chornedsnorkack
Member
I note that Asimov´s Foundationverse is not one of the classics for which thread prefix is offered.
Yet it is useful to compare the technical analysis of other series, posted later.
Asimov does have many cases of inability to do math, or recall and make consistent references elsewhere. But so do these other series.
Starting from the very first. "Foundation" itself. Astounding, May 1942.
It is not just the main text, copied (with alterations) into the novel.
Who here has noted that the contents summary for "Foundation" contains a key piece of information about Foundation, which is not otherwise disclosed in any of the subsequent stories, certainly before 1982?
Yet it is useful to compare the technical analysis of other series, posted later.
Asimov does have many cases of inability to do math, or recall and make consistent references elsewhere. But so do these other series.
Starting from the very first. "Foundation" itself. Astounding, May 1942.
It is not just the main text, copied (with alterations) into the novel.
Who here has noted that the contents summary for "Foundation" contains a key piece of information about Foundation, which is not otherwise disclosed in any of the subsequent stories, certainly before 1982?