I live in the Seattle suburbs. I've been here since 1963, except for a few years going to school in Eastern Washington. I love this state, but our politics are a mess. Seattle dominates King County, and King County dominates the state. And Seattle will elect anything with a D after the name. Effectively its a one party state -- and I'd complain about that no matter which one party it was. Politicians need to be forced to defend their positions. That doesn't happen in an echo chamber.

On the plus side we do have the museum of Flight and some really cool coast defense forts.
 
I live in the Seattle suburbs. I've been here since 1963, except for a few years going to school in Eastern Washington. I love this state, but our politics are a mess. Seattle dominates King County, and King County dominates the state. And Seattle will elect anything with a D after the name. Effectively its a one party state -- and I'd complain about that no matter which one party it was. Politicians need to be forced to defend their positions. That doesn't happen in an echo chamber.

On the plus side we do have the museum of Flight and some really cool coast defense forts.
Now that the elections are over, do you think the violent crime will get stopped in Seattle ?
 
if their political leadership dies maybe not, their leaders are much more destructive then any earthquake.
You really do not get how bad a Cascadia megaquake could be for Seattle and Puget Sound.

Like, normally I'm ok with political hyperbole, and Seattle's Dem leadership is horrendous.

But the Cascadia megaquake would liquefy most of the ground under Puget Sound and the Northwest coast, lead to tsunami's over 100 feet high, and could easily set off Rainer or other Cascadia volcanoes in the months afterwards due to shaking their magma chambers so hard, just to name the top level effects that would cause a lot of problems down the road.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top