Tzeentchean Perspective
Well-known member
The Fire Rises!
Last edited:
Fully Automated Socialist Meme Thread - The Ministry of Ideological Memes
- Thread starter Comrade Clod
- Start date
The Fire Rises!
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
A meme i made myself
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
3 Terms
mrttao
Well-known member
polling "errors". Not deliberate lying for the purpose of demoralizing trump voters so they stay at home3 Terms
also, what procedures were put in place to fix such massive huge errors?
mrttao
Well-known member
It is utterly shocking how many groups are working to ferment a revolution to put into power a system that always oppresses them.
It is like how twitter's ceo recently went "I can't wait for the revolution to win and for us to line up the rich against a wall and shoot them".
does he not comprehend that as a billionaire CEO of a major tech company that HE is the rich that will get lined up?
Tryglaw
Well-known member
It's just like the LGBT crowd demanding multi-kulti and unrestricted immigration.
Completely ignoring the inconvenient truth about culture of those immigrants. That often they come from countries where people overwhelmingly support supremacy of Sharia law over secular laws. Where being LGBT is subject to death penalty.
Seriously, how stupidly deluded can they be???
gral
Well-known member
There's a Brazilian song of the 80s which satirizes corruption and corrupt people, but it has an excerpt that applies here: "se o negócio sujar, é só tomar um avião"("if things go bad, just get into an airplane"). HE will probably be able to escape.
The greatest victims will be along those who are well enough to be seen as 'rich' by most of the population, but aren't anywhere near the levels of wealth a CEO has(i.e., the upper middle-class). Of course, a lot of those support this sort of shit, so there will be irony aplenty.
Yinko
Well-known member
Yeah, I get what you mean. Most socialist states are incredibly conservative in real terms (not religiously or fiscally but in pretty much every other way), and I can kind of agree with some of the "super secret leftist plot" endgame, but not the stuff that it would take to get there. Plus, the chance that they would face-plant and fail utterly is so high that it would never be worth it with such a mediocre goal.
Reactionary sentiment caused by leftists is more beneficial, but still only gets most people to about where they were thirty years ago. Other revolutionary movements have better goals, but don't bother lying about them so they have far worse recruitment.
Abhishekm
Well-known member
Well..are they? I mean whats conservative about them? Honestly asking.
They tend to be socially conservative.
Well,Sharia law advocate killing homosexuals,but they had nothing against lesbians.Althought considering how womans are treatet,maybe those lesbians would choose death.
When commies get power they envitably find out that their shit doesn't work and they now have to manage a dumpster fire. It becomes more about managing liabilities then deviding spoils, and they tend to manage their liabilities with bullets and concentration camps.
Abhishekm
Well-known member
People say that but on what issue exactly? Family Values? Party before all and all that. Child birth? One child policy, honestly seems to he more the Party decides what to do with your body that Pro-Choice. Free Press? The Press belongs to the Party doesn't sound conservative to me. Race? The Party decides what constitutes a people. Sounds more like people conflate lining up the gays along with the clerics, businessmen and the rights of the unborn in the same row by the wall makes them socially conservative for some reason.
Socialists whole schtick is breaking down the stratification of society or whatever bull spin they put on it. But for some reson it gets lumped as Socially Consrrvative because they lump homosexuals with people who own their own farm AND their farming equipment.
Last edited:
Becouse if you want existing state,you need normal families.Thus why after Lenin almost destroyed russian families, Stalin must stopped that.Becouse free love is weapon to destroy state,but when you take over ant want to rule,you need normal families.
Without them even secret police is not fully efficient,becouse you could not threaten families of people who disobey you,becouse they have none.
That is why leftist,if they win,would stomp on lgbt - becouse they are only tool to destroy our cyvilisation states.When they take over,they would need stable states with normal families.
People seem to be confusing LGBTs with Woke/activist LGBTs (which is a larger percentage, but I'm not sure if it's the majority. A fair number of LGBTs (including me) know that they are up against the wall soon after the revolution. Being gay is a bourgeois mentality (or so commies say). Che, for example, enslaved gays in labor camps.
Tryglaw
Well-known member
Well, yes. There's the famous quote "no sex in the Soviet Union", porn was banned is SU and IIRC Poland too (you had to get smuggled stuff brought in by enterprising individuals).
Abortion was on and off (Stalin banned it after WW2).
Certainly no such thing as gay rights.
When it came to social mores the Eastern Block was a lot more conservative then the "decadent West". Biggest difference was that women were supposed to be a part of the workforce and not just housewives.
Amusing sidenote, I recall watching a documentary about rubber industry in Poland, the state-owned manufacturer of condoms also made rubber batons that our un-law enforcement used. During the Martial Law from XII.'81 onwards, entire production capacity* went towards enforcement tools, at expense of, among others, condoms. With the whole nation "locked up" with little to do, and no rubber to speak of, it's no wonder there was a population boom +/- 9 months later...
Condoms were also barter items traded with Soviet Union via "friendship trains**".
Anyway, it was also only during '80s that the state manufacturer started making "special, thicker condoms" - meaning they went "progressive" and made rubber for anal sex, meaning for gays.
*Socialism is a system heroically solving problems which do not exist elsewhere.
In the West you'd have other companies step in to fill the void, not so in planned economy.
** "Friendship trains" were tourism trains making rounds across the Socialist Block, basically a boon for various party comrades from "internationalist friendship societies" to have all expenses paid trips.
Enterprising individuals bought gold in Soviet Union (was cheap there), as they rolled back to Eastern Germany they'd go to West Berlin, trade gold for Western goods, bring them back to trade for gold, and so forth and so forth. Officially illegal as crap, but everybody knew the deal and it was basically a boon for trusted party comrades rewarded for loyalty, with the authorities turning a blind eye.