Immigration and multiculturalism news

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
So unless you include biological differences, biological differences have nothing to do with a cohesive society?...
You only have to, say hypothetically, have a 5x higher rate of violence due to genetics, to fuck up society.
...Please tell me you aren't actually believing the White Nationalists talking point about these things...
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Human populations (races, whatever) differ in terms of hormones, physiology, psychology, and so on. So it is not just cultural incompatibility, and in any case, culture and biology are interwoven.
I am reminded of seeing a hospital trying to advertise on social media that they need a kidney donor for a sick 6 year old girl.
And they are like "we need a very rare race combination XYZ for genetic compatibility purpose"

And a swarm of angry people come by and scream at them for being racist, and saying that anyone should be allowed to donate a kidney to that little girl regardless of race.

And the doctors, bless their heart, keep on trying to explain the scientific reasoning why genetic matching is a thing and how rejection works and so on. And people reply to those explanation with "nuh uh, UR racis! she should get a kidney from another race"
 

Cherico

Well-known member
As in, the people on this site? Nope, that I won't accuse you of. This site does have some racists, but no more than any other. And many of you are Jews, East Asians, mixed race, and even some Africans (Scotty).

It was more of me having some really cynical suspicions of the motives of the loudest anti-immigration voices in the real world.

When you accept an imigrant you are accepting at least a 3 generations long investment because typically that's how long it takes people to culturally assimulate, and in some cases it takes even longer. Thats a lot of time, money and effort so yes the common people of the country involved should get a say in who gets let in because they have to pay for it.

In the case of illegal migration no one gets a say no one gets vetted, and in a place with a welfare state where you have to foot the bill for this shit, it gets incredibly pricy really fast. And thats before you take out the issues of disease....
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
As in, the people on this site? Nope, that I won't accuse you of. This site does have some racists, but no more than any other. And many of you are Jews, East Asians, mixed race, and even some Africans (Scotty).

It was more of me having some really cynical suspicions of the motives of the loudest anti-immigration voices in the real world.
I belong to a people who have some experience getting colonized. :sneaky:
 

Poe

Well-known member
In context of society the term 'biologically incompatible' refers to the ability of various groups to have a cohesive and productive society.
Same way lions and sharks are 'biologically incompatible' in forming hunting packs.
No it doesn't, I've never heard this used at all outside of biology and used to describe speciation. You're reading some weird ass people if they're saying "biologically incompatible" to describe incompatible cultures.
 

ThatZenoGuy

Zealous Evolutionary Nano Organism
Comrade
No it doesn't, I've never heard this used at all outside of biology and used to describe speciation. You're reading some weird ass people if they're saying "biologically incompatible" to describe incompatible cultures.
Biologically (of biology, life, genes)
Incompatible (no workie)

In laymans terms 'biologically incompatible' basically just means their existence as creatures no workie with other creatures. Unless you're LARP'ing as a biologist you really shouldn't be to semantic about it.
 

Poe

Well-known member
Biologically (of biology, life, genes)
Incompatible (no workie)

In laymans terms 'biologically incompatible' basically just means their existence as creatures no workie with other creatures. Unless you're LARP'ing as a biologist you really shouldn't be to semantic about it.
No it doesn't, even to the layman 'biologically incompatible' means exactly what it says and that doesn't apply to different cultures conflicting with one another.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
You're denying crime statistics?...
What, are scary 'White Nationalists' behind non-White crimes?
I'm very well aware of the crime statistics.

The link between culture, biology, and said statistics, that's something argued about, and 'it's totally biology' is specifically a whitnat talking point, one with very little evidence.

How about 'socially incompatible due to biological reasons'.

Is that more helpful then?
This at least will communicate what you mean clearly.
 

ThatZenoGuy

Zealous Evolutionary Nano Organism
Comrade
I'm very well aware of the crime statistics.

The link between culture, biology, and said statistics, that's something argued about, and 'it's totally biology' is specifically a whitnat talking point, one with very little evidence.
I mean it's a black supremacist point to say it has NOTHING to do with biology. So given that their viewpoint is accepted everywhere, makes sense the opposite should be too.

And come on, lets face the facts here, if there was any peaceful decent African genes out there, they've been extinct by the Bantu for quite some time now.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
I mean it's a black supremacist point to say it has NOTHING to do with biology. So given that their viewpoint is accepted everywhere, makes sense the opposite should be too.

And come on, lets face the facts here, if there was any peaceful decent African genes out there, they've been extinct by the Bantu for quite some time now.
...How broadly do you think the Bantu ranged?

Are you even aware of what time period they were going out and conquering other parts of Africa during?
 

mrttao

Well-known member
I'm very well aware of the crime statistics.

The link between culture, biology, and said statistics, that's something argued about, and 'it's totally biology' is specifically a whitnat talking point, one with very little evidence.
what if it is a non white person who does not want to live near blacks specifically due to crime statistics?
Is it also white supremacy when an asian person or an hindu to avoid living together in the "inner cities"? Or when japanese people do not want to grant visas to blacks to migrate into japan?

Also, whether it is 100% purely cultural or has a biological component... it is all academic. The fact is that the statistics are real.

Also, funny you would say "white nationalist" when black nationalists, hindu nationalists, jewish nationalists, chinese nationalists, japanese nationalists, native american nationalists and pretty much everyone OTHER than whites wants to have their own places and nations and be ruled by their own kind.

This obsession with being ruled over / replaced by foreigners is a terminal form of cuckoldry. A fatal mental disorder.
 

ThatZenoGuy

Zealous Evolutionary Nano Organism
Comrade
what if it is a non white person who does not want to live near blacks specifically due to crime statistics?
Is it also white supremacy when an asian person or an hindu to avoid living together in the "inner cities"? Or when japanese people do not want to grant visas to blacks to migrate into japan?

Also, whether it is 100% purely cultural or has a biological component... it is all academic. The fact is that the statistics are real.

Also, funny you would say "white nationalist" when black nationalists, hindu nationalists, jewish nationalists, chinese nationalists, japanese nationalists, native american nationalists and pretty much everyone OTHER than whites wants to have their own places and nations and be ruled by their own kind.

This obsession with being ruled over / replaced by foreigners is a terminal form of cuckoldry. A fatal mental disorder.
Roof.jpeg

Pictured, "White Supremacists" attempting to increase non-White crime rates.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Roof.jpeg

Pictured, "White Supremacists" attempting to increase non-White crime rates.
Yep. Rooftop koreans are free to engage in as much "white supremacy" as they want. MSM calls them "bold and courageous".

But the moment whites want to protect themselves from rioters then they are branded as nazies and mercilessly crushed. What is seen as "healthy" for litearlly everyone else, is "evil" when a white person does it.
 

King Arts

Well-known member
what if it is a non white person who does not want to live near blacks specifically due to crime statistics?
Is it also white supremacy when an asian person or an hindu to avoid living together in the "inner cities"? Or when japanese people do not want to grant visas to blacks to migrate into japan?

Also, whether it is 100% purely cultural or has a biological component... it is all academic. The fact is that the statistics are real.

Also, funny you would say "white nationalist" when black nationalists, hindu nationalists, jewish nationalists, chinese nationalists, japanese nationalists, native american nationalists and pretty much everyone OTHER than whites wants to have their own places and nations and be ruled by their own kind.

This obsession with being ruled over / replaced by foreigners is a terminal form of cuckoldry. A fatal mental disorder.
I think that just pointing to muh biology as if higher melanin genes also give more violence and less intelligence is dumb. The majority of the problem is cultural. But then I was thinking for inner city blacks there might be a genetic component, but not in the way you might think. See it’s the opposite of what @ThatZenoGuy was saying it’s not biology that informs culture it’s cultural aspects that will affect biology.

For instance it’s not well known but it is ironic that inner city black Americans are on average more in red than other groups, even though the stereotype is poor whites doing it. But the issue isn’t that they are doing it on purpose. See let’s say a black man gets a bunch of baby mommas pregnant and then skips town or whatever. Now these children don’t know who the father is. These children grow up and they don’t know who their family is besides on the mother’s side. So think about how common it would be for the boys who grow up making their half sisters on their father’s side into baby mamas. And what if this cultural practice of no fathers sticking around keeps going.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top