The Right and White Nationalism - An annoying cancer

Not entirelly,those guys were simply corrupted,not marxist.Althought...Saint Damiani wrote book against sodomite mafia in church about 1050 AD.

Sure but I would say it is a difference in degree not kind. Is it worse today than then. Without a doubt. But although the victory is already won in eternity, we are still in time.
 
This isn’t entirely new, there’s a reason Dante Alighieri and Savonrola and others were ranting about the toleration of usury and the influence of the monied and vain oligarchs of Venice and Florence upon the Church Hierarchy.
They were only corrupted,when now many really belive in leftist bullshit.Althought...Saint Piotr Damiani wrote in 1049 AD "Liber Gomorrihanus" in which he accused many priest of forming some kind of sodomite mafia.
 
I do note how you've conspicuously avoided mentioning or quoting to that post about a hypothetical/hopeful black conservative/traditionalist Pope.

But then such a thing is an impossibility in your distorted parody of Christianity that presents it as a "whites only" religion. You really have no religion but the supposed supremacy of your ethnic group, which you've lashed a bunch of Catholic-sounding concepts to as camouflage. Oh, and you've again repeatedly refused to counter-argue against me.
 
Last edited:
I do note how you've conspicuously avoided mentioning or quoting to that thread about a hypothetical/hopeful black conservative/traditionalist Pope.

But then such a thing is an impossibility in your distorted parody of Christianity that presents it as a "whites only" religion. You really have no religion but the supposed supremacy of your ethnic group, which you've lashed a bunch of Catholic-sounding concepts to as camouflage.

Cardinal Sara is ironically the closest thing to what a trad cath or a groyper (well the handful that aren't sodomite pagans larping or glowies) would consider ideal in a catholic leader.

In fact the fucker has stopped short of calling for inquisitions because has enough sense to imply without saying.

But they don't like him because he is blek I guess?

It goes back to my point in other threads. A white European who supports the EU is a greater threat to America than. South African immigrants who while liking social safety nets also really, really really hates Marxism and Groomers

And that our immigration policy should be exclusionary towards anything left of center and little else.

Note the "/s".

I noted it. I know ubra isn't one of them I'm just having a nostalgic laugh.
 
Last edited:
Problem with that play is that removing said foundation ... leaves the whole idea of natural rights hanging in the air unsupported. If man is just another animal, you can do whatsoever you please to him. Literally nothing is forbidden.
Except that isn't true, it only a conceit assumed by many religions to give them a means exercise control on people's thoughts and try to pretend the natural world is separate from the human world.

The fact pack animals exist completely blows the conceit out of the water, because they don't need a religion to keep packs together or survive long term. We are just another pack animal, if a very fucking clever and resourceful one that harnessed fire, something no other animal can really claim.

We've also been very lucky.
As an atheist, I think Christianity is great if it prevents people turning their politics into religion.

And I far prefer Christianity over the others, because while I don't agree with all their moral standards, it's probably the closest to my own of all the religions. Probably because my own moral foundation absolutely has it's roots in Christianity, because that's one of the foundations of our nation and our system of laws.

Also in general most Christians I meet are more pleasant than edgelord atheists
I'm not an atheist, more an agnostic who looks for the divine in nature, not in scripture.

I am convinced there is a divine, but I'm not anywhere near feeling any religion represents the totality of it.

Which is why if feel secular laws are safer for societies as a whole, particularly ones where multiple faiths live together.

I think Christianity is great, but has too little focus on humanities place in the larger natural world. I also think Shintoism and Buddhism have great qualities for their more...naturalistic views on humanities' relationship with our world. I like the Sikh self/community defense ethics, and their kickass turbans/beards.
 
See, why don't we just go the old Roman way that led to them having such a period of well...a golden age?

We need our own Augutus, and may Amrs choose him wisely
 
.

The fact pack animals exist completely blows the conceit out of the water, because they don't need a religion to keep packs together or survive long term. We are just another pack animal, if a very fucking clever and resourceful one that harnessed fire, something no other animal can really claim.

ah, yes we should seek to emulate pack hunters like orcas, dolphins and chimps, elephants and crows.

You know baby eating, corpse raping, genocidal maniacs?

Highly intelligent pack animals have some of the most violently dysfunctional societies on the planet.

Without religion and even then only certain religions we'd be walking around thinking necrophilia and cannibalism is totally A okay.
 
Last edited:
Cardinal Sara is ironically the closest thing to what a trad cath or a groyper (well the handful that aren't sodomite pagans larping or glowies) would consider ideal in a catholic leader.

In fact the fucker has stopped short of calling for inquisitions because has enough sense to imply without saying.

But they don't like him because he is blek I guess?

Look, to understand this lot you have to realise their supposed religious traditionalism is all but completely subordinated to their ethno-nationalism. In fact, some of 'em have even distorted their understanding of the religious doctrines to try and pervert Christianity into some sort of "racial religion for whites". It's disgusting.
 
pointing out to Nordicists that their ancestors obliterated the western Roman Empire in a welfare chimpout

That...that's the most unique way I've ever heard anyone describe the fall of the Roman Empire.

But it ain't wrong.

Without religion and even then only certain religions we'd be walking around thinking necrophilia and cannibalism is totally A okay.

One should note how, in comparison to more primitive cultures, Islam is downright civilised. Providing a wide moral framework for a society is a good thing,
 
See, why don't we just go the old Roman way that led to them having such a period of well...a golden age?

We need our own Augutus, and may Amrs choose him wisely

The problem is the moment Augustus died we got in order.

A sadistic pedophile, a maniac who fucked his own sister and by sheer luck a dude who was okay and then as soon as he was murdered by a Thot he was replaced by an obese neckbeard who was assassinated for burning people alive, giving filthy actors political power and building a pimp palace the size of 40 city blocks on the ruins of half his city.

A city he likely burned down.

America can have a Caesar but it needs an armed civilian population with the authority to carry out assassinations against the central power when it feels pressed.

An American Emperor would have the NSA, the FBI, the CIA and the ATF at his beck and call.

Four terrorist organizations with badges doing whatever one man thinks.

Too dangerous.

Rome worked so well when there was a deterrent against abuse by the Caesars.

Look, to understand this lot you have to realise their supposed religious traditionalism is all but completely subordinated to their ethno-nationalism. In fact, some of 'em have even distorted their understanding of the religious doctrines to try and pervert Christianity into some sort of "racial religion for whites". It's disgusting.

Oh I know @Guy of Z and I debated their leaders endlessly when they were still neopagan edge lords who made fun of Christians constantly then magically converted when being a militant Cbristian was a better way to get attention and gift.

They aren't religious. They aren't men of God, most of them used to worship a mongrelized version of Wotan.

So yeah, you're right. They're the modern fedora tippers and deserves to be mocked and called heretics.

Especially when most of them fell for a Allistair Crowley psyop (Aliens are not demons, you fell for an attempt by a Satanist to see if he could dupe Evangelicals into committing heresy).

Yeah, you're right and I'll not dispute it.

That...that's the most unique way I've ever heard anyone describe the fall of the Roman Empire.

But it ain't wrong.

Someone did a great shitpost on twitter with Rome falling to the Goths vs BLM incinerating DC.

With the tag line


SHEIZER MEIN GIBS! vs SHEEIT MUH GIBS!

Brutal but honest.
 
Last edited:
The problem is the moment Augustus died we got in order.

A sadistic pedophile, a maniac who fucked his own sister and by sheer luck a dude who was okay and then as soon as he was murdered by a Thot he was replaced by an obese neckbeard who was assassinated for burning people alive, giving filthy actors political power and building a pimp palace the size of 40 city blocks on the ruins of half his city.

A city gee likely burned down.

America can have a Caesar but it needs an armed civilian population with the authority to carry out assassinations against the central power when it feels pressed.

An American Emperor would have the NSA, the FBI, the CIA and the ATF at his beck and call.

Four terrorist organizations with badges doing whatever one man thinks.

Too dangerous.



Oh I know @Guy of Z and I debated their leaders endlessly when they were still neopagan edge lords who made fun of Christians constantly then magically converted when being a militant Cbristian was a better way to get attention and gift.

They aren't religious. They aren't men of God, most of them used to worship a mongrelized version of Wotan.

So yeah, you're right. They're the modern fedora tippers and deserves to be mocked and called heretics.

Especially when most of them fell for a Allistair Crowley psyop (Aliens are not demons, you fell for an attempt by a Satanist to see if he dupe Evangelicals into committing heresy).

Yeah, you're right and I'll not dispute it.
I was more referring to how the empire lasted as long as it did and Mars willing, we can last longer then they did.
 
I was more referring to how the empire lasted as long as it did and Mars willing, we can last longer then they did.

We probably will.

Unlike Rome our internal and external enemies are great fools and have moved way too damn fast.

That's why I disagreed so much with Sunhawk when he used to accuse me of blackpilling.

To me it's awesome. We've been gifted almost by God with obstructors who are clowns.
 
We probably will.

Unlike Rome our internal and external enemies are great fools and have moved way too damn fast.

That's why I disagreed so much with Sunhawk when he used to accuse me of blackpilling.

To me it's awesome. We've been gifted almost by God with obstructors who are clowns.
I mean...plenty of the Roman ones were as well. it just depends on the era
 
ah, yes we should seek to emulate pack hunters like orcas, dolphins and chimps, elephants and crows.

You know baby eating, corpse raping, genocidal maniacs?

Highly intelligent pack animals are some of the most violently dysfunctional societies on the planet.

Without religion and even then only certain religions we'd be walking around thinking necrophilia and cannibalism is totally A okay.

RE: bolded part, that is largely how humans have come to be a dominant species on the planet... in fact, when you look at dolphin behaviour and the "natural state" human behaviour, there is basically no difference. Where difference does lie is that we are simply too powerful and also have the capacity of being afraid of ourselves. Hence the culture, civilization, laws, borders... all of that exists in order to allow humans to coexist without wiping themselves out.
 
We probably will.

Unlike Rome our internal and external enemies are great fools and have moved way too damn fast.

That's why I disagreed so much with Sunhawk when he used to accuse me of blackpilling.

To me it's awesome. We've been gifted almost by God with obstructors who are clowns.

Honestly, the only man in the lib-left opposition with seemingly any brains is Soros.

And that’s because the old vampire knows well enough to stick to the shadows and pull the puppet strings with his money and seemingly endless proxy organizations.

Meanwhile, at the forefront in lib-left American politics is:

1. A senile serial child sniffer that probably barely remembers to put on his adult diapers in the morning and has a son that will likely be his eventual downfall.

2. A psychotic diversity hire licking her lips every time Joe stumbles, because she knows she’s probably not getting the big chair unless he croaks in office.

3. The crypt keepers even more decayed and gruesome, day drinking cousin who looks like she’s one foot in the grave already and keeps making stupid decisions that do nothing to help her party but sure do inflame the republican base.

4-5. An old faux-socialist grifter and his donkey-toothed millennial protege.

Truly, the Democrats are in good hands.
 
RE: bolded part, that is largely how humans have come to be a dominant species on the planet... in fact, when you look at dolphin behaviour and the "natural state" human behaviour, there is basically no difference.

I'd disagree massively. A good friend of mine once put it to me that whilst humans are capably violent to a frightening extent, we're not quite inherently violent or cruel. We are great apes and unless provoked great apes are rather docile creatures happily eating their greens for the most part. Chimpanzees seem to a bit of an exception to that rule, especially given that their Bonobo cousins (closer to us than even chimps) are far more chilled out than them.

Remember, Silverback Gorillas will fake charge you. You'd have to be a real stupid bastard to get killed by them.

Truly, the Democrats are in good hands.

If Cicero were a Democrat and alive today, he'd cross the senate floor and (uncomfortably on his part) be joyously embraced by the Republicans.
 
Ayo, I understand what you're all driving at, but please don't lump Cato the Elder, Cicero and Pompey Magnus in with Joe Biden and the globalists. Upon further thought, I have determined that the Optimates were far worthier men than many alive today.
That just shows how the US has become.
I think any if those three would be better then damn near every Democraf we currently have if not all of them
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top