Transgender Rights

Hey! If they hate cis-men and cis-women equally then that is equitty. Which makes it all A-OK!
A lot of people have pointed out that their attempts to label anyone not-Them with a CiS prefix is discriminatory in itself, and an attempt of normalizing their batshit craziness as being a social standard/change.

There are no "CiS-Women" and "CiS-Men" -- just men and women.

I'm not a CiS-Man. I'm just a man.

A fucking ugly man, but still a man. :ROFLMAO:
 
There are no "CiS-Women" and "CiS-Men" -- just men and women.
I agree, but within their world view, there is no such thing as a "normal" person. As such, a Cis individual is one who is the same gender (and possibly the same sexuality, that part get's argued over) as they were born. So, in short hand, this refers to straight-men or straight-women. All rather amusing since there are already several terms to refer to this, such as "straight", "normal", "normative", "healthy", "biblical common knowledge 😉", "the most productive relationship", "the path of not being stoned to death", "how not to learn to fly", etc.
 
I agree, but within their world view, there is no such thing as a "normal" person. As such, a Cis individual is one who is the same gender (and possibly the same sexuality, that part get's argued over) as they were born. So, in short hand, this refers to straight-men or straight-women. All rather amusing since there are already several terms to refer to this, such as "straight", "normal", "normative", "healthy", "biblical common knowledge 😉", "the most productive relationship", "the path of not being stoned to death", "how not to learn to fly", etc.
Yeah, but they're attempting to make their deluded world-view the default one everyone follows by trying to impose such discriminatory labels onto everyone else.

I'd say they can go fuck themselves, but... 🤨
 
trying to impose such discriminatory labels onto everyone else.
That's the thing. By not engaging in good-faith arguments they are able to choose the literary terms of engagement. Redefining language to via publications in academia and slang (same thing basically) till you are speaking different dialects and your words are being used against you.

There is a reason they call it a culture "war" and use terms like ideologically "captured". To be captured is such a martial term, it implies occupation, a projection of force.
 
After Bullying VTuber 'Pikamee' Into Retirement Over Hogwarts Legacy, People are Souring on Woke Mobs

I am sick and tired of these deranged morons REEING and attacking people for bullshit, for even remotely being connected to bullshit.

Methinks that every single trans trende should be permitted to use those silly pronouns and "identify as" whatever if and only if they are on hormone replacement therapy to the absolute maximum level possible and their old reproductive organs have been removed.

That will fix the problem, one way or another.
 
What irritates me the most about this is the cognitive dissonance of insisting you're underprivileged and being oppressed, while at the same time using your privileged position in society to try and oppress other people.

I suspect that they don't really think about it. The notion that they are oppressed is a brainbug that they never check against reality.
 
It's the same reason, at its core, why employers aren't hiring women (or at least women who are under forty plus): they're liabilities waiting to happen in this day and age.
 

It sounds like they tested 'They/Them', but the control group had no pronouns listed, not 'She/Her' or 'He/Him.'

I don't think that's a good comparison. I think someone listing their pronouns on a resume is tacky, and it would make me inclined to disregard the resume regardless of the pronouns listed.

I don't think its fundamentally any different than putting your sexual orientation or religious identification right under your name.

Its a resume, not a dating profile.
 
There's as much a thing as 'trans children' as there is 'vegan cats'.
We don't let children do other invasive surgeries or treatments just because they want them.
The most common situation seen is that the mother is batshit insane, and it's the father trying to basically rescue his kid(s).

Mother wanted a girl; she got a boy. "Oh, I know! I'll dress him as a girl, call him a girl's name, and say he's trans!"

Well, it's either that or one of the parents is batshit crazy who genuinely believes in shit like "Theybies".

Unfortunately, due to bias in the courts (among other things), women almost always get custody, even if they're cracked up whores or belong in a psych ward ("because she's their mother!" is not a valid excuse, Courts!).

If this bill stops this insanity from happening to these poor kids, then I'm all for it -- just like taking an abused child away from parents that kick, punch, or... Abuse them and putting them with other family members or a foster family.
 
The most common situation seen is that the mother is batshit insane, and it's the father trying to basically rescue his kid(s).

Mother wanted a girl; she got a boy. "Oh, I know! I'll dress him as a girl, call him a girl's name, and say he's trans!"

Well, it's either that or one of the parents is batshit crazy who genuinely believes in shit like "Theybies".

Unfortunately, due to bias in the courts (among other things), women almost always get custody, even if they're cracked up whores or belong in a psych ward ("because she's their mother!" is not a valid excuse, Courts!).

If this bill stops this insanity from happening to these poor kids, then I'm all for it -- just like taking an abused child away from parents that kick, punch, or... Abuse them and putting them with other family members or a foster family.
Probably going to sound controversial when I say this but from my experience transgenders majorly come in three forms (there's others but they're way less common)

1: Mommy got a son and wanted a daughter
2: Man thinks life would be easier as a woman
3: Insane teacher (9/10 a woman) wants to groom groom
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top