Critical Race Theory In Schools

49ersfootball

Well-known member

DarthOne

☦️
Social worker sues Massachusetts university after she was asked to 'defend her WHITENESS' during interview for professorship she didn't get


  • Donna Johnston, 54, alleges her 'whiteness' cost her a job at the university
  • Johnston, a therapist in Plainfield, Connecticut, filed the race and employment discrimination suit in Massachusetts Superior Court last week
  • Johnston details in the suit the series of jarring questions about her 'whiteness' by an unnamed associate professor who has since left the school
  • The school says that Johnston 'lacked expertise and live classroom experience and failed to present herself as student focused' in the interview
By ALEX HAMMER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 10:21 EST, 10 March 2022 | UPDATED: 10:48 EST, 10 March 202

A licensed social worker who unsuccessfully applied for a professorship at Bridgewater State University last summer has sued the college, after she was allegedly asked to defend her 'whiteness' during an interview.

Donna Johnston, a therapist in Plainfield, Connecticut, filed the race and employment discrimination suit in Massachusetts Superior Court last week, claiming she was subject to a racist interview when she applied for an assistant professorship position at the state-run school's social work department in June.

Johnston, who did not get the job, says that she was asked a series of jarring questions about her 'whiteness' during the interview, presided over by an associate professor who has since left the university.

Johnston, 54, says she was asked to contemplate her 'white privilege' and 'defend her whiteness' by the staffer, and says she was told that 'black students may not be able to relate to you because of your white privilege,' according to the suit - which demands a jury trial and $50,000 in damages.

According to the school, Johnston’s answer - which saw her acknowledge her white privilege to the interviewer, the filing says - 'missed the target.'

The social worker, meanwhile, attests that her qualifications exceeded those of three female applicants the School of Social Work ended up hiring in the weeks after her interview.

Two of the women hired were white and one was black, according to the school.

She argues that her so-called 'whiteness' cost her the job, and hopes that the suit will shine a light on other instances of 'reverse racism.'

'How I was treated during the interview was wrong,' Johnston told The Boston Globe Wednesday of the suit.

'I’m probably not the only one who has endured something like this. Maybe they haven't spoken up. So, if nothing else, maybe I will give people the courage and the strength to come forward.'

She told the Globe she expected questions on her decades of clinical practice, field work, and teaching experience at Southern New Hampshire University and Virginia Commonwealth University - not about the color of her skin.

Johnson's lawyer, Scott Lathrop, added: 'If somebody had said to a black applicant, let’s talk about your blackness, or how does your blackness affect something, there'd be outrage.'

The school, meanwhile, says that Johnston 'lacked expertise and live classroom experience and failed to present herself as student focused' in the interview, resulting in the school to appoint the other candidates.

'Any possibility of discriminatory motive is contradicted by the fact that the university ultimately hired two caucasians,' the college said in the statement. The third hire, the university said, was a black woman.

The school would not release the identity of the School of Social work staffers.

The filing comes less than a month after a formal complaint filed by Johnston against the school with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) was withdrawn, state records show.

It is not currently clear what new evidence in the case has come to light since the complaint was nixed, spurred last week's filing.

The white privilege question, posed by the associate professor in Bridgewater State’s School of Social Work, was meant to give Johnston an 'opportunity to show... how she would use her experience and teaching skills to overcome a common obstacle as a social worker and teacher,' the university said in a 29-page position statement on the MCAD claim February 1.

The school says that race played no factor in their decision to go with the other candidates.

When contacted by DailyMail.com Thursday morning for comment regarding the suit, a spokeswoman for the university said in an email that 'Bridgewater State University does not comment on personnel or pending legal matters.'


It's about God-damn time people started suing these bastards.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Social worker sues Massachusetts university after she was asked to 'defend her WHITENESS' during interview for professorship she didn't get





It's about God-damn time people started suing these bastards.

Its a start but it isnt the snap we all expect.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Update on this:

Trans professor, 34, who defended pedophiles as 'Minor Attracted Persons' finally RESIGNS after 15,000 people signed online petition


Update to the Story... He's Been Hired By John Hopkins University to work at its Baltimore located Moore Center for Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse.

 

The Whispering Monk

Well-known member
Osaul
Update to the Story... He's Been Hired By John Hopkins University to work at its Baltimore located Moore Center for Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse.

to 'prevent sexual abuse'...

Now I just think that John Hopkins is actually working towards enabling the abuse of minors.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
to 'prevent sexual abuse'...

Now I just think that John Hopkins is actually working towards enabling the abuse of minors.
This has a long and dubious history. See, pedos exist, and there's about two types: fixated and lapsed, with fixated being your typical very young child types, while lapsed being people who don't care about the age barrier at 18 much. The fixated ones really can't be 'cured' in any respect. Yet they have an opportunity not to do evil. The question is how to accomplish this best?

Big questions are:
  • Should psychologists be mandatory reporters of even pedophilic thoughts? Yes, it does stop that particular one from maybe doing something bad, but it also means that none of them get therapy for it.
  • Should drawn/fake CP be legal? In the US it pretty much is, other countries have a different perspective.
But every time someone investigates this, it always seems to get worse and worse, then result in what happened with Germany: lets have pedos adopt boys.
 

Spartan303

In Captain America we Trust!
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Osaul
Update to the Story... He's Been Hired By John Hopkins University to work at its Baltimore located Moore Center for Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse.



You can't make this shit up. We are living in Bizarro world...
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Big questions are:
  • Should psychologists be mandatory reporters of even pedophilic thoughts? Yes, it does stop that particular one from maybe doing something bad, but it also means that none of them get therapy for it.
Police should take a page from intelligence tactics to have the cake and eat it too.
Have them be mandatory reporters, but bury that in obscure regulation, and don't arrest reported people as a rule. Instead, covertly investigate them. Of course go with an arrest if it turns out the pedophile is suspiciously drawn to some child related profession and further investigation shows offenses, but if nothing turns up, just keep an eye on them, that's it.
  • Should drawn/fake CP be legal? In the US it pretty much is, other countries have a different perspective.
The big question is, does banning it help limit number/stealth/activity of pedophiles in any meaningful war? I think many asked that question but no one got a conclusive answer, with the experience of USA and Japan leaning towards no. And if that's a no, then its just unnecessary busywork for taxpayer funded institutions.
It could also combine effectively with the above idea, with letting such borderline material stay in darker corners of the internet, but at the same time use these same corners for law enforcement to pick good candidates for further investigation who more likely than not will eagerly congregate in these corners even more than now.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Police should take a page from intelligence tactics to have the cake and eat it too.
Have them be mandatory reporters, but bury that in obscure regulation, and don't arrest reported people as a rule. Instead, covertly investigate them. Of course go with an arrest if it turns out the pedophile is suspiciously drawn to some child related profession and further investigation shows offenses, but if nothing turns up, just keep an eye on them, that's it.
No, this is the worst of all worlds. I don't want anything approaching secret police or secret laws. This won't stop with Pedos. And they aren't idiots: they'll figure it out pretty quickly once an arrest happens: you have to hand over evidence to the defense. It's not like they advertise it now, everyone just knows it's a thing.

The difference with intelligence is that you usually don't prosecute them. You just feed them bullshit. You can't do that with pedos though.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
The difference with intelligence is that you usually don't prosecute them. You just feed them bullshit.
Or you arrest them for a spy swap, or just kill them.

Look I get the point you are trying to make.

However, you need to remember the context around a lot of pedo abuses are people with power (teachers, priests, Epstein's clients, the father and son Biden, etc..) who can, will, and have dodged getting hit for it because of their power and connections.

And given how well connected John Hopkin's is...yeah, this isn't about 'fixing' pedo's, it's about normalizing them.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
No, this is the worst of all worlds. I don't want anything approaching secret police or secret laws. This won't stop with Pedos.
Its a ship that has sailed already - see: terror watchlists.
And they aren't idiots: they'll figure it out pretty quickly once an arrest happens: you have to hand over evidence to the defense. It's not like they advertise it now, everyone just knows it's a thing.
And yet people on terror watchlists sometimes still do terrorism. And those tend to be more organized than pedophiles so they do have knowledge of how others got caught passed around, and on top of that, terrorism is something that can be intelligently and coldly strategized, while here we are talking about a mental illness that the affected cannot really control, especially in the cases we are most interested in prosecuting.
The difference with intelligence is that you usually don't prosecute them. You just feed them bullshit. You can't do that with pedos though.
The idea is the same, you don't prosecute unless evidence of child abuse turns up in the observation. Just like in case of intel, you do arrest/kick out/eliminate agents if they are about to do something beyond the pale.
 

Abhorsen

Local Degenerate
Moderator
Staff Member
Comrade
Osaul
Or you arrest them for a spy swap, or just kill them.

Look I get the point you are trying to make.

However, you need to remember the context around a lot of pedo abuses are people with power (teachers, priests, Epstein's clients, the father and son Biden, etc..) who can, will, and have dodged getting hit for it because of their power and connections.

And given how well connected John Hopkin's is...yeah, this isn't about 'fixing' pedo's, it's about normalizing them.
Hence this part of my statement:
But every time someone investigates this, it always seems to get worse and worse, then result in what happened with Germany: lets have pedos adopt boys.
Its a ship that has sailed already - see: terror watchlists.
Which are awful, and should get gone, not be something we expand. And on top of this, it doesn't work as an analogy. You can't plead state secrets to protect how people get on the list, so the second it happens, it's gonna be revealed to everyone.

And yet people on terror watchlists sometimes still do terrorism. And those tend to be more organized than pedophiles so they do have knowledge of how others got caught passed around, and on top of that, terrorism is something that can be intelligently and coldly strategized, while here we are talking about a mental illness that the affected cannot really control, especially in the cases we are most interested in prosecuting.
My issue is that there's no way to keep this secret, not that they'd do bad things. It's pretty simple:

"How'd you know?" "We were tracking your client." "Why were you tracking him?" "He was on a pedo list." "How'd he end up on the list?"

For some terrorist cases, the US can say "State secrets" right here, and then everything is done under seal. But they can't do that for many terrorist cases or any pedo case brought with psychiatrist. They gotta say that "a psychiatrist warned us" here. And poof goes the secret.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Which are awful, and should get gone, not be something we expand. And on top of this, it doesn't work as an analogy. You can't plead state secrets to protect how people get on the list, so the second it happens, it's gonna be revealed to everyone.


My issue is that there's no way to keep this secret, not that they'd do bad things. It's pretty simple:

"How'd you know?" "We were tracking your client." "Why were you tracking him?" "He was on a pedo list." "How'd he end up on the list?"

For some terrorist cases, the US can say "State secrets" right here, and then everything is done under seal. But they can't do that for many terrorist cases or any pedo case brought with psychiatrist. They gotta say that "a psychiatrist warned us" here. And poof goes the secret.
The thing is, unlike terrorist networks or intel agencies, with training, experienced leaders and so on, most pedos are not cold, rational, competent operators. You don't need perfect secrecy, just good enough will go a long way.
Also many countries have an institution of anonymous police tips, and those are, well, anonymous. Anyone could leave one. Anyone...

After all, we all know of terror watchlists. But did they get terrorists on them to competently lay low?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top