Five minutes of hate news

And with a lack of discipline like that, it’s no wonder our military is overfunded yet still underperforming.
Lol what? Infantry are a good example of getting the job done when needed but when idle does dumb things.

When on duty and on mission and in combat. People do thier job as best as they can. In garrison it is not so much
 
Not sure if it belongs here, but....




:rolleyes:

While we cannot stop Pride Parades, as they are protected as political statements under the 1st amendment, we can move to ban a lot of their content. It’s illegal to have sex in public everywhere in the US, as far as I know. So it seems like it should be legal to ban a lot of the public sexual behaviors exhibited at pride parades.
It does touch upon one thing that is unfortunately only recently being dragged into light. The cultural separatism of the LGBT movement. The left may mean it completely unconsciously when using terms like "LGBT community" and "nontraditional ways of being", while the right is only recently vocally observing the phenomenon, with Eastern Europe's hoopla about "LGBT ideology".
Or as i would say, the people who share the customs, values, tendencies and identifiers represented by the rainbow flag (a set of such symbols also helps identify the scope of this group here) are, for all practical purposes, a subculture, not unlike hippies, furries, or soccer hooligans. Not just any subculture, but a big one that has branches sharing its characteristics all over the world, and in particular the western civilization - some normally recognized subcultures have also spread through a whole civilization too, even a bit beyond, for example if you can spot a goth girl in Ukraine then you can equally easily identify one in USA, UK, France and even in Japan. Their membership strongly skews towards certain demographics, they prefer certain political opinions and factions over others in a pattern different from the general population, often quite fringe ones, they have their own social norms and customs that in some meaningful ways differ from the mainstream culture, mostly in what's socially appropriate and in some more extreme cases even regarding what should be legally allowed, and even though they share the same language they do have some characteristic ways, preferences or quirks in using it.

Much like many commonly recognized cultures have a much more welcoming altitude towards public consumption of alcohol, nevermind those that demand legalization of even more controversial substances, the LGBT subculture has its divergence from mainstream society in, among other things, its attitudes towards public displays of sexuality - after all, the phrase "get a room" didn't come out of nowhere, the sentiment behind it applies in some degree to most parts of western world, that isn't a recent thing either, and it most certainly doesn't except heterosexual acts, even though the LGBT subculture loves to cry homophobic oppression when someone criticizes them for this kind of thing.

The only difference between them and any random typical subculture is that in cases where mainstream culture tries to assert its norms in public space against them, they come crying to courts, celebrities and politicians about hate, discrimination and homophobia, and in case of societies where the left has a lot of cultural influence, that sort of argumentation gets some traction. Meanwhile if punks drink alcohol in public or soccer hooligans have a brawl on the streets, police gets called to deal with it and no one gives a damn.
 
Last edited:
two of these in one day.


I would put a summery but I mean you'd have to read to believe. it's like something out of a horror movie
Look up what happened to David Reimer sometime. He committed suicide when he was 38.

tl;dr version: a psychologist badically used him as a guinea pig when he was a kid. It did not end well.
 
They always like to claim that somehow proves their case about gender being a social construct, when it actually shows the opposite.
In a sense it sorta does prove their case. Prior to puberty boys and girls look and sound very similar. However, they're dressed differently and expected to behave differently. A boy who likes dolls and dresses or a girl who likes to get dirty playing in mud will be considered weird.

If we didn't have a "boys do this, girls do that" mentality the world would be a much better place.
 
Last edited:
In a sense it does prove their case. Prior to puberty boys and girls look and sound very similar. However, they're dressed differently and expected to behave differently. A boy who likes dolls and dresses or a girl who likes to get dirty playing in mud will be considered weird.

If we didn't have a "boys do this, girls do that" mentality the world would be a much better place.

I think the evidence is the other way around.

I'm really not fond of twisting a kid's mind and body until they kill themselves.
 
I think we need to get rid of the experts. Let the kids be kids and just be there to support their choices without pressuring them one way or another. Kids are kids they are children. They will be loud and brash and mean. They are exploring a new environment and trying to figure out what works. We adults need to provide a framework and guidance but allow the little hellions to make their own mistakes. Because life is not neat and clean and orderly. It is dirty, chaotic and messy and you need to learn to deal with that and develop a tougher skin so the slings and arrows bounce off.

currently we are drugging them to silence, we are telling them boys have to act this way and girls this way without letting them see if this or that way fits them better. Good students are grouped with the bad and all are taught by an institution that does not want anyone , but the select few, to think critically and analytically. Because the political class wants sheep not dogs.
 
Green New Deal at the Manhattan Pride March/Rally.


Typical.The same goes in every other country where pederast are marching.
And people on patriotic events usually do not made mess.
But - what could you except from people taking pride from the way they fuck ? i never could undarstandt that.I could take pride from my religion or nation,but i would never march becouse i am straight.
 
I think the evidence is the other way around.

I'm really not fond of twisting a kid's mind and body until they kill themselves.
One can make a distinction between gender and physical sex. I think that's what the professionals are doing. Physical sex is a simple matter of someone's reproductive anatomy. Gender is less absolute.
 
One can make a distinction between gender and physical sex. I think that's what the professionals are doing. Physical sex is a simple matter of someone's reproductive anatomy. Gender is less absolute.
There are certain things hard-coded into one's physical sex though. That said, I'm with @Typhonis; I think we need to stop forcing our adult perspectives onto kids to the point where the weight of it all is crushing them, and just let them be kids.
 
If anyone has ever questioned if anything was sacred, know this: They've come for the freaking bronies.

If this is actually supposed to be set in Equestria, how has everypony not been frozen solid by windigos? You know; the winter spirits that feed off fighting and hatred? Who nearly killed everypony the first time the pony tribes couldn't get along? Who showed up during the finale the instant they started turning on each other again?

I swear; nobody in the western entertainment industry seems to care about legacy or continuity these days. No; the only thing they care about is creating more propaganda to push their political ideology.
 
In a sense it sorta does prove their case. Prior to puberty boys and girls look and sound very similar. However, they're dressed differently and expected to behave differently. A boy who likes dolls and dresses or a girl who likes to get dirty playing in mud will be considered weird.

If we didn't have a "boys do this, girls do that" mentality the world would be a much better place.

This is nonsense, and not just nonsense, but both easily disproven and highly destructive nonsense. Like all dangerous lies though, it does have a little bit of truth in it, which is part of why it is so dangerous.

1. Yes, infant boys and girls are almost indistinguishable if their genitals are covered, but that is functionally only true at that level.
2. Even infants though, show differences in behavior. In a study done on what images infants focused on more just days after birth, there was a distinct preference in boys for looking at objects, and girls for looking at faces. The only place this pattern was reversed was in the case of girls exposed to abnormally high amounts of pre-natal testosterone, at which point those (extremely rare) girls tended to have more object fixation, like the boys.
3. With a few outlying exceptions, the more a child grows up, the more readily their gender can be distinguished. Voice is a good one; voice even from an early age is something that can instantly be clearly recognized as male or female, even for other children. Unless a child is overweight, you'll see differences in their physique well before they hit puberty.
4. Facial features. Again, there are some rare outliers, but feminine and masculine facial features very clearly develop well before puberty hits. Sure, puberty is where facial hair sets in for guys and a girl's chest starts developing, but the face is very discernibly different before then.
5. Behavior patterns. Boys are extremely noticeably more competitive, aggressive, physically active, etc. This also emerges well before puberty hits. Christine Hoffsummers talks about these behavior patterns quite a bitt.

One can make a distinction between gender and physical sex. I think that's what the professionals are doing. Physical sex is a simple matter of someone's reproductive anatomy. Gender is less absolute.

No. The distinction between 'gender' and 'sex' in humans was specifically dreamed up by radical ideologists, exactly so that they could play word games with it.

This:

Covers both that, and the grotesque history of political transgenderism fairly well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top