Leftist Child Grooming

[Wargamer08]

Why is it always fat, trashy, lesbians running these camps? Like without fail?

 

[Cherico]

Why is it always fat, trashy, lesbians running these camps? Like without fail?

Self esteem and ego issues.

 

[DarthOne]

Self esteem and ego issues.

Dingdingding! We have a winner!

 

[DarthOne]

 

[DarthOne]

Watch: Chasten Buttigieg Leads Kids in Pledge to Rainbow Flag — ‘To the Gay Agenda, for Which It Stands’

Pete Buttigieg’s Husband Led Children in LGBT Pledge of Allegiance

Chasten Buttigieg reportedly led children in a pledge of allegiance to the gay pride LGBT flag, during an unearthed video from 2019.

www.breitbart.com

Chasten Buttigieg, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg’s husband, reportedly led children in a pledge of allegiance to the gay pride LGBT flag, during an unearthed video from 2019.

Buttigieg had the young children recite the following pledge:

I pledge my heart to the rainbow of the not so typical gay camp, to the gay agenda for which it stands. One camp, full of pride, indivisible, with affirmation and equal rights for all.

Spoiler: backup for posterity

Teen for Chasten

@teenforchasten
Chasten visiting Pride Camp with Iowa Safe Schools and reciting the Pride Camp Pledge. I love this so much. Watch and pledge along at home #PeteButtigieg #TeamPete #ChastenButtigieg

Watch on Twitter
1:51 AM · Jan 11, 2020

Buttigieg ended the pledge by waving the rainbow flag across the children’s view. The video is reportedly from a Democrat presidential primary campaign stop during Pete Buttigieg’s unsuccessful 2020 candidacy. A video recently went viral on Twitter that reportedly shows Buttigieg leading the gay pride pledge during a clip from Mayor Pete, a 2021 Amazon Prime documentary that highlights Pete Buttigieg’s failed 2020 presidential campaign.

The video shows Buttigieg wearing a shirt that reads “not your typical gay camp,” which is the slogan of Iowa Safe Schools’ Pride Camp.

The Des Moines Register reported that Buttigieg was scheduled to visit Iowa Safe Schools’ Pride Camp as a guest counselor in July 2019 one day after his husband Pete and other Democrat presidential hopefuls visited the camp.

Iowa Safe Schools’ Pride Camp’s mission “is to provide a safe and affirming place for LGBTQ & allied youth to learn valuable life skills and network with other LGBTQ youth in a supportive and nurturing environment.” The five-day long pride camp is open for children as young as 14.

The pride camp also offers programs to bring the “Pride Camp experience” to children as young as eight through its “Pride Camp Junior” and “Pride Camp University” events.

In a second clip posted to Twitter, Buttigieg discusses how being on the campaign trail gives him an opportunity to attend events like the Pride Camp. He said that the event “puts the wing in my sail.”

“Being out on the trail gives me the opportunity to come do things like this, I mean this stuff, just, like, puts the wing in my sail,” Buttigieg said.



Buttigieg is a former teacher and outspoken critic of Florida’s parental rights bill, which would prevent Florida school districts from encouraging classroom discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in “primary grade levels.”

Parroting the White House, which referred to the legislation as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, Buttigieg said, “In Florida, what kind of state are you building, where you’re essentially pushing kids back into the closet? You’re saying, ‘We can’t talk about you. We can’t even talk about your families.’” Buttigieg even claimed that the Florida bill “will kill kids.”

A Breitbart News fact check rated the claim that Florida legislators are targeting vulnerable gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex children as false.

According to Breitbart’s fact check by Joel Pollak, “The legislation does not mention any particular sexuality and applies to teaching in ‘primary grades.’”

 

[Sobek]

Another great look at the state of american government schools with links for the stuff covered on the site

 

[Whitestrake Pelinal]

But maybe it's just good, clean, innocent fun! Let's have a look...

 

[DarthOne]

Related

 

[Captain X]

Disney employees and former judge among 108 arrested in human trafficking sting, Florida police say

Authorities arrested 108 people, including alleged child sexual predators and those seeking prostitutes.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Ixian]

Well this thread has certainly smothered any hope I had for the future.

 

[DarthOne]

CNN Analyst Shocks Viewers With Defense Of Ketanji Brown: Pedophiles Caught With Child Porn DESERVE Lighter Sentences… Because Times Have Changed

CNN Analyst Shocks Viewers With Defense Of Ketanji Brown: Pedophiles Caught With Child Porn DESERVE Lighter Sentences... Because Times Have Changed

Jeffrey Toobin, a CNN legal commentator, startled reasonable viewers yesterday when he claimed that child porn offenders are being punished too harshly in 2021,

en-volve.com

Jeffrey Toobin, a CNN legal commentator, startled reasonable viewers yesterday when he claimed that child porn offenders are being punished too harshly in 2021, and that they should be given considerably more lenient sentences because times have changed.

Toobin, who was offered a job at CNN after being sacked from The New Yorker in 2020 after masturbating on a Zoom conference with coworkers,

When discussing Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings, the CNN analyst defended her compassion toward child porn offenders.



Per Fox: On Tuesday, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson addressed Sen. Josh Hawley’s, R-Mo., criticism against her about her sentencing record of being more lenient towards child porn and sex offenders.

Appearing on CNN’s “At This Hour with Kate Bolduan,” Toobin agreed with Jackson’s argument that current child porn sentences need to be reduced and adapted for a “post-internet” society.

“I remember, when I was an assistant U.S. Attorney back in the ’90s is that when those sentencing guidelines were written for those cases, that this was a time when the people who committed these crimes would order individual photos and get them usually through email, and then they would be sentenced based on the number of photos they possessed. This was all pre-internet,” Toobin explained.

“So once the internet came in and people got access to hundreds and then thousands of photos, the sentencing guidelines would reflect hundreds and then thousands of photos. Federal judges have been struggling with the issue of how do you create a fair system that was designed pre-internet, yet you have to sentence people post-internet.“

Jackson made similar comments when asked about her previous sentences by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

“It wasn’t like she was letting these people go, but they were somewhat less than the guidelines because the guidelines had not been adapted for the internet era,” Toobin said.

In 2020, Toobin was fired from his position at The New Yorker for masturbating during a Zoom call with colleagues. While he was absent for eight months from the liberal network, Toobin returned to CNN in June 2021.

Jackson continues to face questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee about her nomination to the Supreme Court. President Biden selected Jackson as his nominee in February after Justice Stephen Breyer announced his retirement from the bench. If appointed, Jackson will be the first Black female to serve on the Supreme Court.

 

[Captain X]

How much you bet me this guy's HD is full of CP?

 

[Cherico]

How much you bet me this guy's HD is full of CP?

I don't take sucker's bets

 

[Morphic Tide]

How much you bet me this guy's HD is full of CP?

Admittedly, the point being made is valid. Sentencing guidelines being based on number of nominal instances of contraband pre-digitalization result in staggering inflation because now you get an ever-increasing backlog with sod-all actual harm that hasn't already seen punishment.

On a certain level, it functions as double-jeopardy being allowed "because it's that bad". The entire basis of child pornography being illegal is the victimization in its creation, but the laws reflect a time when it was nigh-impossible to get ahold of without directly supporting the makers.

Now, though? It is literally so easy to acquire en mass that there are cases of weaponizing these laws by using CP as a malware attack. The bad actors can fuck over damned near anybody by all sorts of obfuscated file delivery, because what's illegal is to own the file.

Continuing to sentence them as if the availability has not changed essentially means that the sentencing is increased for no reason. Because again, the premise of sentencing by volume was the implicit participation in victimization. With so few caveats that planted photos are genuinely illegal.

This is an area of the law that is a frame-artists wet dream.

 

[Sobek]

Admittedly, the point being made is valid. Sentencing guidelines being based on number of nominal instances of contraband pre-digitalization result in staggering inflation because now you get an ever-increasing backlog with sod-all actual harm that hasn't already seen punishment.

On a certain level, it functions as double-jeopardy being allowed "because it's that bad". The entire basis of child pornography being illegal is the victimization in its creation, but the laws reflect a time when it was nigh-impossible to get ahold of without directly supporting the makers.

Now, though? It is literally so easy to acquire en mass that there are cases of weaponizing these laws by using CP as a malware attack. The bad actors can fuck over damned near anybody by all sorts of obfuscated file delivery, because what's illegal is to own the file.

Continuing to sentence them as if the availability has not changed essentially means that the sentencing is increased for no reason. Because again, the premise of sentencing by volume was the implicit participation in victimization. With so few caveats that planted photos are genuinely illegal.

This is an area of the law that is a frame-artists wet dream.

These are all valid points.

I just don't trust a CNN J*urno to be making them, or having a argument with any sort of good faith.

 

[Morphic Tide]

or having a argument with any sort of good faith.

This part, I can agree on. The words actually said very much were "We're still sentencing like they're mail-order photographs when it's files on a drive that can hold a million". But then, the sorts to specifically publicly defend it on major news... Are really not the sort to be talking about the legal intricacies. Especially when they're the exact sort shrugging at the Floyd Riots.

Edit: Especially given talking about getting individual photos through "email" then calling it pre-internet in the same sentence! Probably a matter of misspeaking, but if you are on a heavily produced and funded broadcast news network that kind of mistake very much points towards "I'm not taking this seriously".

 

[Abhorsen]

Disney employees and former judge among 108 arrested in human trafficking sting, Florida police say

Authorities arrested 108 people, including alleged child sexual predators and those seeking prostitutes.

www.cbsnews.com

As always, this is overblown. There seems to be very little trafficking here, and a lot more basic prostitution.

We have 5 people doing stuff with children or of human trafficking (which can be giving a prostitute a ride, so IDK about even that one). The rest are just johns and prostitutes. And then they imply they've got a 108 person human trafficking ring caught. This is why people think there's an epidemic of human trafficking in the US with little evidence. Glad they caught the 5, but I really don't care about the other 103.

 

[Sobek]

US Schools in Washington State are gonna punish white kids harder because "muh racism"

 

[Sobek]

Remember to never allow your children to just watch TV and browse the internet without supervision until they are at least 12, preferably closer to 16.



These parasites delight on the corruption of youth.

 

[DarthOne]

Public School Indoctrination Is Real: 4th Grade Teacher in Austin Told Her Peers 63% of Her Class Came Out as LGBTQIA+

Public School Indoctrination Is Real: 4th Grade Teacher in Austin Told Her Peers 63% of Her Class Came Out as LGBTQIA+ - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. The goal of the Cultural Marxists behind the LGBTQIA+ Supremacy push is to indoctrinate vulnerable children into embracing destructive anti-Biblical lifestyles. They have to get them when they’re young before they start forming their...

thelibertydaily.com

The goal of the Cultural Marxists behind the LGBTQIA+ Supremacy push is to indoctrinate vulnerable children into embracing destructive anti-Biblical lifestyles. They have to get them when they’re young before they start forming their own ideas; prepubescent children are the easiest to convert into falsely believing they are somehow part of the LGBTQIA+ community.

The reason is obvious. They don’t have the hormones, life experiences, or common sense to tell them otherwise. This is why radical progressives are so adamant about teaching five- to eight-year-olds about adult sexual topics. It’s why they have hideous programs like Drag Queen Story Hour. And it’s why this fourth-grade teacher in Austin is not only angry about gay “Pride” not usurping other causes, but also claimed that 20 out of her 32 students came out to her as LGBTQIA+.


According to Libs of Tik Tok Twitter account:

These are internal messages from a 4th grade elementary teacher in @AustinISD. She’s upset that an entire week dedicated to LGBT still wasn’t good enough. Coincidentally, 20/32 of her FOURTH GRADERS are LGBT and have “come out” to her What the hell is going on in these schools?!

Adults who make the lifestyle decision are free to do that. I oppose sins of all types, including lifestyle sins inherent in the LGBTQIA+ community, but adults who make the choice freely are able to do so in America. As long as they don’t break laws otherwise or try to impose their lifestyles on others, it’s just another of many wrongs that adults perpetrate daily.

But there are two major exceptions to my tolerance. The first is how they go after children. This is wrong. It’s evil. It’s taking advantage of those at their most vulnerable and impressionable so they do not have points of reference that can deflect the indoctrination.

The second is what we’re seeing more and more of it every day. Transgenderism poses problems for others when it’s used to gain advantages. We all know the Will “Lia” Thomas story, but that’s mild in comparison to the heinous actions by those who fly the mantle of transgenderism to get into women’s restrooms, girls’ locker rooms, or female jails.

If there aren’t 20 out of 32 fourth-graders in this teacher’s class who have “come out” as LGBTQIA+, then this is gaslighting. If there are that many, then this teacher should never be allowed anywhere near a child again because the brainwashing is clear as day.

Remember to never allow your children to just watch TV and browse the internet without supervision until they are at least 12, preferably closer to 16.



These parasites delight on the corruption of youth.

On the plus side twitter is trending #OkayGroomer