Having just read
the actual legal document... No it wasn't...
Also that twitter person was either lying, or didn't actually read the case itself. Because the court didn't reject the appeal, it rejected the request for an injunction pending the appeal.
"The Campaign never alleges that
any ballot was fraudulent or cast by an illegal voter. It never alleges that any defendant
treated the Trump campaign or its votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or its
votes. Calling something discrimination does not make it so. The Second Amended Com-
plaint still suffers from these core defects, so granting leave to amend would have been
futile."
"The Campaign has already litigated and lost
most of these issues as garden-variety state-law claims. It now tries to turn them into federal
constitutional claims but cannot.
'there is no basis to grant the unprecedented injunction sought here.'"
"As discussed, the Campaign cannot win this lawsuit. It conceded that it is not alleging
election fraud. It has already raised and lost most of these state-law issues, and it cannot
relitigate them here. It cites no federal authority regulating poll watchers or notice and cure.
It alleges no specific discrimination. And it does not contest that it lacks standing under the
Elections and Electors Clauses. These claims cannot succeed."
"We could stop here. Once we affirm the denial of leave to amend, this case is over. Still,
for completeness, we address the Campaign’s emergency motion to stay the effect of cer-
tification. No stay or injunction is called for."