I agree that it's a sensible option.
Women are the final adjudicator, however. And many women are still of the opinion that a man living with his parents isn't a man worth dating, and is a massive red flag. Simple as.
When that's no longer the case, then we'll have seen the culture shift.
a man that lives with and works for his immediate family - parents, and siblings - is a man whose loyalty and resources stay in said family
females want a man's loyalty and resources to flow to her and, by extension, the children you will have with her.
there is no such thing as a girl that is into a man - and I mean
really into said man - that doesn't want to have his children. it is what they are biologically designed to crave. and females need support and resources - from either said man or the state via taxes - in order to do this
as a man you have to choose where you loyalty and resources go to. and it doesn't matter how much resources you have, what your assets are, etc. with the state meddling in peoples social lives, a botched relationship can see a man, via the power of the state, drained of much of his assets and resources. ergo, more and more men are not taking the risk of seeing their immediate families suffer, because said men couldn't keep it in their pants
balancing immediate family with starting a new family of your own, would be very easy if the state didn't stick it's head in everybodies affairs...
but as to the opening post subject matter? well we all know there is a double standard via gender with men being shamed for living at home...but girls generally get a free pass. although i will say the only men being shamed for living at home are the men that don't work or provide anything to the family. you know, the NEET types. living in a multi-generational family home
where every member of the family contributes to the well being of the family is the most sure way to build multi-generational stability and wealth