Who else dreads this year?

Isem

Well-known member

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
It would be the greatest prank ever if someone managed to convince her that sex-workers were a viable demographic that she could appeal to by going full THOT.

Except for fictional sex workers, gotta ban guys from drawing fanservice while probably not even having the exception card by not being Far Left
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
She might lose but she's never gonna be broke again. For better or worse she's got enough juice. To easily make a mint with books and speeches. She'sset for life now.
As long as she can manage her finances but I have doubts if she has a taste for the high life.
 

Tzeentchean Perspective

Well-known member


If this claim is accurate (and I think it is, this is from a major news host, not a gossip site like Gateway Pundit, Truepundit, Bigleaguepolitics, or 100percentfedup), this wrecks a pretty major case against Drumpf.

As an update to this...

All this stuff that's coming out almost makes me wonder: "Was getting caught part of your plan?"
Even more evidence recording questionable intent by the prosecutors in the Flynn case is bursting out for the public to gawk. At this crucial time I remember the words of some journalist on twitter pointing out that there's an excess of "news" sites online who always claim to have their mythical sources providing the truth, but they never speak up when important developments really do occur in public. I can see why. None of the "fringe" weirdos I observed ever mentioned major evidence in the Flynn case being leaked by their "sources" between warning about the big bad Chinese invasion or Jade Helm being executed for realsies. Meanwhile, it turns out that Maria Baritomo probably had REAL inside sources judging by what's going on now.

Found the post. I know this man writes for the Epoch times, but I'm pretty sure he's not a Falun Gong drone.

 
Last edited:

Isem

Well-known member
At this crucial time I remember the words of some journalist on twitter pointing out that there's an excess of "news" sites online who always claim to have their mythical sources providing the truth, but they never speak up when important developments really do occur in public.
That's because "sources" is often the rough equivalent of "guy tasked by the department in question to discreetly tell things to the press" rather then some member leaking stuff making them glorified propaganda mouthpieces at best. So when something intended to be actually discreet happens said sources tend to be completely silent on the matter.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag



oh.....shit....It looks like the Reed thing might actually be legit.

I give the dem's a 50% chance of swapping him out democracy and primaries be damned. Which would backfire horribly or he continues on and this will continue to drag him down. They might have been better off picking Bernie.


They can choose to deny him actually ever having done it again and again

Reality is subjective, history is subjective

What things are is subjective, who is right and wrong is subjective

And they choose what is correct and not
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag


so according to the statistics democrats are more likely to inform on their neighbors then republicans are.



Well, this lady's thinking she can't rely on the police or government services much anymore after this

Honestly, while I think she and other pro-stay-at-homes have a point, those "non-essential businesses" and their other employees actually need the money
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top