First, it is not US or NATO territorial aerospace, therefore there is no ethical or moral justification for the USAAF to be there. Second the most relevant thing has happened to or from ISIS is getting arrested or murdered rightfully so.
ISIL are hostis humani generis and as such it would be both extremely legal, moral and ethical to kill them even if they were on the bloody dark side of the Moon.
Also i find it fucking hilarious that you whine about lack of moral and ethical justifications like this and in the same post say that "the USAF is a bunch of hypocritical moralist and narcissists".
Not to mention that most of their supporters (and good chunk of their members) are likely in Europe from France to Germany.
LMAO, no, most of their supporters in total are from the Muslim majority countries.
Those are literally maps that show the territorial control of ISIS as of 2020. Not propaganda.
Again, they hide in places they don't control too. If they don't, you are implying that they don't exist in France or Belgium because maps don't show them there.
Context.
No, it just confirms me that the USAF is a bunch of hypocritical moralist and narcissists that can whine about their drone (an object, not even a breathing person) being pissed on by flares of another nation.
Obunga. Who's obunga? I don't think he exists.
www.urbandictionary.com
It is their aircraft legally and as property, with US flag painted on it, and US government being responsible for its action.
It's not hypocritical moralism, it is the international order of things.
If US Navy in retaliation blasted few Russian drones over Syria with AA missiles would you also be whining at them that they shouldn't be mad (and trust me, they would be extremely mad) because it was just drones?
Either way it was an intentional aggressive action by a Russian aircraft against US aircraft. Flares, cannon shells, or missiles, the only difference is how effective and open the aggressive action is.
