Culture Beauty Standards & Jealousy & Attempts-To-Change-Them

Ohhh. I see. That is weird.. There's no relation to the subject.

Yeah, I think it has to do with how we definitely have Communists in our Filipino Universities, they just want to spout it every now and then.

Frankly, I think its not just the first world having to deal with commies coming from universities
 
Yeah, I think it has to do with how we definitely have Communists in our Filipino Universities, they just want to spout it every now and then.

Frankly, I think its not just the first world having to deal with commies coming from universities
Oh. How does it have something to do with the communists in our Universities?
What I am aware of is that, communists in those Universities recruit students to fight against the government or they go to the mountain to become rebels. Though I haven't encountered those in my Uni. Have you? The recruitment and all.
 
Oh. How does it have something to do with the communists in our Universities?
What I am aware of is that, communists in those Universities recruit students to fight against the government or they go to the mountain to become rebels. Though I haven't encountered those in my Uni. Have you? The recruitment and all.

Less outright Communisty Party of the Philippines types and more a bunch of virtue signalers who do things like suddenly talk about Mass Muslim Migration=Good because our female western history teacher decided to go on about how the Romans recruited the Goths or allowed them into their lands and saying its a similar situation and she said therefore mass immigration of another people=GREAT

I once even had a teacher going on about how Communism was good

They may not be outright recruiters, but I think they are helping to try build the Champagne Socialist upper class here like in Hollywood
 
because our female western history teacher decided to go on about how the Romans recruited the Goths or allowed them into their lands and saying its a similar situation and she said therefore mass immigration of another people=GREAT
Wait, what? She used the first people to sack Rome and took the Iberian peninsula as their prize as a good thing?

...I wish I could say I was surprised.
 
Wait, what? She used the first people to sack Rome and took the Iberian peninsula as their prize as a good thing?

...I wish I could say I was surprised.

Kinda pointed out that both the Romans and these Goths were a bunch of horrible slavers and raiders who murdered civilians for fun

All she said was “You’re cute” which she’s said before in class whenever I sorta challenged what she said
 
The West, I think is really trying to go for average, masculine, fat, rail-thin-androgynous physiques and looks for women, both for actors and even fictional ones
Part of the reasons the fashion industry goes for tall and thin models are practical ones. First of all, it's easier to design clothes that look good on tall and thin people. Second one, and this one was told me by a girl who was a model, they want to reduce as much as possible the quantity of material they use on each piece, and you can't do that with voluptuous models.
I think this beauty standard is also an artifact of what a certain subset of homosexual men (ie. the people that run the fashion industry) think is a beautiful woman.


They're literally promoting women who look like twinks.
 
images


Japanese anime/manga/light novel/videogame artists are way better fashion designers for women than those westerners
 
Less outright Communisty Party of the Philippines types and more a bunch of virtue signalers who do things like suddenly talk about Mass Muslim Migration=Good because our female western history teacher decided to go on about how the Romans recruited the Goths or allowed them into their lands and saying its a similar situation and she said therefore mass immigration of another people=GREAT

I once even had a teacher going on about how Communism was good

They may not be outright recruiters, but I think they are helping to try build the Champagne Socialist upper class here like in Hollywood
Oh, I see. Not those types. That's what comes to my mind. Lol
Oh yeah, those who spout ideologies and who virtue signals. And SJWs.
 
Last edited:
Oh, I see. Not those types. That's what comes to my mind. Lol
Oh yeah, those who spout ideologies and who virtue signals. And SJWs.

Luckily for now, the fact the majority of the nation is very poor and Catholic and enjoys stuff with really insulting gay stereotypes “bakla” means that we can mostly laugh off the SJW crowd
 
Beauty standards often reflect what shows wealth in a society.

Where food is scarce, skinny people will not be desirable because they look poor. Where poor people are predominantly overweight, society will declare thin people beautiful because they have the time and money to hit the gym and eat right.

We see similar trends with skin color. Pale was often preferred because they are rich enough not to toil outdoors. Now tans are preferred because they indicate leisure time.

But, generally, figure out what rich people look like and that will be your society's beauty standards.
 
Are most rich men fat, or are you looking at an outlier or an extreme?

Neither really. Just want to point out how being rich doesn’t mean you’d be good looking.....or make the effort with the money and time ya got.

Though, plastic surgery sounds like something the rich can freely spend on alongside liposuction and anorexia.

That said, I do believe that modern day Feminism hating the fanservicey sexy look in favor of the railthin androgynous look is in part to spit on guys and due to feeling really self conscious

I think Elizabeth Banks, the lady who once played a stripper with a gatling gun leg, in part turned to modern day feminism due to similar reasons
 
I may not be from the West, but lots of things I enjoy are from it and Japan and one thing I notice looks to be that the West in particular is trying to change or reject beauty standards

Japan on the other hand is much more unashamedly in love with fanservice

I had some classes in college that had absolutely nothing to do with Feminism, but somehow involved them....like my Filipino class that suddenly went on about female beauty standards and what boobs are for and that big boobs are terrible and involve breast cancer

The West, I think is really trying to go for average, masculine, fat, rail-thin-androgynous physiques and looks for women, both for actors and even fictional ones

Thing is, anybody here think that these attempts are really horribly unsuccessful and possibly backfiring and getting dudes to look away?

I think Westerners have a culture of shame or a sort of accepted wide inferiority complex for women’s beauty standards even in-regards to fictional 2D or CGI women

Having the looks like those could probably only be gained through a combination of fitness, good genetics and not being old(I consider plastic surgery as too obviously fake and creepy). People can get rather self conscious when they look at others and compare themselves.

Tell me if I’m wrong or not, or how bad do you guys feel it is, cause I’m not from the West.....though even in third world countries.....communism receives support in universities


It's various factors that's created the drop in beauty standards. In my mind the most influential groups here are:

1) The Insecure Women

The Insecure are generally composed of women who are for all intents and purposes, average looking by genetics, but have something that drives their insecurity. That can range from a woman being overweight and thinking it unfair that she should be expected to lose the weight to women who are not secure simply by the shape of their body, breasts, hips, hair, and face. Below them are the women who have no standards for themselves, but still think they can get the 'hot' men. And then of course, there are those who do and then get immediately dumped or brushed off because they were nothing more than a passing fancy before McDreamy exchanges them for a hotter model. I think this group tends to merge back and forth with the Feminists, simply because they're looking out for their own genetic interests.

Because if they can force men to accept a lower standard and force other women to dress more modestly, it grants them a genetic edge.


2) Ethnic Women

Ethnic women are less of an issue, because ethnic women I think tend to be more secure in their looks from my experience, but I also get the impression that some of them are upset that white women are treated as higher class or more main stream in terms of beauty standards. Things like straight blond hair, white skin, blue eyes, and that sort of thing that was more common a decade ago before Hollywood decided they needed to press yet another beauty standard.

3) Insecure Men

There is a group of men who know they don't like the lower beauty standards, but I suspect believe two lies. The first is that if beauty standards are lowered for women, then they will be lowered for men. The second is that by accepting the lie of insecure women and some ethnic women, they can scam their way into the arms of a women they might not otherwise get. It's essentially a form of branding used by men who don't believe they're worth much, but whose ego cannot accept that. You'll find that most of these "men" fall into the category of white cucks.

4) Hollywood & Media & Elites

This is a complicated one, I think.

The media is, in my mind, horribly corrupt. Lots of insiders who work with insiders and to get in, you need to impress someone. What it is supposed to look like from the outside is that people get the job based on their merits. Men who can after all, draw in a large audience are in fact, very profitable and get the job. The same cannot be said for women. Women competition is tough. Lots of beautiful, intoxicating women are all in one place, all wanting the same jobs, and competing with each other to get those jobs. And there are lots of men who...well, who would not be their first choice (or second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, or last) when it comes to a sexual or romantic partner. And those men have a great deal of influence and power within that community.

So if you're a woman who is beautiful, talented, and honest...what do you do when you're competing against thirty other women for the same part? What do you do when the guy who makes the decision says he thinks you're perfect for the part, but says that he'd like to get to know you better first? Do you stay honest and lose for the hundredth time to another woman who will spread for it, watch as her career takes off... and you stay poor and keep getting rejections? Or do you swallow your pride and spread your legs? Or do you play the men offering the positions with half-lies and excuses until you get what you want?

Let's be honest (or cynical). A lot of those women were used like rags by a lot of the men who were in those positions. And they all know it. And everyone in their social circles know it. I can't know how frustrating it must be for all those women to stand in the same room and know that half of them were used like a living doll by some sleazy director. And how much more frustrating it must be for a woman to get in because her parents have connections. A woman who was essentially born into having gotten roles they all had to demean themselves for and has the luxury of looking down on women who demeaned themselves to get those roles.

So a lot of women in Hollywood and media I think, are very angry and very bitter for very good reasons. Because the men in their lives did use their power and privilege to get what they wanted. And I imagine more than one of them got burned afterwards. I mean, imagine having demeaned yourself for some beer-belly, tiny dick loser and then being told the next day "Yeah, you were great, but Samantha was better. Better luck next time."

5) Business & HR

For businesses, the idea is to provide a better produce and a hold a valuable brand that can be capitalized on. So if everyone in the news and media is talking about "toxic masculinity", you are going to get a lot of businesses that want to avoid lawsuits and maintain a good brand by adhering to the values of their customers. The problem with that though, is that because of the distorted view that the media has because of their own experiences, they are not getting accurate information.

6) Professors

The left wing infestation of universities has created a large group of dipshits with no real skills who obtained positions not through intellectual works, but through political activism. Where as with intellectual works, there is an inherent value in holding said knowledge of seeking that knowledge, the same is not to be said of political activism. A political activist professor is only useful so long as there is a political movement to push those low fliers into the public light. It's essentially a branding method. So a political activist gone professor cannot release the crusade because without that crusade, they are of no value to anyone. So to hold down their salary, their titles, and the social status they will find and manufacture a crises.

Now you put those people in with young adults who are still in some way, rebelling against their parents as they attempt to form their own personal identity. What I think you get is young, impressionable people who are molded by who they take as high thinking professionals of great intellectual will and experience...but who are in reality, merely leaches who need to manufacture social movements to keep their jobs. The result is a great deal of confused, but very passionate young adults who want to fix a world to fit a narrative that does not match with reality.

Hence why I think you get so many self-hating white people from these places.


Conclusion

The base reality of genetics cannot be changed. You cannot be made to choose someone who you do not find attractive. You might settle on someone because of other factors, but you will in all likelihood, always resent it. Instead, people will simply do what is best for them. Oh sure, lots of people will mouth the words right now, but they'll choose the hottest, most well-off person they can get their hands on. And for those who bought into the impossible dream of "equality within infinite diversity", they will be left old, bitter, and alone. And never understanding that they'd simply been used.
 
It's various factors that's created the drop in beauty standards. In my mind the most influential groups here are:

Man you summed up some of my theories or observations way better than I ever could

I guess that ladies like Brie Larson are in the whole, born into or given said roles via parental connections.

Not sure about the outright fat ladies like Amy Schumer, whom from what I can tell, mostly do substandard generic jokes.

One thing what all this tells me, is that it's only a matter of time till beauty standards are reinforced or Hollywood goes for the prettier ladies more, again
 
Man you summed up some of my theories or observations way better than I ever could

I guess that ladies like Brie Larson are in the whole, born into or given said roles via parental connections.

Not sure about the outright fat ladies like Amy Schumer, whom from what I can tell, mostly do substandard generic jokes.

One thing what all this tells me, is that it's only a matter of time till beauty standards are reinforced or Hollywood goes for the prettier ladies more, again

Dude, Amy Schumer is just a fucking whore.

Amy Schumer is from the angle of feminists who want sexual liberation and very little responsibility to go with that. That's why she goes out on stage and talks about her vagina. Because she's a crass, disgusting whore who probably did dirtier things in the bedroom to the decision makers than she talks about on stage. I seriously doubt the inner circle of the Hollywood noble class thinks she's little more than a whore who gets to parade herself on stage after she seals the deal.

And yeah, Brie Larson is probably a spoiled rich noble girl. But she's also brain washed. Her first role was in Hoot, which was about some kids fighting a developer who wanted to build a nefarious pancake house on the site of some burrowing owls. That said, it's not all rainbow and butterflies for those types. Miley Cyrus was also born rich and connected, but I can tell you that after she left the Disney Channel, she probably got tapped more than the kegs at an Irish pub.

I think that's why you have people like Taylor Swift and Miley Cyrus who push back so hard against President Trump. Because they see the same pig that has probably molested them or sexually exploited them and they can't understand why anyone would ever support someone so disgusting. They don't understand that most women don't have that kind of experience or one to that level of intensity. Because it's not just the powerful men that exploit them, but even losers with very little power or wealth can demean them by simply sexually harassing and assaulting them.

Case in point:

nintchdbpict0003444118756.jpg


That guy grabbing Taylor Swift's ass? Not a mover in the industry. Not really all that rich (relatively speaking). He's some radio host from fucking Denver. And there he is, at a public shoot, grabbing a woman who built her brand into a singing, teen sensation as if she's a cheap whore at a cheap club. At her own fucking event. And she has to just stand there and smile and pretend it isn't happening. And that was to Taylor Swift.

Can you imagine what all the other women who go through the industry have to put up with?

And I know that women have to shoot down a lot of guys and they have to deal with creeps. But I imagine that it's the same distortion for women as it is for men when it comes to wealth and power. The powerful wealthy men attract a lot of women who will throw it out as fast as possible, but are also essentially gold diggers. The women I think attract a lot of creeps who don't care so much about their money, but they want a piece of that ass. Even if it was just to say "Hey, I grabbed Taylor Swift's boob" or "Hey, I had the balls to ask out Miley Cyrus".

Ie, 1 in 10 women might be gold digging whores. In with a crowd of a thousand woman, Trump is going to think he's a stud because a hundred women will throw themselves at him. To reverse it, in a crowd of a thousand men, Taylor Swift is going to attract the hundred creeps who want a crack at her ass.

Hence I think, the distortion in views.
 
You know, I really gotta wonder if those dudes’ own beauty standards are so low to consider finding Amy Schumer or even Zoe Quinn attractive
 
You know, I really gotta wonder if those dudes’ own beauty standards are so low to consider finding Amy Schumer or even Zoe Quinn attractive

Amy Schumer's problem is that she's just kind of an asshole.

Physically speaking she's on the heavy side, but if she dressed sensibly, had a decent atitude and was nicer even if she wasnt famous she could probally get a decent guy.

Zoe Quinn has average looks what makes her disgusting to you is that you know that she's a preditor, a horrible human being that destorys other human beings lives for attention. This is a woman who successfuly preyed on lonely creative types and destroyed their lives and caused one of them to kill themselves.

Society does a pretty good job at warning women about male douchebags it does a shit job at warning men about preditory women.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top