocidal monsters who take the world by storm are a revanchist Pakistan, that'll hardly surprise me.

You ever wonder why you have anti islamic pogroms in India?

Its because of the anti hindu pogroms in Pakastan, recipicrocity is a thing if people see you mistreat their co religiounists in your country they will respond in kind to your co religionists in time. My money is that the current rather kind treatment of muslums in the west has numbered days and that the islamic world will in time get to find out that having bearded men convert you at gunpoint isnt fun when it happens to you.

 

[49ersfootball]

Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

A little over a week after Muslims set fire to a total of 21 churches and 40 Christian homes on false accusations of Qur’an desecration by two Christian men comes more news of a Muslim mob swarming a Christian man on accusations of blasphemy. They shot him to death. After the massive publicity...

www.jihadwatch.org

Now what in the absolute FUCK ?

 

[ATP]

Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

Pakistan: Muslim mob swarms another Christian, shoots him to death

A little over a week after Muslims set fire to a total of 21 churches and 40 Christian homes on false accusations of Qur’an desecration by two Christian men comes more news of a Muslim mob swarming a Christian man on accusations of blasphemy. They shot him to death. After the massive publicity...

www.jihadwatch.org

He was lucky,they could beat him to death.Or burn.

 

[King Arts]

Damn savages. Why the fuck did we allow Pakistan to pull its ISI shit and help Islamic terrorists, why the hell did we allow them to develop nukes.

 

[Cherico]

Damn savages. Why the fuck did we allow Pakistan to pull its ISI shit and help Islamic terrorists, why the hell did we allow them to develop nukes.

The cold war, as bad as Pakistan can be they were less evil then the soviet union.

 

[Typhonis]

How was Pakistan a check on the USSR?

 

[King Arts]

The cold war, as bad as Pakistan can be they were less evil then the soviet union.

True, though that is a pretty low bar.

How was Pakistan a check on the USSR?

Because India was friendly towards the Soviets.

 

[Cherico]

How was Pakistan a check on the USSR?

We took any ally we could against the Soviets

 

[Blasterbot]

Damn savages. Why the fuck did we allow Pakistan to pull its ISI shit and help Islamic terrorists, why the hell did we allow them to develop nukes.

specifically because India was courting both sides and was communist for a while there. so if India is gonna go commie we back Pakistan. because geopolitics rarely lets you be too picky about who you ally with. After that? either sunk cost fallacy or because we really wanted to invade Iran.

 

[Cherico]

specifically because India was courting both sides and was communist for a while there. so if India is gonna go commie we back Pakistan. because geopolitics rarely lets you be too picky about who you ally with. After that? either sunk cost fallacy or because we really wanted to invade Iran.

India very much is working through a whole lot of their own internal bullshit. You had the british a small island that colonized them and before that you had the hindu majority just being brutalized by islamic invaders who were for a few notable exceptions incredibly cruel.

Thus they have had an independent streak that sees their independence supported but also means they often have few allies. Their big enough to stand on their own but it has backfired on them before.

 

[Simonbob]

There were never many Brit troops in India. They didn't rule by conquering it, they just ran the place on money and better tech, that they were sharing.

Being a Brit colony wasn't even close to the worst thing that could have happened to the Indians.

 

[Cherico]

There were never many Brit troops in India. They didn't rule by conquering it, they just ran the place on money and better tech, that they were sharing.

Being a Brit colony wasn't even close to the worst thing that could have happened to the Indians.

It was still a massive hit to their cultural ego, yes on the whole the brits didn't treat the hindus as badly as the muslums historically did but to be conquered by a tiny island oceans away really does hurt the ego, spending centuries under the thumb of various islamic invaders also hurts.

India has had a really rough time and their independent truely indpendent for the first time in centuries, needing to spend a generation or so decompresing is pretty normal after something like that.

 

[King Arts]

There were never many Brit troops in India. They didn't rule by conquering it, they just ran the place on money and better tech, that they were sharing.

Being a Brit colony wasn't even close to the worst thing that could have happened to the Indians.

Let’s not defend the English the English were among the worst of the colonizers with the only ones who hit lower being the Belgians. The one good thing they did is ending Sati so they did do SOME good. But the French and Spanish ensured that their colonies were better treated and transmitted good values to the locals.

India has fighting between Hindutva, and Islamics, and both oppress christians, and other minorities.

 

[DarthOne]

Let’s not defend the English the English were among the worst of the colonizers with the only ones who hit lower being the Belgians. The one good thing they did is ending Sati so they did do SOME good. But the French and Spanish ensured that their colonies were better treated and transmitted good values to the locals.

India has fighting between Hindutva, and Islamics, and both oppress christians, and other minorities.

Feel free to PM me details of British mishaps in their colonies and Empire. I’m already aware of the Second Boer War atrocities.

 

[Cherico]

Let’s not defend the English the English were among the worst of the colonizers with the only ones who hit lower being the Belgians. The one good thing they did is ending Sati so they did do SOME good. But the French and Spanish ensured that their colonies were better treated and transmitted good values to the locals.

India has fighting between Hindutva, and Islamics, and both oppress christians, and other minorities.

Going to have to disagree on the Spanish they we're real assholes to their colonies easily worse then the Brits, the French did try though give them that

 

[Blasterbot]

Going to have to disagree on the Spanish they we're real assholes to their colonies easily worse then the Brits, the French did try though give them that

yeah but then you had to deal with the french... simply unacceptable if you ask me. Brits were pretty middle of the pack as far as how bad they treated their colonies. they just were better at holding on to them longer than most the rest.

 

[King Arts]

Feel free to PM me details of British mishaps in their colonies and Empire. I’m already aware of the Second Boer War atrocities.

The British did have a few genocides and atrocities. But that's not why I was insulting their colonialism. Again the Romans did atrocities towards the barbarians. The difference is that the Romans improved the lands they conqured. France, Spain, and the English nations were not barbaric after Rome was done. The same can't be said for India which has rape problem on the level of Muslims. Like we are talking about gang rape here.

Video of women attacked in Manipur breaks silence on systematic gang rapes in India

Indians were shocked when social media exposed a mob abusing minority Kuki women. But similar incidents have been happening with impunity for months

www.theguardian.com

Also the polution in the ganges(which is supposed to be holy and people use it to cleanse themselves yet there are dead bodies of people and animals there), worship of cows and feces. Like I can understand Winston's Churchill's statement that Indian religion was abominable. But he does not have room to talk because he was actually in a position to change it. Britian simply oppressed Indians for their race, kept the caste system, and looted the wealth of the nation. They did not uplift the nation. If he was some random person that quote would be at least acceptable. But as an influential person in the British Empire he should be ashamed of himself. The British were in a position of power to educate and help the Indians, yet he did not. Again the only good thing the English did in India was end Sati. But they did nothing else. They even kept the caste system and used it. It was not officially abolished until the Indians left the British.

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

A YouGov poll found 43 per cent of Brits thought the British Empire was a good thing, while 44 per cent were proud of Britain's history of colonialism

www.independent.co.uk

Going to have to disagree on the Spanish they we're real assholes to their colonies easily worse then the Brits, the French did try though give them that

I mean no colonial nations hands are "clean" but again the vast majority of the English colonies were killing off the natives, except for India. Spain did not do that they mixed with the Aztec and Maya. The Spanish did not wipe out the "race" of the natives but they did change and improve their culture. The people in South America stopped having human sacrafice and were Christian. South America has some problems with drug cartels and crimes, but that is not every nation. Also for the most part(except Venezula) the people in South America are not starving to death like the 3rd world. While India does have those problems. Yes India has a higher GDP but China also has a higher GDP than Hungary for example yet the average Hun is richer and more prosperous than the average Chinaman.