Modern Food Controversies! The Food Pyramid, Seed Oils, Corn Syrup, the 'F' in FDA, Processed Foods and More!

hyperbole doesn't help your case.
First off, that is literally title of the documentary.

Second off, it is not hyperbole.
obesity-trends-giant.jpg

nina-teicholz-27.jpg



280 000 to 380 000 obesity-related deaths per year just in the United States:
(And note - this is just obesity-related-deaths, not excess-weight-related-deaths).

Dietary guidelines were introduced in February 1980:

2025 to 1980 is 45 years... that means that USDA had caused anywhere between 12,6 million and 17,1 million excess deaths. That is... not that far off from what the Nazis did:

So to sum it up, government WILL genocide you even when it is trying to help you.
 
Last edited:
The food pyramid hasn't been active policy for over a decade.
It still matters, because:
  1. it is still the most widely known
  2. it formed the principles which still inform the dietary decision-making
  3. MyPlate is basically a Food Pyramid redux. I mean, just look at some of the recommendations that accompany it: "Make half your plate fruits and vegetables", "Switch to 1% or skim milk", "Make at least half your grains whole", and "Vary your protein food choices.".
 
It still matters, because:
  1. it is still the most widely known
  2. it formed the principles which still inform the dietary decision-making
  3. MyPlate is basically a Food Pyramid redux. I mean, just look at some of the recommendations that accompany it: "Make half your plate fruits and vegetables", "Switch to 1% or skim milk", "Make at least half your grains whole", and "Vary your protein food choices.".

All of those are considered "good ideas" excepting the skim milk shit. You can't get all of your protein from just 1 single source ffs, rabbit starvation is a thing.

Weren't you the one screaming about what pre-historic people ate? More than half of that was gathered. And what was gathered? Fruits, vegetables, and grains.
 
All of those are considered "good ideas" excepting the skim milk shit. You can't get all of your protein from just 1 single source ffs, rabbit starvation is a thing.
Depends.
1) "Make half the plate fruits and vegetables" is not a good idea for everyone. Modern-day fruits are sugar bombs - I had already posted an article on how zoo animals are getting diabetes from the sugary fruit they are being fed. And majority of modern people have some type of metabolic syndrome, so... yeah. You have to watch what fruits you are eating - eating blueberries and such may be a good idea, gorging on bananas, not really. Even apples may be a problem, considering how different they are from natural apples.
2) Switching to skim milk is, as you note, a terrible idea.
3) Making at least half the grains whole is not necessarily a good idea, because grain bran is literally where all the toxins are. Most of the arsenic in rice is located in the bran, and wheat bran has huge concentrations of glyphosate (though that is a consequence of spraying, not something occuring naturally). Of course, bran is also where all the nutrients other than calories are, so... YMMV.
4) Vary your protein food choices can be a good idea, depending on person and depending on what is exactly meant by the "protein food choices" phrase. Maybe I am paranoid, but why didn't they write "vary your animal food choices"?

As for rabbit starvation, that is literally an issue of too much protein and not enough fat. You can eat meat and nothing else, and so long as you get enough fat in, rabbit starvation won't be a problem. Basically, eating beef or other fatty cuts of meat alone is perfectly fine, but if you are predominantly eating lean meats such as chicken breast and similar, you will need to supplement that with fat - be it lard, butter, olive oil, or something else.

-----------------------------



Summary (my commentary is in the brackets):
  1. Incidence of diabetes and obesity are skyrocketing, and especially among the children. In fact, obesity rates among the children had tripled in the last 30 years - and they were already insane to begin with (and keep in mind, documentary was produced - or at least uploaded - in 2017).
  2. People do not have to have diabetes and obesity to have a metabolic syndrome. In fact, both of these are the end stages of the metabolic disease. And 70% of US tax dollars are being spent on treating said syndrome.
  3. Portion sizes too had dramatically increased. When you look at a plate on paintings of the Last Supper by Leonardo, plates are small. (Although, I have to ask, how much of this increase is because food today is less satisfying?)
  4. Dr. Keyes falsified his Seven Country Study. The study had "shown" that countries with highest fat consumption also had the highest rate of heart disease. But... he started with 22 countries, and then removed all the countries that had detracted from his hypothesis. Nevertheless, his study led to governments all over recommending large carb intake.
  5. In 1977, US Senator George McGovern (awesome name, BTW) led the effort to make the government adopt the new dietary guidelines. Soon after the USDA publicly supported the new carb-heavy diet. Suddenly, bread, pasta, potatoes and rice were considered essential basis of the diet while fat became a boogeyman. And that despite the fact that in the 1960s these foods were considered uniquely fattening (and for centuries had been used by peasants to fatten up animals for slaughter).
  6. Grains, whole or refined, trigger elevated insulin response. This causes hunger, but also overloads pancreas. And they also trigger inflammation, which is what leads to thickening the blood and creation of the plaque.
  7. Campaigns for doctors to wash hands between procedures (Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis) and to wear seat belts both produced positive results. But when in 1977 the FDA released new dietary guidelines, recommending everyone to consume more carbs and less fat, positive results were... missing. Not only that, but we got very rapid influx of negative results. Over the next 30 years, diabetes rates had quadrupled, hypertension climbed steadily, obesity rates have skyrocketed, and the metabolic syndrom had become commonplace. And the fact all of this had happened after the introduction of new guidelines is hardly an accident.
  8. Dietary guidelines had never been tested for how well they work.
  9. Refined carbs and sugar had been around since forever (white bread existed in Roman times, and they used grape juice as a sweetener). But where before you could easily notice what was sugary and what was not, today, basically all foods except meat had been turned into sweets. All processed foods have added sugars or sweeteners, and majority of processed foods are based on grains and thus inherently high in sugar (called "carbohydrates" on the label). And even with foods that do not have sugar naturally, sugar is often added to them (seriously, you have to read the label on the bloody bacon to make sure it doesn't have sugar!).
  10. But that wasn't the start. In 1973, Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz initiated the corporate-friendly agricultural policy which subsidized the production of corn and grain. This combined with the long-lasting campaign against dietary fat led to prominence a new and exciting product: the High Fructose Corn Syrup. Fear of fat and the new low-fat food culture permeating every aspect of life (and grocery stores) meant that substitute had to be made in order to ensure food remained tasty, and HFCS was an obvious choice. Today, nearly every single processed food has either sugar, HFCS, or more often both, present as ingredients in it - without this added sweetness, low-fat food tastes like crap.
  11. And of course, increased consumption of sugar in its various forms (be it simple sugars or various carbohydrates) has its consequences. Where fat is quite sating and suppresses hunger signals, sugar (and its variants) has the opposite effect - it causes hunger and opens up the apetite. This leads to more eating, which leads to more hunger, which leads to even more eating... with the result that now we have the obesity epidemic.
  12. Between 1945 and 1975, fructose consumption had doubled, and by 1995 consumption was triple of what it was in 1945. Generation born in the late 1970s and early 1980s was the first generation to have the High Fructose Corn Syrup prenatally. And this basically led the kids to have HFCS addiction. Basically, if mother eats junk food, child will be born already addicted to said junk food.
  13. 80% of food products sold in the grocery stores contain added sugars or high fructore corn syrup (and just to note, many of the remaining 20% contain either stevia or artificial sweeteners, which is even worse). But food culture in general has led to most people thinking of processed carbohydrates as the primary source of nutrition.
  14. Oh, and when people see ads for food, they eat more food. Monkey see, monkey eat. "Eyes bigger than stomach" is an expression for a reason, and is in the full display now. Even adults cannot really escape it, and children of course are even more vulnerable. Ge them addicted as kids, and they'll eat your garbage as adults as well. So naturally, much of the advertisement is targeted at the kids, deliberately undermining role of the parent in raising the child.
  15. Pace of modern life means that cooking at home is rarely an option (going carnivore quite simplified this particular issue for me BTW as most of my meals have literally one ingredient now) and so vending machines, drive-throughs and packaged meals became basically a necessity. This convenience however is a major issue as people not only don't really know what they are eating, exactly, but can in fact eat without even paying attention to the fact that they are eating in the first place. From what used to be a family ritual, eating has become quite a mindless activity.
  16. Modern diet means that people are carb-loading like professional athletes, but then not exercising like professional athletes. And even for the athletes, benefits of carb-loading may in fact be a myth. Mark Sisson, an endurance tri-athlete, had his health and life ruined by carb-loading. Sami Inkine became pre-diabeting while training 12 hours a week as a top-level tri-athlete. While athletes may benefit from carbohydrates in short events, that is mostly simply because modern diet predisposes us to be carb-adapted. Shawn Baker, a major carnivore diet proponent, is also a champion indoor rower who holds the world record in his age group.
  17. People eat a lot of junk food because it is cheaper. And yes, a piece, a pound or even a calorie of junk food may be cheaper than a natural equivalent, especially if we are talking meat. But that doesn't mean junk food is actually cheaper, as junk food has a lot of hidden costs. Majority of health care costs could in fact be avoided if people started eating healthier, and then there are also environmental costs of packaging, processing, disposal etc. Economic burden of just Type 2 diabetes now exceeds the economic burden of tobacco by 50 billion USD. Average American spends 6 000 USD a year on food - and 8 000 USD a year on medical bills. (And I will note here that even the direct costs do not have to be higher on a healthy diet: junk food is designed to keep you eating, to never leave you satisfied. So while pound of beef may be more expensive than a pound of fries, pound of fries will leave you hungry much sooner. What this means is that it is not a pound of beef vs a pound of fries, but a pound of beef vs a pound of fries + coca-cola + burger + tomato sauce + bread and cheese. My own food expenses decreased after going carnivore).
  18. According to USDA, 23,5 million people in the US live in the so-called "food deserts". These are urban neighbourhoods or rural towns served by fast foods or convenience stores instead of supermarkets and grocery stores. And due to income, for many people there the low quality food seems to be the only choice. (You can in fact have a healthy diet in McDonalds if you watch what you eat, but how many people are going to do that?)
  19. Food is also deliberately designed to encourage overeating. Turns out, if you give people a plate of differently-colored M&Ms (TF are those?), they end up eating half as many again (so 1,5 times the amount) they would have if these had all been the same color. And amount of food also increases with the number of people in proximity - person will eat 30% more food if they are in company with one other person, but 90% more if he is surrounded by seven more people. What is more, amount of food consumed also increases with increase in different types of food. When eating only meat, only almonds, only apples... we get sick of the taste soon and stop. But when eating multi-flavored meal, different flavors and textures provide relief from one another and thus encourage overeating.
  20. Packaged snacks are specifically designed to be extra palatable. Humans love fat, salt, sugar and crunchy texture - and so most of processed and especially fast foods combine at least three or sometimes four of these. (Take chips or french fries: they have fat (fried in fat or oil), salt (salted), sugar (made from potatoes which are high in carbs) and of course crunchy texture due to frying). This combination of flavors is a big factor in causing the addiction, "tickling" the hippotalamus to the point where you can't stop eating, where natural foods have simple tastes which actually reduce the number of calories it takes to feel full.
  21. But modern food products are not only psychologically addictive. They are also chemically addictive. In fact, brain scans of drug addicts and sugar addicts are virtually identical. Much like heroin, sugar also strongly activates dopamine receptors. Combine this sense of pleasure with increased hunger after eating sugar and increase in insulin secretion (to rid blood of excess sugar, which then causes sugar crash and hunger), and sugary foods easily trap us in a vicious cycle of overeating followed by hunger followed by even more overeating. Rinse and repeat again. And everybody trying to give up sugar (or high-carb foods) will tell you that it really is like a withdrawal.
  22. And this is the reason why modern dietary advice fails. It says that you have to reduce calories but can keep eating all the same foods. (And I have to note here that once you have gotten carb addiction, best way is to go keto or, even better, carnivore. You don't cure an alcohol addict by allowing him one glass of wine a day - because he will not be able to stay at that one glass. Nor will you tell someone smoking two packs of cigarettes a day to just reduce it to one cigarette a day. If you had gotten addicted, the only option is to quit entirely).
  23. All of this is basically by intent. Food industry wants you hungry and addicted, because it increases their profits. Modern processed food in particular is specifically designed to maximize the effect of addiction and minimize satiety (and if you don't believe it, just read the damn labels). This is why processed foods are so carb-heavy. High levels of carbohydrates in food lead to high levels of insulin production by the body - and insulin blocks the leptin, satiety hormone, from being received by the body. This has the effect of preventing us from realizing we are, in fact, full, so we just keep eating. (And this has major implications for people with insulin resistance or diabetes. Basically, what medicine does today is giving insulin shots - but this leads to increased levels of insulin in the body, which means less leptin, which means more hunger, which means more overeating and more sugar, which means even more insulin as it is responsible for managing that sugar... all of this leads to a downward spiral of increasing insulin resistance. The only possible way of avoiding that is to avoid carbohydrates - which means going onto ketogenic or even carnivore diet, depending on how bad the problem is. And majority of people in the modern Western world likely have a degree of insulin resistance). Once cells have enough energy however, insulin's job is to store the excess blood sugar as fat. For most people this manifests as a "middle aged pudge" or "dad bod". But this isn't a sign of aging, it is a sign of failing health, failing metabolism and increasing leptin and insulin resistance.
  24. Above is also why the "eat less and exercise more" advice has failed, and will continue to fail. Sure, you may use it to drop weight - but you will feel miserable and sooner or later, your willpower will fail. Not to mention, that advice can only really be given by people who have never worked out in their life. You know what happens after a workout? You get hungry, because body needs to replenish not just the energy but also the key nutrients spent. (Even worse, for a carb-adapted organism, this hunger gets ravenous. Back when I was on a high-carb / standard Western diet, I would get points - especially post-exercise - when I literally couldn't think from how hungry I would be. Now I am on a carnivore diet, I forget to eat. In fact, just recently, I got myself some stomach pain because I had failed to realize that I hadn't eaten for two whole days, and once I did realize it, I ate too much!). So after the exercise, it is natural to simply eat more - the exact opposite of what the people aiming to lose weight should do. As people who actually know fitness say, "abs are made in the kitchen" - but it is not just abs, but the whole health that is made in the kitchen. A couch potato eating healthy diet will be healthier than an athlete eating crap diet, because you cannot exercise away bad dietary choices.
  25. Impact of food on insulin levels (and thus partly metabolic health) can be measured by glycemic load. Higher the glycemic load, worse the food is (and note that meat and dairy, unless treated with sugar and carbs, has universally low glycemic load and glycemic index, making carnivore diet ideal for people suffering from metabolic diseases such as diabetes. I will also have to note that this is not actually universal: this guide puts apples and carrots as low GL foods, yet both of these leave me extremely hungry). Fruits and fructose are good for athletes looking to replenish energy, but because it readily enters bloodstream and just as readily converts into fat, they are not a good food for people with metabolic disorders, and especially not for people who should lose weight (so 90% of Western population).
  26. Diabetes and high-carb diets increase the risk of developing Alzheimer's - to the point that it is in some circles called the Type 3 diabetes.
  27. Cholesterol was demonized because it was found at places where heart and arteries had been damaged, and it was believed that it was actually causing the damage. In reality, cholesterol is much like pus - a sign, but not the cause, of the underlying problem. Just as the pus is white due to the white blood cells that had come to fight the infection, so the cholesterol in the plaque is there because it is trying to help repair the damage. Same goes for the fat - thought was that if arteries are clogged by fat, and we are getting fat, it must be due to eating fat. But eating fat actually prevents accumulation of fat in the body, as well as the arteries. Blaming cholesterol and fat for clogged arteries is like blaming bandaid for getting cut.
  28. Cholesterol is in fact one of the most important molecules in the body, and body makes some 1200 to 1400 milligrams of it on its own each day. It serves as a precursor for Vitamin D, progesterone, estrogen, testosterone, cortisol, and is also acting as a brain anti-oxidant.
  29. While natural saturated fats are good, trans fats (trans-unsaturated fatty acids) found in margarine, fried foods and frozen dinners definitely harm health.
  30. Fat-rich foods help trigger leptin, thus allowing body to produce and recognize satiety signals and avoid overeating. This means nuts, olive oil, beef, fatty fish.
  31. Generally, one should not eat something that could not be found in nature. But one also needs to keep in mind what causes him specifically to keep eating.
  32. Big food is driven by demand - so if people choose healthy options, industry will respond (too optimistic?). In fact, demand for the low-fat alternatives is what had caused it to be impossible to find healthy, fatty food in the grocery stores.
  33. There are essential fats and essential amino-acids, but not a single essential carbohydrate.
  34. Low carb diet can in fact allow diabetes sufferers to maintain blood sugar levels without medication. (Modern doctors, prescribing the pills for everything, are in fact in violation of the original Hippocratic oath: "I will apply dietetic and lifestyle measures to help the sick to my best ability and judgment; I will protect them from harm and injustice.").
  35. Different people do have different levels of tolerance for carbs, and so may need different levels of dietary modification. But abandoning the Standard American Diet would benefit anybody.
  36. Some proteins and some fats are essential - without eating them, we die. There exists no essential carbohydrate, no essential starch, no essential sugar. You can cut out all carbohydrates from your diet and still be healthy.
 
And even with foods that do not have sugar naturally, sugar is often added to them (seriously, you have to read the label on the bloody bacon to make sure it doesn't have sugar!).
In fairness, preserving pork via sugars is actually a historically longstanding method of preservation when making ham. That's what Honey Cured Ham originated as for instance, preserving and curing pork with honey, which is why some bacon is sweetened, to have a similar flavor of bacon that is cut from honey cured port.
 
In fairness, preserving pork via sugars is actually a historically longstanding method of preservation when making ham. That's what Honey Cured Ham originated as for instance, preserving and curing pork with honey, which is why some bacon is sweetened, to have a similar flavor of bacon that is cut from honey cured port.
Thanks. I guess to me bacon was always "smoke and salt" kinda deal so using sugar on it is basically equivalent to sacrilege.

------



  1. Ketogenic diet had been used to successfully treat epilepsy. Only other options are drugs and brain surgery, and neither is really effective. By contrast, ketogenic diet cures epilepsy a third of the time, makes it manegeable another third, and for last third doesn't work.
  2. Some of the worst health myths:
    1. grains are good for you
    2. fat is bad for you
    3. obesity is merely an energy disbalance disorder (calories in-calories out model)
    4. saturated fat is the cause of heart disease
    5. low fat diet is healthy
  3. Story in fact started in the 1860s with a bunch of religious crazies - specifically the 7th Day Adventist Church and the woman named Ellen White. She was quite high up in the church - one of its co-founders - and was having "premonitions". One day she said that a God came to her and said we shouldn't eat anything with a face. This started the modern-day veganism - while there were other religious groups that were vegetarian, veganism literally didn't exist before then. Oh, and God also told her that coffee and tea were bad.
  4. Later came Vilhjalmur Stefansson. He believed that a vegetable heavy diet was mandatory for good health... until he came to live with the Inuits. There he lived (for six years) on an all-animal diet that was 70% fat, and was healthier than ever before.
  5. John Kellog wrote down some of White's ideas: that masturbation was off-limits, sexual desires were evil, and to stave them off one must never eat meat. To suppress sexual desires, she designed cornflakes.
  6. Salami and all luncheon meats include dextrose, and this dextrose is created by cooking down grains.
  7. Switching from SAD of processed foods and sugary vegetables to vegan diet can bring temporary improvement because it gets rid of most of trash in the standard diet
  8. In 1928, Steffanson subjected himself and his friend to living on an all-meat diet of meat, fish and water, which became the Bellevue study. But Steffanson was provided a meat diet that was excessive in protein and extremely low in fat, and became ill. Nevertheless, when the study concluded, several doctors looked at them and found them to be in perfect health. Dr. Lieb stated that the experiment showed that an all-meat diet had improved health, strenghtened resistance to disease, and Mr. Andersen's hair stopped falling out.
  9. Fat is human body's preferred source of energy - but carbohydrates are typically utilized first as body is trying to get rid of them.
  10. Grains are termed "heart healthy" - but that comes from comparing whole grains to refined grains. If you compare garbage to even worse garbage, of course former will look better!
  11. During 1920s and 1930s, non-starchy non-sugary diets were used to starve out cancer. Otto Warburg discovered that cancer cells are only able to metabolize sugar (glucose), and thus ketogenic diet starves them of resources.
  12. Even fast food was different in 1930s and 1940s. French fries were fried in rendered animal fat (beef tallow), which made them far healthier. In the 1950s however processed foods became more prominent, and in 1955 President Eisenhower had a heart attack. Naturally, because smoking was thought of as healthy, nobody blamed his smoking habits on the heart attack. Eisenhower had smoked four packs of cigarettes a day, but instead, the media blamed saturated fats. Eisenhower quit alcohol and tobacco on his own initiative, but also adopted a low-fat diet.
  13. Cholesterol is a key to body's functioning, and body makes nearly all of cholesterol in the liver - dietary cholesterol is absorbed in small quantities, and when more dietary cholesterol is absorbed, body will simply make less of its own.
  14. Ancel Keys entered the picture just during the uproar about Eisenhower's smoking-induced-fat-blamed heart attack. He concluded that dietary fat (specifically saturated fat) and cholesterol were what caused the heart disease. But Ancel Keys was a politician more than a doctor - he was excellent at persuasion, he had his ideas, and he was not above lying to push them forward.
  15. Keys made the Seven Countries Study to prove that saturated fat and cholesterol caused heart attacks. But what he didn't tell anybody is that this seven-country study was originally a 22-country study. He had cherry-picked his data to fit his hypothesis. Full spread of 22 countries did not prove anything at all. And the seven countries in the study all had issues other than fat in their diets. Keys then got onto the American Heart Association Committee and in one year got them to turn around all the dietary advice. All of this despite the fact that there was no credible evidence to show that saturated fat causes heart disease.
  16. The idea was basically that increased amount of cholesterol in the blood of people with atherosclerosis means that fat causes atherosclerosis. Thus corn oil and other seed oils as well as margarine were declared healthy, because they have no cholesterol.
  17. Later, LDL was declared to be bad.
  18. But correlation is not causation - does cholesterol cause heart disease, or does heart disease lead to high cholesterol?
  19. Turned out that HDL / LDL ratio was more important than absolute values, because it indicated the level of insulin sensitivity and resistance.
  20. Keys' theory was not accepted by everyone however - John Yudkin, British scientist, believed that sugar is the problem. His comparative study of 41 nation has shown that there is an almost exact relationship between consumption of fat and consumption of sugar, especially since many of the sugary foods also contained fats (chocolate, cookies, candies etc.). And this is a problem, since sugar raises insulin - and insulin then causes dietary fat as well as excess sugar to be stored straight away as body fat, while sugar is utilized as primary fuel. And once blood sugar is spent, hunger occurs and makes person eat again - which if intake again consists of carbs and fat again leads to fat deposit, and thus fattening and eventually obesity and cardiovascular disease.
  21. Ancel Keys got personally insulted by Yudkin's hypothesis, and immediately attacked Yudkin as a quack and led a media campaign against him. Keys was basically a bully, and managed to "invalidate" Yudkin basically through personal attacks. Keys' conclusion was, essentially, "ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem, ergo dietary sucrose has no influence on the coronary heart disease". And since Keys was personally more influential than Yudkin, his beliefs were held up. Recently, nutrition scientists simply ignored a low-carb study where they reversed a diabetes diagnosis in just one year. And many parents of diabetic kids managed to get their childrens' disease under control by implementing a low-carb diet, but endocrinologists don't want to hear it.
  22. Current recommendations started in response to documentary "Hunger in America". In the 1968 George McGovern's committee was formed to adress the hunger in America. Then a whole slew of other crack happened, and nobody paid attention while the entire food philosophy was slowly subverted.
  23. Food is important for mental health. High-meat, high-fat diet can reverse things such as chronic pain, fibromyalgia, IBS, chronic fatigue, migraines... Problem is that sugar spikes can destabilize brain chemistry, causing mood swings, insomnia, irritability etc. Ketogenic diet means that brain is using ketones for energy and thus does not have such issues.
  24. Mainstream theory is that people get fat because they accumulate extra calories, they simply eat too much. But this ignores hard question such as why that happens. (Also, body can in fact control to an extent the metabolic rate... and burn muscle instead of fat as well. It is thus possible for person to be severely underweight and still be, technically, fat.).
  25. McGovern Committee met in 1973 again and began holding hearings on American diet. Doctors tended to link cholesterol to heart disease, but this singular focus masked far more important underlying issues. And worse, it scared people off eating fat... which meant substitute had to be found. And that substitute was sugar, as well as its numerous varieties.
  26. And while statin drugs helped reduce risk of heart attack... they failed to reduce overall mortality at all.
  27. In 1974, Committee was expanded to focus on the new problem it had created - overeating. A set of nutritional guidelines was finally issued in 1977. These guidelines recommended fewer calories, less fat, less saturated fat, less cholesterol, more poly-unsaturated fat, less sugar, less salt, more fiber, more starchy foods (so to translate: fewer calories, but also fewer things that make food sating and thus discourage overeating; less fat overall, but more dangerously unstable fat that helps cause heart disease; less sugar, but more foods that contain sugar... notice any issues?).
  28. And one idea repeated again and again was "hardening of the arteries" and "cholesterol bad".
  29. And all of this was done despite the fact that 8 studies involving 5 000 patients had failed to show hard evidence that diet has anything to do with heart attack. But individual studies later had shown that more dietary fat lowers LDL-C. Fatty meats, fatty cheeses, fatty nuts... seem to be ideal for heart and brain health.
  30. Yet the dietary guidelines by 1980 still told the Americans to avoid eating fat, industry to produce low-fat foods... and eventually turned a healthy populace into a bunch of sick walruses. (Low-fat varieties were nutritionally poor, thus encouraging overeating. And to make things worse, removing fat turned foods into question into bland, tasteless trash... fat had to be replaced with something, and that something was sugar.)
  31. Thus 1980s brought all sorts of brand new foods, and all of them low-fat, because "if you didn't eat fat you couldn't get fat". They also brought in all the sorts of new fitness trends. Yet everybody got fatter and fatter, especially once high fructose corn syrup got introduced.
  32. Low fat dogma made us fatter and sicker. And in 1992, US introduced the Food Pyramid Scheme. At the base, the basis of diet, was bread, cereal and rice (read: sugar, sugar, sugar). 6 to 11 servings per day. Above it were vegetables at 5 servings per day, and fruit at four servings per day (meaning 10 - 15 servings of sugar per day). Yet meat was only 3 servings per day. And then they wonder why everybody got fat.
  33. And of course, what was "serving"? Food pyramid was calculated at 2 - 3 ounces (57 - 85 g) per serving, but normal assumption would be that serving = bowl. And this is a problem. (Bowls I use at home have volume of 0,568 litres, and oatmeal has density of 247 g per 0,25 l. So if I ever gave a crap about the pyramid, my assumption would be 6 - 11 bowls of oatmeal per day, which would be 280 g per serving and a total of 1,68 to 3,08 kg of oats per day. Who the hell can eat that much I have no idea, but at 140 calories and 28 grams of carbs per 100 g, this would mean 2 352 to 4 312 calories and 470 to 862 grams of carbs per day. So yeah, a problem).
  34. Then food started being labelled... how much fat, protein, fibre... low-fat, high-fibre...
  35. And because ingredients have to be labelled in order of quantity, companies realized that having list read "sugar, sugar, sugar, actual nutrient, sugar, nutrient, sugar" would be bad. So they made up a million different names for sugar - refer the list. (As a note, but I just took a look at three different producs, one American and two Croatian. Sugar is in red, other carbs are in yellow. Note that some of the stuff I didn't label could also have adverse health effects such as sunflower oil and ammonium bicarbonate):
    1. Quickbury Hot Dog (US): wheat flour, water, sugar, yeast, sunflower oil, salt, emulsifiers E471 (partial glycerides) E481 (sodium stearoyl lactylate), barley malt flour, sodium acetates.
    2. Klara Rusk (CRO): wheat flour, yeast, palm oil, barley malt extract, sugar, salt, sweet whey powder, calcium carbonate, soya lecithin, invert sugar syrup, sodium hydrogen carbonate, citric acid, olive oil, ascorbic acid
    3. Petit Beurre Biscuit (CRO): wheat flour, sugar, butter, shea oil, palm oil, honey, ammonium bicarbonate, sodium bicarbonate, dextrose, lactose, salt, artificial vanilla flavor, calcium phosphate
  36. But of course, the establishment just keeps peddling all the same old advice.
  37. Ketogenic diet is basically the best way to deal with epileptic seizures, including in children. In one case, Atkins diet stopped siezures in two days.
 
barley malt extract


barley malt flour
So, in fairness to these in those ingredients lists, these are likely there due to flavor profiles rather than just extra sugar. Malt and Honey both have distinct flavors and have been used due to those flavor profiles in recipes for literally millennia. Thus it's likely these aren't in those recipes due to the removal of fats that would otherwise be used in them, they are there due to their own flavor profile and would remain in them even if we moved back to using more fats in cooking.

That's something else to bear in mind, just because sugars appear multiple times in a recipe isn't necessarily because of the removal of fats. Many things that are interchangeable biochemically are NOT interchangeable culinarily. Thus certain breads might use both refined (white) sugar (to serve as food for yeast to ensure rising), AND, say, molasses due to the specific flavor profile of molasses, and you wouldn't want to simple remove the white sugar while increasing the molasses because that would have dramatic effects on the taste of the end product.

That said, this mainly applies to sugars that people immediately recognize AS being their own flavors: IE Honey, molasses, malt, and the like. Basically if a sugar has an actual flavor, then it's likely there specifically FOR that flavor. If it's a sugar that's not actually noted for having a flavor, like "invert sugar syrup" or "dextrose", then yeah, that's likely just added due to the removal of fats.

Also, on your last example I notice "lactose" is listed, and this one is interesting. Looking up a recipe for homemade cookies in that style I note that they all include either milk, buttercream, or some other form of cream, and none of the oils listed. That recipe appears to basically replace said cream with the oils plus lactose, to replace the flavor the cream would be providing. In short, that recipe needs to add sugar because they replaced a more expensive ingredient with less expensive ones and had to add back in the specific flavor aspects that were missing.
 
So, in fairness to these in those ingredients lists, these are likely there due to flavor profiles rather than just extra sugar. Malt and Honey both have distinct flavors and have been used due to those flavor profiles in recipes for literally millennia. Thus it's likely these aren't in those recipes due to the removal of fats that would otherwise be used in them, they are there due to their own flavor profile and would remain in them even if we moved back to using more fats in cooking.

That's something else to bear in mind, just because sugars appear multiple times in a recipe isn't necessarily because of the removal of fats. Many things that are interchangeable biochemically are NOT interchangeable culinarily. Thus certain breads might use both refined (white) sugar (to serve as food for yeast to ensure rising), AND, say, molasses due to the specific flavor profile of molasses, and you wouldn't want to simple remove the white sugar while increasing the molasses because that would have dramatic effects on the taste of the end product.
Oh, I know. Main reason why sugars are used is because they are a) palpatable, b) addictive and c) act as preservatives to an extent. But if people weren't scared of fat, there would also be less demand for such foods. And there are quite a few cases where sugars do act as replacements for fats.
That said, this mainly applies to sugars that people immediately recognize AS being their own flavors: IE Honey, molasses, malt, and the like. Basically if a sugar has an actual flavor, then it's likely there specifically FOR that flavor. If it's a sugar that's not actually noted for having a flavor, like "invert sugar syrup" or "dextrose", then yeah, that's likely just added due to the removal of fats.
Agreed.
Also, on your last example I notice "lactose" is listed, and this one is interesting. Looking up a recipe for homemade cookies in that style I note that they all include either milk, buttercream, or some other form of cream, and none of the oils listed. That recipe appears to basically replace said cream with the oils plus lactose, to replace the flavor the cream would be providing. In short, that recipe needs to add sugar because they replaced a more expensive ingredient with less expensive ones and had to add back in the specific flavor aspects that were missing.
Yep.
 
Oh, I know. Main reason why sugars are used is because they are a) palpatable, b) addictive and c) act as preservatives to an extent. But if people weren't scared of fat, there would also be less demand for such foods. And there are quite a few cases where sugars do act as replacements for fats.
I agree when it comes to "low fat" alternatives to processed foods. However, sometime people just want a sweet treat that tastes good, and so long as those are enjoyed in moderation and occasionally, I think folks should be allowed to. There's very few things better than a few warm chocolate chip cookies and a cold glass of milk. Sure, the cookies aren't GOOD for you, but there is something just *right* about those things going together.

Though thinking about all the *best* desserts, they ALL are a combination of fats and sugars. Baked goods typically use both milk, cream, or buttermilk AND butter in addition to sugars. Ice Cream is, well, you literally cannot make it without fats. Chocolate is also based on fats and sugar.

. . .

Which also means that properly made desserts, because they include fats, are actually MORE filling than low fat deserts, meaning you need to eat less to feel satisfied with them and also then you actually end up eating LESS sugar than with low-fat desserts because not only do low-fat desserts need to add more sugar to make up for the lost flavors from fats, you also are more likely to eat MORE of them to get the same satiety.
 
I agree when it comes to "low fat" alternatives to processed foods. However, sometime people just want a sweet treat that tastes good, and so long as those are enjoyed in moderation and occasionally, I think folks should be allowed to. There's very few things better than a few warm chocolate chip cookies and a cold glass of milk. Sure, the cookies aren't GOOD for you, but there is something just *right* about those things going together.

Though thinking about all the *best* desserts, they ALL are a combination of fats and sugars. Baked goods typically use both milk, cream, or buttermilk AND butter in addition to sugars. Ice Cream is, well, you literally cannot make it without fats. Chocolate is also based on fats and sugar.

. . .

Which also means that properly made desserts, because they include fats, are actually MORE filling than low fat deserts, meaning you need to eat less to feel satisfied with them and also then you actually end up eating LESS sugar than with low-fat desserts because not only do low-fat desserts need to add more sugar to make up for the lost flavors from fats, you also are more likely to eat MORE of them to get the same satiety.
Precisely. Thanks to the low-fat craze today, you have the effect that a) our main dishes had become, in effect, desserts, and b) even desserts are much less filling than they used to be. The end result is that we eat far more than we need, or would even want to, if our food was properly made.

I have nothing against an occasional sweet treat, but what when your entire menu consists of sweet treats?
 
Why steak and eggs diet works:

- it restores hormonal balance (and for men, boosts production of testosterone)
- whole eggs result in far greater absorption and utilization of protein despite technically having less protein than the same weight of just egg whites
- steak and eggs diet was used by Vince Gironda, a bodybuilder and also a coach to bodybuilders such as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Larry Scott and actors such as Clint Eastwood
- Vince rejected high carb bulking, cheap protein powders and steroids as he considered them cheating, focusing on leanness and hormonal health
- he also believed that 36 eggs a day could deliver results compared to a steroid cycle - but only if one at them whole, yolk and white, as he considered the nutrient-dense yolk just as if not more important than the egg white, which only has protein
- ketogenic and carnivore diets lead to rise in testosterone and athletic performance after the body adapts, but this takes several (3 - 6) months during which performance may actually drop off as the body is not yet adapted and thus defaults to basically starvation mode
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top