Excellence in Shitlording

[Morphic Tide]

It is technically fully within the right of these liberal activst judges to imprison trump for "not respecting me" and "ignoring my blatantly illegal orders".

The Federal "contempt of court" statute, at cursory searches, appears to be the following:

A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as—
(1)
Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice;
(2)
Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions;
(3)
Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.

Though I've not checked with any case law and I am not a lawyer, I think that the first is proximate disorder that could be made slightly more precise, the second is limited to only Judiciary staff, and the third is already limited to lawful orders.

Limiting the first to court premises, the court arguing contempt to merely charging, and defining that prosecution must determine the order is lawful before considering whether it was disobeyed or resisted sufficiently as to constitute criminal contempt would seem to fix the problem.

More broadly, a bill establishing that nothing a court does may take effect outside its jurisdiction, expanding as higher courts affirm it, would shut down such shenanigans more generally. Edit: The "cost" that any judgements restricting activity are limited to that jurisdiction is fine. Anyone big enough to move meaningful assets to another jurisdiction already tends to fight through appeals all the way up anyways, might as well light a fire under the appellate courts' asses to wrap that up in a timely manner so the punishment can actually take effect nationwide.

 

[mrttao]

The Federal "contempt of court" statute, at cursory searches, appears to be the following:

Though I've not checked with any case law and I am not a lawyer, I think that the first is proximate disorder that could be made slightly more precise, the second is limited to only Judiciary staff, and the third is already limited to lawful orders.

Limiting the first to court premises, the court arguing contempt to merely charging, and defining that prosecution must determine the order is lawful before considering whether it was disobeyed or resisted sufficiently as to constitute criminal contempt would seem to fix the problem.

More broadly, a bill establishing that nothing a court does may take effect outside its jurisdiction, expanding as higher courts affirm it, would shut down such shenanigans more generally. Edit: The "cost" that any judgements restricting activity are limited to that jurisdiction is fine. Anyone big enough to move meaningful assets to another jurisdiction already tends to fight through appeals all the way up anyways, might as well light a fire under the appellate courts' asses to wrap that up in a timely manner so the punishment can actually take effect nationwide.

1. Contempt is typically not even charged. rather, judges simply order people be sent to prison immediately on the spot the moment they determine contempt occured.

2. "misbehavior" is super vague.

3. This might be one of those cases where the rules as written say one thing and the actual execution is another.
the constitution SAYS the right to bear arms shall not be abridged.
yet it is being abridged all over the place.

where, rather than a new law, we need to have some consequences for those who violate the existing law.

there is zero actual official punishment listed in the constiution for those who abridge the right to bear arms.

 

[Morphic Tide]

1. Contempt is not charged.

Hence amending the statute so that it is, with the charge processed by a higher court starting with determining if the order was lawful. Include reference to a relevant statute that the judge will be automatically found guilty under if the order they are charging contempt of is ever found unlawful in the future.

2. "misbehavior" is super vague.

Changing "in its presence" to "on its premises" means that shit-talking the judge from home is out of scope. Throw in a requirement of explaining how the conduct has "obstructed the course of justice" if that helps.

3. This might be one of those cases where the rules as written say one thing and the actual execution is another.

Which is a line of questioning that rapidly devolves into "burn the system down" because a refusal of enforcement does this to any system.

where, rather than a new law, we need to have some consequences for those who violate the existing law.

...Like putting their decisions under examination with immediate criminal conviction if overturned? Which to enact as a systemic change requires a new law declaring that such consequences will be enacted?

 

[mrttao]

lol...

Article:

If you haven't been following the El Salvador deportation case, let me bring you up to speed:

Judge: Hey Trump, you can't deport that guy to El Salvador.

Trump: Yeah. Well. I did.

Judge: Well now you have to bring him back.

Trump: No can do compadre. He's under El Salvador control. I have no power there.

Judge: You at least to have to TRY.

Trump: That's fine. The El Salvador President is at my house right now.

Judge: And?

Trump: I asked him.

Judge: AND?

Trump: He said no.

Judge: Did you really ask him?

Trump: Lol no.

Judge: Lol.

Oh... not lol.

Some updates on this case:

1. Maryland senator chris van hollen flew to el salvador to try and convince the govt there to release this MS13 gang member and bring him personally back to the usa.

2. The media lies that he is a beloved family man...
except, his wife got a restraining order against him previously for domestic violence.

U.S. senator travels to El Salvador to return deported illegal immigrant to America

I'm not joking, you guys, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen actually traveled to El Salvador in an attempt to free and bring back to America former illegal Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

notthebee.com

 

[mrttao]

Hence amending the statute so that it is, with the charge processed by a higher court starting with determining if the order was lawful.

100% agree with you. this is an essential fix to the way contempt is currently handled.

Which is a line of questioning that rapidly devolves into "burn the system down" because a refusal of enforcement does this to any system.

Well, no.
I was actually thinking of the need to put in a review board that reviews and punishes judges who abuse this clause.

...Like putting their decisions under examination with immediate criminal conviction if overturned? Which to enact as a systemic change requires a new law declaring that such consequences will be enacted?

yes. exactly 100% what I was thinking of and trying to convey.

 

[mrttao]

Pretty funny.
How to tell apart various asian languages

 

[Husky_Khan]

Four Simple Questions to Determine Whether a Country is Worthy of Respect

Article:

Over the years, I've developed a 4-point test for determining whether a country is worthy of my respect. This is how it works.

1. Is that country's population less than Georgia's? If so, it's not even a real country and not worth a second thought. Irrelevant.

2. Has that country ever had an avowed communist as a leader or been under Soviet control? If so, it is forever poisoned and should be cast to the side.

3. Did that country fight alongside America in the two world wars? If not, it is a permanent enemy and should never be trusted. Ottomans are furniture, not an empire

4. For the select few that survive the first three questions, the final question is: Does that country have an SEC championship? If the answer is no, we cast it to the side.

 

[mrttao]

Four Simple Questions to Determine Whether a Country is Worthy of Respect

Article:

Over the years, I've developed a 4-point test for determining whether a country is worthy of my respect. This is how it works.

1. Is that country's population less than Georgia's? If so, it's not even a real country and not worth a second thought. Irrelevant.

2. Has that country ever had an avowed communist as a leader or been under Soviet control? If so, it is forever poisoned and should be cast to the side.

3. Did that country fight alongside America in the two world wars? If not, it is a permanent enemy and should never be trusted. Ottomans are furniture, not an empire

4. For the select few that survive the first three questions, the final question is: Does that country have an SEC championship? If the answer is no, we cast it to the side.

first 3 are good. last one turns it into a joke

 

[Robovski]

 

[Husky_Khan]

The ongoing Catturd Saga enters a new Age as Catturd is suffering from issues at his workplace where he LABORS twelve to fifteen hours a day or over a HUNDRED HOURS A WEEK trying to make ends meet.

Article:

The last 3 or 4 weeks the algorithm has been so bad on X - it's hard to justify putting 12-15 hours a day on here and busting your ass when you just get throttled to hell and back for no reason.

I've talked to hundreds of large account creators and it's the same for all of them. None of them understand this insane strategy.

It makes no sense throttling the hell out of everyone when X should want their advertisers getting as many views possible.

I just don't get it.

I know everyone understands what I'm talking about because it's happening to everyone.

 

[Husky_Khan]

She be Rowling, Gaiman Hatin...

 

[Skitzyfrenic]

While she's retarded most of the time, JK Rowling can be based when it comes to certain things.

 

[SoliFortissimi]

Rowling is one of the real feminists.

 

[ATP]

Rowling is one of the real feminists.

And that is why they try to purge her now.She is really lucky,that they are neomarxist who only want cancel her,not old school marxist who would simply schoot her....

 

[Captain X]

The way some of them talk about her, I honestly wouldn't be surprised if at some point someone does at least try to kill her.

 

[ATP]

The way some of them talk about her, I honestly wouldn't be surprised if at some point someone does at least try to kill her.

Possible,and police would do notching.But - goverment would not schoot her.Still better then old marxists.

 

[Husky_Khan]

Found this comedian (Ami Kozak) on the social medias... and thankfully the skits are short... shorts.

From a ringing endorsement from Candace Owens.



Tucker Carlson. Good Diction... and that laugh...





Dougie Murray



Jordan Peterson (that music eh?

 

[Husky_Khan]

This is literal Shitlording.

Article:

Met a billionaire for breakfast

I ordered pancakes and chocolate milk

He ordered a 32 egg omelette

I gasped

The bill came out to $957 thanks to his meal

He paid with his Amex Black Platinum Gold Medallion Card

I asked why he got such an expensive meal

"Don't worry, I always get my money's worth," he said, chuckling.

He then went to the restroom and completely destroyed the plumbing.

The business had to pay $2,700 to get the problem fixed

Guess who owns the plumbing company right next door...

Billionaires operate on a different level

Being a Shitlord is a Billionaire mindset.

 

[Captain X]

Woman trips and falls on man's business property and sues both the business owner and the city of NY. NY says that actually that sidewalk is on his property and he is solely responsible for it. Man puts up fence along the edge of his property line, which includes not only the sidewalk, but the parking space along the curb as well. City threatens to fine him and cut down his fence if he doesn't remove it himself by May 17th.

 

[Typhonis]

Yeah I saw this on Youtube earlier. The property deed shows that, yes, the parking spaces and sidewalk are on the man's land. The City basically said, it's not our property.

Wouldn't it be funny if he called the cops on them for trespassing? He owns the street and sidewalk. Thus he can declare they are trespassing.