mrttao
Well-known member
NSA runs counter intel. If FBI does counter intel it is exceeding its remit.
Also, I don't give a fuck. this is some necessary pain to remove an enemy from within.
Excellence in Shitlording
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
Also, I don't give a fuck. this is some necessary pain to remove an enemy from within.
mrttao
Well-known member
1. you CAN defeat a gang by taking out all the underlings. This is why wars exist. You don't HAVE to assassinate the enemy king, you can just conquer the land and kill all the soldiers.
for bonus points, declare the gangs terrorists and send them to el salvador prison
2. so extract them first before publishing them.
No action is completely perfect. But harsh action is needed to drain the swamp and shatter the deep state
NSA runs counter Cyber.
FBI does domestic CI...because they are rhe only one able to legally operate in the US in that capacity...
Except that then starts a guerrilla war. And not all the gangs are stupid, add in you would be having open firefights in the streets.
And killing black teens just makes more vote left, because you will end up killing non gang members.
It isn't easy when it is domestic.
And then what? You now lost your source within the gang and cant get it back.
now you have to enter an open shooting war where you will be outnumbered in the biggest densest cities in the country...
good idea.
And what you are wanting is literally going to cut any and all CI and anti gang activities for years if not decades...
mrttao
Well-known member
I am sure anything that exists has been heavily modified already.
My main issue is that it is a nest of vipers and reforming it is an uphill battle.
just shut it down and make a new organization from scratch. hiring only police veterans this time.
mrttao
Well-known member
No, wrong. NSA is counter intelligence.
CISA runs counter Cyber.
Well, in actuality they BOTH run "counter cyber" against the american citizens on behalf of the oligarchs
NSA does not run counter intelligence in the US except for signals work. FBI runs point on all human based counter intel INSIDE the US.
I run counter intelligence on the Sietch constantly so I don't even know what you people are talking about tbh.
Skitzyfrenic
Well-known member
Yeah, well, I have countered intelligence! Ha! I'm the smartest.
Except that narrows the pool to small and would basically have them overstretched and unable to do ANYTHING.
No, they are not Counter Intel...
Counter intel is diffrent from Counter Cyber.
But of course you know nothing of the diffrence.
But then again you only care for a "win" even if it hurts us long term. But making the FBI into what we want by changing the culture the head and gutting anyone who has gone against Trump allows you to use them against states that try and stop him
CTE catching up to MMA Fighterand now geopolitical expert and pious Christian activist Jake Shields
But...jews are not semantics,right? @Cherico , tell us, you are not semantic?
That dude is such an idiot...it's really sad as an example of human potential.
Dunno if I'll make this a weekly thing. Probably not... Only because I managed to actually see this post when checking Twitter just now lol.
Those FBI Agents must be locked in some bunker somewhere in the Southern District New York FBI Field Office. Send in the 88th Siege Army already!
lol...
Oh... not lol.
Article: If you haven't been following the El Salvador deportation case, let me bring you up to speed:
Judge: Hey Trump, you can't deport that guy to El Salvador.
Trump: Yeah. Well. I did.
Judge: Well now you have to bring him back.
Trump: No can do compadre. He's under El Salvador control. I have no power there.
Judge: You at least to have to TRY.
Trump: That's fine. The El Salvador President is at my house right now.
Judge: And?
Trump: I asked him.
Judge: AND?
Trump: He said no.
Judge: Did you really ask him?
Trump: Lol no.
Judge: Lol.
Oh... not lol.
mrttao
Well-known member
We really need to erase "contempt of court".
I have seen it abused so often in divorce court
> Feminist judge: WHEN ARE YOU PAYING THE 40k a month you owe your wife for child support!
> Husband: I don't have the money because she destroyed my business
> Feminist judge: REEEE CONTEMPT! off to prison!
Anyways, would be hilarious to see the judge ordering trumps to go to prison for contempt of court. I am going to laugh my ass off when it backfires.
mrttao
Well-known member
The funniest part is that he isn't impersonating the president.
It is actually the law that any judge can throw any person in prison for "not respecting me enough" any time the mood strikes them. even if the person did not do anything wrong.
this is an abomination of justice that has been horrible abused for a very long time.
It is technically fully within the right of these liberal activst judges to imprison trump for "not respecting me" and "ignoring my blatantly illegal orders".
I am hoping the govt actually does something to curtail this power of judges and makes it actually illegal to imprison an american citizen without a trial.
mrttao
Well-known member
another fun fact. the police my literally legally rob you at any time.
The USA govt LITERALLY can steal your money for LITERALLY no reason.
Asset forfeiture - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They LITERALLY do not need a trial, they LITERALLY do not need to accuse you of a crime.
Civil asset forfeiture: Unfair, undemocratic, and un-American
Download the PDF Summary Since the advent of the War on Drugs, law enforcement agencies have used civil asset forfeiture laws to strip Americans of billions of dollars in cash, cars, real estate, and other assets. Under these state and federal laws, officers are legally empowered to seize...www.splcenter.org
If they want to, they just can steal all your money. your car. your house. etc.
80% of those whose money is stolen by USA govt never get charged with a crime.
And 50% of the time when the police confiscates your cash, they confiscate less than 192$. Making it impractical to even contest. And when they seize all your money, you don't have the money to hire a lawyer to sue them. (and even if you sue... its very very hard to get anything back).
This was proposed as necessary in "the war on drugs". And never cancelled.
Also, the nationalization in this scenario is actually based on fines.
The standard fine for theft is treble (3x) the stolen amount.
Nationalizing the federal reserve is going to be worth LESS than 3x the amount of money they stole from the public via their money printing.
Furthermore, when they printed money it was also counterfeiting.
The fact they literally bribed govt officials to look the other way and say it is legal does not change the fact that they did it.
After all, back in the day owning slaves was legal.
Genocide is also always legal because the govt is the one doing it.
So when there is a shift in control of govt, you can bet your ass that the new govt is not forced to hold unto old corruptions.
Precedent for forefeiture goes all the way back to the very founding of the USA. where they just confiscates all the money and property of any american that supported the UK during the independence war.
And let us not forget the fact Obama literally Nationalized the auto industry and school loans. That was in our lifetime.