Five minutes of hate news


>wife: you should enlist and get me some money.
>I'd rather not die in this war.
>Wife: mr commissar, my man would like to enlist; our/his address is .....
>commissar: Spasiba, we'll come and get him.
According to the article, it is actually EX wifes who were not receiving alimony/child support payments because their ex-husbands are unemployed.

so they "heroically" lied about still being married so they could sign the ex husbands up for the military

also explicitly telling the news reporters that it is ok if they die, because the women will get compensation for the death.
 
Last edited:
According to the article, it is actually EX wifes who were not receiving alimony/child support payments because their ex-husbands are unemployed.

so they heroically lied about still being married so they could sign the ex husbands up for the military

also explicitly stating that it is ok if they die, because the women will get compensation for the death.

. ..

So they want to give their ex husbands who are already not happy with them military training access to high powered weaponry and a motive to take horrible vengeance.

This is practically a Darwin moment in the making
 
. ..

So they want to give their ex husbands who are already not happy with them military training access to high powered weaponry and a motive to take horrible vengeance.

This is practically a Darwin moment in the making
They're probably expecting them to get tossed into the meat grinder that is the Ukraine invasion.
 

>wife: you should enlist and get me some money.
>I'd rather not die in this war.
>Wife: mr commissar, my man would like to enlist; our/his address is .....
>commissar: Spasiba, we'll come and get him.
It galls me how this article implicitly praises these females for coming up with such a "clever" plan. Guess no matter where and when you go, women stay the same. It happened in London after all, with females getting rid of incovenient men by shaming them into enrolling.

Wouldn't be too surprised if these betrayed exes come back and commit multiple homicides. Would be deserved to, if you ask me!
 
It galls me how this article implicitly praises these females for coming up with such a "clever" plan. Guess no matter where and when you go, women stay the same. It happened in London after all, with females getting rid of incovenient men by shaming them into enrolling.

Wouldn't be too surprised if these betrayed exes come back and commit multiple homicides. Would be deserved to, if you ask me!

since they litterally tried to get them killed and profitted directly from it fincially yeah.... that's deserved.
 
this is most likely true but people come back from meat grinders all of the time.
its like gambling.
if she wins, she gets govt check
if she loses, she gets a very angry war vet

more seriously though, these women just do not consider the future and the consequences of their actions.
 
Under the courageous leadership of successive Democratic leaders from the City Council up to the Governor, Minneapolis has finally established proper Police No-Go Zones filled with Homeless People who can Provide Sanctuary to the Criminal Element.

Kare 11 said:
When the Lumley's get there, they can see the van inside and shoot a cell phone video of people handling their power tools.

So they call police.

"If I can see my stolen property, I don't care if its in someone's home, in their business or on the street, I should have the right to go retrieve it with the authorities," Heather says.

But the Lumleys say they were told by MPD that officers can't go into the encampment to investigate or get the stolen property.
"To have just that kind of brush-aside when we actually need something was, to me, more frustrating than the actual theft," Heather says.

A Minneapolis police spokesperson tells KARE 11 News that for life-saving situations, they don't hesitate to enter encampments. But for property crimes, because of the hostile nature toward police inside the encampments, they need to slow down and make sure they have available staffing and resources before proceeding.

The property owners eventually had to go into the Homeless Encampment themselves and recovered some of their tools. The van however was stripped and found having crashed into an alley somewhere else in the city.

 
Under the courageous leadership of successive Democratic leaders from the City Council up to the Governor, Minneapolis has finally established proper Police No-Go Zones filled with Homeless People who can Provide Sanctuary to the Criminal Element.



The property owners eventually had to go into the Homeless Encampment themselves and recovered some of their tools. The van however was stripped and found having crashed into an alley somewhere else in the city.

Wanna bet that if they demanded their property back at gunpoint the police will enter the "police free zone" to arrest them?

hmm... how soon until a protection racket arises?
actually is it really a racket if they provide actual protection because the police refuse to?
 
Wanna bet that if they demanded their property back at gunpoint the police will enter the "police free zone" to arrest them?

hmm... how soon until a protection racket arises?
actually is it really a racket if they provide actual protection because the police refuse to?

Oh, but don't you know militias are a threat to democracy? (unless they vote democrat of course.)
 
It galls me how this article implicitly praises these females for coming up with such a "clever" plan. Guess no matter where and when you go, women stay the same. It happened in London after all, with females getting rid of incovenient men by shaming them into enrolling.

Wouldn't be too surprised if these betrayed exes come back and commit multiple homicides. Would be deserved to, if you ask me!
Actually I disagree addicts and dead beat dads should be killed. Unless these women just divorced their husbands for no reason they did nothing wrong. But if they were abusive or were drunks then it would be better for the world that they died.
 
Actually I disagree addicts and dead beat dads should be killed. Unless these women just divorced their husbands for no reason they did nothing wrong. But if they were abusive or were drunks then it would be better for the world that they died.
You are inverting cause and effect.
The woman usually divorces the man for no good reason. (usually a false delusion of "I can do better". a delusion which is then dashed on the rocks of reality when she realizes that a divorced 40 year old with children isn't going to snag a funny-considerate-perfect-looking-20-year-old-millionaire-prince. the only options actually available for them are downgrades from their former husbands)

Taking away all of the man's money and breaking his heart. which drives him to drink.

The courts award custody of the children to the woman despite the fact she is the kind of evil witch who ruins her children's lives out of stupid selfish reasons.
As well as the house, and alimony, and child support.

And they are likely "deadbeat" because the global economy went into the shitter. Russia's economy even moreso due to being boycotted by the whole world.

We also only have the women's words that their ex's are deadbeats and addicts. Women who we know for a fact are liars as they admit to have lied to the govt and claimed to still be married so they can sign up "their husbands".
 
Last edited:
You are inverting cause and effect.
The woman usually divorces the man for no good reason. (usually a false delusion of "I can do better". a delusion which is then dashed on the rocks of reality)

Taking away all of the man's money and breaking his heart. which drives him to drink.

The courts award custody of the children to the woman despite the fact she is the kind of evil witch who ruins her children's lives out of stupid selfish reasons.
As well as the house, and alimony, and child support.

And they are likely "deadbeat" because the global economy went into the shitter. Russia's economy even moreso due to being boycotted by the whole world.

We also only have the women's words that their ex's are deadbeats and addicts. Women who we know for a fact are liars as they admit to have lied to the govt and claimed to still be married so they can sign up "their husbands".
What you say is true about American women but just because Russians are white does not mean they have the same culture problems you do. Just like Iranians and Turks and other Muslim white peoples don’t have those same problems.
 
What you say is true about American women but just because Russians are white does not mean they have the same culture problems you do. Just like Iranians and Turks and other Muslim white peoples don’t have those same problems.
1. All westernized countries have this same issue as they all have the same laws on the subject, not just america. As well as consume the same media which pushes the "you can do better" nonsense.

2. Muslim countries don't have that issue because women are property in muslim countries.
Yes, I am aware that not all countries are the same.

3. Russia is not a muslim country. After the fall of USSR russia became fairly liberal in many ways.

4. The women in the article cite their ex-husbands not meeting payments that the courts awarded them, as well as having the kids.
so clearly they have been awarded money and the kids in the divorce.

... however, I just double checked and apparently its just a case of russians being weird and calling "child support payments" an "alimony payment".
With actual alimony being allegedly rare.

They do still take 50% of all assets on the divorce. Take the kids. and get child support.

number 1 cause of divorce in Russia is poverty.
number 2 cause (40% of claims) is allegedly alcoholism of spouse
... and russians actually have more divorces than weddings.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top