I mean... Bill Gates wasn't subtle when he talked about enforcing population control via mandatory vaccines.
the problem is he's on an old paradime based on false premisis's with improving technology you can support higher levels of population, and with space technology you can access the wealth of an entire solar system.
the problem is he's on an old paradime based on false premisis's with improving technology you can support higher levels of population, and with space technology you can access the wealth of an entire solar system.
Bill Gates is aboomer and a greedy megalomaniac and probably a high-functioning autist, he has Wiseberger's syndrome, which is basically the tism in milder form.That's an "everyone wins" solution. But I think what people like him want is a "we win and everyone else loses" solution.
Ingrained zero-sum thinking.
No it can't. Not even close. Not without massive reductions in our standards of living. We had our chance to become a Space Empire in the late 60s early 70s but blew it on Vietnam and forever wars first on drugs then on terrorism.The Earth can easily support at least 5-10x its current population of humans, before you even get into space-based stuff.
The idea that the Earth's ecosystem is at some fragile point that overpopulation will collapse has been BS from the start.
What on Earth makes you think the Earth can't handle such a population increase?No it can't. Not even close. Not without massive reductions in our standards of living. We had our chance to become a Space Empire in the late 60s early 70s but blew it on Vietnam and forever wars first on drugs then on terrorism.
What on Earth makes you think the Earth can't handle such a population increase?
Not really, depends on technologies and politics involved.No it can't. Not even close. Not without massive reductions in our standards of living.
No we didn't, and we still don't. Without massive advances in automation and robotic manufacturing that we are barely scratching on now, or overthrowing the tyranny of the rocket equation, no way. Could have explored some more and made some symbolic landings in come places, but that's it.We had our chance to become a Space Empire in the late 60s early 70s but blew it on Vietnam and forever wars first on drugs then on terrorism.
I think the keyword here is that these are both incredibly poor countries and the whole water issue is about the latter trying to squeeze in some cheap electricity. If there were technologically developed, rich countries in their place, they wouldn't consider that a big deal, just got to build a few extra nuclear reactors and desalinate water as needed if its still not enough.My first guess is that there's talk of waterwars between Egypt-Ethiopia. A symptom but not the reason.
2 of the most populous African countries.
Let that sink in.
War for water.
Which is stupid...because water is freaking plentiful if you put a little effort into it.War for water.
No it can't. Not even close. Not without massive reductions in our standards of living. We had our chance to become a Space Empire in the late 60s early 70s but blew it on Vietnam and forever wars first on drugs then on terrorism.
We need to thoroughly reprioritize our resources and soon. And that means we also need to deal with the elites who won't play ball in this endeavor.
We could always turn to a soylent greenesque fertilizer if all else fails . . .How does Earths phosphate reserves look?
There are alternatives to rock phosphate. The element itself is estimated to be around 0.1% of Earth's weight, and its not being annihilated in nuclear reactions, its all still out there.How does Earths phosphate reserves look?
We wouldn't even need all that much, if we could convince farmers to start rotating their crops to replenish the nutrients in the soil again.There are alternatives to rock phosphate. The element itself is estimated to be around 0.1% of Earth's weight, and its not being annihilated in nuclear reactions, its all still out there.
The only issue is gathering and concentrating it (notable alternative is organic waste of all sorts), which costs energy and money.
But as cheap rock phosphate dries up, these other alternatives will look more and more competitive.
We wouldn't even need all that much, if we could convince farmers to start rotating their crops to replenish the nutrients in the soil again.
You know, normally I'm repulsed by that sort of rhetoric; but in this case, I think it's appropriate. Crop rotation works; and the only reason they stopped is because the government incentivized them to by offering them money to grow certain crops such as corn. Which, thanks to big business lobbyists, never stopped; eventually leading to the creation of things like high-fructose corn syrup, and corn ethanol. Both of which have caused a lot of problems for us as a society.The good old ways, that worked for thousands of years.