Leftist Child Grooming

Ah, right. I suppose they could go that route- IVF presumably. A few months ago I might have actually been okay with that.

As for bigotry... no. Just no. If we were, say, 50 years in the past before the fuckery happening now you might have had a point. We are far past the point of blind judgement here. We have 50 years of meticulously documented bullshit.
No, your own words bear out the blind judgement. You just did it to my friends, after all. That being said, you're probably not worth engaging with anymore.
 
Ah, right. I suppose they could go that route- IVF presumably. A few months ago I might have actually been okay with that.

As for bigotry... no. Just no. If we were, say, 50 years in the past before the fuckery happening now you might have had a point. We are far past the point of blind judgement here. We have 50 years of meticulously documented bullshit.
From personal experience the most common way for lesbian couples to have a kid is literally just a guy providing the 'sample' the natural way or via any way to uhhh, inject it.
 
From personal experience the most common way for lesbian couples to have a kid is literally just a guy providing the 'sample' the natural way or via any way to uhhh, inject it.
Yep. They usually go for the ol' "turkey baster" or the woman lying back and "thinking of England" as their chosen donor ploughs her.
 
Yep. They usually go for the ol' "turkey baster" or the woman lying back and "thinking of England" as their chosen donor ploughs her.

No, I'm pretty sure they just buy them via an "adoption agency".

Also on the latter part of that, any dude who does that is an idiot. It sounds like a great way to be on the hook for child support for 18 years for a kid you won't be allowed to see.
 
No, I'm pretty sure they just buy them via an "adoption agency".

Also on the latter part of that, any dude who does that is an idiot. It sounds like a great way to be on the hook for child support for 18 years for a kid you won't be allowed to see.

Pretty sure that has actually happened at least once in that sort of situation or something like it.
 
No, I'm pretty sure they just buy them via an "adoption agency".

Also on the latter part of that, any dude who does that is an idiot. It sounds like a great way to be on the hook for child support for 18 years for a kid you won't be allowed to see.
No seriously, lesbians tend to birth their own kids. Any dude who agrees with such a plan is a total retard because indeed they have been on the hook for 18 years.
But usually that doesn't happen because then lesbians would quickly run out of children.
 
... I think that's acceptable. I'll take it.
It's retarded, put some sperm in a bowl, and watch it never turn into a baby.

You need sperm+egg for conception.

It's basic biology.

Lets be honest here, a lot of women really like their special child murder rights, and are so upset that people are starting to say "maybe they shouldn't be killing their kids" that they have resorted to dumb stunts like trying to criminalize male masturbation.
 
No, I'm pretty sure they just buy them via an "adoption agency".

Also on the latter part of that, any dude who does that is an idiot. It sounds like a great way to be on the hook for child support for 18 years for a kid you won't be allowed to see.
You'd be surprised how many times this actually happens -- Many women still want children that's biologically theirs, and not every woman wants to adopt.

And, unfortunately, some men have been put on child support, despite how "trusted" the women involved were. smh It's a bad idea all around for any man to do this.

Hell, there was a case a few years back where a women tried to sue a man for child support after getting his sperm from a Bank. The fact it actually reached court, IIRC, shows how ludicrous things have become.
 
It's retarded, put some sperm in a bowl, and watch it never turn into a baby.

You need sperm+egg for conception.

It's basic biology.

Lets be honest here, a lot of women really like their special child murder rights, and are so upset that people are starting to say "maybe they shouldn't be killing their kids" that they have resorted to dumb stunts like trying to criminalize male masturbation.
Man, I think you misunderstand me. It's a fucking retarded law for its stated goal. It will, though, have a fantastic chilling effect so to speak. People could stand to be less fucking horny all the time.

And hey, it's not a conservative, trying to make the law. I may not like him but I'm certainly not going to present a challenge to a law that aligns with my morals.
 
It's retarded, put some sperm in a bowl, and watch it never turn into a baby.

You need sperm+egg for conception.

It's basic biology.

Lets be honest here, a lot of women really like their special child murder rights, and are so upset that people are starting to say "maybe they shouldn't be killing their kids" that they have resorted to dumb stunts like trying to criminalize male masturbation.
Given how male loneliness is predicted to skyrocket, banning male masterbation would result in a pretty fun increase in insanely pissed off guys lmao.
 
Man, I think you misunderstand me. It's a fucking retarded law for its stated goal. It will, though, have a fantastic chilling effect so to speak. People could stand to be less fucking horny all the time.

And hey, it's not a conservative, trying to make the law. I may not like him but I'm certainly not going to present a challenge to a law that aligns with my morals.

That you think it will have a "chilling effect" is also pretty dumb.

You won't make dudes less horney by criminalizing male masturbation.
 
That you think it will have a "chilling effect" is also pretty dumb.

You won't make dudes less horney by criminalizing male masturbation.
People throughout history keep trying to suppress human sexuality. Which is hilarious because it fails every single time because at the end of the day we're living things.
 
Man, I think you misunderstand me. It's a fucking retarded law for its stated goal. It will, though, have a fantastic chilling effect so to speak. People could stand to be less fucking horny all the time.

And hey, it's not a conservative, trying to make the law. I may not like him but I'm certainly not going to present a challenge to a law that aligns with my morals.
Honestly it just illustrates what a parody you are. :sneaky:
 
People throughout history keep trying to suppress human sexuality. Which is hilarious because it fails every single time because at the end of the day we're living things.
. . .

Did you ignore everything I wrote about the modern understanding of human sexuality? How the entire idea that prior societies "suppressed" it was based on research done on actual sex criminals by a man with the moral and ethical research restraints of Mengele? Successful human societies encourage and support exclusive monogamous pair bonding for the majority of people in the society, and the idea that this is "repressive" is FALSE, and undoing this rapidly leads to societal decay and reduced human happiness, as we have seen amply demonstrated in our own society since we shifted from that standard to "unsuppressed human sexuality".
 
. . .

Did you ignore everything I wrote about the modern understanding of human sexuality? How the entire idea that prior societies "suppressed" it was based on research done on actual sex criminals by a man with the moral and ethical research restraints of Mengele? Successful human societies encourage and support exclusive monogamous pair bonding for the majority of people in the society, and the idea that this is "repressive" is FALSE, and undoing this rapidly leads to societal decay and reduced human happiness, as we have seen amply demonstrated in our own society since we shifted from that standard to "unsuppressed human sexuality".

I'd agree with that.

They definitely didn't criminalize masturbation.
 
. . .

Did you ignore everything I wrote about the modern understanding of human sexuality? How the entire idea that prior societies "suppressed" it was based on research done on actual sex criminals by a man with the moral and ethical research restraints of Mengele? Successful human societies encourage and support exclusive monogamous pair bonding for the majority of people in the society, and the idea that this is "repressive" is FALSE, and undoing this rapidly leads to societal decay and reduced human happiness, as we have seen amply demonstrated in our own society since we shifted from that standard to "unsuppressed human sexuality".
The repressive part comes in from forced conformity, and also in keeping people from expressing what they feel.
 
The repressive part comes in from forced conformity, and also in keeping people from expressing what they feel.
On the flipside complete unrestricted freedom leads to deviancy, injuries and general badness. Ask Mr Hands what he thinks of complete sexual freedom.
Oh wait his innards got ruptured and he horrifically died...Oops?
Like all things, a flexible middle ground, but not TOO flexible seems ideal...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top