So's Elon Musk. Don't demand perfection, take people as they are. I don't care that Glenn Greenwald's a lefty, he still does important work. It's a similar story here.He's also a massive green-energy freak though, misguided.
So's Elon Musk. Don't demand perfection, take people as they are. I don't care that Glenn Greenwald's a lefty, he still does important work. It's a similar story here.He's also a massive green-energy freak though, misguided.
@Abhorsen I agree on Greenwald, though I have my reservations about him primarily because his work was partly responsible for liberating Lula in Brazil ,even though lately he seems to go against the Brazilian left considering how he said basically "No it is not good the US influenced the elections in Brazil just because Lula was the one who won them" unlike 99.99% of leftists in Brazil and he has started criticizing the Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil and saying he IS afraid of them and did some videos on how it is NOT right for THEM to CENSOR YOUTUBERS OR others. @gral and @Sobek can confirm what I said probably, and as well have a much harsher tone than me on Greenwald.So's Elon Musk. Don't demand perfection, take people as they are. I don't care that Glenn Greenwald's a lefty, he still does important work. It's a similar story here.
Agreed.Greenwald demonstrates that some people historically on the left do have principles (most of which are misguided), not just 'whatever gets us power.'
The problem is it isn't until the majority of leftists have already 'passed them by' that they realize they were not part of a movement of like-minded people, but mad power-hungry degenerates who can and will destroy civilization.
So a Harvard researcher conducted a study to establish if there was a bias in police shootings against black people and what he found was that if there was a bias, it was actually in favor of black people, and if there was a bias against anyone, it was against white people. His colleagues warned him not to publish, but for once one of these people had some integrity and actually did publish it. As a result he had to live under police protection for over a month.
I think they might be in for a surprise
So a Harvard researcher conducted a study to establish if there was a bias in police shootings against black people and what he found was that if there was a bias, it was actually in favor of black people, and if there was a bias against anyone, it was against white people. His colleagues warned him not to publish, but for once one of these people had some integrity and actually did publish it. As a result he had to live under police protection for over a month.
I mean... I casually looked up the numbers before from usa govt and noted that too. it does not take a lot of digging.
Basically, every tear police shoots and kills roughly equal amount of whites, asians, and blacks.
Even though by far the most cases of someone violently resisting arrest by shooting the police are mostly blacks.
With asians having literally 0 cases per year of an asian person shooting cops. asians are very servile.
Yet despite that, the cops kill an equal amount of asians even though they never threaten the cops in any way.
whites get fucked over too.
It is obvious to anyone with a brain though that cops treat blacks with great care
The fact that they wanted to assassinate him for the publishing is not surprising. But is angering