Election 2020 Nevada Democrats Push To Make ‘Emergency’ 2020 Election Changes Permanent

[DarthOne]

Nevada Democrats Try To Make 'Emergency' Election Changes Permanent

Nevada Democrats are ramming through legislation to make last year's so-called 'emergency' pandemic voting procedures permanent.

thefederalist.com

Nevada Democrats are ramming through legislation to make last year’s chaotic “emergency” voting procedures permanent.
On Wednesday, the Democrat-controlled General Assembly approved a measure that would legalize ballot harvesting and make universal mail-in voting a permanent fixture of elections, both changes that were initially implemented to be temporary last year.

Assembly Bill 321, now moving on for consideration in the upper chamber, requires registered voters to opt out rather than opt in to receiving a mail-in ballot. The law sets up ballots to be sent out automatically as they were in the fall, where nearly all votes cast were by mail, according to the Nevada Secretary of State’s office.

Former Nevada Lt. Gov. Mark Hutchison said the potential changes threaten to undermine already battered faith in the state’s elections, which in 2020 saw confirmed cases of ballots cast by deceased voters. The Trump campaign charged 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, but subsequent investigations by local media and the Nevada secretary of state’s office, run by a Republican, did not find evidence to corroborate that number.
The potential legalization of ballot harvesting, Hutchison said, which was supposed to be a temporary rule change pushed by Democrat Gov. Steve Sisolak in the name of a public health emergency, will erode confidence in subsequent contests.

“Last year’s pandemic-inspired changes have damaged the faith many Nevadans had in the electoral process,” Hutchison said in a Thursday statement. “Democrats and Governor Sisolak promised mailing unsolicited ballots and allowing paid partisan staffers to go door-to-door collecting strangers’ ballots would only be for emergencies, and less than a year they are going back on their word.”

The Nevada state Senate is also considering a bill to allow straight-ticket voting, which would offer residents the option to check a box for a particular party to automatically vote for each candidate of the chosen slate. This would set Nevada apart from the rest of the nation in moving away from what has become an outdated method to cast ballots.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, only six states offered voters the choice to vote by straight-ticket, while legislators in 16 others abolished the practice over the last two decades.

As Nevada lawmakers moved to make pandemic changes dictating elections permanent, Republican Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel railed the effort as “a recipe for disaster.” Mistakes in last year’s contest provoked an avalanche of litigation including ballots sent to outdated addresses.


Nevada, where President Joe Biden won by fewer than 34,000 votes, was one of the final states to certify the winner of its six electoral votes.

In Nevada, Democrats want to make permanent some of the worst practices they forced on voters during the pandemic: *Universally mailing out live ballots *Partisan ballot harvesting *A box at the top of ballot for straight party ticket voting We are fighting back. (1/4)



Ronna McDaniel

@GOPChairwoman
Codifying these practices is a recipe for disaster. It is reported that in 2020, 20% of mail ballots in Clark County were sent to outdated addresses, leading to hundreds of thousands of unclaimed live ballots statewide. (2/4)

And that is the sound of my utter lack of surprise. The Dems/Uniparty is either really confident or really desperate.

 

[Rocinante]

Nevada Democrats Try To Make 'Emergency' Election Changes Permanent

Nevada Democrats are ramming through legislation to make last year's so-called 'emergency' pandemic voting procedures permanent.

thefederalist.com

And that is the sound of my utter lack of surprise. The Dems/Uniparty is either really confident or really desperate.

Not surprised at all they're trying to make their cheating legal

 

[Clanner Moment]

Then the state should be taken to court if it passes.
This is also a teachable moment for how to maintain control after taking power. I recall reading that NV dem party leadership was hijacked by Bernie Bros recently with all the disruption that entails. This is the closes thing to an opening non-dems have.

 

[DarthOne]

Then the state should be taken to court.
This is also a teachable moment for how to maintain control after taking power.

And what court will actually hear it? The Supreme Court? The same one that did nothing during the election?

 

[bintananth]

Not surprised at all they're trying to make their cheating legal

What cheating?

Damn near every case challenging the validity of the last election or accusing fraud was tossed out by the courts as being baseless. I wouldn't be surprised if about half of the Judges who said "this accusation is BS" were Republicans.

Voter fraud in the US is so rare that a random person you've never met before is several times more likely to have been hit by lightning than to have committed voter fraud.

 

[Zachowon]

What cheating?

Damn near every case challenging the validity of the last election or accusing fraud was tossed out by the courts as being baseless. I wouldn't be surprised if about half of the Judges who said "this accusation is BS" were Republicans.

Voter fraud in the US is so rare that a random person you've never met before is several times more likely to have been hit by lightning than to have committed voter fraud.

I mean...
Are you ignoring the huge a,mounts found in AZ, how the dems are trying to stop the audit in GA? The amount of ones they found in NH? The list goes on buddy.

Oh, cant forgetSteven Crowder proving fake addresses in AZ.... or was it NV. ANYWAY he went and proved fake voters

 

[bintananth]

I mean...
Are you ignoring the huge a,mounts found in AZ, how the dems are trying to stop the audit in GA? The amount of ones they found in NH? The list goes on buddy.

Oh, cant forgetSteven Crowder proving fake addresses in AZ.... or was it NV. ANYWAY he went and proved fake voters

I am not. I'm saying that, once you really dig into the details of the accusation, it's almost always someone seeing smoke where there is no fire.

Am I happy with all the returns? No. I will say that the ones with proveable errors are enough of an outlier that I'm not going to lose sleep worring about them.

 

[Zachowon]

I am not. I'm saying that, once you really dig into the details of the accusation, it's almost always someone seeing smoke where there is no fire.

Am I happy with all the returns? No. I will say that the ones with proveable errors are enough of an outlier that I'm not going to lose sleep worring about them.

So Steven Crowder, who only did a fraction of the fake voters in AZ and MI, and could have spent who weeks going through them all, is not enough to show there was fraud?
What about the dems trying to prevent this from happening? Like how Fulton County GA hired the 2 best defense lawyers in the state tk help prevent an Audit...

 

[Terthna]

I am not. I'm saying that, once you really dig into the details of the accusation, it's almost always someone seeing smoke where there is no fire.

Am I happy with all the returns? No. I will say that the ones with proveable errors are enough of an outlier that I'm not going to lose sleep worring about them.

What's your criteria for a "provable error", and can you give any specific examples?

 

[bintananth]

So Steven Crowder, who only did a fraction of the fake voters in AZ and MI, and could have spent who weeks going through them all, is not enough to show there was fraud?
What about the dems trying to prevent this from happening? Like how Fulton County GA hired the 2 best defense lawyers in the state tk help prevent an Audit...

The ones looking into this didn't need to convince us. They needed to convince a Judge, which is much more difficult.

I'm willing to give a Judge the benefit of a doubt when they say "NOPE!"

 

[Zachowon]

The ones looking into this didn't need to convince us. They needed to convince a Judge, which is much more difficult.

I'm willing to give a Judge the benefit of a doubt when they say "NOPE!"

......
Crowder went to the fucking elections office and they straight up denied his evidence because "We checked" and he had video evidence.

THEY ARE DENYING THE FUCKING TRUTH!

 

[bintananth]

What's your criteria for a "provable error", and can you give any specific examples?

The last election for President of my neighbourhood's HOA. The sitting President tried to rig it so she wouldn't be re-elected. She "messed up" and "forgot" to include herself on the list of candidates. She still won as a near-unanimous write-in because no one else wants the job.

......
Crowder went to the fucking elections office and they straight up denied his evidence because "We checked" and he had video evidence.

THEY ARE DENYING THE FUCKING TRUTH!

We're not the ones who need to be convinced.

 

[Zachowon]

The last election for President of my neighbourhood's HOA. The sitting President tried to rig it so she wouldn't be re-elected. She "messed up" and "forgot" to include herself on the list of candidates. She still won as a near-unanimous write-in because no one else wants the job.


We're not the ones who need to be convinced.

When they were thrown out and not even looked at..
I don't think people could be this hard headed...
The cases were thrown out because they didn't want to be responsible for deciding the election.
Yet now we have ALL these states showing there was fraud...and a JUDGE EVEN SAID FOR THER FULTON COUNTY AUDIT TO HAPPEN BECAUSE HE WAS CONVINCED.

 

[Cherico]

When they were thrown out and not even looked at..
I don't think people could be this hard headed...
The cases were thrown out because they didn't want to be responsible for deciding the election.
Yet now we have ALL these states showing there was fraud...and a JUDGE EVEN SAID FOR THER FULTON COUNTY AUDIT TO HAPPEN BECAUSE HE WAS CONVINCED.

Its often harder to help some one realize they have been duped then to dupe them.

 

[DarthOne]

Its often harder to help some one realize they have been duped then to dupe them.

Yeah and you're a prime example buddy.

 

[Cherico]

Yeah and you're a prime example buddy.

explain further.

 

[Battlegrinder]

A significant number of "fraud" cases where thrown out as meritless, or lacking standing, or whatever other excuse the courts could come up with to avoid any appearance of tampering with the election, for reasons ranging from the courts feeling its not thier job to knowing the democrats would start a long term campaign to destroy the judicial system if they did. But another reason was that many suits were in fact baseless and raised by people with no standing to sue.

Even know, months later, there is evidence of errors, mistakes, and perhaps even malicious fraud in a few cases, but there is not evidence of the sort of systemic, organized conspiracy that the fraud narrative requires. There was a clearly coordinated effort to implement the sorts of measures the OP article is discussing in order to tilt the odds in the Democrat's favor, and we know that because they've outright admitted to doing it, but fraud is another thing.

As I've since the start of this "issue", pushing the fraud narrative is tactically a bad idea regardless of if you believe in it, because the sort of undeniable, smoking gun evidence needed to convince skeptics doesn't exist. It didn't exist then, and if it ever did, it's long gone by now. What we should be doing is, as the OP notes, ensuring that temporary changes from 2020 remain temporary, and that going forward the voting system is forties against any future tampering attempts.

Relitigating 2016 didn't work for the democrats (in terms of convincing people that were not already democrats to become democrats) and that was something pushed through every media and cultural channel they had. The right is in a much worse position on that front, so reiterating 2020 is assuredly not a good idea.

 

[DarthOne]

explain further.

Given all the various evidence out there, either America's elections are handled by blithering idiots who can't find their own behinds. Or the Uniparty/Democrats/RINO's rigged the election.

And given how elements of the government don't even want to consider looking into these issues and are actively taking steps to ensure that the last-minute 'temporary emergency measures' that were put in place become permanent, I'm heavily leaning towards 'it was done on purpose'.

 

[DarthOne]

The Hidden Agenda Part 1: H.R.1 inspired legislation state-by-state

LAA's Research Group exposes attempts to pass dangerous elements of HR1 through state legislatures.

lookaheadamerica.org

Click here to view the full report here.
Today, the Look Ahead America (LAA) Research Group released a list of over 563 attempts to pass dangerous elements of HR1 through state legislatures.
Matt Braynard, Executive Director of LAA, made the following statement:
While H.R.1, the dangerous and unconstitutional so-called “election reform” bill has been blocked in the US Senate, our Research Group made a startling discovery: progressives in state legislatures are introducing hundreds of bills that mimic H.R.1.
We are rallying our volunteers and fellow patriots to make sure their state representatives know that attempts to tamper with election integrity by passing H.R.1 through the back door isn’t going unnoticed.

The LAA Research Group has published and will continue to update the list of H.R.1-type legislation being introduced in state legislatures at LAA Identifies Back-Door Attempt to Pass HR1 – Look Ahead America.

Some noteworthy examples include:
MASSACHUSETTS: Mandatory voting for all state citizens, with a $15 tax penalty for not voting. Citation: H 765
WEST VIRGINIA: Remove felonies as a reason to disqualify voting. Citation: H.B. 2864
TEXAS: Under 18 Registration and Inmates Voting. Citation: S.B. 1899
ARIZONA: Removes penalties for ballot harvesting. Citation: S.B. 1671
ALABAMA: Inmate identification card valid form of ID to vote absentee, Sec. 17-9-30 amended. Citation: H.B. 38
VIRGINIA: Constitutional amendment (first reference) 16-year-olds permitted to vote in local elections. Citation: HJR 551

 

[Cherico]

Given all the various evidence out there, either America's elections are handled by blithering idiots who can't find their own behinds. Or the Uniparty/Democrats/RINO's rigged the election.

And given how elements of the government don't even want to consider looking into these issues and are actively taking steps to ensure that the last-minute 'temporary emergency measures' that were put in place become permanent, I'm heavily leaning towards 'it was done on purpose'.

I think there is a misunderstanding, I was not insulting Zack for his statement I was consoling him because it is honestly hard to reach some people, I've looked at the mathmatical formulas and the cheating is pretty obvious from a statisical standpoint.