Who are you hoping that he would lose to?
Also, you rather miss the point. People on this thread are worried less about the outcome of the election, than about the potential craziness leading up to it.
Who else dreads this year?
- Thread starter Cherico
- Start date
Who are you hoping that he would lose to?
Also, you rather miss the point. People on this thread are worried less about the outcome of the election, than about the potential craziness leading up to it.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Whoever wins the Democrat nomination that isn't Biden maybe forced to get cucked like Bernie against Hilary.
I do believe that Bloomberg might be the most sensible one. He's just so normie and bland in everything he says and does, that he might be seen as a viable alternative to the absolutely CUHRAYZEE times Trump has brought.
Bloomburg.
Fucking Bloomburg.
Bloomburg is the Democrat MOST LIKELY to trigger violent civil war in the US. His lackies are this close to triggering it in Virginia. He literally came out just this week and basically said he doesn't think that civilians should have the right to take a life in self defense, that only the government should have it. His cronies in Virginia have crafted a gun control law so expansive that it may well trigger MULTIPLE Constitutional violations beyond the 2nd AND those self same cronies are pretty explicitly gearing up to enforce an outright gun confiscation on Virginia.
Bloomburg is considerably more dangerous than just about ANY other Democrat in the field when it comes to long term rights issues. He is someone whom should be kept away from real political power at almost any cost.
If he gets the presidency, there's going to be an escalation in choice of words. That guy hates citizens being able to defend themselves, he's not going to mince words, protraying the right-leaning and constitution-respecting citizens as murderers waiting to happen and all that lovely stuff. I fully expect him to try and force a boogaloo the moment he were president.
Last edited:
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Isn't he the idiot who thought a soda tax was a good idea?
People just went farther away to get their soda.
Floridaman
Well-known member
That is the one, he also said taxing the poor was good, because they made bad choices with their money.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
But if they're poor you can't tax them any more.
You'd have to do illegal shit like enslave them/remove their organs to be sold on the black market/prostitute them to get back that money.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
So why give welfare money if they’re gonna make bad choices?
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
Well, you can increase the price on regular stuff that they don’t need but consume to deal with everyday life or enjoy because its fun
Speaking of prostitution, tax that, because even the poor pay for sexual services and how else to “legitimatize” the oldest profession?
By making it expensive to have non-essential fun, they would have no choice but to live a very frugal and micromanaged life. Which is bullshit and thinks people are just robots who only prioritize survival.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Only if the circumstances that don't lead to a revolution are there.
Stuff like the French Revolution and Russian Revolution happened when the burden was too hard to handle.
Last edited:
Floridaman
Well-known member
That is what he was referring to... things like taxes on products that poor people buy.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
Problem here is that compared to say, the French Revolution, the Liberal Elites of Western Nations look to be good at redirecting rage at other people’s elites or just plain other people
Also, how many “poor people” will even know why the price for basic luxuries are so expensive, there’s big levels of taking advantage of people not looking things up much
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Same as how those revolutions went.
Smarter people doing the directing to rally the masses. Sometimes they succeed or fail.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
I really wonder at times how there are businesses, celebrities and politicians avoid falling for the stuff Far Left types got
I’ve heard it before, there’s actually a sort of advantage to be gained from going Far Left for even big corporations, it may not mean they prosper, but they’ll keep existing like giant rotting carcasses
So how/why do they go against them, possible principles aside
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Common sense?
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
They could have money and power, in a rotting nation/world, rather than one where its growing and prosperous and possibly more competitive
The latter makes staying ontop harder
Floridaman
Well-known member
Translation some people would rather reign in hell, than serve in heaven.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
They also definitely keep away from the really horrible and downright creepy stuff within their walled compounds in said hell
I doubt even guys like Mark Hamil would be for his own grandkids being dressed in drag and going to a gay bar or being posted on tumblr
Mark Hamil says what he has to say to get work and keep working.
From the inside sources he hates the woke bullshit in start wars even more then we do.
Unfortantly Kathlene Kennady is by all accounts a horrible shrew of a human being in person and a nightmare to work for.