Five minutes of hate news

Yep, endless 4chan memes about how in the 2040's we'll have the republican party saying the following lines.
-Democrats are the REAL transphobes!
-Democrats want to sacrifice children to Baal, when we only want to sacrifice them to Moloch
-etc

I pray to God it doesn’t take that long for us to fix this mess.
 
There's a simple solution to this: simply vote for those who plan on reducing the government, not just 'stopping growth'.

But the thing is, Republicans as a group don't want to do this. They want to use the state to enforce their viewpoint. So do the Democrats. Who wins? The Deep State.

BTW, I'm not talking about the social stuff. Even winning on the social stuff won't help the republicans any. My issue is that they constantly increase government. Social stuff doesn't ratchet to near the extent that gov bureaucracy does, because even in a holding pattern, the bureaucracy still does constant dps.

For an analogy, let's say "how far you go is how shitty things are". Then your current speed is how shitty you are making them, etc. Adding Bureaucracy is accelerating. That's a third order effect which permanently increases the speed at which everything will become shittier.

And republicans consistently vote for it. Because they like the deep state. Honestly, the funny thing about RINOs is that really, if most R politicians are RINOs, doesn't that in some sense make them the real R's, and the rare actually good pols the RINOs, using the name recognition to get something actually good done for once?
 
It's a two party system, you have to vote for one of them!
Primaries. And better a Democrat than a big gov Republican. A D big government can be challenged and replaced by the Rs. A Big Gov R cannot be. Hence why, for example, I wish Lindsey Graham was a Democrat: he'd be easier to kick out of the senate. Same for Ted Cruz, and I could go on.
 
There's a simple solution to this: simply vote for those who plan on reducing the government, not just 'stopping growth'.

But the thing is, Republicans as a group don't want to do this. They want to use the state to enforce their viewpoint. So do the Democrats. Who wins? The Deep State.

BTW, I'm not talking about the social stuff. Even winning on the social stuff won't help the republicans any. My issue is that they constantly increase government. Social stuff doesn't ratchet to near the extent that gov bureaucracy does, because even in a holding pattern, the bureaucracy still does constant dps.

For an analogy, let's say "how far you go is how shitty things are". Then your current speed is how shitty you are making them, etc. Adding Bureaucracy is accelerating. That's a third order effect which permanently increases the speed at which everything will become shittier.

And republicans consistently vote for it. Because they like the deep state. Honestly, the funny thing about RINOs is that really, if most R politicians are RINOs, doesn't that in some sense make them the real R's, and the rare actually good pols the RINOs, using the name recognition to get something actually good done for once?
I have repeatedly been calling them the RINO party
 
Yep, next year America could radically alter it's politics and dump the two 'major' parties forever.

But the question is, are they clever enough, determined enough, or just plain human enough to do so?
Read the rest of the post.
It is not about dumping the two party system, it is about dumping WHICH parties are in the two party system.

The USA has dumped a party FIVE TIMES already.
The psyop is not "it is a two party system"
The psyop is "you must vote for one of these specific two parties".

If something happened five times, what is stopping it from happening a 6th time? A 7th?
We could have a world where the two american parties are [libertarian] vs [america first]
It is entirely doable.

Did the people who dump the whig party waste their vote? obviously not! that party died
did the people who dump the whig party waste their vote? obviously not! that party died
 
Read the rest of the post.
It is not about dumping the two party system, it is about dumping WHICH parties are in the two party system.

The USA has dumped a party FIVE TIMES already.
The psyop is not "it is a two party system"
The psyop is "you must vote for one of these specific two parties".

If something happened five times, what is stopping it from happening a 6th time? A 7th?
We could have a world where the two american parties are [libertarian] vs [america first]
It is entirely doable.
I know they've had different parties in the past, but it doesn't look like the forecast is going to allow for any third party in a longggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg time.
What's preventing a 6th or 7th time is hardcore brainwashing at a national level. Reminder modern people are so stupid they accepted 'smart' products that brick themselves if the internet cuts out. Modern people are so stupid they pay subscription services for shit in their cars that are pre-installed. Modern people are so stupid they cannot actually define what a woman is.

Expecting these sub-100 IQ cretins to pick a political party is like expecting a chimp to write a famous novel.
 
I know they've had different parties in the past, but it doesn't look like the forecast is going to allow for any third party in a longggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg time.
What's preventing a 6th or 7th time is hardcore brainwashing at a national level. Reminder modern people are so stupid they accepted 'smart' products that brick themselves if the internet cuts out. Modern people are so stupid they pay subscription services for shit in their cars that are pre-installed. Modern people are so stupid they cannot actually define what a woman is.

Expecting these sub-100 IQ cretins to pick a political party is like expecting a chimp to write a famous novel.
That is a fair point. People are dumber than ever before. so it is much harder to get that 6th occurance to occur in 2023
 
That is a fair point. People are dumber than ever before. so it is much harder to get that 6th occurance to occur in 2023
I kinda lost faith in humanity when I realized a significant majority of people using the internet are 100% unaware of adblocking software.
That's like 90% of mechanics not understanding a fucking torque wrench.
 
Yea, food IP is an abomination and should be abolished.
Also, I am pretty sure one of these four companies is Syngenta. Which is owned by china's govt
Controversial take but IP in general is an abomination and should be abolished.

It made plenty of sense when shit was constantly being invented and there had to be some level of ownership of ideas.
But if modern IP laws were around since the stoneage you would be drinking your "Coca Cola(tm) neutral fluid beverage" from the Monsanto(registered design) dispenser tap, while trying to read the "Brought to you by Carls Jr" Hummer branded vehicle (rights pending) magazine written in the East India Trading Company(tm) language of English.
 
Controversial take but IP in general is an abomination and should be abolished.
Is it controversial?
I think a lot of people agree with you.

I think, 99%+ of it has to go.
Total abolishment is a huge improvement from what we have now.
But in an ideal world we would fix them rather than totally abolish them.
(fixing does means abolishing 99% of it)
 
Is it controversial?
I think a lot of people agree with you.

I think, 99%+ of it has to go.
Total abolishment is a huge improvement from what we have now.
But in an ideal world we would fix them rather than totally abolish them.
(fixing does means abolishing 99% of it)
You'd be surprised how fucking dickriding modern people with IP's.

To state a ridiculous example, there's people out there who seriously, with 100% sincerity and 200% zealousness, believe that a concept like "Imagine an Orca crossbred with a dragon!" is an idea they and they alone can own and draw.

I wish I was making this shit up, these people would copyright the fucking air we breathe if they believed they had some sort of retarded attachment to it.
 
I won't post as much as before due to the fact that my father has threatened sue me, my mother and my sister over what little he gives us (in our bank accounts we don't collectively reach 5k all of the three of us) and to sell his part of the house, if we don't accept or find another written agreement before the 16 of next month because he, according to his lawyer's letter, "thinks there are no longer the prerequisites of the divorce settlement" which included giving us the bare minimum despite the papers of that divorce clearly stated "until the monetarybself sufficiency and conclusion of the education of the children (me and my sister)" as well as "the house shall be in copropriety/use or the mother until both son and daughter " which none of these things have been fulfillfed...basically he pretends we either accept this by next 16 or he takes to court. The advantages we have is that no one in Italian history has been dislodged , the Italian law system as of today is near incapable of even kicking out actual squatters of any kind (I guess due to the fact those who made laws regarding these situations were paranoid and because the first republic of Italy's governments were very humanitarian in some way), as well as the fact that my mother has not one but two chronic illnesses and my sister is in debt to pay for her private uni because has stopped paying despite the divorce settlement clearly stated he needs to cover it.
As advantage (silver-lining I suppose) is all the documentation regarding my physical and mental health problems and the fact my mother has two chronic illnesses and is still recovering from the cancer and chemotherapy, so to add to the historical precendent that nobody gets kicked out of a house in Italy we have these factors as well.
My mom's (and now probably my and my sister's lawyer) replied with the following :

"Dear,

I read the registered letter from his new lawyer.
Obviously they take everything for granted, but that's not really the case.

I will be happy to take care of the cause that certainly he will do it.

If you want we can make an appointment for the week
on January, so we can talk about everything.

Best regards"

So not all hope is lost. He still using the tactic of giving a last minute ultimatum so that we are scared into agreeing with him, thing is it doesn't work with me and my mom, my sister is of course scared but I suspect she is depressed because she did everything my father asked of her and she still got treated like shit.

I thought this belonged to the hate news section even though it is personal like me telling about my father first lawsuit against me in Brazil (which had to settle with me in the end).

I can only tell that if he actually was happy and satisfied of the life he is having he wouldn't pull legal shit or any kind really.

Really other news is that they are pushing news of COVID cases again in Italy, reportedly they are 41k with upteenth variant.
 
Pierce Brosnan accused of trespassing in Yellowstone National Park
Mr Brosnan, 70, was charged with going off trail near the Mammoth Hot Springs and has been ordered to appear in court in Wyoming on 23 January.

The hot springs are part of the park's thermal features that include geysers, steam vents and scalding mud pools.

More than 20 people have been killed after falling into the park's springs.
 
If true, he really should know better.

People have decided to "take a dip" in what look to be warm pools, but the waters are either boiling to the point where meat would fall off the bone in seconds, acidic or alkaline to the point where you'd die of poisoning if the burns don't kill you, or both combined.

Some poor bastard even dissolved in one of those pools. Dissolved.

Those springs are no fucking joke, people.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top