Thanks for admitting you are glowie getting paid to stir shit here.
I mean it seemed pretty obvious, but admitting you are getting paid to be here is a very nice to help confirm it.
Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow
- Thread starter MelancholicMechanicus
- Start date
I mean it seemed pretty obvious, but admitting you are getting paid to be here is a very nice to help confirm it.
I can actually respect being a paid troll after all we all have to earn a paycheck some how.
Batrix2070
RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
And it is possible to know what kind? Are you trying to turn this place into another stuffy hole like the internet is full of?
Ixian
Well-known member
He wants to turn it into SV, SB or AH.com
Give it a few years and as the site grows we will see people like him trying to worm their way into mod positions, and soon after this place will be on the same path as the above forums.
Its okay, he isn't the only one working on projects involving these four sites.
Last edited:
Batrix2070
RON/PLC was a wonderful country.
I know, I'm guessing that it's some foolish acolyte from those regions who decided to rewrite the "Nazi" site as the only right and true version of events and reality.
A classic, a march through the institutions.
"Project?" In what capacity?
Also love how this thread is outright degenerating into a "He said-She said argument." or just throwing random accusations, can't we all just agree that electronic voting should just be thrown out and we have a simple transparent locked box for votes to assure no vote stuffing?
I mean regardless of if it's Democrats screeching about Russians aiding the "Fascist RepubliKKKans" or Republicans screeching about the Chinese aiding the "Crooked, Socialist DemoRATS" nothing is getting reformed here when it needs to be and the entire reason it keeps happening over and over is because these voting machines by their very nature are suspiciously vague and untransparent to the majority of people who aren't computer programmers and even then only specific 'selected' computer programmers are allowed access to these machines.
Last edited:
I'm good with paper ballots and hand counting.
Bigking321
Well-known member
Paper ballots and a rock solid chain of custody and observation at all times.
None of the typical "found some votes and dropped them off at 2am" bullshit.
None of the typical "found some votes and dropped them off at 2am" bullshit.
Typhonis
Well-known member
Unfortunately the Dems will scream about restricting the vote. Funny that history has shown us other countries that restricted the vote.....how do English elections look?
Doomsought
Well-known member
What I'd like to have put into statute (it may need to be made a constitutional amendment for the appropriate authority):
Any vote without a chain of study that meets or exceeds the standards set for evidence in a criminal court or fails to meet any other standards for the collection of votes set by law must be eliminated from the vote counts.
If a sufficient number of votes have been eliminated and/or brought under suspicion of fraud to bring outcome of an election into question, any positions thus effected must remain empty until an forensic audit has cleared the votes, or the votes have been recast in an emergency election.
Any forensic audit or emergency election may not be conducted by any person or agency which has had custody of a vote eliminated from the vote count by the court of law.
Violation of this statute shall be considered an act of insurrection. Thus no edicts, bills, or orders passed by a person thus unlawfully elected should be considered lawful nor legitimate. Both the National Gaurd and disorganized militia have a irrimovable standing order to respond to such insurrection via military force.
Bear Ribs
Well-known member
That's racist. A reliable chain of custody is something you find in traditional white-dominated democracies, not in ancient Black, Muslim, or Latinx democracies.
Bigking321
Well-known member
Bear Ribs
Well-known member
Imma pass on the advice I've seen work, don't try to just argue politics, you'll be seen as an outsider and that will hamper any progress you make convincing anybody of anything. Join in reading with our book club, participate in a few quests, post some artwork or stories you make. Being a part of the community will serve the goal of reaching hearts and minds better.
You do realize that most studies show that those on the right are significantly less siloed and also less radicalized than those on the left? The entire narrative you believe, about right wing radicalism, that the right has shifted far to the right, and that the right wing exists in echo chambers are actually outright projections by the left? Right wingers, especially those in American politics, better understand left wingers than left wingers do the right, they are much less siloed and in much fewer echo chambers.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
He's probably referring at least in part to the fact that conservatives/right leaning Libertarians have constant run-ins with leftist thought and cultural values, given how it dominates the media.
Leftists are a lot less likely to have any understanding of how conservatives actually think, and much more likely to have their perceptions of conservatives shaped from their own side's propaganda.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
This should be easy enough to demonstrate.
Name a few key/central conservative beliefs, and the reasoning for them.
Megadeath
Well-known member
Bit of a red herring. Conservatives are kind of a loose coalition of many different groups, some of whom have totally separate but mostly non-conflicting beliefs, and some with shared beliefs arrived at through different reasoning.
Take gun freedom. There are distinct groups who support it for totally different reasons. There's the rugged manly men, who know that all that stands between their God fearing family and a world of evil is a hard man with a gun. Or the more libertarian types, who oppose more on the idea that basically any and all regulation is bad. Or, the nuttier types, who think that as long as enough of the general population have bolt action rifles the government and armed forces will be worried enough about them not to declare the WEF uniparty the new permanent overlords.
Their is the religious right, who's rational is all helpfully spelled out in a book, and then interpreted a dozen different ways. People who were liberal until the democratic party started pushing too far on some issue or other that's a sticking point for them. The neo-con war hawks.
It's easy enough to go find threads on this site that make it pretty damn clear that even people almost anyone would agree are hard line right can disagree amongst themselves about what constitutes key/central conservative views.
Vyor
My influence grows!
Neo-cons are not right wing.