Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
It’s thought he might have been a really pissed off Sperm Whale. Some might see that as a let down, but for coast hugging Roman vessels of the 6th century an angry Sperm Whale is quite dangerous enough.
The Cryptid/ Unexplained Event/ Paranormal Thread.
- Thread starter Sailor.X
- Start date
It’s thought he might have been a really pissed off Sperm Whale. Some might see that as a let down, but for coast hugging Roman vessels of the 6th century an angry Sperm Whale is quite dangerous enough.
It remind me story from England - dude was in basement of his home,and saw about 20 roman soldiers marching,but with feet hidden in floor.
He later discovered,that under floor of basement was old roman road.
Logical explanation - people leave some kind of signs of their activity,which could be seen later in the same place later.
I think,that it explain all kinds of ghosts,including tanks.
That is why those romans marched in basement ,not on modern roads.
And,it explain all ghosts who do not react to humans.
Yes - when the "ghost" always appears in the same spot and does exactly the same thing each time anyone sees it. As if it were a recording being triggered to replay.
The point is that part of the lore about such things is that if the old building it happens in is altered or rebuilt, the apparition will no longer show up.
Maybe in your example the old Roman-made road was still there, just buried. But I'd think that marching along a road would have been a pretty humdrum everyday experience for a Roman soldier, not something with enough strong emotion involved to cause an "imprint".
ie: Not like this:
Imagine if there was an old hotel, with a room where those five blighters showed up once a year, every year, on the same night each time...
Yes,there was buried road under basement,that is why he do not saw parts of soldiers legs.
And,they could march to some important battle,were finally send to Rome,or go to brothel.
49ersfootball
Well-known member
Following!
not going to go full "skeptic"; but the thing that always strikes me most odd about these bigfoot sightings is the fact that none of them are ever showing up dead with hunters taking pictures over them. of course the usual bigfoot enthuasist response to that is either "they are very good at concealing themselves"...and yet there are so many supposed sightings. press them further and the usual "government coverup" comes into play.
again, I am not a complete "skeptic". I do feel the woods of North America are vast enough to support things that the general public does not know about. although I am somewhat skeptical of the size of these supposed bigfoots; 8 foot tall, probably 600 plus pound animals need a lot of food. they would be a similiar niche to inland grizzly bears. and if they lived in coastal areas in say, Alaska, they could get even bigger but then they would certainly have to compete with big coastal brown bears during the salmon run and would therefore be blatantly visible. most likely, they are much smaller than that, probably more around human sized but with the strength and body proportions of wild apes
I saw one with my own two eyes from 20ft away. They are very much real flesh and blood creatures. And when you see one. The last thing on your mind is taking a picture.
Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
Yeah, marching wasn’t exactly an out of the ordinary experience for them. You’d expect to hear something like that in the Teutoburg Forest, not a normal Roman road.
And oh dear, that’s a deeply disturbing image. Going for a stroll in the darkness of that massive forest and hearing the distant echoes of men marching and laughing, forever on their way back to camp…
What did it look like? If Big Foot exists, the species would be a Great Ape of some variety.
I Never was in USA or Canada,but i read,that experienced hunters belive,that they exist.
i would doubt some city dwellers,even if it was family,but if experienced hunter say that he saw X,that he saw X.
For the same reason i belive,that Mokele-mbembe and 2 other dinosaurs once lived in Congo.Becouse their experienced hunters saw them.
An amas in Mongolia and Siberia.Which,by the way ,was supposed to capture man or womans if they are interested in them.
Some polish voyager was warned in mongolia,that amas woman could capture him - and it was only semi-joke.
P.S How it look like,like ape or human ? and,could them capture man or womans for sexual reasons,too ?
There have been, actually.
It looked like a cross between a Gorilla and a Chimp in the face. It was 8ft tall with dark brown hair. And it was staring daggers at me. So I backed up to my car and got the hell away from it.
But the official establishment position on that is "nothing to see here, move along now!" ?
I saw a year or two ago footage that was filmed on a live camera in Yellowstone National Park. It showed bison moving in a herd. Then in the same footage a small group of Bigfoots moved in the opposite direction of the herd. Skeptics called official National Park Service footage. Photo shopped.......
Skeptics are only skeptical about things other people believe in, never about their own beliefs.
Any chance of that film being viewable online?
Here's a few videos that discuss the likeliness of bigfoot existing, what they might be, how they avoid people, etc. Basically addressing the arguments skeptics tend to make. Also I recommend this channel in general, which discusses other cryptids as well as some unusual animal attacks from history, like the lions of Tsavo and the Sankebetsu brown bear incident, even if its focus is mainly bigfoot related.