Warmaster
Well-known member
1. According to your interpretation. From my POV I haven't seen a single thing the guy has done to indicate that he's down about talking about profits with Vault-Tec guaranteeing the nuclear apocalypse. Anything else is conjecture. Its interpretation espcially considering House was trying to save at least something before the Great War and wasn't cool with the Legion at all.Probably the only valid criticism you've had so far lol
1. Robert House isn't a good guy, you have to make up your mind first it's not accurate but when they do something accurate about the character you're then upset about it?
2. They didn't instigate it, they guaranteed it would happen. There's a difference.
2. Oh your correct. What's your point? Vault-Tec did that and I hated it.
Slandered? You realize that it retcons an entire city away? And turns the capital into a crater? That's actually something that happens. That's not good in my opinion.You don't like it is fine saying that it slandered the original games in a gross mischaracterization of the show, it's just fans like you that over exaggerate the wasteland background of Bethesda.
Bethesda has only made three games and of those three only one didn't involve rebuilding society, Fallout 4 literally has the Capital rebuilt by the Brotherhood of Steel, Fallout 76 literally has you rebuilding Appalachia. Fallout 3 is literally the only game where society wasn't in the process of rebuilding itself.
That's not an "obsession for wastelands"
I didn't criticize the other games. I like them. I may disagree with some of the choices but you won't see me shitting on them.
My comment on Bethesda dunking on the legacy of 3 different games is only the truth. Its an opinion. They retcon an entire city away and then turn the capital into a crater? Yeah I'm going to bitch.
"Misinformation" "debunked"They nuked a city, if you're mad that Shady Sands doesn't exist anymore that's fine but I literally factually debunked your claim of "they nuked the entire NCR".
I'm fine with people not liking it, what I'm not fine with is obvious blatant misinformation to make the show sound worse than it actually is.
It's being malicious out of spite not genuine criticism.
Where did I say the entire NCR was nuked into the ground? Maybe my rhetoric was scaling up the destruction or something? If your going to claim that I'm spreading misinfo then don't do it yourself.
I have my own takes on what the NCR outside the Shady Sands region looks like and I get that you disagree and think it should look like Fallout 1. Doesn't mean that I do. I have to assume that's what you meant by "I literally factually debunked your claim of "they nuked the entire NCR"."
I haven't been malicious at all. I think as a show it stands well by itself. If you look to my first posts I just said if you like Fallout: New Vegas or the first two games then you probably won't like the show. I said it broke my heart.
I mean look at this. You aren't looking at my argument. You keep calling me a Bethesda hater. You say I don't like Bethesda games. You say that I am "acting like X". You aren't really debating with me.For Christ sake dude, you're acting like it's worse than the Halo TV show.
You bring up the other games over and over again. I'm not arguing for them. I've said it dunks on the legacy of the other games.
You claim I am nitpicking. Then nitpick yourself despite you obviously knowing what I meant.
I even put out an alternative. This is a fair take that would've made everyone happy. Except Legion players.Sad that it's connected to a series that shat on FNV and Fallout 2. They did such a damn good job at set work. Why couldn't they spare more for the writing? Why even put it in California?
Couldn't they just put it in Colorado or something? That way they can do whatever they want with a Vault-Tec plotline without spitting on the legacy of older games. They took California and made it feel like its Fallout 1/2 again. Whatever legacy the games had is now gone.
Its just wasteland 24/7 and it will never evolve from that. Ever.
You attack my argument like you think I don't think its plausible. I'm shitting on the choice of keeping everything terrible. Big difference.
I'm allowed to criticize the narrative. My guess is that you are going to make another argument saying "but it makes sense considering other Bethesda games etc."
I'm just done with this argument. Do whatever and say whatever you want.
Last edited: