Culture Explaining Monogamy to Vox

Fleiur

Well-known member
Yes, yes they are. Observe all the romances in Twilight, 50 shades of Grey and Kylo ren.

Also this from the Wing thread I made before:



Keep in mind, that these men could be the supportive boyfriends of these women or male feminists and yet other men call them losers and cucked boyfriends. Why is that?


Women get bored of marriages earlier then men as their sex drive goes down the drain but introduce the idea of sex with other men and the sex drive comes back as if it never left.
What is your opinion on hookup and premarital sex?
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
Are you for it? Yes/No. Why?
Will you engage yourself in it? Yes/No. Why?

Not interested in sex or actual women

I have work and a YUGE backlog of stuff to read, watch and play

Before you ask, I don’t drink alcohol to begin with, tastes terrible and bitter 300% of the time, no one night stands for me

If possible I’d find a way for me to stop loving food and flavored drinks so much, already have a dangerously high sugar level and carbohydrates and fat in me

Would reduce my expenses significantly and give me extra time to enjoy things, finished reading The Prince by Nicollo Machiavelli, noice
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
Polyandrous arrangements do exist in some cultures. Usually its less about sex, and more about inheritance or population disparities.

With multiple brothers married to the same woman-in say Nepal or wherever polyandry exists as a legitimate form of marriage-its to keep land in the family. And if one brother dies, well he has another.

Problem with polyandry is that men are jealous, and liable to treat children not theirs badly(this has been documented in such cultures in the Amazon).

Polygyny is much more common, whereas polyandry while not a modern invention-is anthropologically speaking a relatively uncommon practice. For obvious reasons.

Then again the above bunch of degenerates strike me as more trying to do some sort of polyamorous arrangement, which is less common and even more prone to instability.

This Wikipedia article ought to give some basic understanding of the practice. Polyandry - Wikipedia
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
Polyandrous arrangements do exist in some cultures. Usually its less about sex, and more about inheritance or population disparities.

With multiple brothers married to the same woman-in say Nepal or wherever polyandry exists as a legitimate form of marriage-its to keep land in the family. And if one brother dies, well he has another.

Problem with polyandry is that men are jealous, and liable to treat children not theirs badly(this has been documented in such cultures in the Amazon).

Polygyny is much more common, whereas polyandry while not a modern invention-is anthropologically speaking a relatively uncommon practice. For obvious reasons.

Then again the above bunch of degenerates strike me as more trying to do some sort of polyamorous arrangement, which is less common and even more prone to instability.

This Wikipedia article ought to give some basic understanding of the practice. Polyandry - Wikipedia
Sure but let's say the West through whatever means. Ended up with one of the these aragements instead of monogomy. These types of people would still try to undermine it. Because it's about destroying all social norms. Isn't that just a lovely way to live sad.
 
D

Deleted member 88

Guest
I mean imagine if the male to female population ratio was skewed badly in male favor?

Like ten men for every woman?

In that case-a single woman’s children become more valuable. A single woman might be worth sharing.

But yes it’s fundamentally about savaging social norms.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top