I suppose it's a good thing they're not doing that. Unless you have some kind of actual proof that they are, outside of histrionic complaints from a secondhand source (waves vaguely at Florida) that don't present any of the actual course materials, just broad statements of "They're teaching CRT! They hate America!"
I've looked through the Army's recent initiatives and while they have added a lot of domestic terrorism stuff to the TARP training and talked about how "Every Soldier will have to complete quarterly online training and annual "live" training;" that's no more than exactly what they do now. Online training that you sit and click through as quickly as possible so you can get done with it and print the certificate, accompanied with Live training meaning a guy from the local counterintelligence company comes and gives an hour long briefing, at the end of which there are no questions.
Not exactly rigid indoctrination, on average it takes six to ten weeks of enforced isolation and constant exposure to cause a significant change in actual belief, and even then you're going to get a significant relapse in behavior in a percentage (as high as 20) of the training population.
The biggest policy change is in AR 600-20, which now states that individuals are responsible and accountable for their activities online, and attaches potential penalties under the UCMJ. The creation of "diversity officers" is an additional duty, that some poor 2LT is going to be stuck with and wind up with the responsibility for hanging posters around the common areas and coordinating an annual training event that people will go out of their way to avoid having to sit through again, not some kind of Bolshevik Political Officer appointments.
What I do see is changes that will eliminate cliques and good ol' boy groups regardless of ethnicity or background, which is a fine thing. I've listened to countless complaints about "Masonic ring knockers," "Just another one of those Harley Club guys," as well as those who think there's nearly conspiracies of every single ethnic/religious group in the Army to take care of their own at the expense of others. Now the ways those people are selected for promotion or positions are having their DA Photo removed, their sex, sexuality, ethnicity, marital status, and just about every other individual trait redacted from their records in order to ensure that the individual is being selected purely on the basis of their performance reports and individual achievements. Which is just how it should be.
Are you? Seems like he's in a better position to talk about what he's seen.
Right, but just saying "what the fuck are you teaching us" isn't actually anything, and is just going to get the response of "idk what my boss told me we have to do, just sit through it." And at least going off the people I know, this is less them saying "what the fuck are you teaching us" and more gripping to their peers about it. That's not to say it's not a start, or not fertile ground, but until and unless we start to see people in the military defying anti-white ideology that actually puts skin in the game en mass (stuff like walking out of anti-white CRT lectures etc),
I'd like to see these purported lectures. I'm pretty confident I know more people in the military than the average person and none of my friends have said anything about them. I have a high confidence that any kind of training plan that's actually being presented to the force at large is going to be bland, boring, and absolutely NOT anti-anything. Because the second you make it anti-there's grounds under existing policy for a discrimination suit, and there's no exceptions for the source, and no means to sweep it under the rug when a SPC can just pick up the phone and call their congressman, winding up with Mark Milley answering questions about it.
then as citizens I think we cannot depend on any sizable proportion of the military to actually risk anything to defend the interests of the historic American nation and fight back against the DC government & state.
I think you're correct, because the military didn't take an oath to support and defend the "historic American nation" (which sounds like it's in the 20kHz range); they swore that to the Constitution of the United States and obey the orders of the President and the Officers appointed over them.
For all the conspiracy theories and gnashing of teeth that happens on either side whenever the administration's political leanings change, it's still a living document, subject to the changing interpretations of the time.
Personally (and on topic for the thread) I'm in favor of unrestricted sale combined with mandatory licensure, just the same as for using automobiles. With the same training requirements, meaning that you'd go and do the CCL course for a couple weeks, then get your license, and be able to carry subject to the local regulations, just like speed limits and stop signs. Want to get a Machinegun? You're gonna need a Class C license for that. Longer course, more training, but at the end, that's it, plonk down your money for your big ol' M2.
I worked with weapons continually for years, and there were STILL negligent discharges and accidents that happened, even in SOF units, so the best bet for making sure that the entire public has access without creating both a hazard to themselves and to other users is to ensure there's a unified training regimen. For people with training from elsewhere? Give a test. The DMV doesn't require you to show you graduated from a Driver's Training course, just that you pass their test. A nice written test followed by a range fire check and a couple shoot/don't shoot scenarios would fit the bill just fine.