Search results for query: *

Mostly, it usually starts as a way to get mommy and daddy's attention. After that it's because it hurts them.

and pink slips in 3...2...1...

I'm so over this sort of behavior...and I'm trying to imagine how I'd feel if a semi just drove through... I'm saddened that I don't think I'd have any sympathy...

really, the democrat symbol should be a sheep on a leash headed towards a butcher's

Yup, I followed and watched bit, but it's just gotten to be average Leftist crap now.

Oh snap.

NOOOOOooooooooo!!!!! They'd NEVER do THAAAT!

I've found the simplest way to short circuit these methods is just to laugh at them, loudly and in their faces. They don't quite know how to respond to it, and it makes me happy!

Entirely possible, but...well...the seas have been killing highly trained people for millennia.

Which is a horrible idea b/c of how much it will hurt maintenance and logistics. Ethanol is hard on engines.

I'm sure you've looked up the Fair Tax plan. For those that don't know, it's a flat embedded sales tax on all, end user, purchases. There are no other exemptions. They did the math, and it would only be around 10% IIRC. If you save or invest. You don't pay any tax on that money. If you donate...

It's a matter of making targeting a problem...apparently...he wasn't good at that.

Israel puttin' warheads on foreheads... Couldn't of happened to better targets.

@King Arts this is my point. Yes, a rifle can be used for shots well over 300 meters. The point here is that Line of Sight is HEAVILY restricted in urban environs and prevents many shots even over 100 meters.

2-300 meters is extremely hard to pull off in a typical urban environment. All those buildings and walls get in the way. That, I'm pretty sure, is what @Zachowon is addressing.

Also the impact of a serious embargo.

My guess is that they are trying to figure out how to launch w/out just getting pasted while they setup. I'm guessing almost all, if not all, of their prepared and hidden positions have been used and lost.

Completely? No. However, I do believe it was corrupt in some portion from the get-go. It's a large, multi-governmental bureaucracy. It was born with corruption in mind simply because of its nature.

@King Arts Again, the UN is blatantly corrupt and a source of evil in this world. Every 'good' thing it does is merely cover, and can be done better in other ways and forms.

We don't need the UN for ANY of this. In fact, I'd posit that the UN actually MAKES things worse for every action they take. Good things happen out of the UN on accident, merely as the result of unintended consequences.