Tzeentchean Perspective
Well-known member
The Fire Rises!
Last edited:
polling "errors". Not deliberate lying for the purpose of demoralizing trump voters so they stay at home3 Terms
It is utterly shocking how many groups are working to ferment a revolution to put into power a system that always oppresses them.It's almost enough to make me want the socialist to win.
Almost.
(and I'm only half-joking there)
It is utterly shocking how many groups are working to ferment a revolution to put into power a system that always oppresses them.
It is like how twitter's ceo recently went "I can't wait for the revolution to win and for us to line up the rich against a wall and shoot them".
does he not comprehend that as a billionaire CEO of a major tech company that HE is the rich that will get lined up?
does he not comprehend that as a billionaire CEO of a major tech company that HE is the rich that will get lined up?
Yeah, I get what you mean. Most socialist states are incredibly conservative in real terms (not religiously or fiscally but in pretty much every other way), and I can kind of agree with some of the "super secret leftist plot" endgame, but not the stuff that it would take to get there. Plus, the chance that they would face-plant and fail utterly is so high that it would never be worth it with such a mediocre goal.It's almost enough to make me want the socialist to win.
Almost.
(and I'm only half-joking there)
Well..are they? I mean whats conservative about them? Honestly asking.Most socialist states are incredibly conservative in real terms
They tend to be socially conservative.Well..are they? I mean whats conservative about them? Honestly asking.
It's just like the LGBT crowd demanding multi-kulti and unrestricted immigration.
Completely ignoring the inconvenient truth about culture of those immigrants. That often they come from countries where people overwhelmingly support supremacy of Sharia law over secular laws. Where being LGBT is subject to death penalty.
Seriously, how stupidly deluded can they be???
They tend to be socially conservative.
People say that but on what issue exactly? Family Values? Party before all and all that. Child birth? One child policy, honestly seems to he more the Party decides what to do with your body that Pro-Choice. Free Press? The Press belongs to the Party doesn't sound conservative to me. Race? The Party decides what constitutes a people. Sounds more like people conflate lining up the gays along with the clerics, businessmen and the rights of the unborn in the same row by the wall makes them socially conservative for some reason.They tend to be socially conservative.
They tend to be socially conservative.
Becouse if you want existing state,you need normal families.Thus why after Lenin almost destroyed russian families, Stalin must stopped that.Becouse free love is weapon to destroy state,but when you take over ant want to rule,you need normal families.
Without them even secret police is not fully efficient,becouse you could not threaten families of people who disobey you,becouse they have none.
That is why leftist,if they win,would stomp on lgbt - becouse they are only tool to destroy our cyvilisation states.When they take over,they would need stable states with normal families.
People seem to be confusing LGBTs with Woke/activist LGBTs (which is a larger percentage, but I'm not sure if it's the majority. A fair number of LGBTs (including me) know that they are up against the wall soon after the revolution. Being gay is a bourgeois mentality (or so commies say). Che, for example, enslaved gays in labor camps.What a lot of LGBT people don't understand is that though we would be first against the wall they would be second.
They tend to be socially conservative.
Well,Sharia law advocate killing homosexuals,but they had nothing against lesbians.Althought considering how womans are treatet,maybe those lesbians would choose death.