Big WW2 German guns shoot down and destroy everything

Then they could mass produce pulse jets - if they get plans.
Certainly, but such long range 'missiles' have issues of targeting. It's hard to fly some 300 kilometers in a missile (almost certainly with no radio) and find something to ram into.
Japan had this issue with the Kaiten.
 
Again, the Leitstrahl system can only control the rocket during the initial ~30 seconds of powered ascent. Additional guidance antennas aren't going to help.



What you want is a maneuverable, terminally guided re-entry vehicle. The first such RV was created by the United States in 1979, and primitive Nazi Germany cannot possibly create one in 1945.
I understand the limitations of the system but what im proposing is mostly an extension of the Leitstrahl.It will incorporate more antennas and radio systems along the path we want the shells to be fired at.Since it only had a few antennas,i think 3-4,trucks and similar vehicles could carry them and deploy wherever thats needed while also carrying the radio equipment.

Do we actually need a maneuverable, terminally guided re-entry vehicle ? We only need some very basic guidance.There were though radar homing glide bombs made by the US so maybe something of that kind can be fitted on the shell.Go to the end of the page Dawn of the Smart Bomb and youll see it
 
Certainly, but such long range 'missiles' have issues of targeting. It's hard to fly some 300 kilometers in a missile (almost certainly with no radio) and find something to ram into.
Japan had this issue with the Kaiten.
True.They need somebody finding targets for them - and those somebody would be quickly schoot down.
 
The V2 couldnt be controlled on its descent through radiowaves because i dont know if they could reach it that far and because the rocket was traveling too fast and was subject to too many environmental factors.However even in modern times the hardest part of a missiles journey to control is the descent.So the Leitstrahl along with the receiver inside the rocket did just correct its path on the ascension faze.I didnt know how it worked but before learning about it and while i was proposing my advanced shell idea the we place an antenna every few hundred km along the missiles path was exactly how i imagined it to work.

I reiterate that it cannot be done. You can have all the antennas in the world all the way to the target, the rocket cannot maneuver without powered thrust.
 
Do we actually need a maneuverable, terminally guided re-entry vehicle ? We only need some very basic guidance.There were though radar homing glide bombs made by the US so maybe something of that kind can be fitted on the shell.Go to the end of the page Dawn of the Smart Bomb and youll see it

I also reiterate that U.S. technology was vastly more advanced than German. If the U.S. could barely build a crude and limited system with all its resources in 1944, rest assured that it impossible for Germany to field a comparable system for many years beyond that.
 
Okha have less then 100km range,V1 - 300km.And could be used from bombers.
Which mean,that Japan could send bombers which would release V1 300km from targets,so american fighters from carriers could not schoot down those bombers.
If they have enough of them,they could gradually sink enough american ships to stop onvasion of Okinawa.

About sarin - that is why it must be used on England cities.And lesser lethality is even better - dead cyvilians could be just buried,when injured must be healed.
If germans fired enough V2 with sarin on London,british health system would fall.

Aside from that - Happy Easter !

The Okha can accurately target ships, the V-1 cannot hope to do so.
 
The V-1 has no guidance and is only accurate to within a very broad area; the Okha was a manned suicide craft with a human pilot providing terminal guidance all the way to impact. Ruthless, but highly effective.
ATP is referring to the manned V1 variant instead of the typical missile version.
 
I reiterate that it cannot be done. You can have all the antennas in the world all the way to the target, the rocket cannot maneuver without powered thrust.
So the necessary thing to allow the V2 to be more accurate in its descent requires it to keeps its engine active or something during descent ?

I also reiterate that U.S. technology was vastly more advanced than German. If the U.S. could barely build a crude and limited system with all its resources in 1944, rest assured that it impossible for Germany to field a comparable system for many years beyond that.
Maybe youre right but with a better R&D maybe the Germans could do it,especialy if they care to implement it on such a project.However what made US electronics that much more advanced ? Materials ? Scientists ? Better R&D ? The fact that they focused on a few projects ? I am unironically asking.
 
Last edited:
So the necessary thing to allow the V2 to be more accurate in its descent requires it to keeps its engine active or something during descent ?


Maybe youre right but with a better R&D maybe the Germans could do it,especialy if they care to implement it on such a project.However what made US electronics that much more advanced ? Materials ? Scientists ? Better R&D ? The fact that they focused on a few projects ? I am unironically asking.
The Americans had the advantage of huge resources, an equally large man power pool, a war focused economy, and a good education base, without the disadvantages of getting bombed to shit, having their territory occupied, and a command economy run by a drug fuelled megalomaniac.

The only way that Germany matches what America could do late in the war, early enough in the war to matter, is if we imagine there's a time travel fairy whispering directly in Hitler's ear that he listens to without question.
 
So the necessary thing to allow the V2 to be more accurate in its descent requires it to keeps its engine active or something during descent ?
That is correct. The V-2's guidance system maneuvered the rocket by a combination of rudders on the fins and guide vanes that vectored the engine thrust; the rudders alone were insufficient to control the rocket.
V1 have manned version,which worked.So,it could be used.
The manned version of the V-1 was the Fieseler Fi 103R Reichenberg, and it did not work. Literally every single test flight of the 103R resulted in a catastrophic, usually fatal, crash and the Germans made absolutely no progress in actually understanding or fixing this.

Literally the only time the thing was even claimed to not crash was in the memoirs of Hanna Reitsch, but there is no credible supporting documentation and Reitsch is known to have been an inveterate liar.
 
The manned version of the V-1 was the Fieseler Fi 103R Reichenberg, and it did not work. Literally every single test flight of the 103R resulted in a catastrophic, usually fatal, crash and the Germans made absolutely no progress in actually understanding or fixing this.

Literally the only time the thing was even claimed to not crash was in the memoirs of Hanna Reitsch, but there is no credible supporting documentation and Reitsch is known to have been an inveterate liar.
As far as I can tell the only times it crashed was when the canopy was jettisoned accidentally, and on landings.
Being a suicide weapon, I don't think Japan would care if it was unable to land. The Ohka was unable to land as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP
As far as I can tell the only times it crashed was when the canopy was jettisoned accidentally, and on landings.
Being a suicide weapon, I don't think Japan would care if it was unable to land. The Ohka was unable to land as well.
This is incorrect -- the trainer variant of the Okha, the K-1, was able to land and did not experience any issues with doing so because it was properly designed from the start as a manned aircraft. The Reichenberg, on the other hand, appears to have had fundamental issues with aerodynamic instability due to cramming a pilot into something designed *without*.
 
This is incorrect -- the trainer variant of the Okha, the K-1, was able to land and did not experience any issues with doing so because it was properly designed from the start as a manned aircraft. The Reichenberg, on the other hand, appears to have had fundamental issues with aerodynamic instability due to cramming a pilot into something designed *without*.
The K-1 was equipped with flaps for landing, which explains why it could land.
As far as I can tell, the V1 manned versions lacked this feature.
 
That is correct. The V-2's guidance system maneuvered the rocket by a combination of rudders on the fins and guide vanes that vectored the engine thrust; the rudders alone were insufficient to control the rocket.

The manned version of the V-1 was the Fieseler Fi 103R Reichenberg, and it did not work. Literally every single test flight of the 103R resulted in a catastrophic, usually fatal, crash and the Germans made absolutely no progress in actually understanding or fixing this.

Literally the only time the thing was even claimed to not crash was in the memoirs of Hanna Reitsch, but there is no credible supporting documentation and Reitsch is known to have been an inveterate liar.
Wrong.They lost few,but eventually Hanna Reitsch landed in it.She was nazi,like almost all germans,but not liar.If she said that she done something,that it was done.

And,Japan would not care about problems - even if 50% fell to the sea before finding american fleet,with mass production it would be not problem.

As far as I can tell the only times it crashed was when the canopy was jettisoned accidentally, and on landings.
Being a suicide weapon, I don't think Japan would care if it was unable to land. The Ohka was unable to land as well.

Indeed.Japan could use it and bleed american fleet near Okinawa enough to prevent any invasion.
Which would not save them from A-bombs,of course.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top