TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
TLDR : Bethesda game enjoyer makes a more believable and better city than FALLOUT 4 devs.
TLDR : Bethesda game enjoyer makes a more believable and better city than FALLOUT 4 devs.
Cmon, there's no fucking way they'll add anything of value to the already bloated rotting corpse that is Fallout.I believe they said that it is canon and takes place after Fallout 4.
https://gamerant.com/fallout-tv-series-canon-problem-factions-setting-timeline/#:~:text=The%20Amazon%20Prime%20show%20based,canon%20to%20the%20game's%20world.
So they'll be some good feats but also potential incoming retcons.
Sneak, small guns, repair
FO1 and 2 kicked my ass the first few times I played it, but I generally knew how to make a decent build just by reading what the traits and skills did.Oh it's the guy who did a no death no save speed run through Fallout on his first try.
So standard player character.
Explain how in NV you can wear it without the servos without becoming completely immobile? :V
Me totally not liking the battlesuit design while everyone hates it.
Fallout Power Armor and Form Fitting is a combination of words I'm unfamiliar with. Unless we're taking a very liberal use of the term form fitting (or Power Armor).
I don't mind the power armor designs really. I think that while Power Cores are dumb, the idea of Power Armor being giant suits of actual power armor is more in line with what it was in Fallout 1/2. New Vegas improved on it with introducing Damage Toughness as a combat factor but in Fallout the idea of getting critically hit for zero points of damage was a very amusing meme. Bullets were just bouncing off of Power Armor as it should be.
You mean how you can slap T-45 parts on a T-51? Despite the two armor sets using different methods of locomotion?My question is.
How can you wear parts of the power armor without the other parts?
It makes no logical sense.
Yes.You mean how you can slap T-45 parts on a T-51? Despite the two armor sets using different methods of locomotion?
FO4 rationalized it as there being an underlying 'frame' and the actual 'power armor' is just metal sheets you duct tape to it.Yes.
And the fact you can have parts destroyed snd it still works, etc.
The underlying frsme makes more sense.FO4 rationalized it as there being an underlying 'frame' and the actual 'power armor' is just metal sheets you duct tape to it.
Meaning the primitive T-45a and Enclave X-01 Mark IV are 'really' identical beneath the plating.
Which...Is such fucking nonsense lmao.
In reality, yeah battle damage to power armor would very much likely result in hydraulic leaks, electrical fires, etc, all nasty stuff which would make it stop working.