Search results for query: *

"Phantom foes". Interesting word choice when said "phantoms" have already tried to get us deplatformed and have already attempted to blackmail TS's owner.

@Realm is on a seven day vacation from this thread while @Bacle is gone for the day.

I wasn't speaking about any specific incident, just general policy. If you have a specific incident in mind then provide a link to the post.

Our general policy is to not stack punishments. If a post violates multiple rules but none of the rule violations on their own deserve more than X punishment, then the post will generally only get X punishment (even that punishment was earned multiple times over). Short of truly egregious rule...

Your various bans on TS have been in line with standing policy and for violations of the rules and you didn't bother to even attempt to appeal any of them. Idiot Discord banned me literally thirty seconds after showing up for the great offense of saying "Hello". Personally, I find it quite...

Ah yes, the discord that banned me for having the audacity to say hello and is run by people who think I should be killed. That discord ;)

It's not a narrative. We literally have a long list of screenshots filled with numerous individuals across multiple platforms talking about, advocating for, planning, and carrying out attacks on TS, its members, and its staff in a coordinated manner. That is by definition a malicious external...

None of them have been banned from TS yet. Nor would they be banned so long as they obeyed TS's rules.

Not even close. The PMs had less than a hundred members, they currently make up under 20% of the TS userbase. Except that optics don't really matter to TS. The platform will either speak for itself over time or it won't. If it does then placating people that we don't much care about (again...

Oh, and in the event that you (a generalized you to all of TS's users) perceive some need for you to have an alt account then make a thread in Staff comm's asking permission to make one and laying out the reason(s) that you need one. If the staff feels that your need is sufficient then you will...

You can give honest feedback. Note that this thread hasn't been shut down, nor have any of the staff made any effort to end it or punish individuals for talking about this topic. Bitching about us or how we run TS isn't going to get people banned, punished, or otherwise treated differently than...

That it does. Although a good part of that is simply that our initial user base was fairly politics heavy and we are the only SB related board that allows pretty much unlimited political discussion without the insanity of visiting Horton's board.

The most active SB spinoff after SV & QQ. Sure, growth is going to slow but it is still beating any of them save SB, SV & QQ for new members. The free and frank exchange of ideas is TS's identity. As for distrusting outsiders, that is a joke considering that a number of users and staff had...

Judging an SB Admin under the same standards that said Admin uses to judge others on SB is perfectly acceptable. Was either incident actually doxxing? No. Was the Rufus incident doxxing under SB's standards? Apparently. Under the SB standards, were Isal'Zha's actions "doxxing"? Yes. Actually...

If the Admins feel like "doing shenanigans" then they have zero need for alt accounts. Considering that 1) the mods didn't/don't know what accounts are alts, 2) alt accounts are infracted just like any other user account, and 3) alt accounts lack the cachet that comes with the staff/admin...