Newt Gingrich learns that you can’t mention George Soros on Fox News

ShieldWife

Marchioness
Agreed. One of the most quoted quote by people who believe in the Jew conspiracy is this: To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize
The topic of who we aren't allowed to criticize is very important and it is indicative of who has power in society. Though it doesn't mean that the people you aren't allowed to criticize rule society, it is more likely to mean that your criticism can't run counter to the ideology and agenda of the people in power.

People can criticize Jews in many circumstances. Think about the terrible things that people say about Ayn Rand. The left hates her. For some reason when people say bad things about George Soros it's antisemitism but saying bad things about Ayn Rand it's just common decency. What about saying bad things about Jews in general, like saying that they are greedy, manipulative, control the world - that kind of stuff? Well, if you're a white Christian then obviously you can't say that, because that would make you a Nazi by the left wing narrative. But, what about a non-white person saying such things or a Muslim? In that case they get a pass, like Louis Farrakhan who says stuff as antisemitic as any Nazi but still gets to hang out with the upper echelons of the Democrat Party, including Barack Obama.

One of the big taboos now is the transsexual issue, which people aren't really allowed to discuss freely, not because transsexuals rule the world but because saying the wrong things on the trans issue runs counter to the establishment's narratives.

So we should analyze what topics are taboo, because those taboos are the taboos of the ruling classes, not necessarily the demographic of the ruling class.
 
One of the big taboos now is the transsexual issue, which people aren't really allowed to discuss freely, not because transsexuals rule the world but because saying the wrong things on the trans issue runs counter to the establishment's narratives.

So we should analyze what topics are taboo, because those taboos are the taboos of the ruling classes, not necessarily the demographic of the ruling class.


I guess what's confusing me if why is transsexualality the hill in which Soros and the ruling 1% choose to die on? Even if it's to promote pedophilia (Which I think is the true purpose of the LGBTQ suppory) why? I mean their vices are pretty much an open secret and it's not like anybody can reasonable go after them. Why go through all of this effort just to virtue signal? even if you believe in the Jewish conspiracy, how would promoting the LGBTQ aid in the conquoring of the US? Would it not make more sense to drag the US in a constant state of war while gradually defending the military?
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
Anything that undermines the Logos, and fundamental understandings of gender and identity.

Trans disorders are fundamentally the promotion of mental illness, with the eventual objective of rendering the populace unable to make basic ontological distinctions between sanity and insanity, normalcy and abnormality, male and female, confusion and clarity, right and wrong.

The whole aim-at the most abstract level is to confuse and mash together fundamental dichotomies on which the very basis of reason and morality are built.

They want to rule over confused masses who would not even understand what “male” is, or what “female” is.

Undermine this dichotomies or binaries(notice they’ll use that word in a negative sense a lot), that are the basis for reason and even the most primitive morality-you’ll rule over a populace that is like beasts. Less than beasts, simplistic machines.

That lack any internal reason or compass.
 
Anything that undermines the Logos, and fundamental understandings of gender and identity.

Trans disorders are fundamentally the promotion of mental illness, with the eventual objective of rendering the populace unable to make basic ontological distinctions between sanity and insanity, normalcy and abnormality, male and female, confusion and clarity, right and wrong.

The whole aim-at the most abstract level is to confuse and mash together fundamental dichotomies on which the very basis of reason and morality are built.

They want to rule over confused masses who would not even understand what “male” is, or what “female” is.

Undermine this dichotomies or binaries(notice they’ll use that word in a negative sense a lot), that are the basis for reason and even the most primitive morality-you’ll rule over a populace that is like beasts. Less than beasts, simplistic machines.

That lack any internal reason or compass.


So why not just replace us all with machines and be the last humans on earth? The kind of people your reffering to won't be good doctors. They'll just be more fragile more defective versions of simple machines.
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
So why not just replace us all with machines and be the last humans on earth? The kind of people your reffering to won't be good doctors. They'll just be more fragile more defective versions of simple machines.
Who says the masses need doctors? There will a gamma slave caste and the ruling elites(at least that’s the dream) with their hangers on and staff.

The masses will be reduced to such a level of Unreason, that they will not comprehend much less have the will to remove the iron chains on their necks.
 
Who says the masses need doctors? There will a gamma slave caste and the ruling elites(at least that’s the dream) with their hangers on and staff.

The masses will be reduced to such a level of Unreason, that they will not comprehend much less have the will to remove the iron chains on their necks.


uh the ruling class would need them?
 

ShieldWife

Marchioness
I guess what's confusing me if why is transsexualality the hill in which Soros and the ruling 1% choose to die on? Even if it's to promote pedophilia (Which I think is the true purpose of the LGBTQ suppory) why? I mean their vices are pretty much an open secret and it's not like anybody can reasonable go after them. Why go through all of this effort just to virtue signal? even if you believe in the Jewish conspiracy, how would promoting the LGBTQ aid in the conquoring of the US? Would it not make more sense to drag the US in a constant state of war while gradually defending the military?
Soros and company don’t die on hills. Having a hill to die on is for people on the defensive. The leftist elites aren’t defending, they are conquering society in a most aggressive manner and for the most part they have been winning. Maybe Donald Trump is part of a movement that will stop them, we will see.

So rather than saying transsexualism is a hill to die on, think of it as a hill to take.

Don’t think of an issue to fight over as a weakness to the left, they thrive on strife. They are religious fanatics of sort for a secular religion. They need a constant casus belli to justify their crusade to purify society. They need to find oppressed people to fight for, they need to find heretics to demonize, they need increasingly radical dogmatic claims for people to reject and be declared heretics.

They’ve won so many battles over feminism, gay marriage, accepting promiscuity and abortion. Now they are saying that a bearded muscly man is a woman if he says he is and he should be allowed to compete in women’s power lifting competitions and people who object are Nazis, they’re the Klan, they are haters who wish to destroy anything different from themselves - they are the heretics of the leftist religion.

So having a radical cause to fight for isn’t a drawback for them, that is part of the point.

Above and beyond that, undermining gender roles is a major component of left wing power. Destroy marriage, destroy masculinity and femininity, destroy the family - they undermine one of the main ways that people resist their influence. Destroy the family and children fall more under the influence of government schooling, they are more susceptible to Hollywood indoctrination, they are in greater need of government assistance, the resulting dysfunction makes them more resentful and more likely to support authoritarianism.

They actually do want to drag the USA into a constant state of war, which they do, but they also want social war too, identity politics, and division rather than unity within society.
 
Last edited:

ShieldWife

Marchioness
these people would rule over a palace of rubble than be a merchant with a palace of diamonds?
Yes, I thought that was obvious, remember the riots which they have encouraged have been in their own cities, not the areas the right runs.
The modern Western world is a palace of diamonds and we are merchants there. Even a very poor person living in modern America is almost certain to have shelter, and heat in the winter, coolness in the summer, running water, indoor toilets, clothing, food every day, access to fresh meat, access to sweet drinks, hot food, cold desserts, fresh fruit, vegetables, refined sugar, and all more or less on demand and every day. In the past, a person who had all of that stuff was called a king. Even with the USA’s messed up health care system, poor people can still get numerous life saving medical treatments that even emperors couldn’t have a century ago.

In the first world, we have basically eliminated poverty, aside from a few mentally ill or pathologically self destructive people who create their own bad conditions. Oh sure, there is still wealth inequality, and having less money is a disadvantage to be sure. But in modern America, we have fat poor people. In fact, poor people are more likely to be fat. In the past, through out the entire history of human civilization, to be poor meant that you had trouble feeding yourself and your family. You had trouble getting clothes or shelter to protect you from the elements. You might have to do terrible things to survive. The people we call poor aren’t poor in any sense that the majority of humans through out the millennia would recognize. They are just less rich. In fact, in the USA, the worst thing about being poor is probably the fact that so many poor people misbehave and as a poor person you’re probably surrounded by them.

So, we do live in diamond palaces, with the addition of modern marvels that no one of the past could dream of. What does the left want to do living in such opulence and prosperity? Burn it down! So maybe a few of them might rule over the ashes.
 
Last edited:
The modern Western world is a palace of diamonds and we are merchants there. Even a very poor person living in modern America is almost certain to have shelter, and army’s in the winter, coolness in the summer, running water, indoor toilets, clothing, food every day, access to fresh meat, access to sweet drinks, hot food, cold desserts, fresh fruit, vegetables, refined sugar, and all more or less on demand and every day. In the past, a person who had all of that stuff was called a king. Even with the USA’s messed up health care system, poor people can still get numerous life saving medical treatments that even emperors couldn’t have a century ago.

In the first world, we have basically eliminated poverty, aside from a few mentally or pathologically self destructive people who create their own bad conditions. Oh sure, there is still wealth inequality, and having less money is a disadvantage to be sure. But in modern America, we have fat poor people. In fact, poor people are more likely to be fat. In the past, through out the entire history of human civilization, to be poor meant that you had trouble feeding yourself and your family. You had trouble getting clothes or shelter to protect you from the elements. You might have to do terrible things to survive. The people we call poor aren’t poor in any sense that the majority of humans through out the millennia would recognize. They are just less rich. In fact, in the USA, the worst thing about being poor is probably the fact that so many poor people misbehave and as a poor person you’re probably surrounded by them.

So, we do live in diamond palaces, with the addition of modern marvels that no one of the past could dream of. What does the left want to do living in such opulence and prosperity? Burn it down! So maybe a few of them might rule over the ashes.


this is like a twilight zone episode where a self-proclaimed king realizes he's essentially a king of rubble and screams into the empty night as he realizes he's essentially alone and starving.
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
this is like a twilight zone episode where a self-proclaimed king realizes he's essentially a king of rubble and screams into the empty night as he realizes he's essentially alone and starving.
Ah but don’t you see, that king will be “liberated” he will be “free”!
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Because to them, lording over machines is nowhere near as fulfilling as twisting, breaking and destroying actual humans. Power is a drug to them, power to destroy what is good and inocent. It's why these elites are so into pedophilia.

Don't forget that there is also the 'playing god' element.

If you can tell all of society what is right, what is wrong, what you can do, what you cannot do, and who gets to live and die, then you have functionally become one of the god-kings of antiquity.

A lot of these people want to be Stalin or Mao, as a god unto mere mortals.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Don't forget that there is also the 'playing god' element.

If you can tell all of society what is right, what is wrong, what you can do, what you cannot do, and who gets to live and die, then you have functionally become one of the god-kings of antiquity.

A lot of these people want to be Stalin or Mao, as a god unto mere mortals.

thing is there can only be one stalin or Mao in the system they want to create the vast vast majority of the 'revolutionaries' will be purged.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
thing is there can only be one stalin or Mao in the system they want to create the vast vast majority of the 'revolutionaries' will be purged.

Yes, but a certain level of arrogance and self-absorption is part-and-parcel to believing in these worldviews. 'The world was such a crappy place, until I came along to fix it.'

Obama is an excellent example. He somehow expected being in the White House to somehow make everything better, even though he didn't have a clue what he was doing 3/4ths of the time, and most of the rest was actively working against American interests.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top