More evidence that women want to have their cake and to eat it too. Also, media pushing for men to be cucked

D

Deleted member 88

Guest
It has the undertones of homo solidarity. Yes.

In theory if men just ignored women? And didn’t pursue them anymore?

The human race would cease existing within a century or so. I imagine women in such a ROB scenario would be very confused and wonder why men now wanted nothing to do with them.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
It has the undertones of homo solidarity. Yes.

In theory if men just ignored women? And didn’t pursue them anymore?

The human race would cease existing within a century or so. I imagine women in such a ROB scenario would be very confused and wonder why men now wanted nothing to do with them.

Gonna make a thread on a What If?
 

Shipmaster Sane

You have been weighed
Well then, I think it's time for sexbots to be a thing, preferably ones with iron wombs
Right boy lemme just whip you up a functional Human level AI with no mental disorders and fit it in a computer the size of a cantaloupe which has to run continuously for 20 years minimum, oh, and I'll just slap on a baby-grower the size of a watermellon that doesnt produce children with three arms and shit. No worries, I'll get right on that son.
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
Well then, I think it's time for sexbots to be a thing, preferably ones with iron wombs
Thats what I have been saying for a while now.

Birth rate may well go up cause here is a secret. birth rate is down cause of women.

You know, I once had a conversation about the problem of having companion bots or sexbots or gynoids

I reasoned that simply put, it is NOT true love because they are programmed to love you specifically, it's NOT of their choice

I think men will still want to feel that sort of companionship, maybe women as well, but as said before they'd only get the fantasy

Not so different from some dating sim
So what? At least the gynoid will work with you and support you rather then seek to destroy you and test you like women do.

Look up shit tests Carl. Even if you get a woman, they constantly shit test you to see if you are still Alpha and if you lose, you gain their contempt which means they treat you even worse and their eyes start to wonder even more. @Lanmandragon please explain shit tests to @CarlManvers2019 .

Many men can't even get women anyway. A gynoid may not love you for real. But is that any different from women who don't love you either?

MGTOW sounds pretty gay to me
if they said to date men instead of women, then sure they are as you say. But so what if they are gay? Are they wrong?

Ad-hominems are not arguments.

One usually post polls with an explanation of what the poll is about.
 
Last edited:

Cherico

Well-known member
Right boy lemme just whip you up a functional Human level AI with no mental disorders and fit it in a computer the size of a cantaloupe which has to run continuously for 20 years minimum, oh, and I'll just slap on a baby-grower the size of a watermellon that doesnt produce children with three arms and shit. No worries, I'll get right on that son.


The baby grower or Iron womb is very doable, if you had enough research money and the government didn't get in the way of said research you could have that technology out in 20 years.

The AI thing is a bitch and a half but keep in mind a sex robot doesnt have to be perfect just think of the absolutely horrible women some men willingly date, all said robots have to do is be better then that and you have a market.
 

Shipmaster Sane

You have been weighed
The baby grower or Iron womb is very doable, if you had enough research money and the government didn't get in the way of said research you could have that technology out in 20 years.
Not in portable, 1:1 replica sense, no. Not even close.

The AI thing is a bitch and a half but keep in mind a sex robot doesnt have to be perfect just think of the absolutely horrible women some men willingly date, all said robots have to do is be better then that and you have a market.
"Children don't need mothers as part of their development"
Remind me again how do single parent children do, statistically?
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Not in portable, 1:1 replica sense, no. Not even close.


"Children don't need mothers as part of their development"
Remind me again how do single parent children do, statistically?

1024px-Surplus_from_Price_Floor.svg.png



What your looking at is a price floor.

The current market of dating, marrage and relationships is suffering from a price floor.

Feminism has raised the price of marrage, this has been done through alimony, child support, the family courts, false rape accusations and an ever growing amount of assorted bullshit. The price of marrage and relationships is also raised by welfare because you as a man have to compete with the federal government as a provider.

Now with the relationship market fucked your going to have a surplus people who would have other wise gotten married and had relationships and children instead become life time bacelors or cat ladies. If this keeps up it will lead to a societal collapse as demographics collapse.

Here are 3 solutions

1. Societal collapse, with a total societal collapse the government can no longer enact the price floor and things return to a better level.

2. Legal reform- change the laws to be less shity and reform the family courts (Good luck)

3. Create a substitute, and have that compete with women allowing society to continue to function even if its at a reduced level.

Robots are not ideal but for some reason as a society we just refuse to hold feminists accountable for their long history of shitty behavior and laws so its a solution.
 

Shipmaster Sane

You have been weighed
3. Create a substitute, and have that compete with women allowing society to continue to function even if its at a reduced level.

Robots are not ideal but for some reason as a society we just refuse to hold feminists accountable for their long history of shitty behavior and laws so its a solution.
So to be clear, your response to "Thats physically impossible and you know it" is "But I really really want it to be possible".

"Praying for Fairy dust to rain down from heaven" is not a better solution than any other kind of losing proposition.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
So to be clear, your response to "Thats physically impossible and you know it" is "But I really really want it to be possible".

"Praying for Fairy dust to rain down from heaven" is not a better solution than any other kind of losing proposition.


We just need the sex robots to be good enough to erase maybe 5% of men from the dating market, and separate Iron womb tech to allow non traditional families to have kids. Putting the robot and iron womb together in one package is beyond our technical abilities having it be separate is not.

The goal is to create enough competition that dating market changes.
 

Shipmaster Sane

You have been weighed
We just need the sex robots to be good enough to erase maybe 5% of men from the dating market, and separate Iron womb tech to allow non traditional families to have kids. Putting the robot and iron womb together in one package is beyond our technical abilities having it be separate is not.

The goal is to create enough competition that dating market changes.
So we're moving the goalpost from "A robot that can fuck you, bear a child, and raise it, just as good as a woman, to totally replace women" to "Put pressure on the dating market with robots you fuck and vat grown children that will be harder to raise and predisposed for all kinds of negative outcomes in life"
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
We just need the sex robots to be good enough to erase maybe 5% of men from the dating market, and separate Iron womb tech to allow non traditional families to have kids. Putting the robot and iron womb together in one package is beyond our technical abilities having it be separate is not.

The goal is to create enough competition that dating market changes.

What’s stopping the government from banning all this?

If Feminists make it harder for even non-feminist women, then they can choose to also intervene when it comes to men deliberately choosing to have alternatives to them
 

Cherico

Well-known member
So we're moving the goalpost from "A robot that can fuck you, bear a child, and raise it, just as good as a woman, to totally replace women" to "Put pressure on the dating market with robots you fuck and vat grown children that will be harder to raise and predisposed for all kinds of negative outcomes in life"

We live in a very shitty world Shipmaster, as far as I'm concerned the chances for an ideal solution are gone and we are now at the point where we have to find the least worst of the bad options.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
We live in a very shitty world Shipmaster, as far as I'm concerned the chances for an ideal solution are gone and we are now at the point where we have to find the least worst of the bad options.

Let’s try seeing things as a sort of Free Market

Women & Governments are both a sort of business

When we are gjven subpar products we try looking for alternatives or refuse to buy, eventually things may balance out
 

Shipmaster Sane

You have been weighed
We live in a very shitty world Shipmaster, as far as I'm concerned the chances for an ideal solution are gone and we are now at the point where we have to find the least worst of the bad options.
"Well men, we can either fight the enemy and lose, or run away."
"No, wait, I've got an idea, what if we throw pineapples at them, thats the least bad solution!
"How is that the least bad solution?"
"Well, I like pineapples, and it would be cool if pineapples won the war for us."

Uh, okay. Yes, it would be fun if a solution magically materialized in defiance of all logic but I'm not investing any resources in your magical Pineapple army plan.
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
"Children don't need mothers as part of their development"
Remind me again how do single parent children do, statistically?
Birth rate is going down anyway aka cause women don't want to have kids at all. We apparently have women who quite openly brag about how many abortions they have. Maternal instinct is not what it used to be and may well get worse.

Also, single parents are overwhelmingly single mothers. What difference does it make if its single fathers now?

So we're moving the goalpost from "A robot that can fuck you, bear a child, and raise it, just as good as a woman, to totally replace women" to "Put pressure on the dating market with robots you fuck and vat grown children that will be harder to raise and predisposed for all kinds of negative outcomes in life"
Well do you have a possible proposal or solution?
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
Let’s try seeing things as a sort of Free Market

Women & Governments are both a sort of business

When we are gjven subpar products we try looking for alternatives or refuse to buy, eventually things may balance out
A "shit test" is when a woman knowingly or unknowingly. Challenges a man by doing something that will{or should} rattle him. Bassically it's an "alphaness" test as your personality will dictate your response. There's a decent argument that feminism itself is a giant shit test for example. Unfortunately we western failed that tests quite hard.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
A "shit test" is when a woman knowingly or unknowingly. Challenges a man by doing something that will{or should} rattle him. Bassically it's an "alphaness" test as your personality will dictate your response. There's a decent argument that feminism itself is a giant shit test for example. Unfortunately we western failed that tests quite hard.

I think paradoxically, men they approach are meant to fail by design

They won’t up and say that they want men who are “bad boys”

And they can’t even be satisfied with men who will stand up for themselves and others when really needed unless as others above have pointed out, they were tempered and given good examples from
childhood
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top