Britain Children as young as SIX are to be given compulsory self-touching lessons that critics say are sexualising youngsters

Well the UK is already using "1984" as a guidebook as how to run a government. Why not "A Brave New World" as well? These kinds of things is the responsibility of the parents not the bloody school.
 
Reading through this, even if it's fake news, I reckon it's only a matter of time before some "bright" teacher starts handing out dildos, and only dildos rather than a mixture of dildos and fleshlights.
 
Last edited:
What evidence is there that it’s fake news, exactly, as opposed to a sensationalised outtake of a real thing?
 
Captain-General said:
What evidence is there that it’s fake news, exactly, as opposed to a sensationalised outtake of a real thing?
Click to expand...
Well it seems to be a sensationalised outtake of the fact that some students of unspecified age are having sex ed classes. Which is, you know, sensationalized enough to be fake news. I'm gonna put the link here since people don't seem to have read it.
 
Lanmandragon said:
Why would that matter? Itd be utterly digustsing either way.
Click to expand...
Because at least heterosexuality would be acknowledged. I swear, one day some leftard will try to push sex-education that is only concerned with Homosexuality and doesn't talk about heterosexuality except to demonize it...
 
tirrene said:
Well it seems to be a sensationalised outtake of the fact that some students of unspecified age are having sex ed classes. Which is, you know, sensationalized enough to be fake news. I'm gonna put the link here since people don't seem to have read it.
Click to expand...


That’s a link to Warwickshire’s health page, not the All About Me programme specifically...
 
tirrene said:
Well it seems to be a sensationalised outtake of the fact that some students of unspecified age are having sex ed classes. Which is, you know, sensationalized enough to be fake news. I'm gonna put the link here since people don't seem to have read it.
Click to expand...
I did... I'm STILL confused about why you think it actually counters the article... especially when the article quotes someone straight up telling you how Warwickshire has been characterizing the program. Which, oh boy, is precisely the line you seem to think disproves anything. Despite you know, being so generic it would be valid even if we took this to the utter absurdity of claiming that the class involved students having actual sex with each other. It would still be teaching students "about sex and relationships".

EDIT: for that matter it would still be valid if it was teaching Pop Culture Victorian Style "get married at 16, obey your husband utterly, lie back and think of England", or S&M relationships, or... well, I think the point has been made.
 
Last edited:
Well guys, I'm a Puritan when it comes to how the government should regulate sexual behavior, so this whole thing needs to go up in metaphorical flames. There should be protests in the street. The police should be investigating. The people pushing this should be fired from their jobs and learn to code.

But that's not happening.

Because the Left has already won.
 
Urabrask Revealed said:
Because at least heterosexuality would be acknowledged. I swear, one day some leftard will try to push sex-education that is only concerned with Homosexuality and doesn't talk about heterosexuality except to demonize it...
Click to expand...
Doesnt really matter what the sexual preference of a pedo is. It just matters that they are pedos and thus should die.
 
The Name of Love said:
Well guys, I'm a Puritan when it comes to how the government should regulate sexual behavior, so this whole thing needs to go up in metaphorical flames. There should be protests in the street. The police should be investigating. The people pushing this should be fired from their jobs and learn to code.

But that's not happening.

Because the Left has already won.
Click to expand...

You are absolutely right. Some things don't need to be discussed in public... And some things should never be discussed in front of children. Houses used to be designed so nobody needed to walk through the Parlour so it could be closed off to have adult conversations away from children -- that was once how much society valued this concept, even architecture was dictated by it.
 
Captain-General said:
You are absolutely right. Some things don't need to be discussed in public... And some things should never be discussed in front of children. Houses used to be designed so nobody needed to walk through the Parlour so it could be closed off to have adult conversations away from children -- that was once how much society valued this concept, even architecture was dictated by it.
Click to expand...
Oh, that sounds interestening. When did that change? What kind of plans would one need for a entire new house?
 
Captain-General said:
“We will astonish the world with our ingratitude” basically describes the LGBT movement after winning gay marriage. To a T. It makes me feel incredibly ashamed. The moment they won, promising people that it would never impact them and would just be about equality, they turned to the offensive. The moment gay marriage was passed however, these activists tore into the rest of society like so much of a Panzer division ripped into enemy lines, showing no mercy in their drive to destroy traditional culture and society. It makes me very ashamed.
Click to expand...
Every leftist position is a stepping stone to a more extremist position. That includes all leftist sexual philosophy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top