Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Greengrass

Well-known member
[<deleted content>

This is somewhat incorrect. If the Senate and the House vote differently (and they will), then the original slate of electors is accepted. The only way the electors aren't accepted is if both the Senate and the House agree that it shouldn't be. See here.
The joint session does not act on any objections that are made. Instead, the joint session is suspended while each house meets separately to debate the objection and vote whether, based on the objection, to count the vote or votes in question. Both houses must vote separately to agree to the objection. Otherwise, the objection fails and the vote or votes are counted. (3 U.S.C. §15, provides that “the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes.... ”)
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
<deleted content>
And the likely hood of that happening is liekly.

SCOTUS should hear all of these, and honestly? They will. Enough of them are willing to look into these cases and want them to reach it.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
If our voting system has been so blatantly compromised and manipulated without justice being served, then the USA is dead anyway. Better the fires of another Civil War take us than dull acceptance that our decisions don't matter.

I don't think the majority of you Americans or other Westerners are truly willing to stand up for your rights

They lack the fanaticism that can keep guys like all the rioters going on straight for weeks to months on end and also dedicating a good portion of their time and money to doing things that people would be weirded out by how much one has ruined even their own body for

Hard Power loses to "Soft Power"
 

DarthOne

☦️
I hate to be an edge lady about such a serious topic as civil war and the harm it could cause, but honestly at this point we might be better off with a civil war than the alternative.
Do you think I like talking about it? Trust me, I know it's not a matter to be treated lightly. Nor is it something I want to see happen if it can be avoided with a Trump victory (or the victory of the Democrats, if the situation was reversed and the GOP was cheating). But as I said, if things are so far gone as they seem to be and Trump loses, then it's better for us to fight than just roll over.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
I don't think the majority of you Americans or other Westerners are truly willing to stand up for your rights

They lack the fanaticism that can keep guys like all the rioters going on straight for weeks to months on end and also dedicating a good portion of their time and money to doing things that people would be weirded out by how much one has ruined even their own body for

Hard Power loses to "Soft Power"
I'll let you in on a secret; the majority of any given population has never been willing to fight. It's always the minority who has fought for, or against, change; while everyone else either passively supports whichever side appeals to them, or ignores the conflict outright in favor of living their lives.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
I'll let you in on a secret; the majority of any given population has never been willing to fight. It's always the minority who has fought for, or against, change; while everyone else either passively supports whichever side appeals to them, or ignores the conflict outright in favor of living their lives.

It’s more of the latter than anything else

Hell, I think while it maybe slow, people will surrender their guns for increasingly worthless cash

People won’t even make the effort of storing old videos and files on hardrives and just wait for whatever’s new and thus the blatant rewriting of history occurs and even if they’re starving or watching their homes burned down they can barely even realize who is to blame or make a shout of rage

It's also not helped that when it comes to people's knowledge on past and current and even about technology or philosophy or science, what they know is incredibly abridged and they're not interested in the finer details
 

TyrantTriumphant

Well-known member
Do you think I like talking about it? Trust me, I know it's not a matter to be treated lightly. Nor is it something I want to see happen if it can be avoided with a Trump victory (or the victory of the Democrats, if the situation was reversed and the GOP was cheating). But as I said, if things are so far gone as they seem to be and Trump loses, then it's better for us to fight than just roll over.
It's worth it to try for a peaceful secession first. Perhaps it wouldn't work, but considering that a civil war would likely kill off most of the population it's still worth a shot.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
It's worth it to try for a peaceful secession first. Perhaps it wouldn't work, but considering that a civil war would likely kill off most of the population it's still worth a shot.

The legal process is the peaceful option. The entire reason we have a legal code, legal institutions, and law enforcement, is to make it so that naked force is not the standard method for resolving conflicts.

Also, a civil war is extremely unlikely to kill off 'most of the population.' That didn't happen in the 1860s, and it's very unlikely to happen now, for a wide variety of reasons.
 

TyrantTriumphant

Well-known member
The legal process is the peaceful option. The entire reason we have a legal code, legal institutions, and law enforcement, is to make it so that naked force is not the standard method for resolving conflicts.
Considering that the Left seems content to ignore the law when they find it convenient and that they usually get away with it I have little faith in the law.

Also, a civil war is extremely unlikely to kill off 'most of the population.' That didn't happen in the 1860s, and it's very unlikely to happen now, for a wide variety of reasons.
Of course back then most people still grew their own food. If anything were to seriously disrupt the national distribution system and electrical grid then we would have mass starvation within a couple of weeks. Most big cities have less than a week's supplies in reserve.

In a civil war it wouldn't be bullets or tanks that would be the real killer. The real death tolls would come from hunger and disease.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
I'll let you in on a secret; the majority of any given population has never been willing to fight. It's always the minority who has fought for, or against, change; while everyone else either passively supports whichever side appeals to them, or ignores the conflict outright in favor of living their lives.

The majority of the population on both sides of the political divide still can't be bothered to get up and vote, the idea that they'd go to war is laughable.
 

Lord Sovereign

The resident Britbong
In battle, it is rarely, if not never, the common soldier's fault for defeat. Indeed, it is usually a failure of leadership that leads to defeat. Over the last seventy years, the officer class of the right have utterly failed to do their job. They've either been missing in action or hopeless libertarians screeching "NAP! NAP!" as the Communists advance.

A good chunk of the general public are not happy with the current situations, but they won't do anything at the moment because they are followers. They aren't up to the task of leading a large movement and know it. They need leadership. If the right could stop shrieking about "normies" and get off its arse, maybe we might start seeing a difference.

Until then, the common soldier can continue to be overwhelmed whilst his officers do fuck all in some distant chateau. Christ Almighty, I hate normie bashing.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
In battle, it is rarely, if not never, the common soldier's fault for defeat. Indeed, it is usually a failure of leadership that leads to defeat. Over the last seventy years, the officer class of the right have utterly failed to do their job. They've either been missing in action or hopeless libertarians screeching "NAP! NAP!" as the Communists advance.

A good chunk of the general public are not happy with the current situations, but they won't do anything at the moment because they are followers. They aren't up to the task of leading a large movement and know it. They need leadership. If the right could stop shrieking about "normies" and get off its arse, maybe we might start seeing a difference.

Until then, the common soldier can continue to be overwhelmed whilst his officers do fuck all in some distant chateau. Christ Almighty, I hate normie bashing.
They need a leader. and should Trump lose, he may become that leader
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
Pretty much.

State courts are compromised clown shows.

State courts don't have the authority to grant the relief being petitioned for in the first place. A lot of the demands being shut down are simply that, not any ruling on the merits, up *or* down. Likewise, a lot of the things being lauded as wins for Trump are really only routine preliminary rulings. None of these cases have gotten into the meat of things yet, and that's not actually due to corruption or bias as far as I see; it's simply that court proceedings are a slow mechanism. Emergency orders are the only thing that happen quickly (emergency orders literally exist *because* the courts are slow), and that's also why they err on the side of freezing things and preserving evidence.

Likewise, Governor Kemp refusing to intervene as directly as Trump wants him to. He simply does not have the authority to do so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top